Virgin New Adventures Reviews: Beyond the Sun by Matthew Jones (or, “Un Cercle Au-Delà du Soleil”)

One of the trends which we’ve observed over the course of the New Adventures has been the gradual shift away from the series’ penchant for lobbing out a scattershot barrage of fans-turned-authors in its early days. Instead, the range moved towards a model that increasingly came to rely upon a few trusted stalwarts who could be relied upon to turn in a novel with a minimum of fuss, hopefully with the added benefit of that novel being basically functional within the strictures of the medium.

To more plainly illustrate this contrast, all we really need to do is compare the NAs’ slate for 1993 to that of 1995. The former year was overwhelmingly dominated by first-time authors, with the only exceptions to this rule of thumb being Nigel Robinson and Jim Mortimore, and although the latter had previously collaborated with Andy Lane on Lucifer RisingBlood Heat remained his first solo outing, so its inclusion alongside a novel like Birthright ought to come with a bit of an asterisk.

By 1995, however, the only New Adventure to be written by a newcomer to the world of Doctor Who was Dave Stone’s Sky Pirates! Even then, Stone was hardly what you could call a novice by that stage, having cut his teeth on the British comics scene with numerous credits for the Judge Dredd Megazine in the early 1990s before migrating to Virgin’s own short-lived line of Judge Dredd tie-in novels, for which he wrote a total of three instalments. For a series that only lasted nine books, that’s certainly no mean feat.

While some might respond to this shift by decrying the novels for their “cliquishness,” we ought not lose sight of the fact that this is really just part and parcel of the process that any long-running series needs to engage in if it hopes to have a shot at actually running for a long time.

Peter Darvill-Evans’ open submissions policy, indirectly echoing a similar edict made by Michael Piller over on the third season of Star Trek: The Next Generation, is rightfully lauded as a brilliant decision. On the most obvious level, presuming you’re the type to care about such things, it helps to ensure that “real fans” with a deep and abiding love for the source material are in a position of shepherding the franchise.

And sure, for all that the subsequent decades may have seen this logic run riot to the detriment of Doctor Who and many other series besides, it was a fundamentally sound idea in the context of a cancelled television programme which nobody had any reason to suspect would ever return. Letting people like Paul Cornell write novels like Revelation was a better game plan for the series in the long term than entrusting it to the same old group of Target veterans, at least one of whom had been working on Doctor Who since the first government of Harold Wilson.

But crucially, this policy of open submissions was only the first step. The greatest strength of the early New Adventures was that they were willing to entertain novels from anyone, and their greatest flaw was… that they were willing to entertain novels from anyone. I may have said it before, but it’s worth reiterating that for every Paul Cornell or Kate Orman that this period produced, you also had an Andrew Hunt or a Neil Penswick. The series would undeniably have been weaker for not allowing this wild, experimental sense of reckless creative abandon, but if you’re aiming to be a consistently entertaining source of fresh Doctor Who, you eventually need to pare things back a bit.

Under Rebecca Levene, then, the Virgin line gradually moved closer to achieving that goal, and the results spoke for themselves. Though the early NAs had their fair share of triumphs, it seems just about inarguable that the lineup of a year like 1995 – wherein the weakest novel was probably the deeply flawed but still interesting Toy Soldiers – represented a substantial improvement over what had come before, and the development of a consistent and reliable pool of writers from those initial submissions was a key component of that success.

It’s perhaps telling that Lawrence Miles, who can probably quite uncontroversially be dubbed the author with the most influence upon the coming shape of the world of Doctor Who novels to have made their debut in this late period of the NAs, had actually submitted a proposed storyline for the book that would become Christmas on a Rational Planet some considerable time earlier, only for it to get lost amidst the slush pile until being idly rediscovered by Gareth Roberts. The novel might quite rightly feel like an anomaly amongst the general trend of Virgin choosing to focus on consolidating their existing writers, but that’s only because it was quite literally grounded in the ethos typified by Darvill-Evans’ editorship.

And then you have Matthew Jones. It is, admittedly, a bit of a stretch to portray Jones as some completely untested novice who sprang out of the ether fully-formed upon the publication of Bad Therapy in December 1996, having already established himself as a known quantity in the vaunted corridors of 1990s Who fandom through his regular Fluid Links column in the pages of Doctor Who Magazine.

Indeed, he’d even contributed The Nine-Day Queen to Lost Property, the second of Virgin’s Decalog short story collections, though it must be said that it wasn’t a story I much cared for in the final telling, taking some rather inelegant shortcuts in establishing its central historical tragedy that left its attempts at emotional heft feeling blunt and underdeveloped.

Yet with all of that being said, Bad Therapy still remained his debut full-length novel, and the new and expanded format seemed to do Jones a world of good, allowing him the space to sketch a quietly moving tale about loneliness and empathy which befitted the vaguely dispirited and dejected mood among certain sects of fandom in the twilight months of the Virgin line.

At the time of its initial publication, it seems fair to say that it was a bit of a difficult book to process, with its emotional stakes being so heavily tied to Roz’s death in the as-yet unpublished So Vile a Sin. Perhaps this confusion at least partially accounts for its conspicuously low placement on the Sullivan rankings, coming in at #20 and missing out on the apparent boost afforded other novels in the New Adventures’ endgame, not-so-narrowly avoiding the fate of being the lowest-rated of the final five books thanks to the widely lambasted Eternity Weeps, which fell at #48.

With Beyond the Sun, by contrast, we’re looking at a book that seems to have received a considerably warmer reception. Among the twenty-three Bernice-led NAs, it’s the highest-rated that we’ve looked at so far, sitting squarely in fourth place, while Oh No It Isn’t! and Dragons’ Wrath only managed to reach eleventh and twelfth, respectively. We won’t be talking about a novel that bests that score until we get to Walking to Babylon some seven months and twenty books hence.

Look at the composition of that top three, however, and the results are quite telling. We have, as mentioned, a tragic historical romance from Kate Orman, a universe-spanning, format-bending epic courtesy of Lawrence Miles at the height of his authorial powers and relevance, and a novel deliberately designed by the Benny novels’ most prolific contributor to wrap up as many of the series’ loose threads as possible in a suitably show-stopping fashion.

These are all books that look remarkably like “safe bets,” and while Beyond the Sun‘s 75.8% rating isn’t too extraordinary – placing it somewhere between Return of the Living Dad and Happy Endings, which occupy eighteenth and nineteenth place among the Doctor-led NAs – the fact that a second-time author like Jones should manage such a warm reception is interesting enough that it bears remarking upon.

In Bernice Summerfield: The Inside Story, Jones himself even reflects on Beyond the Sun as being a more mature and original work than Bad Therapy, crediting his debut New Adventure as “an imitation of several of the others – mostly Paul Cornell’s.” Personally, I think Jones sells himself a bit short – even if it is a self-evident Cornell imitation in some respects, it’s a very good Cornell imitation, which is more than a lot of other first-time novelists can manage – but I can understand the general thrust of his judgment.

Certainly, it’s reflected in the contemporary opinion of DWM‘s own Dave Owen. Having given Bad Therapy a mixed yet still broadly positive review, and noting Jones’ clear fannish affection for the New Adventures as a worthwhile corner of Doctor Who in their own right, his assessment of Beyond the Sun came straight to the point: “Within his opening chapter, Matthew Jones convinces that he has significantly developed his storytelling technique since Bad Therapy.”

Of course, although it could hardly have been obvious to fans at the time, this newfound critical success in the Virgin novels was something of a false dawn for Jones, and anyone harbouring hopes that he might become a shining light among the latter-day New Adventures authors in the vein of a Miles or a Stone was likely to be disappointed, with Beyond the Sun ultimately proving to be his last full-length Doctor Who-adjacent novel in the Wilderness Years.

But equally, the benefit of hindsight proves particularly illuminating here. While Jones might be largely departing the narrative at this point, he only does so by dint of moving outside the bounds of the way I’ve opted to tell the story of the Wilderness Years, rather than by outright ceasing to be influential on the direction of Doctor Who, per se.

Not long after the publication of Beyond the Sun, Jones managed to secure a position as a storyliner on Coronation Street on the strength of a recommendation from Gareth Roberts, joining the list of “NA authors turned soapsmiths” alongside such luminaries as Rebecca Levene, Lance Parkin, Paul Cornell and, indeed, Roberts himself.

This, in turn, contributed directly to his being offered the position of script editor on Russell T. Davies’ Queer as Folk, which we can now plainly recognise as being not just Jones’ proverbial “big break,” but also an absolutely pivotal part of the larger story of how Doctor Who managed to pull itself out of the rut of irrelevance and widespread public mockery in which it found itself throughout the Wilderness Years.

In much the same way that we made a big deal out of Keith Topping and Martin Day’s decision to announce their arrival to BBC Books sans Cornell with The Devil Goblins from Neptune, we’re once again faced with the impression that the strongest narrative thread running through 1997 for the Doctor Who and Bernice Summerfield novels is predominantly one of transition, and of trying to figure out how to continue telling worthwhile stories in the face of a rapidly shifting status quo.

As it turns out, Beyond the Sun‘s answer to this conundrum is just about the same as that arrived at by Justin Richards with Dragons’ Wrath, reintroducing a prominent recurring guest star from the NAs’ past. In this case, rather than the enigmatic and erudite schemer Irving Braxiatel, Jones opts to reacquaint us with one Jason Peter Kane, making his first appearance since the breakdown of his marriage to Benny in Eternity Weeps some six months prior.

While it might have been possible to have a solo Benny series without the character of Braxiatel – yes, as Richards says, it certainly helps to have a Doctor-like raissoneur to hand, but there’s no inherent reason that this has to be Brax, besides the quite reasonable point that he’s just a terribly fun character to have around – the return of Jason feels virtually inevitable. He’s a character wholly original to Virgin who is fundamentally tied to Bernice, having been tailormade to offer up a reason for her departure as a regular travelling companion of the Doctor all the way back in Death and Diplomacy.

Even if the writers had chosen to never bring him back at all – which was already looking unlikely in the extreme once it became clear that Dave Stone was going to be writing one of the first four novels in the retooled line – the emotionally turbulent dissolution of the chief protagonist’s marriage is the type of event that is quite difficult to brush past.

(Then again, I imagine Charlene Connor might have a thing or two to say on this subject once we get around to Deadfall…)

So sure, while the decision may have been made to split up the Summerfield-Kanes just eight months after they were married in a big, show-stopping fiftieth New Adventure extravaganza, Jason pretty much always had a non-zero chance of returning to the series, in-the-flesh or otherwise.

In fact, Virgin have proved commendably reluctant to define Benny’s arc solely around the absence of Jason. While books like The Dying Days and Oh No It Isn’t! referred back to the emotional fallout of the divorce, it never felt as if Bernice’s character was being boiled down to nothing more than a vehicle for exploring some brand new divorce-tinged flavour of the proverbial NA angst that is somewhat reductively viewed as having been the series’ stock-in-trade.

On the contrary, Parkin and Cornell seemed far more concerned with the rather pressing business of proving that they had inherited a lead character who was well-rounded enough to compete with the Doctor in the protagonist sweepstakes. For the record, it’s also interesting to note that Dragons’ Wrath never once directly invokes Jason’s name at all.

Entering into Beyond the Sun, then, it would be all too easy to run with an overly superficial reading of Jason’s return and suggest that Jones has somehow betrayed the convictions of the NAs in keeping our two time-travelling adventurers apart until this point, but such a reading isn’t really supported by the text of the novel itself.

Even if we perform a very rudimentary and basic examination of the novel’s structure, the most significant warping of narrative gravity that Jason is able to achieve is only brought about as a consequence of his kidnapping by the Sunless. He is, in effect, little more than a gender-swapped “damsel in distress” here, which is a gesture so profoundly and cheekily casual in its needling of the standard heteronormative underpinnings of this sort of adventure fiction that one can only imagine the outcry among the usual suspects of modern Doctor Who fandom if it were tried today.

(In fact, this sense of an uninhibited ruffling of heteronormativity’s proverbial feathers runs through the whole book. It’s not for nothing, after all, that the novel also features an extended sequence in which Benny, Emile and Tameka manage to incite a riot by putting on a particularly politically incendiary drag show which directly evokes one of the more iconic scenes from The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert, and that’s before you get to the more blatant manifestations like Emile’s entire character arc being predicated upon the same explicit grappling with themes of queer identity that fuelled so much of Bad Therapy.)

This reflects another important fundamental truth of Beyond the Sun, which is to say that it is undeniably Bernice’s story, even if it is perhaps a bridge too far to label it an out-and-out character piece rather than an action-adventure lark with more dashes of introspection than the statistical average established by its two direct predecessors. By July 1997, we’ve seen Benny take a prominent role in nearly fifty full-length novels spanning almost half a decade, and the extent to which her place in the New Adventures needs to be properly and categorically outlined at this stage is lessened considerably by sheer dint of that self-same longevity.

Accordingly, every novel since The Dying Days has really just been an exercise in crashing Bernice Summerfield into whatever type of narrative takes the authors’ fancy, carrying on the type of inter-genre experimentation that had practically become second nature to Doctor Who by the nineties.

While there are certainly shades of this peculiarly Who-like narrative alchemy to be found in Beyond the Sun‘s final form – most obviously in Jones’ quite plainly having taken inspiration from Ursula K. Le Guin’s 1974 classic of science fiction, The Dispossessed, to the point of extending a suitably cordial and knowing tip of the hat in the naming of the Ursulans – the novel ultimately seems preoccupied with the question of what it really means for Benny to have assumed the role of the New Adventures’ chief protagonist, which is a question that the novels have largely shied away from interrogating in too much depth to this point.

In this respect, it is arguably in its final passages that the novel most plainly articulates its underlying conception of Bernice as a character, as she reflects upon a necklace she had fashioned earlier on as a statement of her own personal ethics, reading thus:

Bernice Summerfield is a human being. And as such she is all too capable of being cruel and cowardly. And yet, while she is often caught up in violent events, she endeavours to remain a woman of peace.

The resonances with Terrance Dicks’ famous description of the Doctor in 1972’s The Making of Doctor Who as being a man of peace who is never cruel or cowardly are so obvious as to almost go without saying, but it should be noted that Jones subtly tweaks the phrasing of that original quote in reiterating it here.

The Making of Doctor Who favoured a more overtly and unambiguously absolutist stance in its proclamations, as one might perhaps expect from Dicks. As a writer, his moral and political compass can pretty reliably be characterised as being possessed of a rather adamant and strident certitude in what he sees as the basic truths of the world.

At its best, this is an approach which can be rather endearing in the simplicity of its black-and-white ethical pronouncements. And really, for all that Dicks has come in for a bit of a lashing in the pages of this blog lately, I’d be remiss if I neglected to mention that there’s also a completely understandable reason why quotes like “Never cruel or cowardly” have endured, to the point where Steven Moffat could build the entire emotional arc of the programme’s fiftieth anniversary out of the line in The Day of the Doctor.

Yet at its worst, it’s just as easy for this sense of surety and conviction to become a vice rather than a virtue. If you want me to provide evidence for this claim… well, like I say, I think I’ve ragged on The Eight Doctors and its embarrassingly reductive take on the rise of crack cocaine quite enough for the moment, so we’ll just leave it at that.

Moreover, the overall aesthetic of the New Adventures actively cut against Dicks’ uncompromising moral ethos, which perhaps goes some way towards explaining why novels like ExodusBlood Harvest and Shakedown often felt like strange – albeit generally entertaining – artistic cul-de-sacs when placed among their contemporaries.

The claim I’m making here isn’t, as you so often hear from some of the NAs’ more vocal detractors, that the books wholeheartedly embraced “morally ambiguous” storytelling. On the contrary, the series was, in its shrewder moments, extremely unambiguous as to the more heinous and objectionable aspects of the Seventh Doctor’s modus operandi. However, this understanding was frequently balanced with a willingness to suggest that the character was still desperately trying, in his own way, to live up to the kind of classical and virtuous heroism so clearly favoured by writers like Dicks.

In regards to Benny and her climactic personal epiphany in Beyond the Sun, it’s undoubtedly deeply significant that the novel in which Paul Cornell introduced the character was also among the first to explicitly incorporate the Dicks quote into its narrative, pulling the line from the ethereal realm of the paratext into the text itself.

What’s more, it’s particularly telling that this trick was performed as a means of establishing the series’ newfound Doctor-companion relationship, particularly when contrasted against the recently-imploded dynamic enjoyed by the television incarnation of Ace.

The suggestion that the Doctor found himself incapable of recognising the person hinted at by the descriptor of “Never cruel or cowardly,” as reinforced by a typically cutting reply from Benny, very quickly and concisely outlined our not-quite-Professor’s unique ability to cut through the Ka Faraq Gatri’s grandiose aspirations towards mystique. Not to be outdone, it also effectively marked the point at which it became undeniable that the NAs would be taking it upon themselves to tell the story of the Doctor’s journey back to that more heroic archetype.

(Well OK, that was the theory. In practice, this idea really developed in fits and starts, as evinced by the way the books were just as likely to serve up riveting stories about the Doctor teaming up with William Blake to take on the Jack the Ripper murders. But hey, the intent was there!)

If we wanted to be unduly snide and acerbic about all this, we could perhaps crack wise about how Jones hasn’t actually managed to escape his being labelled a Cornell imitator in quite as successful a fashion as he might have hoped, but really, at that point we’re just skirting dangerously close to snark for snark’s sake.

In a very real sense, it was pretty much inevitable that any attempt to tackle the question of what distinguishes Bernice from the Doctor as the New Adventures’ chief protagonist was going to have to pull heavily from Cornell in one way or another. After all, between Love and War and Oh No It Isn’t!, he’d now managed the rather surreal feat of defining the character’s place within the series not once, but twice.

So for all that Jones is quite clearly riffing on the single most influential author to ever write for Benny, and arguably for the NAs as a whole, he’s doing so in a way that feels endearing rather than hackneyed or plagiaristic. It feels like a wholly logical extrapolation from the series’ prevailing attitude towards the Doctor’s heroism, with all manner of wonderful antecedents I could point to, whether that be the juggling scene in The Also People or the conversation in Return of the Living Dad where the Time Lord decides – in conversation with Benny herself, no less – upon “He really did the best he could” as the most apt epitaph for his hypothetical gravestone.

Here, at long last, the New Adventures seem truly content with the knowledge that they have found themselves a decidedly human protagonist, wholly divorced from any of the more supernatural or mythological trappings associated with Time’s Champion. Even if Benny can never realistically hope to live up to the splendour and valour implicit in Dicks’ conception of the Doctor, that doesn’t make her efforts to hold herself to that high moral standard any less worthwhile.

Indeed, in introducing Bernice, Jones stresses her peculiar sense of warmth and humanity, making the rather shrewd choice to keep the character at a distance for the first few chapters. We join the action – barring a brief prologue featuring Kitzinger on Ursu – not with Benny herself, but with the two archaeology students who basically assume the role of her pseudo-companions for the duration of the book, allowing Tameka to offer her own assessment of her tutor ahead of their first proper meeting. Even when we transition to the dig on Apollox 4, we don’t get treated to a scene from Bernice’s perspective until her conversation with Jason at the restaurant.

It’s an approach which feels rather consciously chosen, effectively signalling at the earliest opportunity that this is a novel which is going to be more directly concerned with questions of character relationships and interactions than was true of the series’ two previous releases. Furthermore, Jones is just about talented enough that the final results prove rather complimentary, as one might have been led to expect from a writer who made their debut with a book like Bad Therapy.

Actually, it’s worth taking our regularly-scheduled pause at this juncture to note one of the more glaring issues with the Big Finish audio adaptation, namely the complete omission of any scenes set before the Apollox dig. Like so many of the changes in that first season of audio dramas, it’s clearly just a concession to the realities of financing and recording such a production, but the removal of some rather effective early character moments for Emile and Tameka speaks well to some of the pitfalls of this particular adaptation, as Jones himself – having been the only author to actually choose to adapt their own book rather than just handing the job to Jacqueline Rayner – quite readily concedes in The Inside Story.

It’s not that the adaptation is quite as amateurishly unlistenable and clunkily truncated as was the case with Dragons’ Wrath, but more than any other novel chosen to receive the audio treatment, Beyond the Sun feels extremely poorly-suited to the process, with the nature of the medium pretty much requiring characters to loudly declaim reflections that had been wholly internal in the original book. All of this is very much a tangent – I know, I know, spare your gasps of surprise that I would go on tangents in one of these reviews – but I do think it’s a good way of illustrating just how much of the story’s success is tied up in its characters rather than its plot.

(And on the plus side, you’re now spared my discussing the audio drama adaptations at least until the time of Walking to Babylon.)

Viewed from a plot perspective, the story of Beyond the Sun is really one of the most traditional New Adventures narratives imaginable for much of its length. Stripped to its bare essentials, it’s really just the tale of Benny finding herself caught up in the perilous hunt for a McGuffin believed to be a crucial component of a hideously powerful ancient weapon. Granted, a weapon might not perfectly fit the “evil from the dawn of time” bill quite as well as someone like Fenric – it’s a bit like comparing a .45 Colt to Cthulhu, really – but we’re clearly still riffing on conceptual territory that is very familiar for the series at this late stage of its life-cycle.

The final twist in the story, then, is actually supremely clever on Jones’ part, without being needlessly deceptive to the point of unfairness. By the climax the audience has long since been lulled into a reasonable state of security, thinking that they’ve got a handle on the narrative stakes, simple though they are in order to allow the character stuff room to breathe.

More to the point, the novel has pitched its tent pretty squarely in the bleaker end of the tonal spectrum, what with the stark dismality of its portrait of Ursulan life under Sunless occupation, complete with a particularly harrowing flashback sequence that probably comes closer than any New Adventure since Just War to sketching the brutal mechanics of collaboration with an occupying enemy regime.

In this context, the revelation that the visionary figurines do not in fact power a weapon with powers beyond the sun, but rather power the native star of the Sunless’ homeworld beyond its natural life, is a nice little piece of optimistic subversion that manages to land with just the right amount of showiness to be satisfying without becoming infuriating.

It’s certainly a far cry from “Just this once, everybody lives!”, but it’s clever nonetheless, particularly with the added touch that Benny manages to suss out the truth before anyone else by cluing into the improper syntax in an earlier computerised translation of some ancient symbols. Not only does this provide a nice affirmation that it won’t just be Justin Richards who’ll allow the character to apply her archaeological know-how to the problems at hand, but it also handily reiterates the novel’s core idea of the human element being the most crucial of all, and of the inability of cold and detached logic to replicate it.

But on top of all of that, we have the rather delicious added irony that is Nikolas and Iranda being the real visionaries, having to sacrifice themselves to the device in order reignite the sun, and it’s this reveal which really introduces an extra layer of complexity to everything we’ve just sat through, while still feeling organically set up by a number of clues scattered throughout the book.

Admittedly, the only developments of any great thematic import here are primarily centred around Iranda, as it’s very difficult to get a proper handle on Nikolas’ character beyond his rather generic status as a suitably moustache-twirling, smarmy villainous creep. It’s no doubt significant that Jones saw fit to elide his character in the audio drama with that of Iranda to become Miranda, as voiced by Sophie Aldred. Even accepting the extent to which this might have just been another purely budgetary decision, it’s a little hard not to read it as something of a quiet admission that the two characters fill very similar narrative niches and aren’t particularly distinct from one another, and it’s a rare instance of the audio drama’s storytelling proving more elegant than the novel’s.

Putting all of that aside, however, (M)iranda becomes a deeply interesting character in light of this third-act twist. As might be expected of an author who made a name for himself writing a non-fiction column in Doctor Who Magazine, Jones proves no stranger to layering on the paratextual allusions, starting with the title of Beyond the Sun itself, which was a working title for at least The Daleks and The Edge of Destruction in the very earliest days of Doctor Who, if not An Unearthly Child as well. Because apparently it’s an unspoken rule that every review of this book must draw attention to that fact…

With the big hubbub made over Iranda and Nikolas having been an illicit addition to their Eight, and the conspicuous naming of the Blooms – genetic engineering devices which allow Ursulans to reproduce without sex – Beyond the Sun can’t help but evoke Marc Platt’s controversial deep dive into Gallifreyan history and the Doctor’s own rather anomalous biological beginnings in Lungbarrow some four months earlier, a connection which Dave Owen proved all too eager to point out in his review. Even the choice of the number eight feels particularly notable in a post-TV movie fandom, to say nothing of the way that Jason is quite literally described as having become Iranda’s “travelling companion” since last we saw him.

The natural assumption here would be to say that Iranda is plainly meant to be a Doctor stand-in, but the case for that claim certainly doesn’t appear as clear-cut as one might expect upon closer examination. If anything, there’s just as much grounds to label her role as being somewhat analogous to that of a traditional companion, even before you factor in stuff like the audio’s casting of Aldred, an actress inextricably tied to the same McCoy era milieu that spawned the New Adventures and, ultimately, Benny herself.

A further tangential irony sets in – although at this point “coincidence” feels an increasingly appropriate descriptor – when one takes into account the fact that Bernice had, at this point, come to be associated with Lisa Bowerman, who had herself played Karra, the last character to die in the classic series in Survival.

While I fully submit that I’m perhaps not so much reaching for straws here as I am spontaneously collapsing a sufficiently large star in the hopes of catching a few tufts of vegetation in the resultant black hole’s event horizon, it does still strike me that this blurring of the roles of companion and Doctor should figure so prominently in a book concerned with questions of individual self-determination – surely at least partially another legacy of the novel’s taking such heavy inspiration from Le Guin – particularly as it applies to the New Adventures’ first and most popular original companion.

Naming the character Miranda, or an abridged form thereof, also carries deeper resonances beyond Doctor Who, bringing to mind her namesake from William Shakespeare’s The Tempest, whose presentation within the play has served as the foundation for a veritable bevy of feminist analysis. Most such analyses of the Shakespearean Miranda typically focus on her status as the play’s only female character, reading her as something of an idealised Jacobean era representation of female virtue, being defined primarily by her subordination to her father Prospero.

The application of her name to a character in a novel that seems to so consciously blur the lines between Doctor and companion consequently feels like a rather pertinent choice on Jones’ part. Indeed, the reveal of Iranda being one of the visionaries is a satisfyingly layered twist. On the most superficial of levels, it’s a loud and forceful reiteration of Beyond the Sun‘s sympathy for a humanist, empathetic sort of individualism.

(In fact, it ought to be acknowledged that this is a theme with an established precedent in Jones’ debut novel as well, with Bad Therapy effectively grounding Doctor Who‘s genesis in the human capacity for empathy in the face of the cruel and chaotic world of 1950s Britain; the revival of the Sunless’ native star with the use of humans – well, Ursulans – as fuel is really just another, more literal iteration of the pseudo-Ebertian “empathy machine” suggested by the earlier novel.)

Yet at the same time, there remains something faintly horrifying about Iranda’s fate. It’s certainly hard to imagine you’d be able to find many readers who’d argue that she didn’t deserve some form of comeuppance for the whole “aiding a brutal, militaristic regime in the invasion of her home planet” thing, but in being forced into her slot in the machine by Bernice, she finds herself reduced to an object even as the triumph of individuality is asserted.

That’s not a criticism of the novel by any means, and I do like that the book is willing to push Benny to some murky places, while still demonstrating greater thoughtfulness about the whole thing than having her blow up a ship of religious zealots without batting an eye like St Anthony’s Fire. Which we still haven’t received a single further reference to after over thirty NAs, by the way. Just in case you were keeping track.

You could even construct a reasonably plausible reading of Benny’s besting Miranda as a particularly dramatic manifestation of her capacity to overcome Sandifer’s age-old Problem of Susan. In managing to displace the Doctor and anchor her own spin-off series – and to prove so successful at it that said series is still going strong over twenty-five years later – she has effectively stepped outside the tension between objectification and self-actualisation that so frequently defines the role of the companion within Doctor Who.

Emile and Tameka only reinforce the sense that there’s an attempt here to move the franchise beyond its stereotypical mould of companions, even in the absence of a Doctor proper. The former’s grappling with his sexuality provides him with a nice arc, feeling like the next logical step for gay representation in the New Adventures after Chris and David’s dalliance in Damaged Goods, and ever-so-subtly sows the first seeds of a chain of causality linking that book to Queer as Folk and eventually to characters like Jack Harkness in the 2005 revival.

Tameka is, perhaps, slightly closer to the conventional companion archetype, but she still feels subversive in her own way. For all that the idea of a hot-headed, vaguely gothic university student with a penchant for wearing makeup and dressing in “Vampire Chic” fashion might sound like a bit of a recipe for disaster, she actually comes across as a far more believable and well-rounded character than Sam Jones ever did in The Eight Doctors, and it’s nice that her makeup is allowed to be essential to the resolution of the plot, even if it isn’t perhaps the most elegant of storytelling shortcuts.

(I also can’t help but wonder if the inclusion of a story relating the waning of her childhood passion for chemistry after her teacher’s unenthusiastic response to her successfully performing a litmus test was intended as an inversion of a similar beat involving Susan and Ian in An Unearthly Child. I know, I know, black holes and tufts of vegetation, but even so…)

It also helps convey the idea that these new Bernice-led NAs are continuing to commit to the expansion of their recurring cast rather than just reintroducing old series favourites, a notion which has largely been conspicuous by its absence since every author besides Paul Cornell seemingly decided on a whim to ditch the colourful cast of academics he set up in Oh No It Isn’t!

Even at this stage there’s still a certain amount of hedging from the series, as Emile and Tameka go on to pretty much disappear from the books after a short return in Deadfall in three months’ time. While Emile would be lucky enough to eventually figure pretty prominently in the Gods arc after Where Angels Fear, Tameka wouldn’t be quite so lucky, only returning for the naming ceremony of Peter Summerfield in 2002’s The Glass Prison. Still, the intent is clearly there to create a robust recurring cast, even if it took the writers a little while to fully capitalise on the potential of their characters.

Finally, it’s interesting to see the series further develop its distinctly post-Cold War conception of galactic geopolitics, along with the notion that Dellah is basically surrounded by a bunch of smaller, developing planetary systems picking up the pieces after the Galactic War that was certainly not fought with any genocidal pepperpots I could care to name.

The Sunless are, on one level, quite plainly supposed to be generic stand-ins for fascism, and yet, as with the description of Nusek as a “warlord” in Dragons’ Wrath, the decision to cast them as victims of corporate colonialism also roots them in a far more interesting sort of political allegory. The extent to which companies like Krytell can casually dominate conversations among Emile and Tameka might just be some none-too-subtle foreshadowing for Ship of Fools, but it also speaks rather well to the decade’s fears of a global economy that was becoming increasingly centralised in the hands of a few ultra-powerful megacorporations.

Re:Generations had already suggested that the history of Earth and the history of the corporations were, in many key respects, nigh indistinguishable, and the attention paid to ensuring general cohesion in the series’ view of Earth’s future history, much like the efforts to establish a recurring guest cast, does wonders when it comes to marking the series out as having its own distinct identity.

Even if the basic structure of Ursu might be lifted from The Dispossessed, the underlying idea that some might choose to opt out of Earth’s influence – paging Michael Eddington… – feels logical enough given all the available evidence suggesting that the Earth of the NAs’ future is a pretty crappy place on the whole, which I feel helps offset any potential criticisms of unoriginality. Look, if I can give The Also People a pass despite Aaronovitch’s self-admitted transplantation of Iain M. Banks’ Culture series, I don’t think I have much of a leg to stand on here when it comes to decrying artistic appropriation.

(For the sake of illustrating how much Beyond the Sun feels of a piece with the New Adventures of yesteryear, not only does Jones manage to hit on the same presciently pessimistic view of a post-Google Internet dominated by corporations as Lance Parkin did in Secrets of the Black Planet, but he also works in an affectionate nod to Warhead with the naming of the academically stingy Butler Project, which feels appropriate given that Cartmel and his War trilogy were really the first up to bat when it came to these ideas of big business dominating Earth’s future, at least in the New Adventures.)

So, does Beyond the Sun live up to its status as the canonical “best” Benny NA thus far? Well, it’s difficult to compare it with a novel like Oh No It Isn’t!, given just how much of a departure from form that outing was, but I’d say it manages to rise comfortably above something like Dragons’ Wrath, and I can certainly understand why fans would respond more strongly to it.

It’s got some big sci-fi ideas to which it commits wholeheartedly, even if they mightn’t be the most original in the world, it’s populated with a cast of likeable characters while never losing sight of Bernice, and it tactfully handles Jason’s reintroduction and the establishment of Benny’s conflicted emotions towards him. Three books in, and the New Adventures have a pretty solid batting average so far. What more could a fan wish for?

(And perhaps most importantly of all, the Björk reference was cute. Clunky, but cute.)

Miscellaneous Observations

For all that I generally enjoyed the whole drag sequence, it was slightly soured by the decision to have Tameka drop the T slur in describing a dragged-up Emile at one point. It’s a throwaway line, but it’s enough to make you go “Oh wait we’re still in the nineties, aren’t we?”

In a similar vein, and freely accepting that this doesn’t have anything to do with the book itself, I can’t help but roll my eyes at the part in Dave Owen’s review where he says that his only real criticism of Beyond the Sun is its “politically correct” use of pronouns in referring to a singular indiviual as “they.” The more things change, the more they stay the same, I guess…

I know I praised the novel for feeling relatively cohesive when placed against the larger tapestry of Virgin’s well-established future history, but I couldn’t help wondering if the references to a gang of Vilmurians consuming copious amounts of “bubblejack” was an attempted reference to bubbleshake from The Highest Science. Really though, this is the pickiest of nits, and even I had to go back to The Highest Science to double check the name of the drink.

Hey, I haven’t read it in a while, because… well, you know why.

It’s pretty well-known at this point that Jones’ lone script for the 2005 revival of Doctor WhoThe Impossible Planet/The Satan Pit, was heavily retouched by Russell T. Davies, but it’s still interesting that one can almost see the nascent kernels of some of that two-parter’s imagery, most prominent of which is the important role both stories ascribe to a great big pit in the ground surrounded by a ring of indecipherable symbols. Both of said pits are even on an inhospitable lump of rock surrounding a dead or dying star, just for good measure.

Final Thoughts

Well, it’s the first review of the New Year, and I’m pretty happy with how it turned out. As ever, these Bernice reviews really force me to operate in a different wheelhouse to that in which I’ve grown comfortable, and I think I end up running down some interesting avenues of thought I might have otherwise neglected.

I don’t know how quickly I’ll be able to turn out reviews for the time being, as I’m dealing with some health problems at the moment that are leaving me very drained a lot of the time, but regardless, join me next time as the Eighth Doctor returns to San Francisco with Sam, and we see if Jonathan Blum and Kate Orman can best Uncle Terrance’s poor opening showing for the EDAs. All of that and more, coming in Vampire Science. Until then, however…

Kind regards,

Special Agent Dale Cooper

Virgin New Adventures Reviews: Bad Therapy by Matthew Jones (or, “Toy Soldiers… Wait”)

What would it mean for Doctor Who to end?

In December 1996, this is a very pertinent question, and yet it’s also a surprisingly complex one. In one respect, of course, Doctor Who has already ended. There was once a show called Doctor Who that ran on the BBC for twenty-six seasons between 1963 and 1989, and then it stopped. It has therefore been seven years since the last of these seasons. These are obvious and incontrovertible facts.

As we well know, however, this doesn’t even begin to paint the whole picture. Doctor Who continues to live on, not only in the form of Virgin Books’ original novels that they’ve been steadily publishing since 1991, but also in other ancillary forms of media like the pages of the Doctor Who Magazine comic strip.

Still, on television, the series was dead. And then, for about 89 minutes – or 85 if you happened to be watching a UK copy that was afflicted with PAL speed-up – in May 1996, it was alive again. The Seventh Doctor was dead and buried, and Paul McGann had stepped forward to shoulder the burden of becoming the Eighth Doctor. Because the Wilderness Years apparently hadn’t been turbulent and confusing enough up to this point, the franchise promptly decided that the only thing it could do under the circumstances was to pop its clogs and sink back into the grave.

Yet at this stage, the BBC were still remaining resolutely tight-lipped about the fate of a hypothetical revival of the series with McGann at the helm. Constant enquiries from publications like DWM were met with the same answer every time: BBC Worldwide was reticent to commit itself to any hard-and-fast decision before the expiry of their licensing arrangement with Universal at the end of the year. Having nurtured seven long years of doubt, even in the face of executive producer Philip Segal’s bold and ecstatic proclamations in the lead-up to the TV movie that this new revival was “going to be huge,” fans weren’t exactly holding out much hope.

So it was that, in late November – on the same day that The Plotters was published, and the day that So Vile a Sin would have been published if not for the whims of the ever-fickle production gods – the cover of DWM‘s 246th issue posed the question “So, Doctor… which way now?” Signalling the first instalment in a two-part deep dive from editor Gary Gillatt into the production history and subsequent aftermath of the TV movie, this presented a marked contrast to the tone taken just seven months earlier, when issue 239 had so brazenly proclaimed the series to be “back on TV!” For better or for worse, though, this inquiry ultimately seemed to provide a rather apt snapshot of the mood of fandom at the time.

(Well, barring the people who were still unreasonably and blindingly angry over the Doctor being half-human, but we usually like to disregard those folks as much as possible anyway.)

With each new month that dragged by without any news on the promised revival, Segal’s dream of a trans-Atlantic future for Doctor Who was beginning to look more and more like a false dawn. Even when the calendar year came and went, bringing with it the news that BBC Worldwide had decided to extend their arrangement with Universal through to the end of April 1997, it was with the caveat that crucial network co-partner Fox had made the decision to drop all involvement with the franchise.

In interviews with British newspapers and radio stations, an unnamed senior BBC executive would stress that the future of any revival attempts would be contingent upon finding another network to aid in the process of financing and distribution. “If Doctor Who has a future,” the anonymous source declared, “it is as another one-off movie.” Even Paul McGann seemed to be begrudingly coming to terms with his likely fate in an interview with DWM, joking that Sylvester McCoy had taken to calling him “the George Lazenby of Time Lords” and that he had become “famous for two hours.”

But even if the TV movie had failed to drum up enough ratings interest to persuade the BBC and its American partners to make the leap from pilot to series, it performed well enough in the United Kingdom to bring about something of a lasting sea change in the face of Doctor Who. At the same time that it was running interviews with McGann on the transitory nature of fame and television pilots, DWM had rather firmly signalled that it believed the future of the franchise – or at least, the future of its own comic strip – lay with the Eighth Doctor, killing off Ace in the conclusion to Ground Zero and almost immediately launching into a four-part adventure in which the Doctor’s newest incarnation came face to face with the Celestial Toymaker.

(Which actually makes me realise that we somehow haven’t talked about the Celestial Toymaker at all thus far, which I believe makes Virgin one of the only companies in the business of publishing new Doctor Who fiction to so firmly resist the pull of the weird reverence with which fandom treats that particular character. Oh well, you’ll just have to wait another ninety books to hear my thoughts on Divided Loyalties, I suppose…)

Even within the realm of novels, BBC Books had proven more than eager to snatch back the rights to publishing original Doctor Who fiction from Virgin in the light of the TV movie’s surprising success in the programme’s native stomping grounds. In November, Doctor Who had even won an open election as part of the BBC’s Auntie’s All-Time Greats competition as the nation’s “all-time favourite popular drama,” and the fan press were quick to seize on this victory, suggesting that the appetite for a revival was stronger than the Beeb’s stony-faced silence might have insinuated.

Although the mainstream newspapers submitted that this was simply the result of a concerted effort on the part of an immature fandom – and incidentally, whatever the truth of these claims might be, it is very funny to witness Gillatt interrupt the flow of his post-mortem of the failed pilot to go on the defensive against any intimations that publications like DWM or the Doctor Who Appreciation Society’s Celestial Toyroom were engaged in any electoral impropriety; track down the back issues for yourself and see if I’m wrong – the BBC must have at least thought there was some money to be found in this field, and the 246th issue would also contain the news that the first titles in a new range of Eighth and Past Doctor Adventures had been announced. Right under the announcement of the vote’s outcome, as a matter of fact…

All of this means that Bad Therapy arrives at a point in the New Adventures’ life cycle in which they really have to grapple with the question of what it would mean for Doctor Who to end, or at least this particular corner of the franchise. When Jim Mortimore rings in the new year with Eternity Weeps, the iconic McCoy logo will have disappeared from the front cover for ever, as if to proclaim that the New Adventures were aware, on some level, that their time was coming to an end.

This is, of course, because the staff at Virgin were well aware that their novels were effectively living on borrowed time. In conversation with David J. Howe for The Who Adventures, editor Peter Darvill-Evans would later reveal that he had spent a good eighteen months fruitlessly negotiating with the higher-ups at BBC Worldwide before the public announcement of their plans not to renew Virgin’s license when it expired at the end of 1996:

“It was an intensely frustrating time. It was impossible to find out from BBC Worldwide what plans they had for Doctor Who licensing. At first, the only indication that they had any plans at all was the fact that I couldn’t pin down Chris Weller, who at that time was in overall charge of the book ranges, Richard Hollis, the licensing manager, or anyone else to talk about renewing Virgin Publishing’s licence.

Then, once it became clear that BBC Worldwide wanted BBC Books to publish tie-ins to the new eighth Doctor TV movie, we still couldn’t find out whether or not Virgin Publishing would be licensed to continue publishing all, some or none of the several sorts of Doctor Who books – New Adventures, Missing Adventures, non-fiction – that we and our predecessor companies had been producing for 25 years. It seemed hard to believe that such a long publishing history could be entirely swept away.”

In the light of all this confusion, it seems especially pointed that the final NA to bear the Doctor Who logo on the cover should essentially prove to be an extended meditation on grief and loss. Even the in-universe justification for that tone, the death of Roslyn Forrester, ends up inadvertently reflecting the peculiar limbo in which the New Adventures and the larger franchise find themselves at the moment.

Like the hazy, indefinite hope of Doctor Who‘s return to television, Roz’s fate exists with something of a question mark hanging over it. On the one hand, she’s very obviously dead, and author Matthew Jones – making his full-length novel debut after having contributed The Nine-Day Queen to the second of Virgin’s Decalog short story collections – tells us as such from Chris’ very first appearance. On the other hand, though, the fact that fans would have to wait another four months to discover the actual circumstances of that death meant that the impact of this development was always going to be rather muted.

Indeed, readers who only decided to pick up this month’s Missing Adventure would almost be forgiven for not even realising Roz had died to begin with, as Lance Parkin’s Cold Fusion would feature the character travelling with the Doctor and Chris as if nothing had changed at all.

Over twenty-five years later, we don’t have these problems, but there remains something of a laughable irony to the fact that So Vile a Sin‘s production issues should actively enhance the sense that this moment marks a weird, in-between point in the history of Doctor Who. In the chaos and turmoil of the Wilderness Years, even the end of a series was far from being a simple proposition.

However, let’s take a step back from the chaos and try to discern some method within the madness. In a happy twist of fate that greatly simplifies such efforts, Bad Therapy is ultimately a rather traditional and unassuming little tale in and of itself, making it perhaps the perfect book to introduce a confused fandom to the true endgame of the New Adventures. The endgame of the endgame, if you will.

Jones’ work isn’t saddled with the task of resolving the so-called Cartmel Masterplan like Lungbarrow, nor is he expected to exorcise all the Seventh Doctor’s angst like The Room With No Doors. Hell, he doesn’t even have to offer up a massive epic that kills off Liz Shaw alongside 10% of the human race like Eternity Weeps – although one suspects that Jim Mortimore didn’t have to do that either, strictly speaking, but that he insisted on doing it anyway on account of being Jim Mortimore.

None of this should be taken as a suggestion that Bad Therapy lacks depth, mind you. On the contrary, it’s a rather promising debut novel, serving as a pleasantly quiet little character piece that closes out the New Adventures’ stint as a  series bearing the official Doctor Who logo on an appropriately downbeat and reflective note. If So Vile a Sin was the explosive finale, then Bad Therapy confirms that these last five – well, really these last four – novels will be the coda.

Obviously, I can’t really envision how this book would land if I had been unable to read So Vile a Sin beforehand, but then again, neither could Jones himself during the writing process. Under that rather exceptional set of circumstances, I think it manages to have the desired impact, even if it doesn’t ever become the out-and-out sobfest that the epilogue to its would-be predecessor ultimately ended up being. Besides, it would almost certainly dilute the importance of So Vile a Sin if every book managed to hit the exact same emotional highs, so even that’s not much of a point against it by my reckoning.

Now if we’re going to try and hew to my declaration in the previous review that I want these final NA posts to be more character-focused, then I suppose it’s only logical to start this post by talking about Chris, and although this might be his nineteenth book, I think it’s fair to say that this is probably the first time he’s really had to shoulder the weight of an entire story all by himself. Being introduced alongside Roz in Original Sin, there’s a sense that Chris’ arrival onboard the TARDIS was always something of a package deal, and it didn’t take long for writers like Ben Aaronovitch to decide that Roz was the more interesting of the pair.

In all honesty, it’s pretty hard to fault the writers for making this decision. By the very nature of Chris and Roz’s relationship, the latter’s status as the gruff, hardened veteran in the duo provided far more opportunity for a deep and enriching backstory. That’s not to say that there was absolutely no potential in the character of Chris as introduced to us by Andy Lane, but the fresh-faced rookie routine meant that it was far simpler to just, I dunno, give him a random pseudo-romance every other month.

Which is pretty much exactly the route they eventually decided on, funnily enough. While it was never the most revolutionary bit in the world when it was first tried all the way back in Zamper, any remaining freshness was well and truly wrung out of it by the time you had Head Games and The Also People offering up imitations of the trick in rapid succession.

(To be totally fair, The Also People probably stands as the high water mark for the whole “Chris romance of the month” device, with Happy Endings coming in a close second. It took me a re-read of Aaronovitch’s novel, free from the surrounding glut of lesser photocopies, to really appreciate that fact, but it probably helps that he and Paul Cornell are easily some of the strongest emotion salesmen – for lack of a better term – in Virgin’s pool of writers.)

With four regular cast members vying for space in the TARDIS, it was inevitable that somebody would be left out. In a way, the fact that the proverbial third wheel proved to be Virgin’s lone male companion is actually something of a pleasant surprise when you consider Doctor Who‘s historical issues with the rather gendered nature of the companion’s place in the proceedings.

Perhaps spurred on by the precedent set by Ace in the final two seasons of the classic show – leaving aside the age-old question of her post-Deceit persona – it seemed that the New Adventures were far more willing to treat their female companions as multi-faceted individuals with their own personal histories, and that tendency alone is enough to distinguish them from huge swathes of the television programme. It would certainly have been nice if that had translated into the hiring of more female talent besides Kate Orman and Rebecca Levene, but that’s by the by.

As a result of all of this, Bad Therapy represents the point at which the writers seem to recognise that they need to play catch-up with Chris before the final curtain call. Gone are the days in which you could almost entirely write the character out of a book with the excuse that he had gone undercover as a Buddhist monk; the regular cast has now officially dwindled to two for the first time since Original Sin, and that’s not an ideal situation when one half of said cast has spent most of his tenure relegated to perfunctory romance plots and small, cute beats playing off his naïveté as part of a wider ensemble.

Ironically enough, though, it’s these same qualities which serve to make Jones’ work with the character of Chris so impactful. There’s something undeniably heart-breaking about seeing a companion predominantly defined by his youthful and joyous exuberance be so thoroughly wrapped in the cold throes of grief. Even in the moments at which he’s partaking in behaviour that we would ordinarily read as heroic, like using his Adjudicator’s training to escort panicked customers from the blazing remains of the Upstairs Room, there’s a sense that he’s operating on autopilot, and that he himself is aware of this fact.

Indeed, his relationship with Patsy seems rather clever and wry in light of the numerous interchangeable romances of varying quality that we’ve been subjected to over the course of the character’s tenure as a companion. Here is what we might feasibly deem the logical endpoint of all of those subplots, a romance where the would-be object of Chris’ desire lacks any identity outside of that which he himself bestows upon her as a weird melting pot of Roz and all the love interests of days gone by. This is a case in which the characteristics of this school of storytelling are consciously pushed to their absolute limits, stretched so far beyond breaking point that any future attempts will inevitably feel cheap and forced.

This is not a romantic relationship, at least not in the conventional sense. This is a romantic exorcism, both for Chris and for the New Adventures as a whole.

Now, there’s perhaps a much weaker version of Bad Therapy to be had in which the book decides to straightforwardly lean on the tragic irony card and make a big deal out of the perceived misfortune in the fact that the “perfect,” tailor-made partner finally comes along for Chris, and he’s too wrapped up in grief to embrace them. There are shades of this to the finished product, but Jones shrewdly never loses sight of the fundamental existential horror of the Toys.

Because let’s be real here, it’s an absolutely horrifying concept, but in such a deliciously understated way that it might not even fully register in your conscious mind at first. The idea of beings that solely exist to mould themselves to the emotional state of their owner is unsettling enough as it is, but the notion that the Toys’ designers deliberately chose to make them so dependent on those emotions as to literally die in their absence takes this to a whole other level of “messed up.”

This isn’t even that old trope of the “perfect mate” as exemplified by other genre fiction offerings like Elaan of Troyius or… The Perfect Mate. There, while the decision to treat a woman as little more than chattel is obviously deeply unpleasant, there’s not the same visceral and immediate sense of abstract horror; the fates of Elaan and Kamala still have a grounding in the sexual.

(Good God, what a deeply weird sentence that is to type…)

While it’s pretty clear that there’s something of a sexual component to the Toys’ enslavement as well, there’s also just a deeper ontological confinement at work that becomes mind-bogglingly unpleasant if you think about it long enough. As a result, sequences like Doctor Mannheim’s description of Moriah’s desperate attempts to resurrect Petruska are far more unnerving than any pedestrian-gobbling ersatz taxi cab could ever be.

Of course, the notion of a tailor-made pairing with a vaguely horrifying implied power dynamic also has a very specific resonance within the context of Doctor Who, and especially the New Adventures at this point in time. None of Bad Therapy‘s musings on the Doctor-companion relationship necessarily stray into thematic ground that we haven’t trodden many times in the past, but the death of Roz casts an intriguing light over proceedings nevertheless.

Particularly noteworthy is the Doctor’s reaction to the fallout, which is sculpted in such a pitch-perfect manner that it’s honestly rather incredible that it came from the only first-time novelist in this final five-book stretch of the New Adventures. With this novel, Jones slots so neatly into the novels’ established house style that you feel like he’s always been present, and not an author whose only previous contribution is a single First Doctor short story nearly eighteen months ago.

At first, I’ll admit that it seemed a little unlikely to me that the Doctor would bounce back this much given just how total and all-consuming his despondency at the end of So Vile a Sin was. Obviously I would have cut Jones and Bad Therapy some slack here, given the unfinished nature of Aaronovitch’s novel at the time, but the more I let the book sit with me, I was surprised at how well it ended up gelling.

Just like in the case of Chris, there’s a sense that although the Doctor is doing his usual schtick of cracking wise in the face of danger and standing up to the evildoers of the world, something’s ever so slightly off. There’s a powerful sense of a quiet, melancholy sadness lurking just under the surface of every grin and quip, and in those brief moments where the façade slips, you truly feel the depth of his grief at having lost Roz.

Some of the novel’s most powerful beats belong entirely to the Doctor, particularly his impassioned, pained monologue to Moriah about the importance of accepting loss and moving on, even as he clutches at the very heart which so recently stopped at Roz’s funeral. It’s very hard to escape the conclusion that the Doctor in Bad Therapy feels like a fundamentally broken man, trying desperately to hold on to those around him even as it all falls to pieces. In a way, the Seventh Doctor has always been a broken and flawed incarnation, reflecting the New Adventures’ place as a continuation of a dead-and-buried franchise. Once again, however, it’s the understated nature of that damage here that lends it some much-needed additional heft.

And all of that’s before we get to Peri.

The portrait of Peri’s life in the aftermath of Mindwarp is one of the more controversial aspects of Bad Therapy, and it’s often cited as yet another example in the chain of the New Adventures putting ex-companions through hell. On one level, I can definitely understand this characterisation of what Jones is doing here. We’ve talked more than enough about the less-than-stellar post-TARDIS lives dreamed up by Virgin’s authors in the cases of companions like Dodo or Mel, and we’ll talk about it even more next month in the case of Eternity Weeps. The decision to put such characters through hell is one which should obviously be very carefully interrogated, especially in the context of the New Adventures’ endgame, involving as it does the death of one of their own regular characters.

But on the other hand, I would counter that the case of Peri represents something of an anomaly, for the very simple reason that… well, she’s already been through hell. The character’s departure in Mindwarp represents one of the single biggest messes ever thrown up by a classic series companion’s swan-song, no matter which way you choose to slice it.

If you only take into account the evidence we’re initially presented with by Philip Martin’s script, she finds her identity completely erased by the brain of Lord Kiv and is subsequently murdered in a fit of rage by King Yrcanos, reduced to little more than a tally point on the Doctor’s personal moral scoreboard. Alternatively, you can choose to hew to the revelations dreamt up by Pip and Jane Baker in The Ultimate Foe at the urging of producer John Nathan-Turner, and say that she just ended up embroiled in another of the long line of unconvincing and underdeveloped romances that the classic series proved so fond of.

As you can probably imagine, neither of these options is wholly appealing, with each involving a rather significant erasure of Peri’s agency and independence. However, it’s the Bakers’ sheer unwillingness to commit to the more pointed and stinging critiques inherent in Mindwarp that ultimately marks their hypothesis as the weaker one in my estimation, and which arguably undoes any claims The Trial of a Time Lord might make to being any kind of coherent or serious piece of metatextual self-criticism on the part of Doctor Who.

(I do want to stress, however, that Martin is by no means wholly blameless in this situation, and there are some much wider issues at play within his own oeuvre regarding the ways in which women are routinely and unabashedly subjected to disempowerment and humiliation. If I ever get around to doing a piece on The Creed of the Kromon… hoo boy. For now, I’ll only say that his decision to end his novelisation of Mindwarp with a faux-cutesy reveal that Peri and Yrcanos returned to 1980s California and took up a career in the local wrestling industry seems to prove my point that it’s not just the Bakers and Nathan-Turner who were capable of misguided and cowardly retreats from that story’s proposed fate for Perpugilliam Brown.)

With all of this history, the decision to posit a less-than-happy future for Peri becomes not so much an act of unnecessary cruelty, and more an admission of guilt on the part of Doctor Who for sins past. More to the point, it’s the logical culmination of themes that have been bubbling in the background of the New Adventures for some time now. If, as works like RevelationLove and War and Head Games have posited, Season 23 and the accompanying hiatus represent something of an original sin for the Wilderness Years, then Peri’s not-quite death is just as much a part of that failing as any piece of continuity surrounding the title of “Time’s Champion” or the existence of the Valeyard.

Hell, even in a more immediate sense, if the books are going to try and offer up another “companion death” narrative, it’s a supremely logical decision to return to the last bungled example of such a plot beat in an effort to stress the progress that the series has made in the intervening years. And make no mistake, that’s very obviously the point that Jones is making.

Perhaps the most telling moment to examine here is Peri’s personal epiphany regarding the fate of Petruska. Even though the First Queen did not survive as she had hoped, it becomes apparent that her death was not the result of a fit of jealous rage from her husband, but was in fact a final assertion of her own agency and independence in the face of that rage. Given how strongly Kate Orman would subsequently stress the point that Roz’s actions in So Vile a Sin resulted from a desire to “write the final chapter” of her own life, even in the face of the Doctor’s urging to the contrary, there’s a symmetry to Petruska’s tale here that proves deeply significant.

Underneath all the doom and gloom and misbegotten grief, however, there’s a sense that Jones has buried some small kernels of hope for us to take heart from. At the end of the day, the most powerful force in the narrative turns out to be the rather simple, unassuming gesture of extending a little bit of empathy. For all that Moriah might protest that the Toys are inhuman, there’s a rather quaint and ironic sense that they might just number among the most human characters in the book.

This empathy pervades every page of the novel, in ways both big and small. It’s empathy with Petruska’s proto-feminist covert communication network that drives Peri to seek out answers between the lines of the erstwhile queen’s ballad, and it’s a broader, communal sense of shared empathy that allows the Toys to affirm each other’s existence independent of their bonded partners. When the Doctor needs to create a replica of Moriah’s lost bride, he reaches out to Peri’s own memories in order to help shape said replica.

Not only that, the very fact that Tilda and the Major predominantly gravitate towards the racial and sexual minorities of Notting Hill seems to suggest an ability to relate to the plight of the disadvantaged and the ostracised, further reinforcing the idea of the Toys’ fundamental decency and humanity. Even the Doctor’s discussion of psychological profiling with Chief Inspector Harris is basically just – as any reasonably knowledgeable fan of the glut of ’90s serial killer fiction would be able to tell you – a discussion about the ability of an investigator to empathise with the object of their pursuit.

Bad Therapy, then, plays as something of an ode to the human capacity for empathy in the face of loss and hardship. In their own individual way, each of the characters in the novel are professing their ability to empathise with others, even as the once-certain bedrock of the world around them is tossed and turned by the winds of change and the foreshocks of the turbulent 1960s.

Ultimately, this is the real kicker, and the thing that cements Bad Therapy as an essential piece in the unfurling tapestry of Doctor Who in the 1990s. Because the Britain evoked by Jones, a world rocked by social upheaval, challenges to the purported post-war social consensus and the looming spectre of decolonisation? Well, that’s precisely the Britain that drove a certain Canadian producer to create an unassuming little educational show about a crotchety old grandfather travelling time and space alongside his granddaughter and her teachers.

If Roger Ebert was right when he declaimed that the purpose of cinema was to serve as something of an “empathy machine,” then maybe Doctor Who can be too. Maybe that’s the real fuel of the franchise, even more than any silly technobabble about artron energy or dimensional transcendentalism. And if that’s true, if Doctor Who runs on empathy, then perhaps there isn’t any reason that the story ever has to end.

I suppose that if that’s the last big statement that the New Adventures get to make before they lose the official Doctor Who seal forever, then it’s a bloody good one indeed, and a credit to all involved.

Miscellaneous Observations

There’s a nice bit of symmetry to be found in Chris’ vision of a half-formed Eighth Doctor pushing his way out of the ashes of the Seventh. Obviously, it’s consciously evoking Ace’s encounter with the Doctor’s future self within the mindscape of Revelation, and as such there’s something rather neat in returning to such a memorable piece of imagery from the fourth New Adventure in this, the fourth-last New Adventure to feature Seven.

Speaking of symmetry, the gunshot that Chris takes to his shoulder in attempting to rescue Patsy at the climax of the novel pretty directly recalls the mythic wounds sustained by the Doctor himself in books like The Left-Handed Hummingbird and Set Piece. There is, I suppose, no better way to signify the character’s long-overdue induction into the panoply of “broken and wounded New Adventures protagonists” than that.

Fully acknowledging that I’m stepping pretty firmly into the territory of ludicrous reaches with this one, I do have to wonder if there’s perhaps something to Chief Inspector Harris sharing a surname with the author who pretty much invented the whole “overly empathetic criminal profiler” subgenre of detective fiction with books like Red Dragon. There probably isn’t, but hey, who knows?

Final Thoughts

So yeah, there we have it. The final New Adventure of 1996, and our final goodbye to the McCoy logo that has been our constant companion over the past five years. Which feels… odd, to say the least. I didn’t think I could attach so much emotional value to a logo, but maybe that’s just proof of a strange empathy of my own. Anyway, hope you enjoyed the review as ever, and I hope you’ll join me next time as we come full circle and close the year in the same way we began it, as Lance Parkin returns to bring the Seventh Doctor squarely into the realm of the Missing Adventures with Cold Fusion. Until then, however…

Kind regards,

Special Agent Dale Cooper

(P.S. I didn’t intend for there to be a Full Circle pun in my teaser for what will be our first full look at the character of Adric in a Missing Adventure, but it’s there now. How happily serendipitous these things can be!)

Virgin Decalog Reviews: Lost Property, edited by Mark Stammers and Stephen James Walker

At long last, after over thirty years of adventures, Lost Property sees the Doctor venture into that most horrifying and impenetrable of landscapes: the real estate market!

More seriously, though, the second of Virgin Books’ Decalogs sees the series discard the notion of an opening short story that serves as a recurring framing device throughout the collection. Instead, the link is a more abstract one. All ten stories share a central theme. That theme, as I alluded to earlier, is the various properties and houses owned by the Doctor.

I don’t have as much to say in this Preamble as I did the first time around, since you probably understand the general premise of the Decalogs well enough by now. If not, feel free to go back and read my review of that first Decalog, because we’re going to jump straight into the first of Lost Property‘s stories with…

1. Vortex of Fear by Gareth Roberts (featuring the Second Doctor, Jamie and Zoe)

Oh dear Lord I already regret this decision. Talk about throwing me in at the deep end…

OK, anybody who’s read this blog for a while knows that I find it difficult to review Gareth Roberts stories. Not because the works themselves are bad, per se, but the man has just made himself a complete pariah in the world of Doctor Who at this point by going so far down the “They’re cancelling me!” rabbit hole of awfulness after he faced criticism for some transphobic remarks.

And the trouble is that he is definitely a talented writer. I can see why his works were as beloved as they were for so long. They’re enjoyably whimsical and quick-witted, and he’s very much the Doctor Who writer who has best captured the ethos of Douglas Adams and Season 17 in his stories. I think I’ve come to realise that, while I generally enjoy reading Roberts’ books, reviewing them is an altogether more exhausting prospect because I find myself reminded of just how spectacular his self-manufactured fall from grace has been.

With all of that being put aside, how about Vortex of Fear itself? It’s certainly odd, and it probably stands a fair chance of being crowned Roberts’ most experimental stories. To be honest, it’s perhaps a little much to jump straight into at the start of the anthology, but it largely succeeds.

The biggest problem, really, is that the story doesn’t feel too connected to the general theme of “houses owned by the Doctor.” There’s a cursory line from Zoe early on about the Time Vortex being the Doctor’s home, in a manner of speaking, but that’s really about it.

I could almost envision this as a rejected entry for the first Decalog that was reworked slightly to have the most tangential of links to the central theme of this second installment. I doubt that that’s actually what happened, and in any event I’d likely have no way of knowing one way or the other. Nonetheless, Vortex of Fear certainly feels of a piece with some of the first Decalog’s more mind-bending stories like The Book of Shadows or Lackaday Express.

These aren’t comparisons which are especially favourable to Roberts. Vortex of Fear has neither the tight command of pacing employed by Mortimore, nor the simple yet undeniably effective emotional core which Cornell brought.

By the same token, though, that isn’t to say that this story isn’t a lot of fun. It has a solid premise, and sticks to it throughout to deliver a short story that is, while perhaps not transcendent, still pretty enjoyable.

In essence, the story sees the Doctor, Jamie and Zoe stumble upon a lavishly-decorated hotel-like structure within the Time Vortex. It isn’t long before they begin to realise that the people inside the hotel have become the victims of an exceedingly timey-wimey misfortune, with all of them being stuck in a time loop. Only one of them is aware of this, but he’s been locked up as a madman and is desperately trying to escape.

I imagine the “weird and illogical hotel” elements of this premise have probably put quite a few of my readers in mind of The God Complex, but as I kept reading I honestly found myself thinking more of the early Star Trek: The Next Generation episode, The Royale. Both stories feature characters trapped in a time loop within hotel-like surroundings, with the only individual who is aware of the loop being holed up inside their room.

As usual when it comes to these comparisons, I do not draw this connection in order to spin some narrative that Vortex of Fear ripped off The Royale. Rather, I think that I enjoy this short story for much the same reasons as I enjoy that episode. Neither of them are close to being perfect installments of their respective series, but there’s something to be said for the strangeness of their premises.

The notion that the hotel is basically just an incredibly advanced tax haven is wonderful. As I alluded to earlier, much is made of Roberts as a successor to Douglas Adams’ tenure as script editor on Doctor Who, and this certainly feels like the kind of premise which the mind behind Hitchhiker’s might have toyed with.

Though it naturally isn’t delved into with as much depth as it might have been in a full-scale novel, it also serves as a nice piece of bitterly comedic commentary on the lengths that the ultra-wealthy will go to in service of their own ends.

Much like The Royale, the story also concludes with the knowledge that this loop will go on. The people within are trapped forever, and there’s something faintly chilling in the idea that this loop is playing itself out in a little corner of the Time Vortex every time that the Doctor traverses it. Obviously it’s hard to feel too much in the way of sympathy for a bunch of self-obsessed billionaires, at least one of whom is verifiably a murderer, but it’s still quite a horrific fate.

Indeed, it’s quite a bold storytelling choice to have the Doctor turn down Brachinnen’s desperate pleas for a means of escape. I can understand how some might think this a textbook example of the Virgin books’ reputation for grim, gritty cynicism, but I think it works within the context of the story. The hotel is a hellish place, to be sure, but it’s a hell that’s entirely borne of the billionaires’ own greed and avarice.

As for the regulars, this is another case where the Decalogs prove more adept at capturing the voice of the Second Doctor than the full-length novels I’ve looked at so far. It’s especially noteworthy in this case, since I think this is the only time Roberts has written for this incarnation of the Doctor. Despite that, the mannerisms and even the interactions with Jamie feel true to the spirit of the repartee between Patrick Troughton and Frazer Hines.

It’s also always nice to see Zoe actually explored as a character in her own right. This kind of goes back to what I said about Dodo in my review of The Golden Door in the first Decalog, but the female companions in 1960s Who tended to start out with an incredibly interesting premise (a Time Lady in all but name, an orphan from the 25th century, an orphan from… the 19th century) but quickly settled into a more generic “companion” role. That much is certainly true of Zoe.

She was introduced as an incredibly intelligent character, but there was also a certain strain of condescension in the way the show treated her. It seemed to suggest that she was too cold and cerebral and needed to learn how to appreciate the world around her from a more emotional point of view.

There’s nothing inherently wrong with this as a character arc. It’ll always smack of a faint whiff of anti-intellectualism, but it’s a solid grounding for a character. It’s arguably not too dissimilar from the central conflict at the heart of Star Trek‘s Spock. The crucial difference, though, lies in the gender of the two characters.

The “companion” role, as a genericised archetype within Doctor Who, has long had certain awkwardly-gendered implications for the power dynamics of the show’s regular cast. Those implications definitely bled into Zoe’s characterisation in a way that they didn’t for, say, Spock.

To say that Vortex of Fear provides the most interesting examination of Zoe’s character from the franchise to this point may not exactly be a very high bar, then, but I do still think it holds true. Zoe feels more like a fully-formed character here than she ever did in the television series, and I very much appreciate that.

Roberts seems to have reimagined Zoe’s status as an intellectual wunderkind in a way that puts her on a more equal footing with the Doctor, seeming more reminiscent of the show’s treatment of Romana than anything else. Again, this makes sense for an author who was always heavily influenced by Season 17.

All around, this is a pretty solid way to open the anthology. Its links to the collection’s overarching themes are pretty weak, but it has an interesting premise that is well-executed, as well as characterisation of the regulars that makes writing the Second Doctor look effortless. Of course, I’d also completely understand if people felt like skipping this one thanks to Roberts’ involvement.

2. Crimson Dawn by Tim Robins (featuring the Fourth Doctor, Leela and K9 Mark I)

Hey, remember Leela? She sure was a character in Doctor Who, wasn’t she?

I’m being flippant, but that’s just because I find it incredibly strange that Crimson Dawn is one of only two stories ever published by Virgin to feature Leela travelling with the Fourth Doctor. The other is People of the Trees from later in this very same collection, though she does have a guest appearance in the Seventh Doctor’s final New Adventure, Lungbarrow. When you consider that even Dodo was afforded a chance to anchor a full-length novel in The Man in the Velvet Mask, it just seems very, very strange.

Anyway, we’ll get back to Leela in a moment. Crimson Dawn also marks the return of Tim Robins to the Decalogs. He previously wrote Prisoners of the Sun for the first collection in the series, and it wasn’t one of the more promising franchise debuts Virgin has ever played host to. It was laden with a metric ton of clunky exposition, largely because of the overly-ambitious attempt to tell an alternate universe narrative within the extremely limited time allotted to a short story.

That being said, I was willing to give this story a chance. Some New Adventures authors have had pretty astonishingly poor debut novels, but have surprised me with a much more enjoyable sophomore effort (paging Christopher Bulis…). I knew ahead of time that Robins never wrote for the franchise after this point, but I was open to the possibility that maybe he was just an underappreciated talent who slipped through the cracks of Virgin’s open submissions policy.

Much as it pains me to say this, however, I don’t think Crimson Dawn is very good. It’s probably a bit of an improvement over Prisoners of the Sun, but it ultimately ends up succumbing to much the same problems that plagued that story.

There’s no alternate-universe shenanigans here, but Robins has still attempted to tell this very big, epic story of a businessman in cahoots with terrorists and aliens and… hey wait a minute this actually still sounds extremely similar to Prisoners of the Sun

OK, obviously I’m being a little facetious with these remarks. Just about any two stories can probably seem quite similar if you reduce them to the most basic, broad summaries like that, but it still felt eerily similar to me.

In Crimson Dawn‘s defence, though, the thematic point here does seem a little clearer and more focused than it was in Prisoners of the Sun. This is very obviously a thinly-veiled allegorical story about the crass commercialisation of non-European cultures by big companies for the purposes of tourism.

Honestly, I found this to be a pretty great premise that fits well with the grand science-fiction tradition of using fictional societies and cultures to comment upon real-world issues, and Robins very much highlights the classical sci-fi roots of Crimson Dawn. The Doctor’s houseboat (providing that link to the “property” theme) is named the Dejah Thoris, and the story is peppered not only with further references to the works of Edgar Rice Burroughs, but also H. G. Wells.

For all that it’s propped up with some truly burdensome exposition, the vision of Mars presented here is a lot of fun. It perfectly captures the atmosphere of these kinds of tacky tourist traps that we’ve all no doubt been dragged to at some point or another. And yeah, I’ll admit it since I’m not a heartless, pun-hating Grinch: any story that features an actual dining establishment named the Mars Bar is automatically elevated by a few points at the bare minimum.

On a more serious note, the inclusion of Leela turns out to be a bit of a thornier choice, if you’ll pardon the expression. Leela was always a somewhat troubled creation. With her leather-clad, warrior woman demeanor, she often leaned a little too heavily into the kinds of patronising “noble savage” tropes which would ironically feel quite at home in a Burroughs novel. This was an impression which wasn’t at all helped by the fact that the production team decided to base her character arc around the idea of the Doctor “educating” her about her ancestors.

This certainly isn’t to say that it’s impossible to tell good stories featuring the character in spite of these problems. On the contrary, I think the expanded universe managed to get quite adept at humanising Leela in a way that the Hinchcliffe and Williams Eras sometimes didn’t. Big Finish’s Gallifrey audio series is a particular standout on that score.

Unfortunately, Crimson Dawn very much arrives before the franchise really got a handle on telling Leela stories in a way that didn’t play to the more unsavoury stereotypes with which she is associated. There’s a chunk in the middle of the story where the character reacts with bafflement when presented with the tacky excess of Mars, and it brushes uncomfortably close to the kind of romanticism of “less civilised” cultures that comes straight from the handbook of the noble savage trope.

This is all especially troubling in the context of the 1990s. It seemed like the popular culture of the decade held a particular fascination with non-European culture and spirituality, and especially that of Native Americans.

Kevin Costner’s Dances with Wolves was the fourth-highest grossing film of 1990, and took home seven wins from twelve nominations at the 63rd Academy Awards. Lost Property saw release two months after Chris Carter began to incorporate Native American culture into the mythology of The X-Files with Anasazi.

At the same time, Michael Piller was pushing for similar ideas within Star Trek: Voyager, an incredibly ill-advised move which would lead to trainwrecks like Tattoo and contribute to his departure from the franchise. Just one month before Lost Property‘s publication, Disney’s Pocahontas also sparked controversy over its numerous deviations from history.

Crimson Dawn is, thankfully, not quite as overt as all that, but it still plays into the broader context of white writers and directors’ fascination with these cultures as some kind of simplistic, romantic ideal. That this should come to the fore in a story which sets out with the worthy goal of criticising Western, capitalistic cultural appropriation only compounds the frustration.

There’s not too much more of any great depth to be said that I didn’t already say in covering Prisoners of the Sun, other than perhaps to note that Robins has gotten better at writing action scenes. Certainly none of the action was as disorientating as the choppy, confused raid on the BT Tower from his previous story.

Ultimately, I think I can only paraphrase what I said in my summation of Prisoners of the Sun. I could see there being a really good novel at the heart of Crimson Dawn, because it seems like Robins’ big ideas would be better suited to a longer-form medium. Unfortunately, that’s not what the Decalogs are about, and I have to judge these short stories as, well, short stories. On those terms, I just don’t think this one works.

3. Where the Heart Is by Andy Lane (featuring the Third Doctor and Jo)

Where the Heart Is builds from an incredibly continuity-heavy, fan-wanky premise. Reduced to its most basic level, it is the story of how the “manor house” UNIT HQ that debuted in The Time Monster was acquired from Doctor Dantalion, the Birastrop memory-surgeon from Original Sin.

It’s fair to say that this could easily fail spectacularly, coming across as a ridiculously self-indulgent, ill-advised mess. Thankfully, this is an Andy Lane story.

Lane is an author who has certainly never shied away from continuity references in his work. Lucifer Rising featured a main character whose husband disappeared on the Hydrax from State of DecayThe Empire of Glass was predicated on building out a portrayal of the Armageddon Convention from a single line in Revenge of the Cybermen.

To be fair, there were times when this tendency could backfire on Lane. The reveal in Original Sin that a cybernetic Tobias Vaughn was responsible for a millennium’s worth of the Doctor’s enemies was quite patently absurd, for instance.

Still, those instances are the exceptions that prove the rule. The fact remains that Lane has always been extremely talented at using continuity-heavy premises to paint a wonderfully detailed snapshot of a particular time and place, all while peppering the narrative with enjoyable, satisfying character interactions.

Where the Heart Is doesn’t have to do nearly as much worldbuilding as something like All-Consuming Fire or The Empire of Glass. That’s partially down to the fact that it takes place in the familiar, non-descript near future of the UNIT Era, but it also represents Lane rather shrewdly streamlining his storytelling sensibilities to fit within the short story format.

Instead of the worldbuilding, then, Lane places the emphasis on those smaller character moments. The story is pretty quiet, a marked change of pace from the apocalyptic, Earth-shattering (OK, Mars-shattering) stakes of Crimson Dawn. Things happen, to be sure, and there’s even a climax featuring a six-vehicle military convoy. Even that, however, feels pretty subdued, and this is a choice that works in Lane’s favour.

The real joy of Where the Heart Is isn’t really in the plot. On a basic level, it could probably be argued that it falls victim to some of the same problems which haunted The Straw that Broke the Camel’s Back. Both are UNIT stories that focus on the characters’ responses to an external situation that we know must be resolved before the end of the story. Just like we knew there was never any real chance that the Doctor would leave UNIT in The Straw, we know that UNIT obviously cannot be disbanded here.

So what is it that makes this story succeed, where its spiritual predecessor didn’t? Well, it helps that Lane is, as I’ve said, a very experienced author at this point who has demonstrated considerable aptitude for writing characters. However, the story is also paced very well.

One of the biggest issues with the execution of The Straw that Broke the Camel’s Back, looking back, was that it felt a little too frenetic. It bounced much too quickly from plot point to confrontation to other plot point. Here, Lane isn’t afraid to slow things down and make room for small touches that really make the characters come alive, whether it be the Brigadier snatching away Yates’ vol-au-vent or the Doctor pausing in the middle of an investigation to ruminate on Dantalion’s wine cellar.

Dantalion himself is fun, and it’s nice to contrast this much younger, more energetic personality with the version we met in Original Sin. It’s nice that he genuinely feels alien, both in appearance and in morals. The notion of a society where killing is tolerated if it’s done in pursuit of furthering medical knowledge is quite chilling, and the respective reactions of both the Doctor and Jo to this felt perfectly in-character. Some might argue that he gets off too lightly, but Original Sin doesn’t exactly see him living what you could call the high life, so I’m not too bothered by it.

I don’t have too much more to say. This is probably the best Virgin-published Third Doctor story I’ve read so far. To be fair, it’s not as if efforts like The Ghosts of N-Space have exactly set the bar very high, but still. I’m sad that this is the last Andy Lane story I’ll read for quite some time; it’s certainly the last of his stories for Virgin to feature the Doctor. When it comes to characterisation and storytelling, he’s really proved one more time that he knows precisely Where the Heart Is.

(Look, I held back for long enough, OK? Just give me that one…)

4. The Trials of Tara by Paul Cornell (featuring the Seventh Doctor and Benny)

The Trials of Tara marks the first “proper” Seventh Doctor story in one of these Decalogs. I use the term “proper” rather loosely for two main reasons. Firstly, the previous anthology’s framing device, Playback, did feature a starring role for Seven, albeit without any of his regular companions from the books or the TV series. Secondly, and perhaps more obviously, the term “proper” implies a sense of normality to the presentation of this story. Such a claim would be quite unfounded.

For you see, The Trials of Tara is not so much a short story as it is a four-act play script written in the style of a Shakespearean comedy. To give you an idea of how deeply Paul Cornell has committed to this idea, I need only quote the full, alternate title as it is given in the book: Would That It Were, the Comedie of Count Grendel the Master of Gracht with the Life and Death of His New Executioner.

So… yeah.

I’ll admit, I’m kind of thrown for a loop with this one. When you’ve reviewed things for years, you get so used to the rhythms of a short story or novel, no matter how experimental it might be. Any seismic change like this, therefore, kind of hits like a truck. In this case, it’s definitely a positive truck-hitting, though. I don’t think such a thing exists, but I’ve never let a wonky simile stop me before.

Anyway, as the title (well, both titles) kind of hints, this is a sequel to The Androids of Tara. As it goes along, it transpires that it’s also a sequel to The Happiness Patrol as well. On the surface, you could probably make all kinds of criticisms about how ridiculous it is to mash these two characters up. These criticisms would miss the fact that the ridiculousness is very much the point.

And make no mistake, this is a very silly (and often very funny) story, but it’s also quite an attentive recreation of the works of one of the most celebrated English authors of all time. It feels a little too much describe a pastiche of already-comedic stories as having “played it straight,” but the sentiment still holds. The bawdy humour and double entendres are amply represented, and those familiar with the Bard will also doubtless recognise a number of plot beats and names from his plays which Cornell has repurposed here.

I can’t really comment on if it’s accurate to the more technical aspects like the stage directions or the iambic pentametre or what have you. Yours truly does not, it must be said, really possess the necessary grounding in classical literature or poetry to make any such judgments. If you do, and you read the story, draw your own conclusions in this area.

One area which I do feel qualified to speak on, though, are the Doctor Who elements. Obviously the characters are a little exaggerated to fit into a Shakespearean comedy, but the Doctor and Bernice are both still pretty recognisable even through the farce. The latter in particular should come as no surprise, since we are of course dealing with the author who invented Benny in the first place, but it’s nice to see all the same.

The rest of the characters are fun enough, if perhaps not especially deep. Nonetheless, there were still some creative ideas. Taking Oberon and Titania and making them the monarchs of android fairies constructed as novelty Christmas gifts is a cute twist on the original play that also totally fits with what we know of Taran culture.

The last thing of substance I’ll note is that it’s interesting to view this in the context of some of Cornell’s later books. The obvious point of reference would probably be something like Oh No It Isn’t!, which is quite heavily steeped in ideas of pantomime and performance.

However, it also fits quite well with the author’s earlier reworking of Karl Marx in No Future: “They say history repeats itself… The first time as tragedy, the second time as farce. This time, it’s panto.”

To contort this quote beyond all reasonable measure, if The Androids of Tara is the tragedy, then it seems reasonable that The Trials of Tara is the farce. Does this make Oh No It Isn’t! the final, evolved iteration of Cornell-as-panto? Eh, probably not. Again, this all relies on me stretching a throwaway line to breaking point and I don’t really intend it in too much seriousness, but it is interesting to note these ideas recurring throughout the author’s work all the same.

The Trials of Tara is a delightful example of the way in which Virgin’s willingness to allow its authors to experiment could often pay dividends. It’s the kind of thing that you could never really do in a visual medium like television, but which also couldn’t really sustain a full-length novel. In that respect, then, it’s arguably doing exactly what a short story should.

5. Housewarming by David A. McIntee (featuring Sarah, Yates and K9 Mark III)

Kind of surprising that, with a premise like “stories about houses owned by the Doctor,” it took us until nearly halfway through Lost Property to get a haunted house story. Less surprising, though, is that it should come from the pen of David A. McIntee.

McIntee has always had a certain fondness for pulp. His debut novel, White Darkness, featured Haitian zombies under the thrall of an unnamed Cthulhu. His sophomore effort, First Frontier, was very much an archetypal “alien invasion of 1950s New Mexico” story that leaned heavily on the mythos and ambience associated with the Roswell Incident.

Housewarming slots rather comfortably into this tradition. Sure, the eventual explanation might rest more on time travel technobabble than on anything “supernatural” (perhaps an inheritance from McIntee’s other great influence, Star Trek), but the imagery with which the story is playing will seem familiar to any reader with even the most fleeting acquaintance with horror cinema.

The team of paranormal investigators that Sarah, Mike and K-9 find themselves teaming up with are all pretty broadly drawn. There’s the tech wizard, the skeptic, the young couple who inevitably wind up being creepily watched (though, in this case, not slain) by the main villain during a sexual encounter.

Again, this is all pretty standard stuff, but it’s largely carried by how much fun McIntee is having working in this space. The shorter format also helps ensure that Housewarming avoids the pitfalls of something like First Frontier in feeling so familiar that it becomes rote, tired and dull.

Speaking of First Frontier, though, there’s actually a pretty solid link to that novel here. What follows is technically going to be a spoiler, I suppose. Really though, if a bearded, aquiline man in dark clothing going by a name like “Marius Castillo” turns up in a David A. McIntee story, chances are pretty good that he’s the Master.

Predictably, that is indeed precisely who he turns out to be. However, it also seems like this is actually the Basil Rathbone incarnation from First Frontier. There’s nothing explicit within the text to really confirm this, but considering both stories are from the same author, it seems likely. Neither Mike nor Sarah recognise him, either, which would seemingly rule out the possibility that it’s Delgado or Ainley.

The Rathbone Master remains one of those delightful oddities thrown up by the New Adventures while they were given the task of proverbially shepherding the franchise continuity. Beyond First Frontier and this story, he would only appear in Paul Cornell’s Happy Endings before quietly disappearing. Some have speculated that he is, in fact, the incarnation played by Gordon Tipple that we glimpse at the beginning of the 1996 TV movie, but there’s nothing to really confirm that.

Since he only appeared towards the end of First Frontier after the Ainley Master was shot, this is really the first time we’ve gotten the chance to glimpse this incarnation “fully-formed,” as it were. How does he do? Well, he’s fine, albeit a little indistinct. The Master is really a character who lives and dies on the performance, or the capturing of that performance when it comes to literary media like prose or comics.

McIntee has already demonstrated a knack for capturing the performance and spirit of the Master to this point, but the Rathbone Master perhaps suffered from the jump in comparison to those on-screen incarnations. The character certainly does all the expected Master-y things, but still feels a tad generic.

Given this Master’s roots in Rathbone’s performance as Guy of Gisbourne, though, it was fun to see the story climax in a rapier duel between him, Mike and Sarah… even if the “I’m not left-handed” bit was pretty blatantly cribbing from The Princess Bride.

The last noteworthy thing about Housewarming is that I believe it marks the first story published by Virgin to not feature the Doctor at all. We’ve obviously brushed up against that in the past with novels like Birthright, or within the Decalogs themselves with The Duke of Dominoes. Still, even these stories featured a token Doctor cameo or two.

What would seem to be represented in this focus on Doctor-less stories (indeed, by the time they stopped writing Doctor Who-adjacent fiction in 1999, that would be the only thing Virgin was able to publish) is an attempt to broaden the scope of the Doctor Who universe. Again, as I kind of alluded to in that parenthetical just now, it was also often reflective of the fact that they simply didn’t have the rights to use elements like the Doctor, the TARDIS or the Daleks. I think the creative intent was still there in some form, though, however unconscious of it they may have been.

This also isn’t really something exclusive to the Wilderness Years. After all, Housewarming does owe a considerable debt to the failed K-9 and Company pilot from the early 1980s. At times it plays almost as a hypothetical second episode of the series that never was, although with the admitted caveat that it definitely takes place some time later in the 1990s. In a post-Sarah Jane Adventures world, it’s interesting to see how the seeds were sown, and the characterisation of Sarah, Yates and K-9 is solid.

Housewarming takes a premise that could probably feel tired and worn-out in different hands, and elevates it to something a lot more enjoyable. Much like Vortex of Fear, it’s not exactly high art, and that’s probably only further highlighted by the fact that it comes directly after two of Lost Property‘s strongest stories. Still, for what it is, it’s a great deal of fun.

6. The Nine-Day Queen by Matthew Jones (featuring the First Doctor, Ian and Barbara)

Oh hey, another story from a first-time Doctor Who author. More than that, a first-time author who would actually go on to have a reasonable amount of success and staying power in the franchise. I don’t know what it is about the Decalogs so far, but all the authors who have made their debut within these two collections haven’t tended to go on to write much outside of them.

Whatever the case may be, Matthew Jones (or, as his later credits would refer to him, Matt Jones) would go on to write two New Adventures novels in the form of Bad Therapy and Beyond the Sun. When Doctor Who returned to television in 2005, he would contribute The Impossible Planet and The Satan Pit to the revival’s second season, as well as penning Dead Man Walking for the spin-off series Torchwood.

There isn’t really much to tie The Nine-Day Queen to those later efforts, to be honest. Indeed, against their depictions of the Devil and Death itself, a story focusing on the Doctor, Ian and Barbara’s becoming enmeshed in the tragic fate of Lady Jane Grey seems positively intimate and small-scale by comparison.

The biggest problem with this premise is that it invited me to draw comparisons in my head to a previous First Doctor story, The Book of Shadows. To be fair, the notion of throwing that particular incarnation into a historical setting is one that would likely occur to a great many writers, based on his television tenure.

From there, it’s not exactly a great leap to throw in a science-fiction element and base the story’s central thrust around a tricky moral dilemma like the possibility of rewriting history. All the same, there are a few key shortcomings that unfortunately held me back from enjoying The Nine-Day Queen as much as I did The Book of Shadows.

Most glaringly, the story’s pacing is a bit of a mess. It’s supposed to take place over a period of a few months, but I simply didn’t feel that the text created that impression skilfully enough. The best example to illustrate my point is that the Doctor only spends one scene as Jane’s tutor before her wedding to Guildford.

We are, of course, told that they spend much more time together, but therein lies the problem: being told about two characters forming a deep bond off-screen is really not a substitute for actually seeing that happening.

“Show, don’t tell” has almost become a cliché in its own right when it comes to writing advice, and there’s a lot more nuance to be found in the application of those three words than is perhaps generally acknowledged. Sometimes, though, the old advice is still the best, and this is one of those cases.

(Much the same applies to Jones’ decision to begin the story in media res and tell the tale of Barbara’s possession by the Vrij entirely in Ian’s own memories. It just feels clunky and awkward, and recalls the problems I’ve discussed previously with Crimson Dawn or Prisoners of the Sun leaning much too heavily on expository infodumps.)

The truncation of the Doctor and Jane’s relationship also speaks to another complaint I have. For a story entitled The Nine-Day Queen, the Nine-Day Queen herself doesn’t have much presence. It feels like this was written with the intent of exploring the way in which Grey’s agency was robbed from her by the political machinations of the men around her, and while that’s certainly a noble sentiment, its impact is rather lessened by her absence from large chunks of the narrative.

There is still some emotion to be found in the Doctor just narrowly missing a chance to say a proper goodbye to Jane, or in Barbara musing on the Queen’s fate. Nonetheless, it’s largely drowned out by the generic sci-fi possession stuff involving the Vrij (probably the winner of the Most Inexplicably Dutch Extraterrestrial Name competition), and the tragedy that is present has been done better elsewhere.

I dunno. I feel kind of bad that none of the first-time authors from the Decalog series have really been “landing” with me, especially since I quite like The Impossible Planet and The Satan Pit in particular. But yet again, here’s another story that just felt a little too large for a short story and so feels more than a little like squandered potential.

7. Lonely Days by Daniel Blythe (featuring the Fifth Doctor and Nyssa)

If you’ve been reading this blog for a while, you might recall that I wasn’t especially enamoured with either of Daniel Blythe’s previous novels. The Dimension Riders hewed much too closely to the template of Douglas Adams’ Shada, with a little bit of Star Trek thrown in for added flavour. Infinite Requiem was an improvement, but it still suffered from generic antagonists with unclear motives and an outrageously cheap “shock value” ending.

It’s perhaps too much to characterise Lonely Days as Blythe’s magnum opus or some unheralded masterpiece waiting in the wings, but I did enjoy it a great deal more than either of those novels. It almost feels a shame that it should mark his last story for Virgin, but that’s the way things go I suppose.

What hit me most about Lonely Days is something entirely unintentional. As the title implies, it’s a story dealing with themes of isolation and loneliness, as a survey officer grapples with being the only human being on an asteroid. Obviously this is something that resonates a lot more after the last two years than it may have done in 1995. While there is some awkwardness in aspects of Blythe’s approach to this idea, I did still appreciate the rather low-key nature of the premise.

Indeed, much like Where the Heart Is, “low-key” is very much the word of the day here. The story is quite short relative to the others in the collection, and apart from the researcher, the Doctor and Nyssa, there’s only one other character.

Honestly, I think that these kinds of narratives are much better suited to the short story format than larger-scale efforts like Crimson Dawn or The Nine-Day Queen. They’re not the only way to tell a good short story, and indeed there have been some “bigger” stories that I have still liked. Just look at The Book of Shadows.

Nonetheless, I find that the average quality of your short stories tends to improve when you treat them as “short stories” and not just “novels of a much shorter length.” Probably shouldn’t be a very radical observation but what’re you gonna do?

The plot itself isn’t exactly super groundbreaking. There’s some weird things going on at a far-flung research outpost on an asteroid that the Doctor once won while gambling, but everything is ultimately resolved without too much of a fuss once it turns out that the asteroid is actually a dying, sentient being who was just trying to warn the researcher.

This is all pretty stock-standard science-fiction stuff. It even feels a little reminiscent of the type of “misunderstanding between aliens and humans that is resolved by finding a way of breaching the barriers in communication and language” moral that Star Trek is particularly fond of (see The Devil in the DarkOne of Our Planets Is Missing, Home Soil).

While it might be a bit of a tropey plot, though, it’s executed well enough here that I can forgive it. If authors are going to pull aspects from Star Trek (which, though I am loath to admit it, is perhaps a little unavoidable since the books are the product of the 1990s), I’d rather they take some of the moral philosophy from it than just try to ape the setting and characters.

The premise does run into some issues, though. It turns out that the researcher has created a hologram of his girlfriend, who was killed in a Dalek attack during his posting to the asteroid. The story at least seems to recognise, on some level, that this is weird. It isn’t as if it condones it, but it doesn’t exactly feel like condemnation either. Indeed, the dying asteroid-being even agrees to remain in the form of the holographic girlfriend at story’s end.

All of this feels somewhat akin to struggles that the ’90s Star Trek shows would run into with the holodeck. The franchise seemed decidedly uncomfortable with the prospect of directly and seriously addressing the possibility that people would use this kind of technology for less-than-wholesome purposes. What you got instead were scripts like Hollow Pursuits or Booby Trap that seemed to gesture at a recognition of the holodeck’s creepy aspects, but always stopped just shy of explicit acknowledgment of those possibilities.

(Of course, when the franchise did grapple with these ideas, we got trainwrecks like the “Quark is hired to make holographic pornography featuring Kira’s image without her consent” subplot from Deep Space Nine‘s Meridian so… maybe it’s for the best that it didn’t happen more often.)

What makes this so frustrating in the case of Lonely Days is that the whole “holographic girlfriend” angle could have been cut so easily and the story would have avoided these issues altogether. It doesn’t exactly ruin the story for me, but it is just… a weird idea to drop so casually into a story like this.

I guess the last thing I’ll mention is the characterisation of the regulars. They’re both good, though perhaps a little broadly-drawn when compared to some of the truly great Doctor and Nyssa stories.

It is interesting to see authors begin to capitalise on the potential of the gap between Time-Flight and Arc of Infinity as an opportunity to tell previously unseen adventures, though. Big Finish would later do the same, particularly in the early years before Janet Fielding agreed to reprise her role as Tegan.

Lonely Days isn’t a great story. It’s perhaps a little too simple and archetypal a plot, there are some questionable storytelling decisions, and while the characterisation of the Doctor and Nyssa isn’t egregiously terrible, it’s not exactly first-class stuff either. And yet, for whatever reason, I found it to be enjoyable enough.

Maybe if it was longer it would have wound up overstaying its welcome, but thankfully that didn’t really end up happening. While I can’t say I’ll especially miss having more Daniel Blythe stories to review, this was probably the strongest thing he wrote for Virgin.

8. People of the Trees by Pam Baddeley (featuring the Fourth Doctor and Leela)

People of the Trees is a baffling creation. On the one hand, it is reasonably well-written and flows pretty smoothly. There’s none of the awkwardly crammed exposition that has plagued some of the weaker stories the Decalogs have brought us. Unfortunately, it also suffers from a premise which can’t help but feel like an uncritical and unexamined use of the white saviour trope.

In keeping with the anthology’s central, unifying theme, the property which People of the Trees focuses on is an area of land which the First Doctor purchased on an unnamed planet. He did this with the intent of protecting the titular People of the Trees, an arboreal race considered by the other inhabitants of the planet to be “savages.”

Within the short story, it seems reasonably clear that the People are portrayed in a manner that evokes traditional conceptions of Native Americans and other First Nations peoples who have historically been the victims of violence and hostility from colonialist European powers.

The specifics of the allegory aren’t one-to-one, to be fair. The Dascarians are never explicitly said to have colonised this region of the planet. Based solely on the evidence of the text, it’s not entirely unreasonable to assume that the two races have always occupied the same area. Still, the discussion of the People’s tribes having been exterminated in the past seems fairly clear as to what part of history it is evoking, as do the persistent beliefs advanced by the Dascarians that the People are little more than “savages.”

I don’t necessarily take issue with the very idea of doing a story tackling these kinds of issues. Indeed, the collection’s theme of “land ownership” could have even provided a window into contemporary discussions of native title.

After all, native title was very much a hot-button topic in the 1990s, particularly in Australia. In the high-profile court case Mabo v Queensland (No 2), the High Court had almost unanimously voted to overturn the doctrine of terra nullius. One year later, Paul Keating’s Labor government passed the Native Title Act 1993 which enshrined the titular doctrine in federal law.

However, these decisions did not have the effect of quashing debate on the topic. Lost Property arrived a year before the High Court’s judgment in the Wik Peoples v Queensland case would receive intense criticism and blowback from federal and state Liberal-National coalition governments. The cover of a December 1997 issue of Australian periodical The Bulletin would pose the question “Land Rights: How Much is Too Much?”

People of the Trees obviously exists in a British context and not an Australian one, but it’s hard not to read it as reflecting these contemporary discussions in some fashion. Sadly, when viewed in that light, I think this story falls quite short.

As much as I wish we had got a bold and challenging story, something that might have affirmed the rights of First Nations peoples to exercise ownership of their traditional lands, we didn’t get that. The story pretty much takes for granted that the best possible outcome that the People can hope for is that the Doctor retains ownership of the land so that he can protect them.

There is… a lot to unpack in that, and as a white critic there are obviously limits to how qualified I can ever be to fully parse the implications of that assumption. What I will say, though, is that in the absolute most charitable reading possible, People of the Trees still brushes uncomfortably close to the imperialist rhetoric of the White Man’s Burden.

This is the kind of rhetoric that has been used for centuries to justify various policies that adopt a paternalistic approach to First Nations peoples in countries like the United States, Canada and Australia. In particular, the Doctor’s decision to carve out an area of the land for the People’s “protection” is scarily similar to the policy enacted in the United States by the government of President Andrew Jackson under the Indian Removal Act.

There are perhaps ways of making this revelation work. After all, it makes some measure of sense that the First Doctor might choose to do something like this. His presentation as a refined, scholarly English gentleman wandering the universe and righting wrongs has always carried certain colonialist undercurrents, so writing a story that called out some of those tendencies would make complete sense. Unfortunately, this isn’t what People of the Trees does, and it instead ultimately accepts the Doctor’s actions as being completely, unquestionably justified.

To be fair, there are times where the story seems to flirt with the prospect of making some more stinging criticisms. Most notably, the scene where the Doctor tries in vain to warn the Justiciar of Aulian Thorolis’ villainous intentions feels like it comes closest to recognising the ways in which the legal and judicial systems will often tend to be weighted in favour of the majority’s interests. The story still ends with the Doctor’s ownership of the land seemingly secure, though, which undermines any heft that the scene’s criticisms might have had.

I dunno. It just doesn’t quite sit right with me, even as I recognise that there are elements here that I do like. The Doctor and Leela’s relationship here seems perhaps a little more equal than it was in Crimson Dawn, though that might just be the effect of juxtaposing it with all the stuff with the People.

As I said at the beginning of this review, Baddeley also has a better understanding of how to structure and pace a short story than some other authors thus far. It’s a bit of a shame that this is her only story for the franchise, as the White Man’s Burden/white saviour aspects do overshadow the parts that show some promise.

Even more unfortunate is that this should prove to be the last time Virgin published a proper outing for the Fourth Doctor and Leela. It’s a shame that both stories have been tarnished by clumsy attempts to tackle issues of cultural imperialism and colonialism against First Nations peoples. Perhaps it’s not too surprising, though, given that Leela is a character whose base concept is more than a little iffy.

It’s strange, because I came into Lost Property hoping to be able to talk about these stories as some kind of forgotten, overlooked gems. That’s what I wanted, given their unique status within Virgin’s oeuvre. However, if Crimson Dawn and People of the Trees can at all be considered a valid barometer of the quality we could expect from further stories with the Doctor and Leela, then perhaps it’s for the best that this particular dynamic duo were never again put in the spotlight as they were here.

9. Timeshare by Vanessa Bishop (featuring the Sixth Doctor and Peri)

I wasn’t a huge fan of Vanessa Bishop’s contribution to the first Decalog, The Straw that Broke the Camel’s Back. Its drama felt a little forced, there were some clunky writing decisions that made it a little too confusing to follow at times, and the whole thing also felt strangely truncated. Nonetheless, I went into Timeshare hoping that I would enjoy it more.

Thankfully, my hopes were vindicated.

Timeshare is a great deal of fun, and probably one of the strongest stories in Lost Property. I honestly think Bishop had a lot of potential, which is why it’s a bit of a shame that she apparently only ever wrote one other short story for Big Finish’s Short Trips: A Christmas Treasury anthology in 2004.

Still, there’s a lot to like here, starting with the way Timeshare handles its high-concept science-fiction premise. The property in this story is a sort of time-travelling timeshare, operated by an unnamed disreputable party who essentially allowed customers across time to “buy” the ability to stay there for one week. This is a neat idea, and the story explains it pretty clearly without ever becoming bogged down in the exposition. It’s a simple thing, but considering how many of these stories have had trouble with that so far, it’s appreciated.

There’s also a pretty neat twist to the general formulae that a lot of the stories in this collection have followed. The stories generally either start with the Doctor having suddenly remembered a house or piece of real estate that he happens to own (as in stories like Lonely Days or People of the Trees), or the house and its significance is revealed during the progression of a larger narrative. Timeshare initially looks like it’s going to go with the former, but it blends in a little bit of the latter by having the Doctor be unaware of his ownership of this particular house.

This all plays into the other big point in the story’s favour: the mystery elements. Bishop boldly sets up a number of plates that she has to keep spinning throughout Timeshare, and generally speaking, it’s a move that pays off.

I’ve spoken before about how it can be difficult to construct these kinds of weird, mind-bending sci-fi mysteries, because the universe is inherently not bound by such paltry trifles as the laws of physics or other things us mere denizens of reality have to contend with. It’s already difficult to make all the spinning plates of a regular mystery land in a satisfying way, even before you throw in uncertainty as to the laws of gravity.

In theory, I suppose one might expect me to chew out Timeshare for having its resolution come in the form of a convenient dose of exposition from a random, unnamed Time Lord. Honestly, though, I don’t mind it. Bishop demonstrates a knack for making the infodump feel like an actual conversation, so there’s a tad more elegance than you see in stuff like Prisoners of the Sun or The Nine-Day Queen.

It also helps that the aforementioned Time Lord is, himself, a lot of fun. I like the idea of a Time Lord who isn’t a stuffy old bureaucrat, a refined scholar or a stern military commander, but is just an ordinary, put-upon technician. He’s basically the Miles O’Brien of Gallifrey, which is the kind of character we never really got to see in the original show. The closest example that springs to mind is Neil Daglish as Damon in Arc of Infinity, but… yeah, what a memorable character he was.

Timeshare is also notable for being the first “proper” Sixth Doctor story from the Decalogs, after he took a turn as a guest star in The Golden Door in the first Decalog. Colin Baker’s performance definitely shines through the pages, and while his interactions with Peri are still a little combative at times, Bishop never overdoes it and knows when to rein things in before their conversations just become irredeemably unpleasant. Once again, it’s really interesting to see the progression of Wilderness Years authors steadily getting a better handle on how to approach this “black sheep” incarnation.

Finally, I rather liked the way the plot basically all just stemmed from a series of tiny, comical misunderstandings and errors which added up as the story went along. It really helped impart a sense of mounting tension to proceedings.

Timeshare is a return to good form for Lost Property after the slump represented by People of the Trees. It has just about everything going for it, and like I said earlier, it’s a shame this would ultimately be Bishop’s last Doctor Who short story for nearly a decade. In an ideal world, it would have been nice to see her get the chance to contribute a full-length novel. What we’re left with is still quite entertaining, so it’s hard to complain too much.

10. Question Mark Pyjamas by Robert Perry and Mike Tucker (featuring the Seventh Doctor, Ace and Benny)

And Lost Property rounds itself out with another debut. Or, rather, almost debut. Robert Perry and Mike Tucker had both already contributed a short story, Girls’ Night In, to Doctor Who Magazine‘s recurring series of Brief Encounter vignettes. Nonetheless, this is still early days for the duo who would become best known for their Seventh Doctor stories for BBC Books’ Past Doctor Adventures range.

Question Mark Pyjamas is, needless to say, a bit of an outlier in their career. It’s strange to see Tucker and Perry contribute a story to Virgin – let alone a story so rooted in the particulars of the New Adventures – when most of their subsequent BBC work would seem to try and present an “alternate” continuation of the Seventh Doctor’s televised tenure.

Not only does this story feature both Benny and the NAs’ so-called “New Ace,” but the “lost property” in question is the house on Allen Road that has been a recurring fixture of the books since Warhead. It’s funny, but I had honestly gotten so wrapped up in reviewing the previous nine stories that “Why don’t they feature the house in Kent?” never crossed my mind. Now that it’s appeared, it seems like the most obvious choice in existence.

Anyway, this is a nice piece of fluff to end the collection on. It’s very silly, and that may irk some people, but I found it enjoyable enough. The New Adventures have such a (perhaps somewhat overstated) reputation for being dark and edgy, so it’s nice that between Question Mark Pyjamas and The Trials of Tara, both of Lost Property‘s Seventh Doctor stories have been pretty light-hearted.

I don’t doubt that a lot of my enjoyment of this story’s comedy probably stems from my general affection for the regular cast line-up of the Doctor, Ace and Benny. If this were another set of characters I probably wouldn’t find it quite as enjoyable, but I read much of Question Mark Pyjamas with a smile on my face.

It helps that the general comedy of “villains trying to fit a TARDIS team this dysfunctional into the mould of a stereotypical domestic family” is also backed up by some wonderfully ludicrous imagery. The house on Allen Road being incongruously transported to a barren asteroid is already surreal enough, but stuff like the Doctor using a lawnmower to cut the non-existent grass or Ace bursting out of a garage on a Harley-Davidson is just the cherry on top of a bizarre sundae.

Mr Garpol and Mr Blint, the villains of the piece (and the only major guest characters to speak of), are rather broadly drawn. However, that feels only appropriate for a story like this and they’re still great fun as your typical Holmesian double act.

If I had any major criticisms, it would be that Benny doesn’t get quite as much to do as Ace or the Doctor. It’s possible to cynically view this as Tucker and Perry’s potential preferences for those two characters bleeding through, but I think that interpretation is a little too uncharitable.

After all, Benny does still get some great lines and is well-characterised, so I find it hard to complain too much. The two authors seem to have a good grip on where she fits into the dynamics of the trio, and that’s honestly not really something I can say for every New Adventures author.

Question Mark Pyjamas may not be the deepest story in Lost Property, but it still manages to be a goofy yet strangely heartwarming conclusion that provides a nice reminder of just why I love the New Adventures to begin with. In a way, this feels like the perfect story with which to conclude the first five years of Dale’s Ramblings.

Who could ask for much more than that?

Final Thoughts

So… how does this stack up against the original Decalog? Probably ever so slightly better, by my estimation. The average quality of the stories was about the same, with some really strong efforts standing shoulder-to-shoulder with much weaker ones.

What gives Lost Property the edge over the original, I would say, is the abandonment of the “one single story” concept. Things just flow a lot smoother when you can jump right into the next story and figure out how it ties into the collection’s overarching theme, rather than having to read a couple of pages of an extremely tangential framing sequence. This is the approach that most of the Decalogs (and the spiritual successor series, Short Trips) would go on to take, and it’s not hard to see why.

So, that concludes all the Decalog reviews that I will be doing at this point in time. I’ll obviously review the remaining three when I get to them, but I see no need to skip ahead. The next blog post you see on here will probably be the five-year anniversary post in October, where I’ll do another Virgin Adventure Revisitation on Paul Cornell’s No Future. A few weeks after that I’ll conclude Moffat Era Rewatch coverage over on Twitter, and hopefully get back into the swing of proper Virgin Adventure Reviews in 2023.

Thank you all for sticking with this blog, even though it’s been pretty inactive for the past year or so. Think of 2022 as something of a “gap year” for the VARs, if you like. I’m just very busy with starting university and such, but it means a lot that people still read my stuff.

Kind regards,

Special Agent Dale Cooper