Virgin New Adventures Reviews: The Dying Days by Lance Parkin (or, “The Final Cut”)

Nothing lasts forever. Even the longest, the most glittering reign must come to an end someday.

Edward Greyhaven Francis Urquhart, House of Cards (1990)

The date is May 3, 1979, and Art Garfunkel currently reigns supreme on the UK singles charts, holding the No. 1 spot for the fourth straight week with “Bright Eyes,” written by Mike Batt for the rather polarising yet broadly critically-acclaimed animated adaptation of Richard Adams’ Watership Down. It will go on to be the best-selling single of the year.

Meanwhile in the land of cinema, the big release of the week is Last Embrace starring Roy Scheider and Janet Margolin, a neo-noir movie which I have neither seen nor heard of. Judging by its only pulling in about $1.5 million at the box office, and only having about 6,000 ratings on IMDb, it seems I’m not the only one, but it’s still notable as an early directorial effort from one Jonathan Demme, who would go on to bigger and better things with films like Stop Making SenseThe Silence of the Lambs and Philadelphia.

Doctor Who is currently off the air, having concluded its sixteenth season in late February with the broadcast of the final part of Bob Baker and Dave Martin’s The Armageddon Factor. Mary Tamm and John Leeson have both deigned to bid farewell to the programme, to be replaced by Lalla Ward and David Brierly respectively.

Behind the scenes, Ward, Tom Baker, and guest actor Tom Chadbon have just wrapped up a four-day location shoot in Paris for City of Death, drawing the series’ first ever overseas sojourn to a close. On the same day, script editor Douglas Adams ended up making an unexpected appearance in the French capital, having arrived to discuss the forthcoming production of Destiny of the Daleks with producer Graham Williams. Adams being Adams, this apparently ended up morphing into an epic continental pub crawl that saw the two men wind up in West Germany, before finally returning home to the UK on the 4th.

I mention all of this mostly to make one crucial point: If you ever wind up with a hangover in the course of your life, no matter how nightmarishly painful it may be, you can at least be relatively secure in the knowledge that you will probably not return home to find that the country is now being run by Margaret Thatcher. Indeed, it may well be that there is no more sobering realisation under the sun.

And so we’re presented with one of those surreally serendipitous occasions in which a small, insignificant moment like an impromptu pub crawl organised by two members of the Doctor Who production staff actually ends up coinciding perfectly with one of the defining shifts in British culture, a juxtaposition so utterly beautiful that even the most fanciful of poets could never hope to dream up its like if you gave them a million years.

With the benefit of hindsight though, we probably shouldn’t be at all surprised that Thatcher ended up carrying the Conservatives to victory in 1979. Whatever else she may have been – and make no mistake, Margaret Thatcher was many, many things, all of them quite terrible in nature – she always possessed a keen understanding of the ways in which she could use the media to her own personal advantage.

There are all manner of examples we could bring up here, from her ability to mobilise the virulent racism and homophobia of groups like the National Front or Mary Whitehouse’s National Viewers’ and Listeners’ Association (which we actually already discussed back in Dave Stone’s Burning Heart), to her truly groundbreaking conclusion that Enoch Powell’s grotesquely xenophobic “Rivers of Blood” speech had a good, worthwhile message at its core that was ultimately just the victim of poor phrasing on the Shadow Minister’s part.

All of these would be worthwhile topics, but it’s perhaps most illuminating to stick to the familiar territory surrounding the 1979 general election. When it emerged that the centrepiece of the Conservatives’ “Labour Isn’t Working” campaign was the product of photographic manipulation, deliberately playing up the desired image of a dole queue in spite of a measly twenty volunteers turning up for the photoshoot on the day, Chancellor Denis Healey railed against the advertisement in the House of Commons, accusing Saatchi and Saatchi and their newfound Whitehall clients of “selling politics like soap-powder.” For all that the accusation may have stuck, however, it seemed that the electorate were more than willing to buy the Tories’ product of choice.

Against the disturbingly well-oiled media machine of Margaret Thatcher, then, James Callaghan was always going to come up short. Truthful or not, the notion of Callaghan as a weak, ineffectual and out-of-touch Prime Minister who failed to adequately respond to the pressures of the so-called Winter of Discontent would prove to be the enduring image of his premiership in the popular consciousness, spurred on by a gleeful national press with brazen misquotes like the infamous “Crisis? What crisis?” headline with which The Sun ran in their coverage of the PM’s first press conference after returning from a diplomatic function in the Caribbean.

In light of this resounding defeat, then, Labour would enter a prolonged and painful hangover to rival the best efforts of Adams and Williams. Callaghan would stay on as party leader for the next seventeen months, before being succeeded by his former Deputy, Michael Foot.

Facing a schism from a number of prominent moderate Labour MPs, who went on to form the Social Democratic Party, Foot’s more vehemently left-wing policies ultimately ended up alienating substantial tracts of the party’s voting base, and the 1983 general election would see Labour lose sixty seats and more than three million votes, recording their worst electoral performance since the turbulent days of Ramsay MacDonald and his National Government in the early 1930s.

After Foot stepped down – pun very much intended – the mantle of Labour leadership was taken up by Neil Kinnock, who began to more firmly steer the party away from the more militant left-wing politics that were already coming to be viewed as having been poisonous to his immediate predecessor’s bid for the Prime Ministership, going so far as to vociferously oppose the tactics of National Union of Mineworkers leader Arthur Scargill in the 1984-85 miners’ strike.

Despite these efforts to make a clean break with the unfavourable image that Labour had built up in the minds of many, Kinnock remained unable to oust the Conservatives from the top of the electoral pile, even as an increasingly divisive Thatcher saw herself voted out by her party colleagues in favour of Chancellor John Major, whose premiership was almost immediately dogged by the looming spectre of recession and widespread predictions that the 1992 general election would result in a narrow Labour majority or, at the very least, a hung parliament.

Following Labour’s fourth consecutive defeat, the party saw yet another contentious leadership change, as Shadow Chancellor John Smith was elected as Kinnock’s successor. Although the party’s approval ratings benefitted significantly from public disillusionment with the Conservatives’ leadership in the wake of a string of high-profile scandals, Smith’s more circumspect and cautious approach to reforming the party when compared with Kinnock ended up causing internal friction between himself and members of his Shadow Cabinet, with the most vocal critics being a rapidly-rising pair of Shadow Ministers by the name of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

And then, in May 1994, at the age of 55, Smith suffered a fatal heart attack in his London apartment, having given a speech at the Park Lane Hotel just the previous night. The subsequent leadership election some two months later saw Blair triumph over both John Prescott and interim Labour leader Margaret Beckett. For those of you keeping track on the Virgin Books timeline, this means that we’ve now caught up to around the release of Blood Harvest and Goth Opera. In fact, the novels were actually published on the exact same day as the fateful leadership election, because history apparently feels serendipity to be too neat a concept to not get trotted out a second time.

At the annual Labour Party Conference that October, Blair graced the world with the first inklings of his bold new vision for Labour in a piece of oratorical sloganeering that would effectively go on to shape the party’s policy for more than a decade: “New Labour, new Britain.” According to Welsh historian Kenneth O. Morgan, Blair’s speech used the word “new” a total of thirty-seven times, while the party’s accompanying draft manifesto for the forthcoming general election managed an even more impressive count of 107.

Which brings us, finally, to the present day, or the nearest thing for our current purposes. The date is April 18, 1997, a little under two weeks out from the general election, and the number one single is R. Kelly’s “I Believe I Can Fly,” given a boost by virtue of its appearance in the smash feature-length Nike commercial, Space Jam, which as far as the “Films Featuring Animated Rabbits” spectrum goes, is pretty much the exact polar opposite of Watership Down. This, incidentally, almost certainly makes for a most grimly entertaining double feature to bookend the pop cultural experience of the Tory years, if you’re interested in such things.

(If you’re understandably troubled by Kelly’s chart position here given subsequent revelations about his status as a truly monstrous individual in years to come, it might also bear noting that the week of the election will see his three-week shot at UK chart dominance ended by none other than Michael Jackson, making this something of an uncomfortable time to look back on, to say the least.)

Cinema-wise, three films see a wide theatrical release in the United States, and all land with a loud and unmistakable splat at the box office. It’s hard to see why, really, as a cinematic adaptation of McHale’s Navy from the man who brought you Mighty Morphin’ Power Rangers: The Movie does sound like ever so enticing an offer, to say nothing of mid-tier Joe Pesci vehicle and unabashed Pulp Fiction imitator 8 Heads in a Duffel Bag.

This same week also saw the release of Lynne Stopkewich’s Kissed, a movie which tackles such whimsical topics as female sexual repression and necrophilia, and whose failure to ignite much buzz among audiences is consequently rather more explicable. Nevertheless, it does apparently feature the use of the Aquanettas’ “Beach Party,” which I only really mention because I actually quite like the Aquanettas, and consider them one of the more underrated gems to be found amidst the post-punk and alternative rock scene of the early 1990s. Consider that a last-minute Dale’s Ramblings recommendation, just for the hell of it.

In the United Kingdom, of course, we find ourselves faced with yet another general election whose outcome seems all but assured. The slim majority enjoyed by Major and the Conservatives at the 1992 election has since been whittled away thanks to a series of resignations and unfavourable by-elections, in an ironic echo of the fate which befell Callaghan some eighteen years earlier.

Being about a decade or so younger than Major, and fifteen years younger than Smith, the forty-three year-old Blair seemed increasingly like the vanguard of an approaching tide of reform that would sweep through the established political order and leave a better, shinier world in its place, with Labour consistently placing ahead in opinion polls in the lead-up to the election. When it comes down to the crunch in about two weeks’ time, the party will ultimately win more than 400 seats in a landslide victory, leaving the Conservatives to mull over their weakest electoral showing in nearly a century.

In other words, what we are on the verge of witnessing here is almost certainly the peak of the so-called “Third Way” school of liberalism, that period of time when both Blair and Clinton were in the ascendant, and the styles of leadership and political reform that they were initially taken to exemplify were setting the tone of political discourse on a wide scale.

(Australia, in a move that won’t exactly help put paid to the tiresome memes about the denizens of the Southern Hemisphere existing upside down, seemingly got things the wrong way around, having spent the 1980s and early 1990s preemptively speed-running through the rise and fall of its own Prime Minister/Treasurer power couple who espoused a Third Way-esque version of Labor Party policies, before handing off to a leader from the opposite party who would stay in power until 2007. Parallels, people, parallels.)

In retrospect, we can see this peak as the fleeting cultural blip that it ultimately turned out to be, and Labour and the British left are largely still falling over themselves in an infighting-riddled effort to decide just how much of a failed experiment “New Labour” was. That it did in fact fail when confronted with problems like the Iraq War, if not well before that, is pretty much inarguable, given just how low Blair’s approval ratings sank in the aftermath of his decision to back the Bush administration’s invasion of Iraq, leading to the ignominious resignation which would punctuate the end of his residence in Downing Street.

And at the end of the day, Blair’s fall from electoral grace is a pretty effective microcosm of what the 1990s are really building to, as we repeatedly like to stress on Dale’s Ramblings, since we have principally been concerned with the 1990s as our topic of choice so far. The post-Cold War unipolar moment and the purported end of history in which writers like Charles Krauthammer or Francis Fukuyama so glowingly exulted crashed head-first into the grim realities of 9/11 and the War on Terror. There’s no escaping the shadow that that realisation casts, even when discussing moments that might initially appear to be triumphant in nature.

Furthermore, this feeds into the reason I chose to open a review of Lance Parkin’s The Dying Days with about two thousand words attempting to give a whirlwind tour of two decades of British politics. Well, OK, there are a few reasons, but they all kind of boil down to the same thing. First, it is a truth universally acknowledged that any discussion of UK politics from Dale’s Ramblings must inevitably circle around to the subject of Gordon Brown at some point or another.

More importantly, though, this sense of an uncertain transition into an unknowable future hangs over every word of The Dying Days like a funeral shroud – as you might feasibly have expected on the basis of the title alone – tapping into the anxieties of the New Adventures and the United Kingdom as a nation in equal measure. There’s something poetic in the fact that the last NA to feature the Doctor should also be the last novel of the Wilderness Years to be published under a Conservative government, So Vile a Sin notwithstanding.

Indeed, Blair will end up clinging on to power for so long that by the time we reach the end of Dale’s Ramblings as a project – or, at least, as a project chiefly concerned with the business of covering Doctor Who books – with the review of Atom Bomb Blues in December 2005, we will still be dealing with the very same Prime Minister whose arrival seems so imminent at this present moment in April 1997.

This is our first big clue into what exactly The Dying Days is trying to do, title aside, and Parkin is at least candid enough to signpost his intentions from pretty early in the piece, with Benny’s internal admission that she can’t recall the identities of the leaders of either the United Kingdom or the United States, owing to the two countries having both held elections in the nine months before the novel’s opening setting of May 6, 1997.

Taken on its own, this is a seemingly insignificant point, with Parkin himself characterising it as a simple means of covering his bases in the event that it turned out he had made the wrong call in the gap between the novel’s being written and its eventual publication. This, on a basic level, makes perfect sense for what we know of Parkin’s artistic and creative temperament, given what we discussed back in Cold Fusion with regards to his status as one of the novelists most concerned with the explicit historicisation of Doctor Who as a narrative that maps relatively neatly onto real-world cultural and social concerns, even as he often self-deprecatingly admits that such an approach will always have a tendency to run itself up a blind alley of incoherence.

Considering this fact, it’s perhaps telling that, when given the chance to update the novel for the 2003 BBCi re-release, Parkin’s only substantial addition served to tie the story all the more firmly to its era of choice. To quote Bernice Summerfield: The Inside Story:

“Oh, I had the option to change it,” [Parkin] says. “Marc Platt revised Lungbarrow a fair amount. I twiddled a couple of details, corrected a couple of things, but nothing major. The version I had on disc wasn’t the copy-edited version. I copy-edited it myself, so there will be quite a lot of little differences. The major thing I did was add the Spice Girls to the party scene; they didn’t exist when I wrote the book, but it’s difficult to imagine 1997 without them.”

But there is something strange lurking underneath this observation, is there not? The Blairslide was, after all, far from being wholly unpredictable, to the point where even Zamper, published all the way back in August 1995, felt confident enough to drop a passing reference to “Number Ten, Tony’s den.” Ironically enough, I only recalled that particular factoid thanks to having obsessively pored over Parkin’s own AHistory over the years.

Clinton’s victory, admittedly, could have been said to be a marginally less sure bet than Blair’s, with the Democrats having managed the rare feat of losing both the House of Representatives and the Senate in the 1994 midterm elections. Still, the fact that the Republicans ended up selecting the 73-year-old Bob Dole as their presidential hopeful made it hilariously easy for the Democrats to capitalise upon Clinton’s public image as a young, forward-thinking political innovator, riding a booming economy to another resounding victory, with Ross Perot’s third-party candidacy politely managing to prove significantly less of an irritant than it had in 1992.

(In one of those amusing consequences that necessarily comes about when you legally require your presidential candidates to be at least thirty-five years old, Clinton would probably not have been considered particularly youthful by the standards of contemporaneous British politics, being only three years younger than Major, and about five years younger than Liberal Democrat leader Paddy Ashdown.)

All of which is really just a roundabout way of saying that the logic of “attempting to avoid glaring errors in predicting the outcome of two reasonably assured elections” doesn’t really stand up all that well to much scrutiny.

Even if Parkin had somehow ended up being totally wrong in his predictions, it probably couldn’t have been that much more embarrassing than comparable blunders like The Green Death half-seriously positing the possibility of Liberal Party leader Jeremy Thorpe being elevated to the Prime Ministership, or Battlefield predicting that a story apparently set in the late 1990s -around about 1997 by most sources’ reckoning, funnily enough – would see both the continued existence of a unified Czechoslovakia and the presence of a King upon the Sovereign’s Throne.

More to the point, chances were good that it would instead end up more akin to something like Terror of the Zygons fleetingly referencing a female Prime Minister in an obvious tip of the hat to Thatcher, who had only recently succeeded Edward Heath as Conservative Party leader at the time of the story’s original production in early 1975.

No, what’s really going on here is that The Dying Days is thoroughly committing to its positioning at a strange and ambiguous turning point in the intertwining histories of Doctor Who and the United Kingdom. If we read The Dying Days as a document telling of an Ice Warrior invasion in early May 1997 – as A History of the Universe and AHistory would prefer – this ambiguity is puzzling, but it actually fits perfectly if we read it as the sixty-first and final New Adventure to feature the Doctor, published in April of that same year. Because, well, that’s what it is, and that’s exactly how it would have been presented to audiences upon its initial publication.

Central to any turning point worth its salt, however, is a closing down of a particular vision of the future, the erasure of a given possibility and its supersession by something new, and within the text of The Dying Days there is no better example with which to start than that of Edward Greyhaven.

The most noteworthy thing about Greyhaven is that he’s very obviously played by legendary Shakespearean actor Ian Richardson. It is of course true that every Parkin book thus far has included a character modelled on Richardson, to the point where I’ve even enshrined the habit in the form of a semi-recurring and semi-serious recurring feature entitled the “Richardson Report.” Even before you factor in the illustrations from Allan Bednar, the source of inspiration should be clear enough from the moment Greyhaven is introduced as having an “aquiline face,” a descriptor that has already been enshrined, just three novels in, as one of Parkin’s go-to signifiers when introducing a Richardson-based character to the audience.

In the case of The Dying Days though, this resemblance is taken one step further than it was when we talked about Oskar Steinmann in Just War or Admiral Dattani in Cold Fusion. Greyhaven is not just based on Richardson, but on one of the actor’s most famous roles, that of scheming Chief Whip and eventual Prime Minister Francis Urquhart in Andrew Davies’ critically-acclaimed televised adaptations of the House of Cards novels for the BBC.

Urquhart, by definition, is inextricably linked to the identity crisis that arose in the late Thatcher years among the Conservative Party faithful, with the original House of Cards having been written by prominent Tory staffer Michael Dobbs, who was unflatteringly but memorably dubbed “Westminster’s baby-faced hit man” by a 1987 article in The Guardian, and rather more flatteringly dubbed a Life Peer in 2010.

As if to reinforce these connections even further, Thatcher would formally resign from the party leadership just three days after the airing of House of Cards‘ second episode, turning the opening lines of the serial – duly reproduced at the beginning of this review, naturally – into a grim and prescient portent of a Prime Minister’s demise. By the time of The Final Cut‘s airing in November 1995, this portent had become quite literal, opening with a hypothetical depiction of the funeral of the still very much alive Thatcher that so incensed Dobbs that he requested Davies remove his name from the opening credits post-haste.

Greyhaven, appropriately enough for The Dying Days‘ broader points, is a considerably more ambiguous figure when taken in isolation. His political affiliations are never explicitly pinned down, such that you could theoretically choose to read him as either a Conservative or as a Labour MP. Even having the Doctor recognise him as the minister for science from the UNIT days is no big help, given the legendary asterisk which hovers over any attempts to pin down a precise date for any of the stories featuring UNIT.

Even this seems like overstating the case though. As far as Virgin is concerned, the evidence overwhelmingly supports a dating for the UNIT era that places it as being roughly contemporaneous with the time of broadcast for the original Pertwee stories, most prominently in the form of works like Who Killed Kennedy.

Indeed, Parkin even explicitly draws attention to the link between The Dying Days and Who Killed Kennedy, cheekily asserting that the in-universe version of the book caused the government no small measure of embarrassment, suggesting that both James Stevens and David Bishop were subsequently put under surveillance by MI5, and that the publishers of the book were pressured into swearing that they’d never print anything of its like again. So that’d be Virgin, then, and one might almost imagine that “anything of its like” might include any books that purport to tell of the escapades of some mysterious Doctor. Really makes you think, huh?

(As an addendum, to firmly plant my own flag in a particular corner of the UNIT dating debate -which is probably, to be perfectly honest, fundamentally incapable of ever being resolved given the sheer weight of identically weighted and mutually incompatible evidence with which the audience is presented – I do think that the evidence of the Pertwee Era itself supports a contemporary dating, more often than not. It admittedly means accepting a definition of “contemporary” that features accurate historical details like pre-decimal currency in March 1970 existing almost side-by-side with profoundly ahistorical concepts like a fully-fledged British space programme, but this is no more nonsensical than seriously trying to argue, as many fans have over the years, that Sarah Jane Smith is somehow confused as to what year she hails from. Madness comes with the territory in this case.)

Accepting a roughly contemporary dating as a given, then, the inescapable conclusion seems to be that Greyhaven was part of whichever political party was in office in the period spanning roughly from the broadcast of Spearhead from Space in January 1970 to Planet of the Spiders in June 1974. As it happens, this coincides almost exactly with the Conservative government of Edward Heath, which had entered office a day before the final episode of Inferno, and was ousted by Harold Wilson’s reinvigorated Labour government in the gap between Death to the Daleks‘ second and third episodes.

What’s more, a careful inspection of the particulars of the Heath ministry will show that the post of “Minister for Science” – or, more formally, the Secretary of State for Education and Science, the two portfolios having been combined between 1964 and 1992 for reasons that I’m sure made perfectly good sense at the time – was consistently held by none other than Margaret Thatcher herself.

Given Greyhaven’s demonstrable status as an avatar of a bygone era of the Conservative Party, however coy The Dying Days chooses to play it, there’s a sense in which the character’s power-mad attempt to install Xznaal on the British throne – to have him play the King, if you will – serves as nothing so much as a final repudiation of the possible future that Urquhart represented, in which it was at all feasible to imagine that the Conservatives’ Chief Whip could ever hope to eclipse Thatcher’s record as the longest-serving post-war Prime Minister of the twentieth century.

The other important point that Greyhaven serves to establish is the notion that much of The Dying Days is operating off of a deeply symbolic logic, relying on the audience’s awareness of the wider cultural landscape of April 1997 to project a code of meaning onto the novel beyond that which might be present on a purely textual level.

This bleeds through into the treatment of the Brigadier, who is an obvious choice to fill the role of the more well-established and dignified representative of the Pertwee Era, in a way that a guest character like Greyhaven simply can’t ever hope to compete with. Lest this be misconstrued as an accusation that Parkin’s character work is shallow and solely trades on fan nostalgia, I should stress that that’s far from being the case.

I mean, yes, the novel is obviously not short on nostalgic reverence for the character, but that’s very much been enshrined as standard operating procedure for the Brigadier since at least No Future, and if we’re being truly pedantic sticklers we could probably make a case for that strain of thought stretching as far back as Mawdryn Undead and The Five Doctors. In other words, Brigadier Alistair Gordon Lethbridge-Stewart is probably the regular character who feels like the most natural fit for this kind of symbol-based storytelling.

Whatever the underlying discomfort that writers like Paul Cornell might feel about the Pertwee Era exiling the Doctor to Earth and making him a Tory – and the Doctor’s casual recognition of Greyhaven here certainly does nothing to dispel those accusations – it cannot be denied that the Brigadier and Nicholas Courtney are very much an institution in their own right at this stage. Even Cornell himself seems willing to join in the fun, at least if Happy Endings is anything to go by, and it’s no big surprise that The Wedding of River Song would ultimately choose to implicitly pay tribute to Courtney after his passing. The Brigadier possesses an almost larger-than-life status that just about allows you to get by on sticking him into any story of your choosing and trusting that that alone will nudge it into attaining the coveted status of an “event story.”

As, it must be said, kind of happens here. The character is excellent, and as likeable as ever, but it’s not as if there’s much in the way of deep profundity to be mined from his presence, beyond reiterating the whole “UNIT: The Next Generation” feel that we already got from Battlefield, complete with the return of Bambera. Yet The Dying Days, as the last New Adventure, existing in the aftermath of the introspective and moody character work of novels like The Room With No Doors and Lungbarrow, doesn’t really need to do “profound” in order to work; it can instead let loose a little bit and just have fun, placing its money on “solid and dependable,” much like the character of the Brigadier himself.

“Solid and dependable” also serves to characterise the plot of the novel itself. With its focus on a Mars probe gone awry, the involvement of UNIT and some sketchy Prime Ministerial shenanigans, it wouldn’t perhaps be entirely unreasonable to make a few snide comments here about the possibility of Russell T. Davies filing away a few notes for later use in The Christmas Invasion.

More seriously, though, if there’s any similarity it really only stems from the fact that, for the pure iconic spectacle of the thing, you can’t really beat “a massive alien spaceship shows up and hovers over some identifiable landmarks.” It’s probably at least 95% of the reason Roland Emmerich’s Independence Day made more than $800 million at the box office, after all, and Parkin himself quite readily admits to The Dying Days owing something of an artistic debt to that cornerstone of 1990s disaster cinema.

In turn, The Christmas Invasion might be thought to include a veiled shout-out to Parkin’s novel in the form of Major Blake’s assertion that the Sycorax bear no resemblance to actual Martians, which actually goes some way towards bolstering my assertion that the two writers are operating from more-or-less identical principles of spectacle and iconography.

Both The Dying Days and Blake’s throwaway line rely, on some level, upon a certain proportion of the audience being the kind of Doctor Who fans who will nigh-instantaneously make the intuitive leap linking UNIT and the Ice Warriors as two groups that never got a proper on-screen confrontation, whatever the newly-regenerated Fifth Doctor might attest in Castrovalva. Indeed, The Dying Days apparently built off an abandoned proposal for a Third Doctor novel that Parkin had been toying with called Cold War, which would have featured everyone’s favourite Martians, and would have beat Mark Gatiss to the punch by about fifteen years or so, just for good measure.

Mind you, the extent to which both works lean on this kind of fannish gap-filling is vastly different. It’s effectively baked into the very premise of The Dying Days, whereas The Christmas Invasion confines it to a single throwaway line that works just as well if you only read it as a typically witty Davies aside. Nevertheless, it’s almost reassuring that the final New Adventure should contain such strong hints towards the future of the franchise, offering one last example of just how crucial these books were in shepherding Doctor Who through the 1990s.

Even the plans of Greyhaven and Xznaal for national domination pay great attention to the external, ritualistic symbolism of the relevant iconography. Staines might dismiss any notion that the intense media coverage of the Mars 97 event is simply an attempt to recapture a sense of patriotic, jingoistic British exceptionalism at the close of the twentieth century, but the fact that he’s implicated as a co-conspirator in the ill-fated Martian coup d’état naturally disinclines us to believe his assertions.

One of the very best scenes of the novel, and undoubtedly one of the most memorable, concerns Xznaal’s coronation as King of England, which Parkin seems justifiably proud of in his 2003 commentary, to the point of lightheartedly boasting that he got to the whole “crowning an otherworldly being as the King of England” thing before Grant Morrison managed to with The Invisibles.

It’s the ultimate manifestation of the ludicrous lengths to which an obsession with symbolism and ritual has driven the conspirators, trying desperately to stick to the pre-ordained programme even as it quickly descends into a farce, with Xznaal misinterpreting the use of the Anointing Spoon as an attack on his person and being unable to fit into the vestments that the ceremony requires. It’s a putrefaction of the iconography of imperialist monarchy just as deep as that afflicting the winter berry from Xznaal’s childhood remembrances, and one which similarly allows the maintenance of a deceptively lustrous and glamorous external appearance.

Even Alexander Christian, the disgraced ex-astronaut who was once considered enough of a paragon of idealised military virtue that he was chosen to fill the vacancy in the Scots Guards left by Lethbridge-Stewart’s secondment to UNIT, suffers a fate which possesses a certain symbolic horror to it.

Imprisoned on The Sea Devils‘ Fortress Island after being framed for the murder of his crewmates, he seemingly hasn’t been so much as photographed in decades, and the novel repeatedly stresses that the government have buried his case so deep that few of the younger members of the armed forces have even heard of him. In a world with no shortage of sensationalist evil – and Parkin explicitly names the Yorkshire Ripper, Myra Hindley and Rosemary West in his tableau of tabloid excess – what use would The Sun possibly have for a man like Alexander Christian?

But the final big piece of symbolic logic at work within The Dying Days is, aptly enough, the Doctor himself. Here, for the first and only time, we find ourselves presented with a New Adventure headlined by the Eighth Doctor. As a result, there’s an inherent temptation to treat this as the dawning of a brave new world, and a passing of the torch that kicks off the second form of the Wilderness Years, no longer shackled by that strange, small fellow with the umbrella and the questionable taste in pullovers.

Yet, as just about everyone under the sun has observed, it’s very difficult to treat the Eighth Doctor as an established character in his own right at this point, for the simple reason that the TV movie offers the writers so little material with which to work. It was intended as the launching point for a new series of Doctor Who on television, but it ended up making such a hash of it that it ultimately gave rise to new iterations of Doctor Who in just about every medium besides television.

Trying to read the tea leaves of the television movie and divine the shape of a theoretical McGann performance in the context of an ongoing series, then, is about as difficult a task as predicting the character arc of Michael Dorn’s Worf based on no deeper evidence than the first season of Star Trek: The Next Generation. Both characters are unmistakably present, and occasionally they’re even given stuff to do, but they’re at such a nascent stage in development that it would be ludicrously ill-advised to try and anchor a whole twenty-six episode season of television around them, let alone an eight-year, 73-book series.

Faced with this profound paucity of source material – a state of affairs which will continue to hold until at least the time of Storm Warning in January 2001 at the very earliest – Parkin effectively becomes the first to engage in what will quickly become the go-to method of characterising the Eighth Doctor, which is to play the character more as a Sandiferian, alchemical symbol of what the Doctor represents. “Generic Doctor,” in other words; store brand Doctor, if you will.

Again, I might sound like I’m being unduly harsh on Parkin and McGann, but that’s not my intention at all. Neither of them can be said to have been responsible for the rather confused status quo of the Eighth Doctor going into April 1997, and in the case of The Dying Days, the fact that Parkin makes such heavy use of symbolic logic throughout the novel means that applying that logic to the Doctor himself just about passes muster.

Indeed, even when we shortly make the transition from Virgin to the early days of BBC Books, there are plenty of writers who will make a genuine effort to lift the incarnation above the roiling tide of genericism, which a more acerbic commentator than myself might describe as the very definition of a “thankless task.” The lack of characterisation in the TV movie need not be an entirely insurmountable obstacle, but it is going to prove an obstacle, and we get our first real inklings of it here, even if The Dying Days takes a rather novel approach to the problem.

Which leads us, at long last, to talking about Benny. In the times to come, we will obviously be talking about her quite a bit, as she finally asserts full control over the narrative of the New Adventures and becomes their main protagonist of choice, give or take a DeadfallDead Romance or The Mary-Sue Extrusion here and there. If anything, The Dying Days can lay a much greater and more substantive claim to being the first true Bernice Summerfield novel than it can to being the first original Eighth Doctor book, even if both are technically true.

The novel is very consciously structured to ease the audience into the idea of a reformed New Adventures line to be headlined by Benny, shrewdly introducing us to the action of the novel from the perspective of her lengthy stay at the house on Allen Road awaiting the Doctor’s arrival.

This, of course, all reaches its natural conclusion in the eleventh chapter, where it appears that Parkin has chosen to kill off the Doctor, as it was rumoured he would in the lead-up to the novel’s release. Again, as many have pointed out, this is yet another instance of the book relying on knowledge of the cultural context in which it sits, going so far as to ensure the final scene revolves around the Doctor’s absence, just to trip up any overly credulous readers who might be intended to skip to the last page and find out if McGann really has been killed.

Believing that Parkin would have actually done so requires a rather far-reaching suspension of disbelief on the part of the audience – even if he had, everyone knew that there was a line of novels starring the character due to start in less than two months – but that obviously isn’t the point. No, the point is to more properly foreground Bernice, following up on the trick adopted by Eternity Weeps by treating the audience to lengthy first-person segments framed as extracts from the good Professor’s omnipresent diary.

Unlike Mortimore’s novel, these sections never completely take over the narrative, but they nevertheless exert a peculiar form of gravity on any scene in which Bernice is present, forcing the audience to reckon with her as a true protagonist in a way that we haven’t really seen her treated in Doctor Who to this point. Even the attack on Allen Road is consciously designed to parallel her actions against those of the Doctor, with both finding themselves attempting to talk their way out of a confrontation with a lone Ice Warrior at different ends of the house, before reluctantly making use of their idiosyncratic forms of ingenuity to defend themselves.

In that moment, Bernice Surprise Summerfield finally comes to wholly and undeniably embody that most classic of descriptions of the Doctor, striving to remain a woman of peace even when caught up in violent situations. Even the Doctor himself is on fine form, choosing to pause in the midst of his act of grand self-sacrifice to save a trapped cat from the wreckage of his owner’s store.

In a rather glorious bit of internal monologue from Parkin, the novel reflects on the thorough ordinariness of this kind of heroism when compared against the oftentimes planet- or universe-threatening stakes that Doctor Who can sometimes favour:

The Doctor could end wars, repel invasions, track the villain to his lair, expose master plans and wipe out evil across the universe of time and space, he could do all that before breakfast.
[…]
But if the Doctor couldn’t use his unique abilities and special powers to save the life of one little cat, then what was the point of having them?
[…]
Because when it comes down to it, doctors save lives and any life is worth saving.

It is the gradual loss of the capitalisation and definite article on “Doctor” here which is most telling, and it is this which finally clinches The Dying Days‘ status as an appropriate send-off to the Doctor as he has existed in the New Adventures, and an ushering in of the age of Bernice. There are certainly jubilant moments for the character after that point, whether it be Parkin’s frankly sublime decision to have the Doctor’s “last words” be an offer of a jelly baby to the Red Death – though a cynic might read this as yet more fuel for the fire of suspicion that we’re dealing with the realms of “generic Doctor;” on this one occasion, I am not one of these people, so I love it to bits – or his inevitable heroic return, complete with one last rousing speech about who he is, for old time’s sake.

And that’s what it all really comes down to, isn’t it? No, The Dying Days is not one of the best or most ground-breaking books Virgin ever put out. From a certain point of view, given the extraordinarily high standards that the company and its authors had proven themselves capable of achieving, some might see this as a last-minute failing, a case of ending not with a bang but with a whimper.

But such a stance fails to consider that all the bold, ground-breaking stuff was left to the sixty novels beforehand. This is the literary equivalent of a victory lap, and so in spite of the fact that McGann isn’t especially well-characterised, in spite of the fact that it’s kind of just a bog-standard alien invasion narrative that makes the bizarre attempt to only have two Ice Warriors per scene in a strangely unnecessary bit of Segal-bashing, in spite of the fact that I’d pretty comfortably consider it to be only my third-favourite New Adventure from these last four months of Virgin possessing the Doctor Who license… I can’t bring myself to dislike it at all.

Here, at this very moment, I have done something I never seriously thought I would do: I wrote reviews of all sixty-one New Adventures featuring the Doctor. Some of these pieces were leagues better than others, and when I started out I definitely didn’t take this whole reviewing thing as seriously as I did now.

There was the early embarrassing, edgy teenage overuse of swearing, that I quietly went back and corrected some time back, because frankly I just couldn’t bear it any longer and it made me wince every time I thought about it. There were the reviews that frankly got a little too mean-spirited and personal at times when I was younger, with particular apologies due to folks like Gary Russell or Christopher Bulis; I promise I’ll write less viciously-phrased reviews of Shadowmind and Legacy at some point. There were the ludicrously short and half-assed reviews, that to this day perplex me on a fundamental level.

(How did I ever think turning in a 330-word review for Apocalypse was at all acceptable? You tell me, but at least I went back and remedied that one, I suppose.)

Through it all, though, there were the New Adventures, a series that I loved and cherished through all its ups and downs. There were Adjudicators and Also People, psychic vampires on the Titanic and common or garden variety vampires in E-Space, and a million and one other things besides.

Most of all, though, I’m just thankful for all of the people I met along the way. There are really too many of you for me to ever hope to do you justice by naming you all, but the people who I’m talking about will already know. I like to think that even those who I haven’t spoken to in a donkey’s age will somehow be aware on a subconscious level, but I recognise that that’s little more than wishful thinking on my part.

When I began this project, I was a lonely teenager who had very much reached his lowest ebb. If you had told that child that he would somehow manage to review ninety-seven whole books before turning twenty-one, to say that he would have disbelieved you would quite probably be the understatement of the century. He very probably wouldn’t have even believed that he would live for another five years.

But I have, and I’m here, and I’m so grateful. So that’s what this is, really. One last chance to express my gratitude and bask in the jubilation of having achieved something that I like to think is worthwhile. Because, to be blunt, if you know what’s coming up in the next post, you’ve probably already guessed that I simply don’t feel I can be very happy that time around. I will probably be very angry and sullen, in point of fact. For now, though, let’s just sit in this feeling. Whatever comes after this moment, this is the end of the New Adventures, and I think that’s a good enough note on which to finish.

(sotto voce)

Oh… no… it… isn’t…

Miscellaneous Observations

As I also noted with Chris’ private little war on the Ice Warrior base in GodEngine, it’s rather striking, from a post-9/11 standpoint, to see a novel in a popular science-fiction franchise so cavalierly describe fan favourite characters like UNIT as partaking in tactics explicitly likened to those of terrorists. Guess there’s really just something about the Ice Warriors that brings these sorts of ideas out of Doctor Who, huh?

On the subject of the Secretary of State for Education and Science, it’s perhaps a tad ironic in light of No Future that the next-longest serving holder of the position from the 1970s was Labour’s Shirley Williams, posited by Cornell as being the unnamed female Prime Minister from Terror of the Zygons rather than Thatcher.

Despite having a ton of plot points from Doctor Who novels “spoiled” for me over the years in the course of researching them in order to feel qualified to speak on the matter, somehow the fact that Eight ends up giving Benny the Seventh Doctor’s umbrella completely slipped my attention, so it hit hard. I mean, it still would have done regardless, but on this one occasion it was nice to be genuinely and completely surprised.

Final Thoughts

Well here we are, at an ending of sorts, but it’s far from being the last page. As I gestured to, we will be covering Gareth Roberts’ The Well-Mannered War next time, so join me for that. At the same time… it’s gonna be rough, I’m not going to lie, and it will probably be the moodier, less joyous shadow to the exuberant mood I’ve tried to project throughout this review. If you wanted to skip that one, and just decide to tune in when we’re back to doing light-hearted pantomime frockery with Oh No It Isn’t!, I would absolutely understand. Thank you for reading as much of this blog as you have, however much that may be. Until whatever will pass for “next time” in your particular case, however…

Kind regards,

Special Agent Dale Cooper

Virgin Missing Adventures Reviews: The Dark Path by David A. McIntee (or, “Heart of Darkness”)

It’s become customary, in reviewing these last months of the Missing Adventures, to try and offer up a conclusive closing statement on each Doctor’s tenure within the range, a thesis that can tie together five or so given novels into something resembling a single cohesive package rather than a motley collection of authors pulling in all sorts of different directions.

The ease with which this task is accomplished varies wildly from Doctor to Doctor, to say the least. On a good day, you might find yourself faced with an incarnation like the Sixth, where every book featuring the character seems to serve a very clear purpose in rehabilitating Colin Baker’s much-maligned Technicolour Time Lord, and maintains a certain baseline level of quality to boot. On the slightly more difficult end of the spectrum, the other Baker’s novels present something of a challenge if for no deeper reason than that there are rather a lot of them, even before you factor in the clashing aesthetics of the Hinchcliffe and Williams years.

And now, in the penultimate Missing Adventure, we find ourselves facing the same conundrum in the context of the Second Doctor novels, which is… not the most enviable of undertakings, to put it bluntly. Because let’s be perfectly frank here, the Second Doctor has pretty consistently headlined some of the absolute worst novels that Virgin ever put out under the Doctor Who brand, to the point where it’s extraordinarily tough to come up with anything approaching a Grand Unified Theory of Troughton Novels that doesn’t simply boil down to “Well, they’re just not very good.”

To Virgin’s credit, however, they at least seemed to recognise on some level that the Second Doctor books simply weren’t cutting it. If the Fourth Doctor reigns as the undisputed champion of the Missing Adventures in raw numerical terms, with a whopping seven outings to his name as of March 1997 – rising even further to a final total of eight by the time Gareth Roberts drops The Well-Mannered War as the range’s swansong next month – then the Second Doctor sits quite firmly at the bottom of the pile, falling just short of the standard five novels afforded every other incarnation.

You could, admittedly, put a marginally more optimistic spin on this discrepancy, making the quite reasonable point that it doesn’t so much suggest an active vote of no confidence in the Troughton Era on Virgin’s part as it does a more general shortfall in the number of writers who were pitching novels set in that period of the show’s history. And to be clear, I think this is all but certain to be the more accurate characterisation of events, as I don’t actually sincerely believe that Rebecca Levene and the other editorial staff at Virgin were sitting in the company’s offices maliciously plotting to bar Troughton from the hallowed halls of Missing Adventurehood.

In this regard, the first Second Doctor novel might prove rather instructive here, with Martin Day admitting that The Menagerie was initially proposed as a New Adventure before being rather hastily reworked to feature the Second Doctor, Jamie and Zoe when it became clear that Gary Russell would need more time to fine-tune Invasion of the Cat-People.

Which is odd in and of itself, no? Not just because I seriously used the word “fine-tune” in discussing Invasion of the Cat-People, but because it does rather suggest an attitude of “We don’t have anything else to work with, so this’ll have to do.”

After all, one suspects that retuning a New Adventure to work as a Missing Adventure is the sort of thing you only really do as a last resort, and when combined with the fact that Troughton ultimately became the last of the first six Doctors to receive an MA – with The Menagerie dropping in May 1995, nearly a full year after the launch of the series – it strongly suggests that there were simply no other Second Doctor novels in the pipeline at that time, or at least none that were considered to be in a workable enough state that they could serve as a stopgap to buy Russell some time.

But equally, it’s not exactly as if Patrick Troughton has ever been a particularly unpopular Doctor. If anything, he’s pretty consistently clung on to “fan favourite” status, in spite of numerous factors that one might ordinarily assume to weigh pretty heavily against any attempts at claiming such a crown, perhaps most prominent of which is his televised era having in many ways suffered the hardest blows in the great missing episode debacle.

I kind of hinted at the Troughton Era status quo as it stood in the mid-1990s all the way back in my review of The Menagerie, but I do think it’s worth running over the particulars in a bit more detail here, just for old time’s sake.

To start with, let’s grossly understate the matter and say that as it stood at the turn of the decade, things were looking pretty damn grim for the Second Doctor. Of the twenty-one total televised stories in which the character appeared from 1966 to 1969, the first fourteen – that’s the entirety of his first two seasons, for those playing the home game – were all missing at least one episode. Four stories possessed no surviving episodes whatsoever, while seven “orphaned” stories were missing a majority of their episodes.

This is crucial to understanding why the Second Doctor’s era was historically represented in the rather scattershot way that it was, even with the advent of home video technology in the mid-1980s, which is to say that it was mostly only Season Six stories that saw a VHS release to start with. Indeed, the fact that Seasons Four and Five were almost entirely missing at this point is really the only remotely defensible reason you could ever give for choosing to release The Dominators as your fourth Troughton story of choice.

Eventually, those orphaned episodes which were obviously incapable of helming a fully-fledged VHS release of their own would start creeping out in the form of John Nathan-Turner-curated specials like 1991’s The Troughton Years, or 1992’s The Early Years compilations for both the Daleks and the Cybermen. What’s more, stories like The Invasion – yet another Season Six story, it must be pointed out – would be treated to specially-shot linking material from members of the cast to smooth over those gaps in the narrative left by the missing episodes.

Yet there exists, in the collective imagination of fans, another way of thinking about the Troughton Era, one which is almost exclusively founded upon the medium of print rather than a few meagre VHS tapes. I refer, of course, to the Target novelisations. Much as the BBC’s home video releases of the Troughton Era quickly fell into a readily discernible pattern, so too did Target’s output, to the point where it’s probably just best if I rattle the first five off in quick succession so you can see what I mean.

The Abominable SnowmenThe Moonbase (retitled The Cybermen in order to better fit the archetypal naming pattern expected of such an iconic Doctor Who monster), The Ice WarriorsThe Web of Fear, and finally The Tomb of the Cybermen. With the exception of The Moonbase, virtually every story on that list is a base under siege story from Season Five, the period of the show that has famously garnered a reputation as the “Monster Season” for reasons that are hopefully pretty self-explanatory.

(Hint: It’s got a lot of monsters.)

Honestly, it’s hard to even single out The Moonbase as being much of a stylistic outlier here, featuring as it does a phenomenally popular and enduring Doctor Who monster, and effectively marking the point at which the series confirmed that the “base under siege” formula established in The Tenth Planet was more than just a one-off deal. After all, if you were to sit down with a Doctor Who fan who didn’t possess a reasonable working knowledge of what stories fell where in the series’ timeline, and told them that The Moonbase was a part of the same season as the other four stories I just listed, they probably wouldn’t have a hard time believing you.

Although Target would eventually start to novelise those stories that did not fit this traditional base under siege mould, beginning with The War Games in September 1979, this initial string of novelisations effectively wound up cementing a certain image of Troughton’s stories in the minds of readers everywhere, being the only plausible gateway into that time period that existed for fans living in a pre-VHS world.

It’s fascinating, then, to wind the clock forward about twenty years later and look at how Troughton fared in Doctor Who Magazine‘s 1998 survey ranking every televised story based on the votes of thousands of Doctor Who fans. Publishing its results in issue #265, barely a year after The Dark Path hit the shelves, it was the first survey of its kind in the magazine’s history, and consequently provides us with a rather invaluable tool with which to gauge the general temperature of fan opinion in the Wilderness Years.

A quick glance at the list unsurprisingly reveals the after-effects of the reverence for the Monster Season to be in full swing, with three of the top ten slots being filled by Second Doctor stories, two of which are from Season Five. Even the lone exception to this rule, The Evil of the Daleks, still manages to be emblematic of a conception of the Troughton years which sees them as being defined primarily by their monsters.

For comparison, Tom Baker is the only other Doctor to put in more than one appearance in the top ten, and considering he had more than twice as many seasons as Troughton and precisely zero missing episodes, I’d say the cosmic hobo did phenomenally well for himself, all things considered.

The identities of those Second Doctor stories that made it to the heights of the poll is equally revealing, with The Tomb of the Cybermen unsurprisingly achieving the highest placement at #8, no doubt being given a sizeable boost thanks to its then-recent rediscovery in the archives of a Hong Kong-based television relay company in 1992. The magazine’s write-up, from prolific Doctor Who novelist Steve Lyons, predictably devotes considerable ink to the question of whether this long-time Holy Grail had managed to live up to its mythic reputation, and ultimately had this to say:

When The Tomb of the Cybermen was returned to us, there were those who, knowing it only by its legend, thought the reality disappointing. The plot is quite basic and highly derivative, there are the inevitable duff effects (the Cyberman Controller’s head falls off in one scene) and, like any story which relies on building up suspense and providing surprises, it doesn’t stand up terribly well to repeated viewing. Once you know that the end-of-first-episode Cyberman is a fake, it loses its shock value. Sadly, most of us knew it was a fake before we even knew the episodes existed. I envy those privileged viewers who saw The Tomb of the Cybermen without preconceptions, on a monochrome screen over four dark evenings in 1967. For those of us who came later – who devoured the novelisation, the script book and many, many articles in the belief that we would not get anything more – it is impossible to separate the reality from the legend. Nevertheless, six years on, the story’s showing in this poll proves that it is still something special – both to those fans who could once only dream of seeing it and, hopefully, to those new fans who just picked up the video without knowing what to expect. The reality holds up pretty well.

Perhaps, in the end, the important thing about The Tomb of the Cybermen isn’t whether or not it can live up to its own legend; it’s the fact that it created one in the first place.

This is, in many ways, an effective microcosm of fandom’s overall experience of the Troughton Era, even if Lyons may have only been directly considering a single story. To watch the Troughton Era is to engage in a process of constant reconstruction and reevaluation in a way that simply isn’t true of other periods in the show’s history. Even the Hartnell years, perhaps the era to which Troughton’s tenure can be most closely compared, benefit from having significantly more surviving serials, alongside a general willingness from fans to pardon some of the more dated hallmarks of the time by simple dint of being the iteration of the programme that effectively laid the foundations upon which later production teams built.

The Tomb of the Cybermen has, over the years, undergone something of a minor fall from grace, as has the whole Troughton Era. Both are still well-liked, make no mistake, but it’s telling that not a single Second Doctor story managed to crack the top ten in DWM‘s 2014 edition of the poll, and Tomb ultimately sank to twenty-third place.

It’s worth contrasting this against something like, say, The Enemy of the World, voted fandom’s least-favourite story of Season Five in 1998, coming in at #108. Not so coincidentally, it’s also the lone story not to fit the bill of the Monster Season within which it sits. In 2014, after having been recently recovered in its entirety in Nigeria and subsequently topping the iTunes download charts alongside the returned episodes of The Web of Fear, it jumped accordingly to #56.

With all of that being said, then, there’s perhaps something of a perverse irony to be found in the Troughton Era’s prose-bound afterlife having met with such a lukewarm reception. It would admittedly be a bit of a stretch to claim that the original television programme was routinely turning out stories that are on the same level of quality as the first three Second Doctor adventures put forth by Virgin. If nothing else, a story like Fury from the Deep was almost certainly a more bearable experience in 1968 than something like Twilight of the Gods, due in no small part to being significantly briefer, particularly when experienced in weekly 25-minute chunks.

At the same time, it cannot be denied that the Troughton novels seemed to consistently run aground on the same problematic reefs that so frequently sank the original era, becoming a series of incredibly generic and uninteresting runarounds with only the thinnest excuse for a plot structure that is more concerned with providing the audience with a memorable monster than with anything more meaningful.

(Even if you want to point to the failings of Invasion of the Cat-People as being distinct from those of Season Five, with its rather questionable treatment of the belief systems of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, to the point of twice using a full-blown slur to describe said peoples… well, The Tomb of the Cybermen is right there, and I think we’ve talked about it more than enough already today, thank you very much.)

Perhaps this spectacle-oriented attitude best explains why the nightmarish, lopsided theatrics of The Web Planet proved such a frequent point of reference for the Second Doctor books, whether it be in a more generalised sense like in the case of The Menagerie, or the rather less subtle sequelitis of Twilight of the Gods.

And that, in turn, begins to gesture at the heart of the problem with trying to port such a visual approach to a fundamentally non-visual medium like prose, which might partially account for the high proportion of Troughton duds we’ve been subjected to thus far. Even if the novels may ultimately end up being a rather faithful recreation of the era’s original attitudes, that very fidelity proves profoundly poisonous to any attempts to craft an enjoyable reading experience.

But here we have something a little different. The Dark Path is, uncommonly among Second Doctor novels, the one that is most often held up as actually being pretty good. DWM‘s own Dave Owen admitted to being pleasantly surprised by the book in his monthly Shelf Life feature, particularly considering his self-confessed historical ambivalence towards the works of David A. McIntee. “I don’t believe in reincarnation,” he wrote, “but I do put my faith in redemption, a faith rewarded now by The Dark Path.” So, pretty high praise then. If anything, Owen ultimately seemed rather more fond of it than Virgin’s other offering that month, Marc Platt’s Lungbarrow, and you can find his positive opinion more or less echoed by Lars Pearson in I, Who.

Perhaps the most striking evidence of all, however, is to be found in the almighty Shannon Sullivan rankings. Among its peers in the Missing Adventures, The Dark Path is so manifestly the most well-regarded Second Doctor novel that it’s not even close, sitting as it does in tenth place with a not-too-shabby overall rating of 72.9%. The next highest-rated novel of its kind, Twilight of the Gods, sits at twenty-ninth, which is a frankly mind-boggling gap when you consider that there’s only a total of thirty-three MAs to begin with.

Indeed, The Dark Path‘s rating is so high that it even manages to narrowly edge past Mark Gatiss’ The Roundheads at 72.6%, and thus claims the crown as the bona fide best Second Doctor novel across the entirety of the Virgin and BBC lines, at least by this one very specific metric. Anyone taking a casual glance over these statistics could be forgiven for thinking, then, that the Second Doctor novels have finally found their very own answer to The Tomb of the Cybermen, here in the very last moments before the curtain call. But does the novel truly live up to the hype, or has the passage of time consigned it to the same ignominious and underwhelming fate as innumerable Troughton stories before it?

Thankfully, I’m pleased to say that The Dark Path is, in fact, the best Troughton novel thus far. It’s not as if that’s a title for which there is particularly stiff competition, and I technically said the exact same thing about Twilight of the Gods last time despite not thinking it was up to much on the whole, but no, this is a reasonably solid and readable book for much of its length. It has some interesting ideas that tap into the context of this twilight period of the Virgin book lines, while also speaking to the wider social anxieties of the United Kingdom as it stands in 1997.

Not only that, but for once we’ve received that rarest of miracles, a Troughton book where one can actually recognise the Second Doctor’s onscreen persona, which surely deserves commendation in and of itself. Both Jamie and Victoria are suitably in-character as well, and the novel is elevated considerably by a particularly enjoyable guest player, whose identity you can probably guess at by looking at the front cover, or indeed just remembering exactly which author we’re dealing with here.

Nevertheless, I’m not quite convinced it’s an out-and-out masterpiece, or even a Masterpiece, for that matter. As with Lords of the Storm, McIntee proves a little too eager to abuse the Star Trek button, with many elements that would be more than recognisable to any fan of that franchise, and which translate about as poorly as ever. More than that, its attempts to provide the audience with huge revelations about the backstory of a certain major Doctor Who antagonist can’t help but feel distinctly underwhelming, and are especially jarring coming right off the back of the rather more deft Lungbarrow.

But let’s start with the good stuff here, because there actually is quite a bit to talk about on that front. Most glaringly, there’s the fact that McIntee manages, against all odds, to capture the essence of the Second Doctor in a way that feels as if it’s a reasonable facsimile of Patrick Troughton’s delivery, were this to air as a televised production in early March 1968, as is the ostensible mission statement of the Missing Adventures.

“A reasonable facsimile” may sound like damning with faint praise, but when considering the evidence the Second Doctor novels have presented us with thus far, it’s perhaps one of the highest compliments I can pay. The fact of the matter is that, of the first seven performers to play the Doctor, Troughton’s take on the role was quite possibly the most “actorly” in the classical sense, commonly working in minor improvisations and physical quirks in a way that’s extraordinarily difficult to pin down in the written word.

When put up against the efforts of Martin Day and Gary Russell, both of whom seemed to desperately wish they were writing a Seventh Doctor book instead – and Day, at least, has the excuse of having originally written The Menagerie to fulfil just such a mandate – McIntee’s attempt at solving the problem measures up quite well.

In a way, this is perhaps one instance where the writer’s legendarily descriptive prose style serves him well, as he’s better able to capture the subtle nuances and inflections that formed just as crucial a part of the Second Doctor’s manner of speaking as the actual dialogue itself. He does such a good job that it’s honestly a little disappointing to realise he apparently never wrote for this iteration of the character again, but such is life, I suppose.

On a related note, McIntee seems to genuinely relish the chance to write for Jamie, and there’s something rather endearing in his decision to work in more authentically Scottish patterns of speech than the television series was ever willing to give the character, excepting an intermittent “Creag an tuire!” for special occasions.

Even outside of dropping a periodic smattering of Gaelic into Jamie’s dialogue, however, The Dark Path goes out of its way to homage Hines and Troughton’s infamous tendency to exclaim in unabashedly innuendo-laden fashion over the size of a given building or space station or, well, just about anything. Sure, in so doing, the novel basically just lifts the opening dialogue from The Two Doctors word for word, but I’ll allow it this once. This is clearly a portrait of one of the more iconic Doctor-companion dynamics from a writer who seems to have a genuine affection for both characters, which is certainly more than can be said for most of the Troughton novels thus far.

Which leaves us, of course, with Victoria. And, well, don’t get me wrong, she’s good here, being given a greater sense of interiority than she was ever allowed onscreen. The only problem is that that’s basically standard-issue Missing Adventure fare, and so isn’t exactly noteworthy in its own right at this point.

What’s more, attentive readers will recall that this story proclaims itself to slot into the gap between The Web of Fear and Fury from the Deep, i.e. the exact same space occupied by Twilight of the Gods. In effect, the ramifications this has for The Dark Path are twofold. On the one hand, we get a few scattered references to the events on Vortis, which is nice in terms of ensuring basic coherence from book to book but does have the rather unfortunate side effect of reminding the audience of one of the lesser Troughton novels.

The other consequence, and in many ways the more damaging one for McIntee’s purposes, is that The Dark Path winds up giving Victoria an emotional arc that can’t help but feel like a retread of ground already covered by Christopher Bulis, touching on her desire for a permanent, fixed abode, her exhaustion at the thrill-a-minute lifestyle so eagerly embraced by her travelling companions, and the internal conflict between these emotions and her general gratitude towards the Doctor and Jamie for taking her in after the death of her father.

When paired with Downtime‘s focus on the character’s troubled life in the aftermath of her departure from the TARDIS, it does rather create the impression that the Missing Adventures have reached a point where they don’t really have much new to say on the subject of Victoria Waterfield. In the space of a little over a year, we’ve effectively received three separate novels that have covered much the same thematic real estate, with only the most marginal of differences in emphasis between them.

Here, we get the Master tempting her with the chance to preemptively destroy Skaro to ensure that she was never orphaned by the events of The Evil of the Daleks, which might have been a nice, meaty dilemma if it wasn’t effectively crammed into the back half of the novel as something of an afterthought in an already rather overstuffed third act that devotes most of its energy to the same lengthy space battles and action sequences that proved such a chore back in Lords of the Storm.

Taken on its own terms, everything the novel does with Victoria is certainly serviceable enough, but it’s a bit much to have it be the third exploration of these ideas in as many appearances, and this sense of reiteration ad nauseam might go some way towards explaining why the character would be much more sporadically used in BBC Books’ Past Doctor Adventures line, not making another appearance until Justin Richards’ Dreams of Empire, some forty-eight books and seventeen months hence.

But of course, The Dark Path‘s star attraction isn’t to be found among any of the regular cast, oh no. It’s here, twenty-six years after Roger Delgado first stepped out of a horse box in Terror of the Autons, that an author has finally felt brave enough to tackle the origin story of the Master.

That said author should turn out to be McIntee is no big surprise. After all, it was he who attempted to move the character forward in First Frontier by having him regenerate into a new body resembling Basil Rathbone, and subsequently wrote the rather delightful Housewarming as a pulpy, good old-fashioned haunted house story that eventually climaxed in a swashbuckling swordfight homaging the noted thespian’s duel with Errol Flynn in 1938’s The Adventures of Robin Hood.

Outside of these two efforts, the errant Time Lord has only featured prominently in two Virgin stories from writers other than McIntee, taking the role of the big bad in both David Bishop’s strange conspiratorial tome, Who Killed Kennedy, and Paul Cornell’s celebratorily indulgent Happy Endings just one month later.

Technically, “the Master” doesn’t really make much in the way of a meaningful appearance here until the very end of the novel, with the character instead going by the inexplicably Russian moniker of “Koschei.” Nonetheless, it is Koschei’s steady slide into the role of the Master that forms the bulk of the novel’s backbone here, and McIntee’s descriptions, in conjunction with Alister Pearson’s typically brilliant cover likenesses – and damn, I am really going to miss him when we start getting into the depths of the Black Sheep days, folks – make it pretty clear that the character is supposed to resemble Delgado.

Much like Troughton, Delgado is the kind of actor who possesses a certain charismatic, magnetic quality that is very hard to capture in a non-performative medium like prose, so there’s a sense that The Dark Path is skirting dangerously close to the point at which we might say it’s biting off more than it can chew, even before you factor in the decision to transplant that already brilliant performance into a context shorn of the camaraderie Delgado enjoyed with fellow mainstays of the so-called “UNIT Family” like Jon Pertwee, Katy Manning and Nicholas Courtney.

Even Who Killed Kennedy, thanks to the rather atypical nature of that work, wisely kept the Master at arm’s length throughout, and it’s telling that the sequences dealing with his villainous scheme to undo the Kennedy assassination, despite lending the novel its title, are widely regarded as one of the weaker points of the book. There is, in other words, very little chance that any of this will turn out remotely bearable, which makes it all the more delightful that McIntee handles it as well as he does.

On a pure characterisation front, Koschei is positively incandescent in just about every scene in which he features. McIntee totally sells the notion of a primordial Master, one who initially genuinely regrets being forced into a situation where he has to take a life, but who is still recognisable as the same character underneath it all. Sequences like his genuine bemusement when faced with Captain Sherwin’s assumption that he and Ailla are secretly a couple also help to give him some much-needed texture and definition before his inevitable downfall, and his repartee with his compatriot is entertaining enough that you almost suspect it would, if produced in modern times, give rise to a mass of fans clamouring for a spin-off series.

Unfortunately, the actual plotting of Koschei’s tragic downfall leaves something to be desired, and this sense of McIntee’s grasp of characterisation exceeding his handle on narrative structure and pacing is a recurring problem for The Dark Path. So, just like we did with Lungbarrow, let’s try and lay all of this out in an easy to understand fashion.

Essentially, over the course of the novel, Koschei and Ailla find themselves investigating a big ol’ temporal anomaly called the Darkheart, which is under the control of a military force from the practically extinguished Earth Empire that has been hanging around on the planet’s surface for the past three centuries in a state of temporal stasis and effective immortality thanks to the Darkheart’s unique properties.

While investigating the structure within which the anomaly is housed, the duo get into a firefight with the Imperial forces, in the course of which Koschei accidentally shoots and kills Ailla. Unbeknownst to him, however, she turns out to be a Time Lord in disguise – though, in a peculiar form of deference to The War Games, the words “Time Lord” are never spoken outside of the back cover – and subsequently shows up, having regenerated, to reveal that she’s been spying on him for the High Council all along.

By this stage, Koschei has already sunk pretty deeply into his grief over what he presumed to be the loss of Ailla, and has attempted to usurp the power of the Darkheart in an effort to undo said loss, manipulating the Imperials into completely destroying the homeworld of the Terileptils in the process. So, y’know, he’s not exactly in the right headspace to deal with any more major shocks to the system at this point, and he consequently ends up renouncing his old name in favour of a new sinister sobriquet: the Master.

Once again, stripped back to the barest and most elemental of plotting mechanics, there’s nothing here that’s so poorly done that it becomes particularly egregious or distracting. McIntee has implemented a very clear and comprehensible structure for Koschei’s arc to follow, and the character progresses along that arc in a steady fashion. As the old saying goes, however, while a straight line may be the shortest distance between two points, it is by no means the most interesting.

Put simply, even though everything here works well enough from a top-down, bird’s eye perspective, it’s difficult to escape the sensation that Koschei’s transformation into the Master wasn’t given nearly enough room in which to breathe, a turn of events which is frankly ludicrous in a book that runs to nearly three hundred pages as is.

As with the rewriting shenanigans which befell The Menagerie, this might actually be another case of real-world editorial concerns impinging upon the novel, as there seems to be reasonable evidence that substantial portions of The Dark Path were cut and/or rewritten as development progressed, creating a nice bit of unintentional symmetry between the first and last Second Doctor adventures from Virgin.

To hear McIntee tell it on his Tumblr in 2014, Ailla’s death was originally to have been permanent, rather than simply being a misunderstanding caused by her status as an undercover Time Lord. More to the point, there was apparently enough excised material to form the backbone of From the Cutting Room Floor, an entry in Mark Phippen and Helen Fayle’s 1998 charity anthology Perfect Timing… which I don’t actually have access to at the moment, and thus cannot comment upon in any further detail.

Regardless, all of this is especially frustrating when one takes into consideration the rather glacial pacing that afflicts the novel. It takes until the halfway point for the Doctor and Koschei’s respective teams to all arrive at the Darkheart and actually end up in the same place as one another, which wouldn’t be a problem if anything of particular note happened in that first half. By the time a third of the novel has elapsed, the Doctor, Jamie and Victoria haven’t done much more than arrive on Darkheart, be shown to their quarters by the local Adjudicators, and attend a fancy diplomatic function.

(The less said about the Federation guest stars the better; they’re really just your standard issue imitations of Star Trek characters, complete with one of the more blatant attempts by a Doctor Who novel to replicate the Kirk and Spock dynamic in the form of Sherwin and Salamanca.)

In fact, this all has the rather bizarre effect of making the audience empathise more with Koschei throughout, based almost entirely on the fact that he’s the only lead character who actually seems to be doing things of any import or substance for much of the novel’s length.

At the same time, any empathy that one can actually glean from this quirk of circumstance is rather sharply curtailed by the decision to constantly spend time on the significantly less interesting, non-Koschei characters, serving to ensure that Koschei’s own character arc ultimately lands with something of a dispirited and muted whimper when all is said and done. And, frankly, this is the last possible outcome you would want from a story whose self-proclaimed raison d’etre is to provide the audience with the grand and cosmically tragic tale of how Koschei fell from grace and became the Master.

To conclude on a more positive note, however, The Dark Path does at least have a few more points of interest, and it’s mainly to do with the in-universe context against which McIntee has chosen to set the events of his novel. As I alluded to earlier, the Darkheart base is overseen by holdouts from the Earth Empire days, who are ultimately discovered by the Galactic Federation. Predictably, this leads to quite a lot of friction, but the way in which this tension manifests is rather interesting for a novel published in March 1997.

On the face of it, both the Empire and the Federation are just two more examples of the Pertwee Era reaching back and affecting its own relative past within The Dark Path, with McIntee making use of concepts originally invented for The Mutants and The Curse of Peladon respectively. As such, they fit quite comfortably alongside the attempts to tell an origin story for the Master, and the revelation that the Darkheart was a creation of the Chronovores from The Time Monster.

But the novel chooses to employ these concepts in ways that Baker, Martin, Hulke and Hayles never did, with events unfolding against the backdrop of a transitory period between the two systems of governance that had previously only been the stuff of fan conjecture. The decline of the Earth Empire has been a particularly prominent concern for the novels as of late, with books like Burning Heart illustrating the painful death throes of the old feudal order, and Cold Fusion having originally been envisioned as a companion piece to the infamously troubled So Vile a Sin.

(Even The Dark Path seems to be more than willing to play coy on the subject of Aaronovitch and Orman’s perennially delayed, showstopping epic, with Lieutenant Clark ruefully admitting, “Really we don’t have that much knowledge about what was going on towards the end of the Empire,” which feels like a decent enough summary of the veil of ignorance which fandom would find themselves cloaked in for a good month or so as regards that very subject.)

The Empire naturally holds a particular significance for the Virgin novels, having served as a locus for their own distinctive, carefully-crafted vision of Doctor Who‘s future history through the efforts of writers like Andy Lane and countless others besides. Viewed through this lens, The Dark Path‘s palpable anxiety over the incomprehensibly powerful ontological threat posed by the Darkheart – an artefact that threatens to rewrite the DNA of every species in the universe that evolved on a human-hospitable world so that they have always been human, and to erase any trace of all others – feels appropriate for this, the penultimate entry in a line that is, by this stage, well aware of its own impending supersession by the BBC Books ranges.

But this is, it must be said, an incomplete portrait that neglects to consider a far more obvious facet of McIntee’s commentary, and it’s here that we get to indulge in some real-world history harvesting of the kind that I haven’t gotten the chance to do much of lately, what with all the more pressing business that comes with trying to wrap up these last few novels.

We’ll start with a few stunningly obvious observations, since that’s always a pretty sure bet. It should hopefully come as no surprise for any of my readers to learn that the Earth Empire as presented in Third Doctor stories like The Mutants and Frontier in Space is, in point of fact, a rather clear analogue for the anxieties of a United Kingdom that had spent most of the second half of the twentieth century coming to grips with the existential dread caused by the wave of decolonisation sweeping the globe, to say nothing of the steadily growing suspicion in the wake of events like the Suez Crisis that the nation’s days as a major colonial power were well and truly over.

Against this, we also have The Curse of Peladon‘s Galactic Federation, an equally blatant stand-in for the European Economic Community, British entry into which was a rather hot-button issue in the hazy, far-off past of 1972.

Thank heavens we’ve moved past all of that, no?

Snide comments aside, it’s worth consulting the historical barometer in an effort to determine where these pressing political concerns stood in March of 1997. On the subject of decolonisation, the answer is a remarkably straightforward one. If the claim that the sun never set on the British Empire was already looking rather shaky on its feet a quarter of a century earlier, by this stage it was positively on life support, with almost all the country’s last remaining major Caribbean and Pacific colonies having declared independence by the mid-1980s.

Of course, you also can’t talk about the Empire in 1997 without discussing Hong Kong, Britain’s 99-year lease on which was due to expire in short order. Although Margaret Thatcher had initially hoped to retain administrative power over the colony, the Chinese government had rejected all such proposals, and under the terms of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration, it was agreed that the colony was to become a Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China at midnight on July 1, 1997, a scant three months after the publication of The Dark Path.

More than any other point in time, it is the date of this handover that is commonly held to mark the final and definitive end of the British Empire, with Hong Kong accounting for 97% of the population of all remaining British Dependent Territories. With that in mind, McIntee’s decision to touch upon the colonial mindset at this given moment has an even deeper significance than it might usually have.

Indeed, there’s something rather shocking – but also refreshingly candid – to have Victoria be the regular who most quickly grasps the colonial rationale put forth by Viscount Gothard. Even if it’s stressed that her mind has been sufficiently broadened by travelling with the Doctor and Jamie that she no longer sees the rhetoric of Empire as an unambiguously benevolent construct, as she once might have done, it’s the kind of quietly bold character moment which I have a hard time believing you would see a major franchise drop so casually in the modern fandom climate.

It’s also not unreasonable to conclude that this ties into something of an implicit critique of the very structures of the Monster Season itself. When discussing the Veltrochni “demon” menacing the Adjudicators on the surface of Darkheart, it’s Victoria who most readily onboards the assumption that the creature must be acting out of nothing more than sheer, bloody-minded malice, justifying this position by reference to the Daleks, in many ways the ur-monster of the franchise. Although the Doctor and Jamie push back against this notion, the eavesdropping Terrell reflects shortly thereafter that the history of Earth shows “hostility and the desire for dominance [to be] a universal constant,” a staggeringly colonial mindset if ever there was one, and one which strikes rather close to the driving impetus behind Season Five.

Still, if Hong Kong provides us with an obvious centre of gravity to guide our discussions on the waning of imperialism, then the matter of Britain’s integration with continental Europe is a rather more complicated topic. Although the Conservative government of Edward Heath had overseen the entry of the United Kingdom into the EEC in 1973, this was by no means the last word on the matter, and the intervening decades would see a steadily rising anti-marketer movement, gradually coming to be lumped together under the umbrella term of “Euroscepticism.”

Historically, the most prominent Eurosceptic voices were associated with the Labour Party, but the accession of Neil Kinnock to the party leadership in 1983 heralded a gradual shift towards greater Labour support of the EEC and its eventual successor body, the European Union. Perhaps the most succinct snapshot of this shift came from erstwhile Eurosceptic union leader Ron Todd’s famous declaration in 1988 that, with the Conservatives being firmly entrenched in Westminster, “the only card game in town at the moment [was] in a town called Brussels,” roughly coinciding with Thatcher’s vociferous expression of her own hardline anti-EEC stance in the Bruges speech that September.

By March 1997, the enactment of the Maastricht Treaty and the consequent formation of the EU were over three years gone, and it seemed that the Eurosceptic movement was rapidly gaining ground within Britain. Wealthy business magnate James Goldsmith had founded the Referendum Party in November 1994 as a single-issue party seeking to draft a referendum on the question of continued British membership of the EU, and the run-up to the 1997 general election saw the organisation outspend both the Conservatives and Labour in the sphere of print advertising, while fielding candidates in 547 of the nation’s 659 seats in the House of Commons. Twelve days before the publication of The Dark Path, it had even gained its first – and ultimately only – MP when George Gardiner, the Member for Reigate, announced his resignation from the Conservative Party.

We’ll probably talk more broadly about the outcome of the general election next time, but suffice it to say for our current purposes that the Referendum Party was rather poorly served. Gardiner was resoundingly defeated by the Conservatives’ new candidate for Reigate, Crispin Blunt, and the party failed to win a single seat in the House, with all but forty-two of the candidates failing to meet the 5% vote threshold that entitled them to a return on their initial £500 deposit. When Goldsmith died barely two and a half months later, the party was soon to follow, having existed in toto for less than three years.

In any case, the Referendum Party proved that a Eurosceptic policy platform was a workable model, and this example would subsequently be capitalised upon by competing factions like the United Kingdom Independence Party, which had technically been founded over a year before Goldsmith’s organisation ever got off the ground. In the 1997 election, they had fielded 194 candidates, but were ultimately largely overshadowed by the Referendum Party, with only one candidate managing to secure a return on their investment: Nigel Farage, running for the seat of Salisbury. Shortly thereafter, Farage would usurp control of UKIP from founder Alan Sked, and the party would go on to win three seats in the European Parliament elections of June 1999.

It is from this status quo that The Dark Path has rather obviously pulled in its portrayal of an imperialist culture finding itself forced to reckon with the possibility of participating in a more collaborative and consultative form of government, and it’s something which has aged rather well in a post-Brexit world. In one of those great moments in media that truly vindicates the great Garth Marenghi’s musings on subtext and cowardice, Captain Sherwin gives a Cliff note summary of the Galactic Federation’s origins that should sound rather familiar to those acquainted with the history of the EU:

…It’s a mutually cooperative society. Originally it started to provide a stable market to help rebuild the Galaxy’s economies after the collapse of the Empire. Thousands of worlds all had their own local systems and currencies, and on some planets you could exchange half a ton of platinum for a crate of foodstuffs.

Still, while all of this is fascinating in the abstract, it’s not quite enough to make up for The Dark Path‘s serious shortcomings. It may be the best Second Doctor novel thus far by a considerable margin, but it frequently winds up feeling bloated and overlong when it should feel operatically tragic, which is all the more regrettable when McIntee has proven himself more than capable of evoking such a tone with Sanctuary. The characterisation of the regulars and Koschei is nothing short of marvellous, though, and it’s just a shame that the plotting of the novel fails to rise to match that high standard.

Miscellaneous Observations

Further to the themes of imperialism and the European Union, the sequences involving the Alpha Centauran commissioner Epilira patronisingly lecturing her Federation crewmates on Imperial etiquette were a nice way of subverting the anthropocentrism that can sometimes creep into the treatment of the alien in franchises like Doctor Who or Star Trek. Considering just how clear it is that McIntee took inspiration from the United Federation of Planets in crafting the Federation guest stars seen here, the latter example is especially relevant.

Come to think of it, Gary Russell had already done the whole “Galactic Federation as blatant Star Trek homage” spiel all the way back in Legacy, but I think what makes it work better in the case of The Dark Path is the fact that McIntee still hasn’t lost sight of the EEC/EU parallels at the heart of the original concept, and has actively used those factors as a stepping stone to make a deeper comment about the then-current political climate. Funny how that works…

Although, speaking of Epilira and the Federation made me realise that the whole “The DNA of the Piri Reis‘ alien crewmembers is being rewritten!” thing kinda fades into the background as the book continues. Sure, Koschei manipulates the Imperials to get them to use the Darkheart as an energy projector rather than as a weapon of existentially-tinged genocide, but it doesn’t seem as if that automatically undoes the changes to Salamanca or the erasure of Ipthiss and the Xarax.

The obvious assumption, given that we very demonstrably see the Doctor interact with Draconians and Terileptils past this point, is that the subsequent destruction of the Darkheart manages to undo these changes. The alternative is to suddenly accept that the events of stories like Frontier in Space or The Visitation happened very, very differently, and that frankly feels like a little too much weight to put on The Dark Path. All the same, it would have been nice to get even a single throwaway line to clarify the situation. If such a line does in fact exist, it’s buried deep enough that I completely missed it.

It feels weird to finally meet the Veltrochni, after having heard about them in just about every one of McIntee’s books so far. I’d guess this was his attempt to put something of a capstone on his Virgin novels, and it’s the kind of harmless indulgence that’s charming rather than infuriating.

Final Thoughts

I’d make some big song and dance about bidding farewell to McIntee here, but that’s obviously not the case, as he’ll go on to write six more books for the BBC lines over the next seven years or so. Closing on a pseudo-farewell to the Second Doctor feels similarly inappropriate, as we’ll be talking about The Murder Game in just ten books’ time. So uh… I guess I’ll just say that I hope the Troughton novels continue their very gradual upward trend in quality into the future. Maybe we’ll eventually get a masterpiece, who knows?

Regardless, I hope you’ll join me next time for the permanent return of Bernice Summerfield, as we properly welcome the Eighth Doctor and bid farewell to the New Adventures as we know them in Lance Parkin’s The Dying Days. Until then, however…

Kind regards,

Special Agent Dale Cooper

Virgin New Adventures Reviews: Lungbarrow by Marc Platt (or, “Looming Chaos”)

Within the continually unfolding text that is Doctor Who, there is one story that has always stood out from its contemporaries. It’s a story that would have offered an account of the Doctor’s origins that threw a wrench in everything we thought we knew, but which was eventually lost to the nebulous mists of production hell, with only whispered anecdotes and scattered internal documents to attest to its ever having existed at all. The story in question, of course, is none other than C. E. Webber’s Nothing at the End of the Lane.

As far as the programme’s “secret history” is concerned, Nothing at the End of the Lane is perhaps the ultimate expression of ambiguity and mystery. To be quite frank, the extent to which it can even be considered a bona fide “lost story” at all is extremely debatable, having only reached the most perfunctory stages of development – almost entirely consisting of a title and a basic idea of a synopsis – before being abandoned by Sydney Newman in favour of The Giants, an adventure that would have seen the regular cast miniaturised.

Because, y’know, that’s a perfectly cost-effective and filmable concept to throw out as part of your first episode, especially when you know you’ll be filming in the cramped and antiquated surroundings of Lime Grove Studio D.

For decades, fans weren’t even privy to much in the way of hard, concrete details on the life of Webber himself, an individual who never received an on-screen credit and was consequently shrouded in an all-pervading air of mystery. But with fans being the ravenous, trivia-hungry horde that they are, this dearth of available historical evidence would not prevent them from poring over the contents of these preliminary format guides in the sort of painstaking and meticulous detail that one might associate more with scholars of canon law, or an archaeological expedition uncovering a new Dead Sea Scroll.

Although many of the supplementary details contained within the pages of Webber’s documents were subsequently jettisoned or substantially reworked by the time the pilot episode assumed its final shape as An Unearthly Child – or, depending on who you ask, 100,000 BC or The Tribe of Gum – the broad parameters of the show are still quite readily discernible.

Webber broaches the possibility of cliffhangers as a mainstay of each episode’s format, while much is made of the unreliability of the strange and as yet unnamed time-travelling vessel into which Ian and Barbara Cliff and Lola would inadvertently stumble over the course of the first episode, features which should be immediately familiar to any fan possessing even a passing familiarity with classic Doctor Who.

Perhaps the most significant divergence from the pattern which the series would eventually go on to establish, then, concerns the backstory of the Doctor, namely in the fact that Webber actually made the decision to give the character a definitive backstory in the first place.

Admittedly, I use the word “definitive” under advisement here, at least as regards the first version of the format document. All we really get are some vague hints that he fled from an unspecified futuristic society to craft some kind of shining utopia in the past, while being pursued by the authorities of his original domain. Not only that, but he would exhibit a deep-seated antipathy to any technological or scientific advancement, to the point of actively trying to prevent such developments if at all possible.

This last notion, more than any other dreamt up by Webber, seems to have provided the impetus for Sydney Newman to request that the guide be revised, and it’s hard to disagree too strongly with his objections. It is, after all, supremely difficult to craft an educational show with a positive outlook on the wonders of the universe when the protagonist’s own worldview is fundamentally at odds with such a message.

Whatever the case may be, the second version of the guide was rather more explicit, now revealing that the Doctor in fact hailed from the year 5733, was a sprightly 650 years old, and had seemingly been involved in some kind of galactic conflict, with the latter fact only being hazily suggested to the audience through periodic bursts of clarity in amongst the character’s otherwise chaotic and jumbled memory. As you’ve probably been able to surmise by now, though, none of this proposed backstory would ever make it to the screen, numbering among the tidbits to be lost in the transition from The Giants to An Unearthly Child.

After a brief spell in which the character of the Doctor was reworked to be a talented hypnotist who travelled through time and space in his “Change and Dimensional Electronic Selector and Extender,” Anthony Coburn would eventually settle upon an origin story which cast this wanderer in the fourth dimension as a Lord of the House of Dooclare, whose home planet had been attacked by the Palladin Hordes.

In the ensuing confusion, the Doctor had chosen to safeguard the heir to the throne, Findooclare, who would eventually adopt the name Suzanne – eventually just Susan – Foreman upon their arrival on Earth, having now assumed the role previously filled by the character designated Bridget or “Biddy” in Webber’s scripts.

In keeping with everything we’ve discussed so far, all of these ideas were rather promptly forgotten, but it’s definitely worth pondering exactly why that is. On a basic production level, the answer is more than likely quite a simple one: although Coburn played a crucial role in scripting the first Doctor Who story, it quickly became apparent that the attempts to get him to provide a follow-up story in the form of The Masters of Luxor were in vain, with the production team instead opting to produce Terry Nation’s The Daleks.

After that point, all bets were off as to the guise that the programme would eventually adopt, and Coburn’s status as a freelance writer at the time he had worked on An Unearthly Child may well have proved a problem for any attempts to legitimise the House of Dooclare’s struggles against the Palladin Hordes as a serious part of the show’s lore. I mean, that’s really just nothing more than idle speculation on my part, but Doctor Who is filled with these sorts of vagaries thrown up by British copyright law – as in the case of The Daleks itself – so it wouldn’t surprise me in the least if that played a role.

We might be tempted to conclude that the bigger problem is actually that it’s all a bit silly, but even that needn’t necessarily be an insurmountable roadblock in and of itself. Doctor Who has always been a profoundly silly show, and even the most loving and generous accounts of its history must be prepared to admit that fact.

What’s more, it’s very hard to construct a serious argument that it is somehow any more ridiculous to proclaim that the Doctor hails from the House of Dooclare than it is to identify him as a Time Lord from the planet Gallifrey. In the real world, both concepts are equally nonsensical, with the only material difference for the audience of 2023 being that the Time Lords actually managed to break through and become a crucial element of the show’s history, sticking around just long enough to prove that they have, if nothing else, a rather refined and ostentatious sense in headgear, and a penchant for naming increasingly banal items after some dead bloke who looks an awful lot like James Bond.

At a push, I’d venture to say that the real problem – difficult though it is to extrapolate from scattered clues that never materially affected the substance of the show itself – is that Coburn’s ideas are silly, but only in a manifestly predictable fashion. There’s nothing here which wouldn’t feel right at home in a particularly bland and uninspired space opera, an impression only reinforced by the rather unapologetically space-operatic trappings of The Masters of Luxor.

My objection here is not based upon some misguided notion that Doctor Who “cannot do space opera,” which would be a monumentally daft claim for me to make. Even if we were to leave aside the fact that there exist vast swathes of the programme’s history which were more than happy to “do space opera” on a semi-regular basis, as it were, we would still run up against Doctor Who‘s essential conceptual and stylistic fluidity. Doctor Who can, given the right set of circumstances, do just about anything it sets its mind to. On occasion, it can even do it very well.

But to explicitly define the Doctor as a character who has escaped from a generic space opera before the show’s beginnings smacks uncomfortably of insinuating that Doctor Who is, by extension, a generic space opera on a foundational level.

Aesthetically, there’s not many interesting directions in which you can develop that suggestion, beyond maybe throwing in an occasional aside to the effect of Susan’s “I was born in the 49th century” comment, and eventually just deciding to bite the bullet and allow the space opera stylings to slam into the narrative in full force.

It obviously becomes the stuff of wild fan speculation to try and envision the ultimate realisation of a concept like “the Palladin Hordes,” but it seems unlikely that it could have ever found an expression half as strange and haunting as the Time Lords using their God-like powers to entrap the Doctor, Jamie and Zoe at the close of The War Games.

This feels like an appropriate time, then, to pivot to a discussion of Gallifrey, and thereby contrast all this talk of discarded origin stories with the actuality of the backstory that ended up sticking. The most obvious distinction that presents itself, as we’ve already kind of set up, is that the Time Lords’ fabled homeworld is – in its best moments – a rather strange and mutable realm, which can be just about anything that an individual writer needs it to be at a given point in time.

The straightforward, unabashed splendour of Terrance Dicks’ Gallifrey is distinct from the cynical, grubby squabbling of the planet as envisioned by Robert Holmes. And yet, paradoxically, each take on the concept is still pretty unmistakably Gallifrey. More than anything else, this is what makes Gallifrey a perfect fit for the show that Doctor Who would eventually become, and the show that it was arguably already beginning to transform into by the time the production office chose Nation over Coburn and irrevocably sealed their fate.

We must, however, draw a distinction between Gallifrey as a concept that feels in-step with the characteristics of the show around it, and Gallifrey as a worthwhile, self-reflexive subject in its own right, whose iconography and history are interesting enough to serve as the sole driving force behind an episode. We need to draw this distinction because, quite frankly, the latter idea is woefully misguided, and forms a not insignificant part of the trap that the television series eventually found itself stuck in when handling the Time Lords in stories like The Invasion of Time or Arc of Infinity.

As a general rule, it’s fair to say that Gallifrey works best as an abstract ideal, a loose collection of facts around which to hang a bigger story, and a tool to provide a given writer with a springboard that can serve to launch them into a deeper exploration of ideas and aesthetics that interest them.

Large portions of fandom would, perhaps unsurprisingly, disagree with this sentiment, essentially demanding that the aforementioned loose collection of facts be so tightly-wound as to already be fielding offers from Rolex and TAG Heuer to be allowed to reverse engineer its internals.

The easy target here is, of course, Doctor Who Appreciation Society President Jan Vincent-Rudzki’s infamously scathing review of The Deadly Assassin on its original transmission, in which he laughably bemoans what he perceives as inconsistencies in the story’s presentation of Gallifrey, little realising that virtually everything Robert Holmes established within The Deadly Assassin would be enshrined as gospel truth in the years to come, before he finally closes with the eternal question: “What has happened to the magic of Doctor Who?”

Like virtually every sufficiently notorious moment in the history of Doctor Who fandom, Vincent-Rudzki’s review has been pored over to the point where it would be exceedingly difficult for me to add anything new to the conversation, at least as far as the actual quality of its reasoning and analysis is concerned.

More to the point, being written a good twenty years before the publication of Lungbarrow, and at least a good twelve years or so before Marc Platt had so much as decided what exactly a “Lungbarrow” even was, the extent to which this original review of The Deadly Assassin can be taken to speak directly to the novel that we’re talking about today is, by necessity, limited.

Nonetheless, it does manage to speak quite well to a few key truths about fandom, and that alone makes it a worthwhile topic of analysis when discussing anything even vaguely adjacent to a controversial conception of Gallifrey, a description which Lungbarrow most assuredly embodies.

Most notably, Vincent-Rudzki inadvertently reveals that fandom has pretty much always been a remarkably silly place, and not in the wholesome, heartwarming kind of way that we usually associate with Doctor Who.

No, the kind of silliness on display here is one of intense entitlement, an attitude where knowledge of the show’s history is treated as the only justification needed to start slagging off the show in a rather hyperbolic and faintly ridiculous fashion. It’s a model of Doctor Who fandom based on power, on the ability to sway the tides of opinion through deference to one’s own purportedly enlightened state on the minutiae of the show. So, in other words, a model of fandom that’ll be familiar to you if you’ve turned on the Internet at any point in the last thirty years…

Which will be all of you, then.

And make no mistake, the Internet is the crux of the matter here, as it was always going to be in trying to parse out the implications of a Doctor Who novel about Gallifrey published in March 1997.

In this respect, the fact that Vincent-Rudzki’s scathingly narrow-minded critique of The Deadly Assassin ends up subsumed by a more overwhelming tide of positive fan opinion is actually wholly foreseeable. It’s really just another iteration of a pattern we’ve already observed in the case of both Star Trek and Star Wars, with initially controversial instalments like The Wrath of Khan or The Empire Strikes Back eventually becoming revered fan favourites. Although fandom has virtually always contained the harsh and excoriating voices that we might associate with more modern discourse, it’s hard to avoid the impression that, in the pre-Internet era, these elements were largely left to stew in their own embittered juices until they ran out of steam.

By 1997, we are pretty firmly in the Internet era of fandom. We have been for a while, really. Science fiction fans have historically had quite a strong presence among those early adopters of Internet technology, and that’s how you end up with Usenet groups like rec.arts.doctorwho exerting considerable influence over the contours of fandom.

Still, it’s apparent that this period is something of a turning point in the adoption of the Internet within wider society. In 1994, Star Trek Generations became the first major motion picture to market itself through an official website, with Paramount promoting the site on the fast-expanding online service provider, Prodigy. The X-Files, one of the first shows to cultivate a truly massive and mainstream Internet fan following, is rapidly barrelling towards the heights of its popularity, having recently been chosen as the lead-out programme for the 1997 Super Bowl.

The site that would become IMDb had made the leap to the World Wide Web in 1993, hosted on the servers of Cardiff University’s computer sciences department; the first version of its famous Top 250 list was published in late April 1996, just a few short weeks before the American premiere of the Paul McGann television movie.

You can probably see where I’m going with this one.

As far as contentious revisions to the Doctor’s origins go, the TV movie’s sudden declaration that the Eighth Doctor was “half-human, on [his] mother’s side” is certainly one of them. In fact, it’s so infamous that it has often effectively served as Exhibit A in the argument that the movie was, at the very least, a fundamentally flawed take on Doctor Who that rightfully bombed and sent the franchise back into a televisual coma for the next nine years or so. Those arguments, naturally, primarily took place online.

It’s tempting to wonder what form these objections to the TV movie would have taken in the absence of the Internet. Would the insinuation of half-humanity have been quietly forgotten, discarded as a quirk of the bizarre status of the Wilderness Years as has been, more or less, the approach adopted by the revival post-2005, or would it have actually been accepted into the canon, leaving behind a few disgruntled Jan Vincent-Rudzki analogues in its wake?

It’s impossible to know, of course. If you’re imagining an alternate history without the Internet just for the sake of thinking about the reaction to a single piece of middling television from 1996, you’ve changed so much that you might as well have just gone for the big-ticket items like the Kennedy assassination or the outcome of the Second World War. Paradoxically – because really, that’s the only way you can coherently talk about the Eighth Doctor, or incoherently talk about him, for that matter – you would also end up undoing the existence of the very blog on which you’re having this hypothetical conversation, so I mean, there’s that as well…

(There’s also a perverse irony in the fact that, as we mentioned back in our discussion of the wheelings-and-dealings of American television in Eternity Weeps, there’s reason to suspect that Internet fandom played a rather large part in persuading Universal to make a hard-and-fast budgetary commitment to the TV movie to begin with. Truly a monkey’s paw situation if ever I’ve heard one…)

It has been rightly pointed out, mind you, that the half-human revelation doesn’t actually meaningfully advance anything found in the television movie itself, despite being reiterated multiple times. Furthermore, people have quite reasonably speculated that the idea’s presence in Matthew Jacobs’ script is really just a relic of an earlier, abandoned draft by John Leekley, which retrofitted the Doctor and the Master’s rivalry into a rather generic Hero’s Journey framework that cast Cardinal Borusa as their mutual grandfather, with both Time Lords being sons of the lost Gallifreyan explorer Ulysses.

Naturally, at the time of the film’s original airing in May 1996, none of this would have been common knowledge among the viewing audience. By the following March, however, it had been two months since the publication of Jean-Marc Lofficier’s The Nth Doctor. Billed as “an in-depth study of the films that almost were,” it featured never-before-seen details of Leekley’s treatments, alongside those of his predecessors. Indeed, it’s been suggested that the book was rather too candid, with much of the material that informed its creation seemingly having been sourced from documents provided to Lofficier and his wife while Philip Segal had hired them in an advisory capacity on the McGann film.

I think it’s fitting at this point to quote from Doctor Who Magazine‘s own Dave Owen and his review of The Nth Doctor in issue #247, serving as it does as a nice little microcosm both of fan reaction to the TV movie in particular, and to the general subject of writerly efforts to reveal the Doctor’s backstory:

There are questionnaire-style interviews, too, with most of the writers, whose screenplays largely ignore the second word of the series’ title, and attempt to cram in as much insight into the motivation and personal history of the Doctor as possible. Gallifrey features strongly in many of the scripts; the shock I experienced upon seeing Paul McGann’s Doctor staggering around San Francisco telling the innermost secrets of his life to anyone who would listen, is as naught compared to my potential reaction had any of these stories been made – Borusa the Doctor’s grandfather! The Master the Doctor’s brother!

And so this is the status quo we’re left with if we want to make sense of Lungbarrow, a novel which finds itself faced with the already supremely unenviable task of wrapping up sixty New Adventures featuring the Seventh Doctor in a starring role, adapting a legendarily unproduced piece of the so-called “Cartmel Masterplan” that was nearly a decade old by 1997.

On top of this, the state of the franchise virtually ensured that no matter what Platt came up with in answer to the age-old questions which hovered around the Doctor’s departure from Gallifrey, his account of events was almost certain to be swept aside with the coming of the new BBC Books line, which were increasingly rumoured to be making a conscious decision to define themselves in stark contrast to some of the more polarising hallmarks of Virgin’s particular brand of Doctor Who.

Add to that fandom’s aforementioned ambient distrust of any writer who even gives a hint of obsessing over origin stories at this point in time, in the wake of a TV movie that’s already being held up as one of the prime guilty parties in committing that cardinal sin, and you’re practically guaranteed to have a book that will start a conversation, if nothing else.

All of which is to say that it’s practically inevitable that Lungbarrow effectively ended up as one last fractious shot across the bow of the franchise’s continuity. To this day, ask a Doctor Who fan their opinion on Looms, or the Other, or the Pythia, or even just Lungbarrow as a piece of fiction, and you’re liable to get a pretty broad smattering of viewpoints.

I must confess to having played a little bit of a trick on you with that list, however. Lest you think too poorly of me for such underhandedness, dear reader, I wholeheartedly maintain that I only did so in order to make a point about one of the more frustrating aspects of the Lungbarrow “discourse,” such as it is.

You may note that, in rattling off the things that fans have pored over in the decades since the Virgin line wound to a close – and make no mistake, this is the last New Adventure in all but name, being the final instalment to bear the trappings of the series’ most recognisable form – I began simply listing off a bunch of plot points, relegating Lungbarrow‘s actual artistic merits to last place.

This was not a fluke on my part, but rather a microcosm of the overwhelming majority of fandom’s discussions of Lungbarrow, where the actual substantial realities of the novel are allowed to fade into the background so that we can instead opt to bicker about a single author’s take on the mythology that, if we’re being honest, doesn’t actually have any material consequences for the franchise moving forward.

And, well, there are two reasons why this is mildly infuriating. On the one hand, I think it just tends to obscure that Marc Platt and the novel he’s constructed here – the last of his contributions that we’ll be talking about for the purposes of the blog, though he’s continued to be rather prolific over at Big Finish, not to mention quite talented to boot – are actually significantly more intelligent than the most prominent naysayers would credit them with being.

Yet even that is insufficient to account for why I find these conversations enormously exhausting, however. Taste varies, and even as someone who unironically loves Time’s Crucible in all its incomprehensible, indigestible glory – I reiterate, dear reader, I went back to reread it in 2022 for no deeper reason than that I actually wanted to – I am more than prepared to admit that Platt’s writing style is not exactly what you might call accessible or crowd-pleasing.

My deeper problem is that so many of Lungbarrow‘s detractors seem to skirt perilously close to the kind of obsessive continuity debates that mar Vincent-Rudzki’s appraisal of The Deadly Assassin, while simultaneously giving off the impression that they instead believe themselves to be filling the role of Robert Holmes in this analogy.

But OK, let’s back up a bit, because I will concede that I’m being perhaps a little flippant. If nothing else, there’s an underlying logic at play here that is far more cogent than an off-the-cuff invocation of an undefined “magic of Doctor Who,” so we should at least entertain this possibility in the interests of fairness.

There are two broad camps into which we can separate negative reactions to Lungbarrow. The first are those folks who feel a general antipathy to the New Adventures, and were therefore never exactly likely to be swayed by Platt’s vision of Gallifrey to begin with. After all, there’s a fair chance that they’d already tuned out when he started laying the groundwork all the way back in Time’s Crucible, if they hadn’t already sworn off the NAs even earlier. This is a valid viewpoint, even if I obviously wholeheartedly disagree with the basic premise that the series is without merit.

But in many ways the more interesting repudiation comes courtesy of those fans with a more positive disposition towards the New Adventures, who nevertheless maintain that Platt’s novel is effectively a last-minute stumble from an otherwise rather important and groundbreaking set of books.

At the risk of making an extremely broad generalisation here, the argument generally seems to proceed as follows: Lungbarrow represents one last despairing try by Marc Platt to legitimise his own soon-to-be-forgotten ideas about the mythology of the Time Lords and Gallifrey, only reluctantly feeding into the TV movie while not-so-subtextually thumbing its nose at Matthew Jacobs’ implication that the Doctor could possibly be half-human. Not only that, but it’s usually characterised as a rather regressive step that is not at all in tune with all the rather wonderful work Kate Orman did in wrapping up the more intimate mythological threads in The Room With No Doors, and thus ensures that the New Adventures go out on a cult fandom-pleasing whimper rather than a bang.

So here’s the thing. I completely get the reasoning behind this argument. Lord knows I’ve made much out of the struggle within Doctor Who between the forces of the cult and the domestic throughout 1997, so I’m not exactly going to dismiss it out of hand. It’s also, not entirely insignificantly, the argument made by El Sandifer in her piece on the novel, and TARDIS Eruditorum has very much become a strong influence on this blog as the years have gone by. For all that I might understand the reasoning at play here, though, I’m far from being convinced by it.

The first thing that makes me raise my eyebrows a little is just how much rests on our interpretation of Platt as some continuity-proselytising and self-important ideologue who was unwilling to cede any ground on a television story which was rejected and reworked nearly a decade earlier.

In order for this interpretation to work, we’re effectively taking as read the assumption that the most appropriate way to read Lungbarrow is through adopting a biographical approach to Platt and his contributions to Doctor Who, such that the thesis of his standing apart from the other authors around him in the New Adventures’ endgame can eventually be proven.

On the basis of the evidence alone, I do think this is an extraordinarily cynical reading that fails to account for several salient points, most obvious of which is Platt’s own description of his creative process in the extensive commentary which accompanies the 2003 BBCi eBook edition.

Not only does he claim to have been initially indecisive as to whether his third contribution to Virgin should take the form of Lungbarrow, having done so in his telling of events at the urging of Ben Aaronovitch and, latterly, Rebecca Levene, but he also recounts being in sufficiently close contact with Kate Orman, at the very least, to have rung her up from the other side of the world in the midst of her birthday party in Sydney to discuss their respective novels. This account is bolstered by the fact that Platt specifically recalls the topic of J. G. Archer’s painting, The Death of Arthur, an artwork which makes a direct appearance in The Room With No Doors‘ prologue, suitably retouched by the Doctor to include a Dalek and a Merlin wearing a smiley-face badge.

You could perhaps handwave this away by saying that Platt had six years in which to read The Room With No Doors and include that detail as a means of making himself out to be significantly more in tune with his peers than he actually was, but that’s frankly straying too far into the ludicrous realms of outright conspiracy theory in the vein of snarky YouTube critics taking clips and interviews out of context to prove that Steven Moffat is an evil, seething misogynist who thinks he has the biggest brain in the universe and hates Doctor Who, and is thus scheming to bring it down from the inside in quite possibly the lamest Kim Philby impersonation imaginable.

No, all indications are that Platt genuinely did coordinate the particulars of his book with those authors around him, in much the same way as Lance Parkin will, in The Dying Days, go on to include a nod to the Eighth Doctor being “the Champion of Life and Time” in deference to Jonathan Blum and Kate Orman’s then-unpublished Vampire Science. It requires significantly more work, in fact, to “prove” that Platt was unconsciously setting out to remake the New Adventures in his own image than it does to just assume, as seems to be the case, that he was in fact marching perfectly in time to the beat of Virgin’s drum.

At this point, you’re probably practically champing at the bit to beat me to death with your own personal copies of the collected writings of Roland Barthes, and you’d probably be right to do so. Appeals to authorial intent ultimately shouldn’t form our argumentative backbone here, but that maxim proves a double-edged sword, and if you’re going to agree on that point, then you need to give up the great game of trying to discern Platt’s motives.

(I’d also kindly ask that you refrain from enacting the aforementioned act of book-tinged slaughter upon me, if for no other reason than that I’d much rather go out under the tender mercies of a hefty Joseph Campbell tome, not because I think its claims have any appreciable value whatsoever, but because it’s infinitely more relevant to Lungbarrow and, more to the point, far more demeaning. It’s the definition of a win-win!)

So if we put all of that aside, I guess we’re left with the material facts of the novel’s revelations. A fair amount of people are probably already familiar with the broad strokes of what exactly Platt reveals here, but for the benefit of those folks who are just joining us, let’s provide a quick refresher.

Actually, that’s a surprisingly good starting point, as evidenced by the fact that that’s precisely where the novel opens, in a rather comical “Previously on the New Adventures…” sequence that catches the audience up to speed in amusing fashion. Or does it? I’m admittedly not entirely clear on the point of whether or not this whole sequence is something added in the 2003 edition, and I’d check the print copy but, well, print copies of Lungbarrow have a tendency to go for prices somewhere in excess of certain small countries’ GDP, and I’m a Gen Z university student living in the third most-populous city in Australia in the midst of a cost of living crisis. I’m not made of money, folks.

(In fact, all signs point to my actually being made of anti-money, which I didn’t think was at all possible, but here we are.)

Thus it’s a little bit difficult to judge the provenance of this sequence, and that’s a shame, as it’s rather important evidence in determining exactly how seriously Marc Platt is taking all of this. For our purposes, we’ve already established that we’re not actually interested in that question at all, so it’s sufficient to just say that it gives us the pleasant mental image of Timothy Dalton doing his best Homer Simpson by having Rassilon utter “D’oh!” in a moment of bewilderment.

If nothing else, that alone should be canon.

We’re still dancing around the central attraction, though, so let’s just go ahead and lay it all out. Lungbarrow gives us our most extensive look at the Doctor’s life in the hazy days before the events of An Unearthly Child, taking us all the way back to his ancestral home, the titular House of Lungbarrow, effectively a living, sentient building which owes a not inconsiderable debt to the Gothic stylings of Mervyn Peake’s Gormenghast trilogy.

About 673 years before the “present day” portions of the novel, the not-yet-Doctor ends up causing quite a stir among the Cousins of his House when he announces that he doesn’t intend to try his hand at the cutthroat world of Gallifreyan politics, but instead wishes to become… well, a Doctor. With the family having consequently chosen to disown him, he’s eventually framed by his jealous Cousin Glospin for the murder of Ordinal-General Quences, an older member of the House who had effectively served as a mentor and father figure to our fledgling protagonist.

Running in parallel to all of this, the Cousins have also used the House’s Loom – established all the way back in Time’s Crucible, and about which more later – to create Owis, a replacement for the disgraced Doctor. This is, however, entirely against established Gallifreyan protocol, and the House consequently sinks below Mount Lung, trapping the Cousins in a subterranean nightmare for the better part of seven centuries.

We got all that? OK cool, now it’s time to get to the controversial bit.

See, it turns out that the Doctor is in fact the reincarnation of the Other, a mysterious third founder of Gallifrey who was a contemporary of both Rassilon and Omega, who flung himself into the Looms’ Prime Distributor in the knowledge that his genetic pattern would eventually be woven into a new body. Millions of years later, after his disownment, the Doctor eventually travels back to the early days of Gallifrey and picks up Susan, revealed here to actually be the granddaughter of the Other.

In most accounts of the novel, this is the point at which Platt doesn’t so much jump the shark as he does spontaneously initiate a British space programme in the great Ralph Cornish tradition, and achieves escape velocity in his efforts to lord his supremacy over the poor, benighted selachians and their pitiful oceans.

And again, putting my own facetiousness to one side here, I can understand the logic underpinning these concerns. When I lay it all out like that, in a couple paragraphs’ worth of text, it certainly sounds profoundly dry and uninteresting. What’s worse, it might very well run the risk of turning the Doctor into just another Campbellian protagonist in the vein of a Luke Skywalker or a Harry Potter.

(Since Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone wouldn’t see print until June of 1997, mind, nobody reading Lungbarrow on its initial printing would have had the vocabulary to describe what exactly a “Harry Potter” even was. Given how that whole mess turned out, we are left with the rather inescapable conclusion that they probably have the much sweeter deal, ignorance being bliss and all that.)

Except the thing that we miss out on in treating Lungbarrow as nothing but a series of plot developments and epic revelations rather than as a novel, is… well, the fact that it actually is a novel, and a pretty well-written one at that. So here’s the point where I finally get to lay down my own personal thesis on why Platt is far more conscious of the need to preserve the Doctor’s fundamental mystery than most readings seem to give him credit for, and there are a few structural tricks he employs that can help us discern the scope of that consciousness.

The first of these tricks is the repeated focus on mirrors, most prominently as a means by which Satthralope is able to keep tabs on the denizens of the House during their long entombment. The notion that this system functions through an endless series of complex and precise reflections of an original image is, scientifically speaking, something we might charitably describe as “nonsensical,” but it makes perfect sense if we accept that we’re operating under Gormenghast logic. In other words, it’s the rather dreamlike logic of Gothic fantasy, not anything that we would recognise as science.

In light of this concession to the fantastical, it’s surely significant that the first of Chris’ strange, revelatory dreams to hint at the Doctor’s purported history within the House begins with his crossing into an abandoned mirror. Not only does it serve as yet another shoutout to the works of Lewis Carroll within Platt’s books – with Chris quite literally going “through the looking glass,” as it were – but it effectively ensures that the audience will always remain at arm’s length from any of the events shown to them, just as Satthralope’s own personal surveillance system allows her to scry out distant corners of the House.

It’s telling, then, that the dream remains relatively stable right up until the point that the Doctor ostensibly intrudes upon the story, with the fragmentation of the mirror coinciding neatly with his “murder” of Quences. Even if it turns out to be a disguised Glospin, the implication seems to be that the mere idea of the Doctor’s presence, however erroneous, is sufficient to destabilise any notions we might hold as to the objective historical truth of the House’s recollections.

Later on, the Doctor and Innocet seem rather uncertain as to the veracity of the memories rattling around Chris’ head when they find themselves cast in the role of scrutinising the former’s flight from Gallifrey. “Did this really happen to you?” Innocet inquires, speaking, one imagines, for many readers. “Apparently so,” the Doctor replies, which isn’t exactly the most ringing endorsement as to the soundness of the memories’ content.

When the duo ask Badger for his own account of Quences’ murder, he merely admits that he cannot recall such an event; as Innocet points out, however, even these cold, mechanical and presumed-to-be impartial processes of machine memory could well have been subverted through the process of erasure, and the medium of collective, shared remembrance is by its very nature impermanent and mutable. “Some echoes bang around the walls forever,” to quote Innocet on the subject of the House’s troubled mental reverberations. “They get magnified and exaggerated.”

This is, essentially, why I’m deeply skeptical of the claims that Marc Platt somehow fails to recognise the inherent unsatisfactoriness of any attempt to resolve the mystery of the Doctor’s origins. On the contrary, I think the text of Lungbarrow – as opposed to the imagined construct dreamt up in the minds of fans over the years, helped along by its relative inaccessibility – could just as easily support an opposite reading.

In this regard, Platt actually lays his cards on the table pretty early on. Confronted with a gun-toting reconstruction of her past self, Ace/Dorothée ascertains her mirror image’s artificiality by realising that the double’s knowledge only seems to extend to the barest, most two-dimensional plot summary of the facts of her life. “You’ve got all the lurid facts,” she taunts, “but you don’t have a clue how I feel.” In a book which rather consciously avoids giving us too many sequences from the Doctor’s own perspective, the phrasing here is rather telling.

(Also delightful is Dorothée explicitly noting a discrepancy in the badge collection on her doppelgänger’s bomber jacket as a “continuity error.” In many ways, I would argue that Ace is rather crucial to discerning the central thrust of Lungbarrow, which makes it frustrating that she’s almost universally one of the novel’s least-discussed aspects.)

This reading is only further bolstered by a later scene, in which Lord Ferain rather bluntly asks Leela, “Who is [the Doctor] really?” And in response, we get a passage that I really think I should just quote in full:

She shook her head. “He’s a wise man. A shaman. No, he is more than that.” For a moment, she was uncertain. In her memories, there was an excitement and wonderment, a sense of danger that the thought of the Doctor always aroused. But she had always accepted him; never questioned his identity. Finally, she knew her answer. She understood the Doctor’s secret. He could not and must never be tied down, pinpointed or categorised.

“He is a mystery,” she said with the utmost reverence.

There is, perhaps, some slight wiggle room afforded for interpretation here. One could make the argument that Platt is merely having Leela expound upon this viewpoint in order to brutally knock it down later on. Certainly, when she reiterates her viewpoint to Dorothée, Time’s Vigilante remains unswerving in her desire to learn some measure of the Doctor’s secrets. “Maybe,” she remarks of the Doctor’s potentially perpetual status as a mystery, “but I still want to know.”

But there’s one very simple reason that I don’t believe this to be the point of Lungbarrow, and once again we run into the annoying tendency people have to neglect to mention something that changes the whole tone of the novel’s flashbacks. You see, towards the end of the story, the Doctor pretty explicitly chooses to jettison the portion of his subconscious containing the memories of his early life on Gallifrey.

Not only that, but his final decision to embark on the fateful journey to Skaro is framed as a direct repudiation of his ostensible connection to the Other, having already emerged, at the novel’s climax, from a brief sojourn into the embrace of the House’s Loom, incoherently babbling to Chris that he doesn’t wish to know the answers to the myriad questions swirling around his identity. The confusion felt by the Doctor in this moment is explicitly described by Platt as a “fright of rebirth,” laying bare the sense that this is supposed to be a new beginning in the wake of these fresh mysteries.

Sure, there’s some ambiguity here as to exactly what proportion of his subconscious memories were jettisoned, and you could perhaps argue that this represents nothing more than a final act of cowardice on Platt’s part, an unabashed hitting of the reset button to avoid the more profound consequences of the revelations that he himself brought about.

Equally, however… I mean, what did you expect? This is the sixtieth New Adventure, Virgin’s license is expiring in a mere two months, and BBC Books are due to start their own line of Doctor Who novels shortly thereafter. Is it really such an ungodly surprise that Platt should wager on his ideas being disregarded like this? For that matter, can anyone really look at a novel like The Eight Doctors and seriously tell me that his judgment wasn’t proved entirely correct in very short order?

This is the real secret of Lungbarrow. It isn’t some last hubristic attempt to impose Platt’s will on the shape of the franchise, forever and ever amen, but a sincere acknowledgment of the ways in which the franchise has very materially moved on since 1989. Indeed, Platt actually goes so far as to quite firmly reject one of the key tenets of fan lore that had built up around the myth of the increasingly inaccurately-named Cartmel Masterplan and the fabled lost twenty-seventh season of the classic programme, with the Doctor reflecting on his abandoned plan to send Ace off to Gallifrey and enrol her in the Academy to become a Time Lord.

(If anything, it’s Chris – having admittedly gotten a bit lost in the shuffle in his final story as a regular, or as Finn Clark rather drolly puts it over at the Doctor Who Ratings Guide, “[retiring] from the plot to become a human television” – who gets the ending most analogous to that originally planned for Ace, becoming an agent of the Time Lords. Dead Romance will quite plainly reveal that it doesn’t exactly work out all that well, but it certainly feels like a natural progression from his role as the impartial Adjudicator of the Doctor’s subconscious here, which gets repeatedly stressed throughout the novel.)

Sure, Lungbarrow might be adapting a rejected script from Season 26 that was eventually reworked into Ghost Light, but I don’t think Platt is really trying to recapture the glory days of his only televised script for the programme as some have claimed over the years. Instead, it almost seems to be something of a personal exorcism for himself and the programme, releasing the feverish ideas rattling around in his head so that the series can move forward, just as the Doctor needs to cast off that heavily symbolic robe woven by the Eternals from his past experiences if he ever hopes to open the Gate of the Future.

Despite the fervent hopes of Quences’ ghost, the idea of the Doctor being shackled to a boring old House, however magical, complete with boring Gallifreyan political power, is antithetical to the character on a very basic level, and it’s to Platt’s credit that he understands that as thoroughly as he seems to.

Frankly, it’s hard to imagine Lungbarrow even working half as well as the third story in Season 26 as it does in this, its final form, the last “proper” New Adventure before the curtain call. It’s weird, it’s strange, it’s probably tragically overwritten in places, but it’s not half as franchise-breaking as it’s often made out to be, and all those qualities I just listed are qualities that the NAs quite frequently possessed in spades.

This isn’t a desecration of the series’ grave, it’s a fitting and respectful epitaph to a wondrous period in the history of Doctor Who that we’ll never quite be able to recapture again. It almost seems more insulting and sacrilegious to turn such a gloomily beautiful novel into nothing more than a nexus of controversy over stupid continuity minutiae, when it’s actually so, so much more.

In 1976, Jan Vincent-Rudzki petulantly asked what had happened to the magic of Doctor Who. Twenty years later, Lungbarrow answers him in rather cutting fashion, a final mystical incantation in the bizarrely loveable corner of the franchise that was the New Adventures.

And I think I’ll let Platt have the final word, through the Doctor:

I’m me. The Doctor. What I have been, someone might have imagined. What I will be, how can I tell?

In the end, we all played our part in imagining the Doctor, whether he came from the House of Dooclare or of Lungbarrow, whether Susan was the grandchild of the Other or was born in the 49th century. Our imagination is the point, because our memory never has a chance of keeping pace with it. And whatever his origins, there’s one crucial element that Platt understands, that we have all collectively imagined, whatever our opinions on Looms or the Pythia may be.

The Doctor. In the TARDIS. Next stop everywhere.

Miscellaneous Observations

I’m wary of straying too much into the Lungbarrow asexuality discourse, on account of my not being aspec and therefore not really wanting to tread on the toes of anyone who is more directly affected by these kinds of considerations. With that being said, the notion that Marc Platt deliberately set out to vilify asexuals by presenting the Looms as a monstrosity is a big enough part of the conversation surrounding this book that I do at least want to give it some consideration here, even if I should by no means be your primary source on such matters.

That should be, y’know, actual aspec people.

Anyway, while I totally understand the concerns on this matter, I’m not entirely convinced that a reading of the Time Lords as analogous to asexuals is really all that supported by the text of the novel. Sure, it’s made plain that the vast majority of Time Lords don’t have any interest in sex, with Leela and Andred being a glaring anomaly, and the Looms enable them to reproduce in spite of that fact. To reproduce asexually, even.

Equally, however, I don’t think this is really supposed to be equivalent to the lived experience of asexuality. If anything, given the heavy Victorian influence that practically drips from every page of the novel, and the historical treatment of the Time Lords as stand-ins for the upper crust of the British aristocracy, I think you can make a much stronger argument that it’s just an analogue for good old-fashioned stereotypical nineteenth-century sexual repression.

This is only further reinforced by Platt’s decision to stress the fact that the sexual politics of Gallifreyan society effectively amount to little more than an extended experiment in eugenics, with Glospin being rather explicitly named as a “Cellular Eugenicist,” an idea that not only proves crucial to the resolution of the murder mystery, but which also carries some very specific connotations when you’re dealing with a clearly Victorian-influenced society. I mean, this is the guy who wrote Ghost Light as a not-so-subtle takedown of social Darwinism and scientific racism, are you really going to tell me that I’m just grasping at straws here?

This is, I think, the real motivator behind the last-minute revelation that Leela is pregnant with Andred’s child. I don’t believe it to be a case of “Ah, those cold, inhuman asexuals just need to have sex and then they’ll realise what they’re missing” – a viewpoint which is, if I may be positively crystal clear on this point, wholly repugnant – but rather the dawning of a realisation within Gallifreyan society that maybe having a social order which operates along eugenicist lines is bad, actually. Unless the popular image of asexuals among acephobes is that of twentieth-century eugenics proponents like Charles Davenport or John Maynard Keynes, I’m not personally all that convinced that Platt deliberately set out to vilify aspec people, as is sometimes claimed.

Nonetheless, as I’ve repeatedly stressed throughout this review, authorial intent is not everything. We don’t need to prove that Jonathan Demme was sitting around and actively scheming to hurt gay and trans people in order to raise concerns about The Silence of the Lambs and its treatment of Buffalo Bill, for instance, so I certainly understand if people are made uncomfortable by Lungbarrow‘s treatment of the Looms, and I sincerely hope that this didn’t come across as me trying to push down on a group of people who face enough marginalisation and discrimination as it is.

Anyway, to take a shameless pivot to a completely unrelated topic, I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention one last time that Lungbarrow is an absolutely gorgeously written novel, right from the very first line: “Time’s roses were scented with memory,” you say? Yes please. I know some folks don’t like it when the novels’ prose veers off into the realms of the purple – and, well, Lungbarrow is borderline ultraviolet in that respect – but I unabashedly adore it, so I have no qualms admitting that I pretty much ate it up.

In fact, my generally fast pace when it comes to reading and reviewing these novels does mean that, as with The Room With No Doors, I’m definitely filing this away for a re-read when I can really luxuriate fully in the moody atmosphere Platt evokes. For what it’s worth, I still enjoyed it immensely, even if the self-same fast pace at which I read it, in conjunction with the novel’s small print size, has regrettably left me with a rather painful headache.

I am going to lie down now.

Final Thoughts

Well there it is. I’ve officially reviewed every single New Adventure starring the Seventh Doctor, meaning we’re drawing ever closer to the original ending point my fifteen-year-old self dreamt up of having written about every licensed Doctor Who book from Virgin. Which’ll be in about three books’ time.

Sorry if the tone on this one occasionally got too lecture-y but I just really enjoyed Lungbarrow, and wanted to at least try my hand at the sort of analysis I’ve found lacking over the years from the constant stream of hot takes, more often than not prefaced with an admission by the hot-taker that they haven’t even read the book. Which, fair play, I’ll again admit that this isn’t the most accessible of novels, but maybe not having read a piece of media should count against the assertion that one has a truly revolutionary opinion on said piece of media.

Anyway. Rant over. Join me next time as we turn our attention to the final Second Doctor adventure for a while, and David A. McIntee’s Virgin swansong, The Dark Path. And, fresh off the revelations about the Doctor’s past contained within Lungbarrow, we get… some more revelations about the Doctor’s past? Oh goody. Until then, however…

Kind regards,

Special Agent Dale Cooper

Virgin Missing Adventures Reviews: A Device of Death by Christopher Bulis (or, “Genesis of the Movellans?”)

It’s rather surprising, but A Device of Death represents our first extended engagement with the Hinchcliffe Era in quite some time.

Although Christopher Bulis’ latest contribution to the Missing Adventures – bringing his total number of novels for the range to an unequalled five at the very last minute – may not be the last Fourth Doctor novel from Virgin, the fact of the matter is that I’m planning to give over much of the thematic real estate in my review of The Well-Mannered War to a more generalised closing summary of Virgin’s stint as the custodians of the Doctor Who print license, given that it’s the last novel to be published before the loss of said license.

As such, I feel it behooves me at this juncture to offer up the standard retrospective of the Fourth Doctor’s run in the MAs, since this is really the last chance I’ll have to do it. What’s more, there’s undeniably something interesting to be gleaned from the way in which these novels have handled the Hinchcliffe and Holmes years, a period widely considered to number among a select few epochs in the history of televised Doctor Who that could credibly be described as a “Golden Age.”

With the publication of the first Missing Adventure to feature Tom Baker’s iconic bescarved Gallifreyan misfit, there seemed to be a conscious desire to evoke these kinds of favourable associations and fond remembrances of the era. John Peel’s Evolution was a work that leaned very heavily on the aesthetics of Gothic horror and Victoriana that had proved such a winning combination for H&H.

Even the regular cast’s wardrobe was apparently in on the act, with the Doctor sporting his imitation Sherlock Holmes get up from The Talons of Weng-Chiang, and Sarah pointedly choosing to don the dress once owned by Victoria, as she did in Pyramids of Mars.

Peel, of course, was undeniably a representative of the more traditionalist school of Doctor Who writers. A staunch ally of Terry Nation with scattered credits stretching back to the earliest days of the Doctor Who Magazine backup strips, he shot to prominence in the late 1980s as the writer who took on the unenviable task of novelising the remaining 1960s Dalek stories that had – thanks to the infamously complicated rights situation pertaining to the xenophobic pepperpots – remained unadapted to that point. What’s more, he was selected as Nation’s co-author on 1988’s The Official Doctor Who & the Daleks Book, complete with a seventy-four page in-universe history of the creatures.

When Virgin made the leap to the production of original fiction in June of 1991, Peel had also been afforded the opportunity to usher in the New Adventures. Although Genesys ultimately turned out to be a rather unappetising hodgepodge of sleazy sexuality and flavourless, Target novelisation-style plotting, its status as the series’ first instalment nevertheless helped to cement its author as something of a pivotal figure in the early stages of the Wilderness Years.

One suspects, then, that the decision to hire Peel to provide the second Missing Adventure, featuring one of the most popular and recognisable TARDIS teams imaginable, was – at least in part – an attempt to get into the good graces of fandom by starting in the realms of the familiar. It may not have exactly been a very ambitious plan, but you need to learn to crawl before you can walk, I suppose.

With the benefit of hindsight, the faultiness of this reasoning rather readily presents itself. Although Peel’s work may have fit quite comfortably alongside the more restrained and conservative stylings adopted by the early New Adventures of 1991, it was hopelessly outmoded by the time of Evolution‘s publication in September 1994.

As if to reinforce this sense of the novel being a time-lost relic of a bygone age, virtually all of the same problems that had plagued Genesys reared their head once more, from the decision to introduce Sarah in a skimpy, low-cut swimsuit to the tired “You can’t judge people from the past who did horrible things!” rhetoric. On top of all that, its generic plot detailing the escapades of a nefarious Victorian industrialist didn’t exactly make for the most scintillating of reading material.

So it seems fair to say that the Fourth Doctor wasn’t exactly off to the most auspicious of starts, despite the clear desire to recapture the goodwill enjoyed by his most beloved of eras. Indeed, far from becoming some new fan-favourite, Evolution was seemingly greeted with something of a collective shrug. If you consult the final form of the almighty Shannon Sullivan rankings, it sits at no. 28 out of a total of thirty-three Missing Adventures, thereby awarding it the dubious honour of being the lowest-ranked Fourth Doctor novel on the list by some considerable distance.

Fortunately, Virgin seemed to hit upon a rather more successful template by the time they took their second crack at dear old Tom with the publication of Gareth Roberts’ The Romance of Crime just four months later. Perhaps the most surprising thing about the novel, particularly when placed against Peel’s, is the vastly different choice of source material.

Situated between The Creature from the Pit and Nightmare of Eden, in the thick of Douglas Adams’ single-season tenure as script editor, it’s hard to think of a more stark contrast to the moody darkness that so incensed Mary Whitehouse back in the day.

Despite this profound tonal shift, The Romance of Crime was greeted with a much more exuberant reception than Evolution ever was, to the point where Virgin would shortly commission two further novels from Roberts featuring the exact same roster.

For a series like the Missing Adventures, with very little connective tissue between each book, this was something of an atypical manoeuvre, which probably speaks to the high regard in which Roberts was held at this time. The closest points of comparison would probably be Steve Lyons continuing the adventures of Grant Markham in Killing Ground, or David A. McIntee structuring next month’s The Dark Path to loosely follow on from Bulis’ own Twilight of the Gods.

Even today, Roberts’ Season Seventeen books continue to cast a long shadow. Each of them manages to fit quite comfortably within the top ten highest-rated novels as measured by Sullivan. Moreover, when Big Finish decided to adapt some choice favourites from the Virgin years as audio dramas in the 2010s, the trilogy numbered among the only Missing Adventures to receive the treatment.

(Although Lance Parkin’s Cold Fusion is pretty unambiguously a Fifth Doctor novel with a guest appearance by the Seventh Doctor and his companions, the fact that Big Finish saw fit to release it in conjunction with an adaptation of Chris and Roz’s debut in Original Sin would seem to suggest that they viewed it as being of a piece with their other adaptations of New Adventures.)

All of these subsequent developments notwithstanding, however, it’s still hard to escape the sensation that Roberts’ focus on the Williams years served to distort the Fourth Doctor novels to come. System Shock was nominally placed in the gap between Seasons 13 and 14. As a high-octane techno thriller, though, its presentation owed a far greater debt to contemporary anxieties about the “information superhighway” than anything that might be deemed more strongly reminiscent of Doctor Who as it existed in 1976.

By contrast, Stephen Marley’s Managra was unashamed to wear its Gothic influences on its sleeve, featuring clones of Mary Shelley, representations of and allusions to the works of Edgar Allan Poe, and no fewer than three versions of Lord Byron.

Nonetheless, this promise of Gothic-drenched Hinchcliffe homages would largely go unfulfilled in the subsequent novels. Even when The Shadow of Weng-Chiang offered up a sequel to a beloved fan-favourite story from the era, David A. McIntee would make the choice to integrate the plot into the Doctor and Romana’s quest for the Key to Time.

It is perhaps worth pondering the question of why exactly the Hinchcliffe Era has remained largely untouched by the Missing Adventures when compared to the Williams Era. The easy answer would be to make the observation that one is significantly more beloved than the other, and any botched attempts at capturing the spirit of that original period in Doctor Who‘s history would consequently be met with a more acrimonious reaction.

While the Hinchcliffe/Holmes years are often held up as the programme’s Golden Age, fandom’s estimation of the Williams Era is usually far less flattering in nature. Broadly speaking, as we noted in reviewing Burning Heart, it seems reasonable to say that this period is most often viewed as the starting point – or, at the very least, a possible starting point – of Doctor Who‘s eventual decline, with the incoming producer finding himself forced by BBC management to make a rapid course correction away from the violence and darkness that had so incensed the rabid, unhinged, bigoted hordes comprising the powerbase of Whitehouse’s NVLA.

The thing that usually gets held up as “the problem” here, mind, is that a lot of the writers working on the programme at this point didn’t seem able to come to an agreement upon something approaching a basic, cohesive and consistent style that could supplant all that Gothic horror goodness, beyond a vague notion that the show should have a brighter, more colourful and more humorous bent. Oh, and that maybe they should try making it a bit like that new film people seem to be going fashionably crazy for. Constellation Belligerences, or some such, no?

Regardless, the truth of the matter is admittedly far more complex, bound up in all sorts of unfortunate production realities and unlucky happenstances, and like any piece of Doctor Who I could care to name, the Williams Era has never been without its stalwart defenders, not the least formidable of whom is Gareth Roberts.

Regrettably…

Even allowing for these attempts to mount a defence in the intervening decades, fans as a whole still seem rather icily disposed towards this particular three-season block, particularly when compared with its direct predecessor.

Consulting the results of Doctor Who Magazine‘s mammoth “First 50 Years” poll from 2014 – and conceding that I’m relying considerably more on fan rankings as a barometer of opinion than I usually do, but kindly bear with me – immediately presents a pretty sharp disparity.

As one might expect, Seasons Twelve through Fourteen manage to land no fewer than three entries in the list’s top ten, with Genesis of the Daleks taking third place and thus attaining the lofty distinction of being the highest-rated serial of the classic show.

Seasons Fifteen through Seventeen, on the other hand, are far more uneven in their distribution; with the exception of City of Death, not a single story from this period cracks the top thirty. Furthermore, five stories actually manage to fall below 200th place, while the lowest-rated story of the Hinchcliffe Era, Revenge of the Cybermen, sits at a cool 160.

Given the obvious and vast gulf that exists between the fan perception of the two eras, it’s certainly not a wild or unfounded supposition that the Hinchcliffe years might have constituted something of a sacred cow that the writers were collectively unwilling to poke at.

Even the “About the Author” blurbs on the novels’ back covers seemed to be in on the bit at times, if only in the half-hearted, comedic kind of way that one expects from such things. Sure, we’re obviously not supposed to take The Shadow of Weng-Chiang‘s declaration that McIntee “[said] no one in their right mind would even suggest a sequel to The Talons of Weng-Chiang, which is why he volunteered instead” entirely seriously, but that doesn’t mean that it’s light-years removed from being a feasible response on the part of fandom, given the genuinely reverent light in which Talons is often viewed.

(Whether it should be held in such reverence is another question entirely. To which the answer is no, incidentally, but I digress…)

With all of that being said, despite the appealing simplicity of this hypothesis, I don’t believe it to be quite sufficient to completely cover the nuances of the Missing Adventures’ attitudes towards the Hinchcliffe years.

After all, fans had been pretty unanimously positive in their appraisal of Justin Richards’ The Sands of Time, a book which, though set during the Davison years, was still pulling from a beloved classic in the form of Pyramids of Mars. Evidently, it seemed that readers were more than willing to tolerate reiterations of the more iconic imagery of the programme’s perceived Golden Age if it was done right, even if the exact parameters of “right” may have been largely dependent on a given individual’s personal interpretation.

So there’s clearly something deeper going on here, and I would contend that this preference for the aesthetics of the Williams years over those of Hinchcliffe is just another manifestation of the same internal conflict that has plagued the Missing Adventures ever since their inception: how seamlessly are these books supposed to slot into the television series?

To compare and contrast the Fourth Doctor books we’ve already discussed, it’s pretty clear which school of thought each story aligns itself with. If you toned down some of the more graphic bits of violence and upped the programme’s budget – and, being honest, the nature of the Hinchcliffe Era means that you might not even have to go too far with regards to the former of those two criteria – Evolution could very readily slot between the gap in which its back cover places it. It’s a traditionalist work through and through, aiming to recapture the spirit of the original stories to the letter, for better or for worse.

The Romance of Crime, however, is actively engaged in a redemptive reading of a much-maligned period of the show’s history, attempting to bring forth the potential which Gareth Roberts seemed to wholeheartedly believe was always present within Williams and Adams’ vision of Doctor Who, but which was often hampered and smothered by the realities of television production.

Even a novel like Managra, which outwardly cloaks itself in the trappings of Gothicism, still manages to end up becoming far too literary and strange, making very deliberate use of its status as a novel in such a way as to render it, in all probability, nigh-unfilmable.

And so we come to A Device of Death, a book which seems to have made the rather curious decision to split the difference between these two modes of Fourth Doctor literature, and attempts to get the best of both worlds in the process.

By its very nature as a book from Christopher Bulis, it’s obviously not exactly liable to become some sort of post-modern masterpiece that revolutionises the Missing Adventures and turns everything we thought we knew about Doctor Who on its head.

This is Bulis’ sixth novel, all told, and he’s long since made a name for himself as one of the more traditionalist and nostalgia-prone voices in Virgin’s line-up, having offered up affectionate homages to such diverse genres as Golden Age science fiction (State of Change), epic fantasy (The Sorcerer’s Apprentice), and even the Boys’ Own adventure serials of the 1930s (The Eye of the Giant).

Whatever your thoughts on these books might be, it can’t be denied that, if you need a solid Missing Adventure delivered in a pinch – indeed, A Device of Death marks the author’s third novel in the past twelve months, proving that Bulis is, if nothing else, supremely efficient in his writing – there are far worse candidates to whom you could turn, and for all that his style may be less ambitious than some of his comrades over in the New Adventures, he’s almost indisputably possessed of rather more talent and imagination than someone like John Peel.

So on one level, A Device of Death is everything we’ve come to expect from Bulis at this point in time. There’s a whole boatload (fleetload? armadaload?) of internal military hierarchical politics, some high-tech, futuristic combat sequences between a bunch of alien factions, and a propensity for spouting technobabble, all of which combine to leave the audience with the general impression that Bulis may feel more at home in the realm of Star Trek than Doctor Who.

Wrapped around all of this, however, is a simple yet effective framing device that might just be the best conceit to grace a Bulis novel since State of Change gave us “an alternate Rome, but not really.”

I’m assuming, if you’re bothering to read this post, you’re familiar with the general dramatic thrust of Season Twelve’s Genesis of the Daleks: the Doctor winds up being recruited by the Time Lords to interfere with the creation of the Daleks in the distant past of their home planet Skaro, hoping to completely avert or, at the very least, significantly delay their galactic reign of terror.

Inevitably, what with the Doctor being a rather anti-genocide sort – he’s just quirky like that, I guess – he ends up refusing to kill the Kaled mutants in their incubation chambers, giving a rather iconic speech about not having the right to serve as judge, jury and executioner on such a monumental scale, before promptly using the Time Ring to escape the general carnage that tends to arise when a thousand year-long war comes to a violent and bloody conclusion. As far as the television series was concerned, that was that.

As it turns out, fans weren’t quite so convinced that all the loose ends had been tidied away, and would idly ponder the implications of the Doctor’s actions in the years to come. Within the serial itself, we’re only given the most fleeting of clues, primarily in the form of the Doctor’s insistence that he had “only delayed them for a short time. Perhaps a thousand years.”

All of this is without even mentioning the nasty continuity snarls thrown up – for those who knew enough to care about such things – by the sudden existence of Davros, a never-before-referenced figure who would go on to become all-important in the Daleks’ remaining appearances throughout the classic run, and whose status as the creator of the Daleks seemed to directly contradict the TV Century 21 comic strips, which ascribed that title to Yarvelling, a member of a blue-skinned humanoid race bearing very little resemblance to the eventual on-screen presentation of the Kaleds.

The task of reconciling these discrepancies obviously falls squarely within the realm of fan speculation, and therefore is usually outside the remit of these reviews, barring the occasional cheeky acknowledgment from someone like Lance Parkin in The Gallifrey Chronicles, wherein the Eighth Doctor is said to have nearly driven William of Ockham to a nervous breakdown by confronting him with the tangle of Skarosian history.

No, for the purposes of examining A Device of Death, there’s only one particular theory that we really need to consider, courtesy of that age-old fount of wisdom – if you’re willing to stretch your personal definition of “age-old” a little bit to mean “about twenty-one months or so when counted from February 1997” – from the minds of Cornell, Day and Topping, The Discontinuity Guide.

Essentially, the trio ran with the notion that the Doctor’s mission had broadly succeeded in rewriting substantial chunks of Dalek history, with the survival of Davros – as revealed in the creatures’ next appearance in Season Seventeen’s Destiny of the Daleks – being considered a remnant of said temporal alteration, and going some way towards explaining all the factional infighting that plagues the Daleks throughout their later outings. Quoth the Guide:

The Doctor does succeed in changing history in Genesis of the Daleks. The events of previous Dalek stories, if they happened at all, are now vastly different. The Doctor delays Dalek development by 1000 years, but, more importantly, his actions cause Davros to remain alive.

The Doctor’s warnings about the dangers of the Daleks had some effect on their creator, making him paranoid enough to activate a force field in his chair. He thus survives the Daleks’ assassination attempt. In the previous time line, Davros was killed and forgotten. Davros also remembered some of the Dalek defeats mentioned by the Doctor. For example, the Daleks retain an interest in Earth and want to invade it again, especially as Davros thinks he knows how they were defeated.

A Device of Death, then, proceeds further along this chain of reasoning, inserting a gap between the Doctor, Sarah and Harry’s departure from Skaro and their arrival on Nerva Beacon in Revenge of the Cybermen. There is, naturally, not much in the way of on-screen evidence to suggest such a gap, but it seems churlish to start complaining about such things now, when the very first Missing Adventure positioned itself in a seemingly non-existent interval between Snakedance and Mawdryn Undead.

Regardless, in the great classical Who tradition, the three regulars find themselves separated from one another thanks to their being caught in the wake of a rogue front of temporal distortion resulting from the alteration of history at the conclusion of Genesis, thrown into their own personal subplots which eventually come to mesh together by the book’s end.

All throughout this, though, the novel’s prologue establishes that the effects of their actions are being closely monitored by the Time Lords back on Gallifrey, and once the rather traditional main plot has drawn to a close, the Doctor is informed by his people that the secret Landoran weapons manufactory of Deepcity so heavily featured throughout the book will eventually go on to give rise to a race of “synthonic robots” with some unspecified role to play in the downfall of the Daleks.

Although these robots are never identified by name, the very clear implication is that they are, in fact, the Movellans seen in Destiny of the Daleks, whose conflict with the Doctor’s iconic nemeses served to provide the impetus for them to dig him out of his extended hibernation in the first place. And the second place, if we’re also throwing Resurrection of the Daleks into the bargain.

Got all that? OK, you may now exhale.

So. There are a couple of ways that we can assess this development. To start with, there’s the obvious response of kneejerk cynicism, writing all of this off as so much fan-pleasing guff which only manages to attain marginally more artistic value than something like Craig Hinton’s attempts to delineate the social standing of gastronomy within the Ice Warrior caste system in GodEngine.

Certainly, this is something of an understandable viewpoint. It’s not as if providing an origin story for the Movellans – a race who had only, to date, appeared once nearly twenty years ago in one of the less-beloved Dalek stories, and who would go on to make one further cameo appearance in Series Ten’s The Pilot twenty years after the publication of A Device of Death – was really one of the burning questions that fans were clamouring en masse to have answered, but it is the type of thing whose inclusion in a novel would still end up pleasing a certain stripe of continuity-obsessed fan.

Equally, though, I do think there is at least the semblance of a deeper meaning to be mined from Bulis’ inclusion of this twist. It is, on the level of the programme’s own metanarrative, a clear attempt to forge an undeniable link between the Hinchcliffe and Williams years; that it does so using the pre-existing time travel shenanigans of Genesis of the Daleks, too, should be no big surprise, given the high esteem in which we have continually reiterated that fandom holds that serial.

Indeed, it’s a revelation that feels perfectly in keeping with that conception of the Missing Adventures as a series which can engage in these sorts of redemptive readings, weaving strands of connective tissue into the tapestry of Doctor Who‘s history and attempting to form some kind of Grand Unified Theory of Tom, if you will. If you’re going to do that, then keeping it to the very end is perhaps the most unobtrusive and reasonable way of doing so.

It also bears noting that choosing to play to the fans in this manner is a much more forgivable manoeuvre in light of the current status of the Virgin books, because at this stage, fans are really the only ones who have stuck around.

Those who weren’t sufficiently attached to Doctor Who to begin with had likely remained wholly unaware of the novels’ existence, and those hardcore fans who had found themselves alienated by the occasionally spiky in-house style of the New and Missing Adventures were probably just twiddling their thumbs and waiting impatiently for the BBC Books line to start. After all, it’s not as if you can go too drastically wrong with Uncle Terrance at the helm, right?

(Dramatic irony? What’s that?)

Of course, if you’re shrewd enough to put on your patented futuresight goggles… well, first off, I’ll ask very politely if you could lend me a pair. After that, though, you might very well ask me why I would write in defence of Bulis taking the time to elucidate upon a minor point of continuity while having occasionally ragged on John Peel for doing something similar in War of the Daleks.

Putting aside basic questions of which individual is the stronger writer, pound-for-pound – I mean, it’s not as if Christopher Bulis vs. John Peel is the kind of head-to-head I could really bring myself to get all that worked up about – the simple fact of the matter is that War‘s infamous retcon stems from little more than a profound grumpiness at the direction in which the Daleks had developed in those scripts that didn’t have Terry Nation’s name emblazoned across the front in big bold letters.

Without getting too thick into the weeds on War of the Daleks just yet, I’ll merely note that the difference in apparent intent between Peel and Bulis seems to bleed through into the finished substance of their respective novels.

A Device of Death hinges upon the iterative and cumulative nature of Doctor Who and its lore; the revelation that we’ve been unknowingly reading the origin story of the Movellans for the last 200-odd pages simply doesn’t work unless we assume there’s something of a natural, unspoken progression from the aesthetic of Hinchcliffe to that of Williams.

War of the Daleks, on the other hand, will choose to actively play against this idea, seeking to rewind the clock on nearly a decade’s worth of televised Dalek stories in the most petty and inelegant manner possible. It’s telling that the origin of the Movellans is the most significant divergence between the two books, with Peel going out of his way to have the Dalek Prime detail a ludicrous scheme in which the threat of the androids is said to have been entirely concocted by the Daleks as a means of pulling one over on Davros.

It is surely completely coincidental that War should choose Destiny of the Daleks, a script which director Ken Grieve apparently claimed was “98% written by Douglas Adams” and whose final form had consequently attracted Nation’s disapproval, as the proverbial “ground zero” for its efforts to rewrite Dalek history. Surely.

So now, through examining A Device of Death, we’ve ironically looped right back around to the beginning of the review, and have begun – in a roundabout sort of way – to get at the rather inconvenient truth about John Peel, which is to say that he’s a writer whose greatest contribution to the history of the Wilderness Years was always in setting up a template from which subsequent novels in a given series could deviate wildly, whether it be the puerile sexuality of Genesys being supplanted by the genuine maturity of Revelation, the uninspired imitation of Evolution giving way to the revisionist joys of The Romance of Crime, or the cynical retconning of War of the Daleks crumbling under the weight of Alien Bodies‘ sheer inventiveness.

(To be perfectly honest, I half suspect that the only reason Legacy of the Daleks was never meaningfully rebuffed by later novels in this fashion is simply down to Peel having so thoroughly torpedoed his own standing among fans with the release of War that nobody was really paying him much attention at that point. This is perhaps me wearing my most cynical of hats, but I don’t think I’m entirely wrong either…)

A Device of Death‘s case is only further bolstered by virtue of the fact that this central idea of the Doctor and his companions materially altering the substance and character of the world around them resonates pretty heavily throughout the novel. Perhaps the most obvious example of this can be seen in Sarah’s friendship with Max, the synthonic Landoran trooper who comes to grow his own personality and conscience over the course of their journey together.

Yes, you could quite easily write all this off as Bulis’ latent Star Trek sympathies shining through once again, as there’s nothing here that will be too radically unfamiliar to anyone who’s ever watched any of the episodes of The Next Generation or Voyager focusing on Data or the EMH, say, but it’s charming nonetheless.

To be quite honest, despite his status as a robot, Max is infinitely more likeable and memorable than any of the dry, lifeless planks of wood masquerading as characters that inhabited Twilight of the Gods. In a sense, the forging of this connection only serves to add an extra sting to the Time Lords’ implication that Max’s leadership of Deepcity will eventually end up paving the way for the ruthless efficiency of the Movellans.

This idea of profound and constant metamorphosis even finds an expression within the Doctor’s very mode of conveyance. Being separated from his regular TARDIS in the wake of the mission to Skaro, the Time Lords end up providing him with a replacement, complete with a functioning chameleon circuit.

On the symbolic level, it goes without saying that this is deeply significant, undermining as it does the police box shape that has served as one of the only truly enduring constants in the ever-changing landscape of the programme, and thus reinforcing the sensation that the audience is somehow bearing witness to a strange mercurial process in which the very fabric of Doctor Who is being subtly reshaped around them.

Even the TARDIS’ temporary masquerade as the Tralsammavarian yacht, all gaudy and gold-plated and graceful, feels far more of a piece with the space opera stylings of Williams than it does the Gothic gloom of Hinchcliffe, and it’s not for nothing that the Time Lords ultimately reclaim the time capsule as a result of the Doctor’s influence having “disrupted [the unit’s] psychometric balance.”

This same inconstancy also holds true of the war gripping the Adelphine Cluster, which provides the better part of the novel’s plot. Oftentimes this aspect of the book is summarily dismissed as being little more than a cut-rate imitation of Genesis of the Daleks, but I don’t think that’s an entirely fair characterisation, and it overlooks the fact that Bulis has actually injected some pretty interesting worldbuilding to help flesh out the particulars of the conflict. There are, inevitably, superficial similarities inherent in telling a story of two alien factions locked in a state of perpetual and ceaseless war, but that’s really about as far as the comparisons can feasibly be carried.

For one, while Nation’s original script for Genesis had very clearly drawn from the iconography and weaponry of the Second World War, especially in the characterisation and costuming of the Kaleds, A Device of Death sees Bulis shift his frame of reference a little further down the historical track.

Where the Thals and the Kaleds were presented as largely homogeneous, monolithic political entities in line with the traditional conception of nation states – pun very much intended – the Union and the Alliance more closely evoke a vision of geopolitics in line with the realities of the Cold War, two competing interstellar superpowers engaging each other in a series of proxy wars in lieu of a direct military confrontation. As such, we’re again left with the impression that there is some level of distortion and alteration in evidence here, with the seemingly firm political and moral foundations at play in Genesis having been worn away.

Bulis has one more fiendish trick up his sleeve, however, as it’s revealed that the “war” is effectively nothing more than a hollow façade maintained by the upper echelons of Landoran society. More than that, Landor has actually long since obliterated the homeworld of the Averonian Union, with Director Kambril merely keeping up the pretence that the inverse is true in an effort to motivate the Deepcity workers to continue the manufacture of ever more deadly weapons, selling the products of their labour to both sides in an effort to keep the native inhabitants of the Cluster wrapped up in interminable skirmishes and therefore unable to challenge the supremacy of the Alliance.

It is, perhaps, not the most original of twists. Dave Stone had already tread similar ground with the Hollow Gods’ manipulation of the Dagellan Cluster in Death and Diplomacy, as well as exploring militantly xenophobic attitudes in Burning Heart. Nevertheless, there’s something to be said for the sheer sardonic tang which suffuses A Device of Death‘s commentary, particularly from a writer like Bulis, who can often seem a tad more enamoured with the aesthetics of the military and the “space marine” style of science fiction than is usually considered seemly within Doctor Who.

There’s just something so wonderfully cynical and incisive about setting up the Adelphine Cluster as a thinly-veiled Cold War allegory, when it is in fact a mildly more thickly-veiled post-Cold War allegory, with Landor’s behaviour holding up a mirror to the role of the United States – and implicitly, the Western political bloc as a whole – in the 1990s, having seemingly vanquished the spectre of communism and standing triumphant as the victor of the twentieth century, primarily engaging in military conflict in a “peacekeeping” capacity. Indeed, like so many of those pieces of media that seem skeptical of the “unipolar moment” stretching on into eternity, A Device of Death has only become more pointed in the post-9/11 world.

This is not to suggest, however, that the novel lacks a contemporary relevance in its original context. After all, arms trading was a pretty big hot-button issue in the 1990s. A little over a month after the publication of A Device of Death, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine would embroil Quark in the shady clutches of the gunrunning business in Business as Usual. For their part, Virgin had already waded into this territory before, with Andy Lane’s The Empire of Glass depicting Irving Braxiatel’s efforts to head up an arms control summit.

(And it now occurs to me that, since said summit is the Armageddon Conveniton off-handedly referenced in Revenge of the Cybermen, there are now entirely too many explorations of 1990s arms trading that use late Season Twelve as a lodestone of sorts…)

As any historian well-versed in the Soviet-Afghan War or the Iran-Contra affair will tell you, arms trading had long served as a useful foreign policy lever in the toolkit of the American government during the Cold War, but the 1990s saw this trade intersect with the collapse of the Soviet Union in new and complex ways.

The most infamous figure to rise out of this time was one Viktor Anatolyevich Bout, a Russian arms dealer who made a name for himself supplying illicit weaponry for use in conflicts the world over, from Liberia and Afghanistan to Yugoslavia. It is suspected that Bout’s operations were given an early headstart through his acquisition of former Soviet military assets, including a fleet of cargo planes, thanks to pre-existing connections forged during his time in said military.

Here, Kambril’s rhetorical inquiry becomes especially relevant: “Who really knows or cares what is happening in the next star system, or who sold them the weapons?” The deception perpetrated upon Deepcity functions through imposing artificial distance upon the citizens of the Alliance, and it is ultimately this same logic that fuels the divisions fostered throughout the Cluster. In short, it’s imperialism, given a shiny new coat of paint for the turn of the millennium.

That these points are often overlooked in appraising A Device of Death is a real shame, as I do think it leads people to unfairly disregard a novel that might just be a solid contender for Bulis’ new personal best. It’s filled with solid characterisation of the regulars, a couple standout guest players – Olivor Malf, the pretentious alcoholic thespian, is an absolute joy – and some abnormally barbed and clever commentary from the usually strictly traditionalist Bulis.

And yet the fact that the novel’s central conflict is so frequently compared to Genesis of the Daleks is also hardly surprising, while proving deeply emblematic of some of the broader problems afflicting the Missing Adventures.

For all that Bulis might have tried to get a little more experimental with the implied links to other stories, the fact remains that nobody is really reading this as a secret, undiscovered sixth serial from Season Twelve placed between Genesis of the Daleks and Revenge of the Cybermen, bar those rare, crazy few who try to go through the books in strictly chronological order.

No, the novel’s default mode of consumption, for most people, will be as the thirty-first Missing Adventure, and it will almost always be evaluated as such. That is, after all, how it was released, and I do wonder if this accounts for some of the more dismissive reactions to the war plotline. It’s easy to see how people might react poorly when considering the fact that Bulis essentially pulled a similar – albeit much less nuanced- “two warring alien factions” schtick not even six months prior with Twilight of the Gods.

So we haven’t really resolved that central tension of the Fourth Doctor novels – and the past Doctor books at large – which we began back in Evolution, and I can’t say that I blame Virgin for not choosing this novel as Tom’s final bow.

Very good though it may be, it doesn’t really fit with the spirit of the Fourth Doctor as embodied by the VMAs, and while it does go some way towards reconciling the incarnation’s two very different eras, it never quite manages to put together a summative closing statement on the totality of this block of seasons. For that, unfortunately enough, we once again need to return to Gareth Roberts.

And, unfortunately enough, we shall shortly do just that… but we don’t have to do it just yet.

Miscellaneous Observations

It’s curious that Bulis should decide to reveal the name of the Time Lord messenger from the opening of Genesis of the Daleks, here given as Brastall, when the very next book will posit an entirely separate identity for the character in the form of Lord Ferain. I suppose it’s possible that we’re dealing with two incarnations of the same Time Lord, each going by a different name, and Brastall certainly doesn’t stick around long enough to rule out the possibility of his being Ferain.

None of that, however, can possibly account for Gallifrey‘s suggestion that Valyes was the one sent on the mission to Skaro, and he’s almost certainly a distinct individual. It’s almost like fans scrambling over each other to explain a trivial piece of continuity will sometimes end up producing a multitude of different answers.

(No I’m not foreshadowing the review of Lungbarrow, why would you suggest that?)

It didn’t really fit with the wider body of the review, but Bulis does a pretty good job at capturing Harry here, an especially impressive feat since he’s only made one prior appearance, a few decades after the conclusion of his TARDIS travels – from his point of view – in System Shock.

It was nice to see his medical training actually get some considerable play for once, and it’s just a shame that – barring Millennium Shock, featuring the same aged Harry from Richards’ earlier novel – we’ll have to wait well over six years and almost 170 books until we get another story featuring him in the regular cast.

Ah well. He’s still in more books than Leela so far.

(No I’m not foreshadowing the review of Lung… etc. etc.)

Final Thoughts

Huh, I was pleasantly surprised with how that turned out. I didn’t like being as harsh on Bulis as I was in my Twilight of the Gods review, so it was nice to have some almost uniformly positive things to say about one of his novels as a change of pace.

Regardless, I hope you’ll join me next time, as we try and sort out once and for all just what a Lungbarrow even is anyway, and bid farewell to the Seventh Doctor’s tenure as the protagonist of our ongoing journey. Until then, however…

Kind regards,

Special Agent Dale Cooper

Virgin New Adventures Reviews: The Room With No Doors by Kate Orman (or, “Seven and the Samurai”)

The world is running out of heroes
The world is running out of time
Where are those martial arts manoeuvres
We’re getting massacred by crime

~ Sparks, Modesty Blaise Plays (1982)

Mythology.

It’s something we’ve discussed before with regards to Doctor Who. In our most recent discussion, in “reviewing” The Plotters, we lent especial consideration to the ways in which fandom is often liable to mythologise various aspects of the show’s production and lore in order to prop up or tear down a particular narrative framework through which said aspects can be viewed and understood on a larger scale.

In the process, certain writers get lionised, while others are nearly erased. It’s certainly regrettable, but it’s part and parcel of the way that these sorts of long-running franchises tend to work. No series can feasibly attain a nigh on sixty year lifespan while totally resisting the pull of the mythological, if for no other reason than that this kind of longevity tends to be multi-generational, and the coming and going of various generations’ interest in a given television programme or film trilogy or what have you is perhaps the closest thing to a readily discernible mechanism by which the propagation and sustenance of fandom can be said to operate.

However, I’d be remiss if I didn’t acknowledge that there also exists a smaller scale, in-universe kind of mythology that is arguably just as inevitable for a series like Doctor Who, one spoken in the straightforward narrative language common to most media rather than the strange, metatextual processes of fan culture; in short, this is the kind of myth making that might feasibly fall under the somewhat flippant and memetic umbrella categorisation of “lore.”

To be fair, we mustn’t overstate the case for a clean break between these two mythologies. Lore, like so many other things in media, does not exist as an entirely discrete entity, walled off from fan culture by some kind of vast and impermeable membrane that permits no passage or intermingling between the two.

Indeed, the existence of lore almost presupposes some kind of external arbiter with the ability to decide what things do and do not “count” as legitimate pieces of backstory. This arbiter, then, becomes the entity with the power to decree that the Daleks were originally humanoid, thinly-veiled Nazi analogues – Iron Cross and all – rather than weird, short, blue people in the fantastical 1960s science fiction tradition of the TV Century 21 strip.

If you’re thinking that this is all beginning to sound rather like the beginnings of a “canon,” well, you’re completely right. Canon is, after all, a concept with a firm grounding in the realms of the religious and the mythological, with the very name having its roots in the process by which particular religious texts were deemed worthy of formal inclusion in a given sect or creed’s accepted body of significant scriptural works.

In the context of a franchise like Doctor Who, of course, the distinct lack of any kind of official ruling on the canonicity of particular corners of the franchise – of the kind typified by those pronouncements made by CBS with regards to Star Trek, or Lucasfilm’s restructuring of the Star Wars Extended Universe in the aftermath of the Disney buyout – has ensured that the analogue of this arbiter is, more than anything else, fandom itself. Paradoxically, the inherent multiplicity of fan opinion virtually ensures that, as the old refrain goes, “There’s no such thing as canon.”

Even if we make allowances for this kind of strange canonistic nihilism, however – and, as someone who has built pretty much their entire online presence around reviewing “Extended Universe” material based on Doctor Who, I’m obviously inclined to do so, as to argue that none of the books or comic strips or audios “count” in a meaningful sense is to pretty much invite an existential crisis over the meaninglessness and futility of my passions… or something like that, anyway – we would still be left with a programme that has a mythology.

Here, then, we come to the other point of overlap in this scribbly, twisted Venn diagram. In one sphere, we have “canon,” in another we have “lore and/or mythology,” and in another we have something that I can probably only reasonably term “bedrock fundamentals,” those bits of backstory and structure that are practically taken as a given when you’re operating in a certain fictional space.

When I last spoke on this topic at length, in reviewing Return of the Living Dad, I concerned myself more with metanarrative structures than with actual plot points, stuff like the revolving door cast policy or the basic fact that there was once a police box standing in a junkyard that could move anywhere in time and space.

Even in the case of in-universe “lore,” though, I would maintain that the underlying systems of gradual accretion and accumlation remain the same. Just as nobody had conceived of the idea that Carole Ann Ford could be replaced by Maureen O’Brien when they sat down to script An Unearthly Child, it took a full six seasons for anybody to decide that the Doctor was a Time Lord, and a further five seasons to decide that he was from a place called Gallifrey. This is, as you might well have guessed, functionally identical to the way that myths work, shifting and changing and growing with the passage of time and the telling of new stories about familiar characters, bringing them into bold and uncharted waters.

In this regard, it could be argued that Doctor Who is uniquely suited to assume the mantle of a kind of “modern myth.” Even in the earliest stages, the ingredients for such a recipe are all there, with the initially ordinary and wholly congruous shape of a police box taking on an almost totemic significance within the iconography of the show.

We might not hear the phrase “chameleon circuit” uttered until well into the programme’s second decade, but we are immediately assured by Susan upon our very first landing in 100,000 BC that there is a defect in the TARDIS that ensures its police-boxified form will remain as the lone point of stability and fixity in an otherwise volatile world.

Sure, the reasons behind this limitation have more to do with the budgetary realities facing a kitschy homegrown British slice of weekly science fiction goodness than they do any conscious effort to create some sort of grand operatic canvas within which the show can work. By drawing attention to the TARDIS’ steadiness as an aberration, Susan’s handwaved explanation of what effectively amounts to a shortfall in the special effects budget nonetheless establishes that Doctor Who is, at its core, a show about change.

Naturally, in the face of Ford’s growing dissatisfaction with the character of Susan, and eventually having to contend with William Hartnell’s failing health on top of everything else, this philosophy of constant change would only be further literalised with the institution of the aforementioned revolving door cast policy in stories like The Dalek Invasion of Earth and, perhaps most starkly, The Tenth Planet. With these moves, the Doctor and his companions firmly cemented themselves as iterational, malleable protagonists in the tradition of the finest classical heroes.

And so, in turn, we are now brought to the subject of heroes.

Clearly delineating the point at which the Doctor goes from merely being the eponymous character in the narrative to assuming the honest-to-goodness mantle of “hero” is a rather messy business, but as any viewer well-versed in the Hartnell years will be able to tell you, there’s undeniably a transition.

Quite simply, there has to be, because it’s otherwise virtually impossible to reconcile a man who would eagerly brain a prone caveman in order to make his escape with a man who would, say, willingly lay down his life for a random American tourist that he – barring Big Finish, to pre-empt any particularly snide commenters who may be typing at the moment – only recently met.

Unsurprisingly, one of the more prevalent theories in modern fan circles centres around the first encounter with the Daleks. This is the hypothesis that explicitly drives Into the Dalek, and, slightly more subtly, also informs the conception of the Doctor as “the one that monsters have nightmares about” that we’ve long since established as a core tenet of the New Adventures’ moral philosophy, which actually shouldn’t be remotely shocking when you consider exactly who is listed as a co-author on Into the Dalek.

And, much as it pains me to say it, when it comes to identifying the tipping point in this matter… Steven Moffat is wrong. But only just, and only in the kind of wishy-washy sense that nobody can ever be completely right when it comes to such a complex question.

With that being said, if you’re going to identify the Daleks as a crucial element in defining the Doctor’s identity as the “hero” of Doctor Who, it makes far more sense to place the emphasis on the diabolical pepperpots’ second outing, and not their first. In one of the pleasing pieces of symmetry that only reliably comes about by pure happenstance, it just so happens that this is the same exact story that establishes the impermanence of the regular cast.

Going purely off of the evidence with which we’re actually presented in The Daleks, the titular creatures are far from being the archetypal ur-monsters that we really need them to be for the purposes of our hypothesis. They’re xenophobic and have a propensity for killing any member of the guest cast that they can get their plungers on, sure, but their plan for Skaro also follows a pretty readily apparent logic beyond “Well we just wanted to be a bit evil, didn’t we?” More to the point, they haven’t even picked up some of their more iconic habits, like screaming “EXTERMINATE!” as loud as ring-modulated vocal chords will allow.

With The Dalek Invasion of Earth, of course, most of that changed. Certainly, the plan to remove the Earth’s core and pilot the planet around “just ’cause” is several star systems removed from anything resembling “readily apparent logic,” so they’ve got that going for them at least.

(Admittedly, they’re still rather low on the old “exterminate” quota, but the Black Dalek does at least get his foot in the door with three uses of the word in quick succession in the final episode. Technically, it’s not until The Chase that we see a marked increase in the phrase’s usage, clocking in at a whopping eighteen instances of “exterminate,” as opposed to The Dalek Invasion of Earth‘s five and The Daleks‘ pitiful two.)

And thus the broad parameters of Doctor Who‘s central myth were established, the heroic Doctor against the villainous Daleks. Later, this remit would be broadened considerably to include other iconic monsters, taking in those corners of the universe which have bred the most terrible things and all that jazz that we know so very well at this point.

Equally, however, we’re also well aware that the New Adventures have been putting their own spin on these ideas for quite some time, deliberately playing in the realm of the mythic and the heroic with almost reckless abandon.

In fact, they’ve been doing so for pretty much the entire span of their existence, ever since John Peel made the decision to bring the Timewyrm to Earth in the time of Gilgamesh and had her masquerade as the goddess Ishtar. This, funnily enough, is perhaps the closest thing to an enduring contribution that John Peel ever made to the New Adventures, which is at least more than he can claim to have accomplished in the case of the Eighth Doctor Adventures…

Almost immediately, I find myself hastening to point out the rather substantial caveats inherent to such a statement. Make no mistake, Genesys‘ hinting towards the mythic future of the New Adventures is almost entirely the product of accident rather than design, and is rightly overshadowed by the simple fact that so much of the novel surrounding it is really quite bad.

In fact, given how the Doctor had been treated by writers like Ben Aaronovitch as early as Remembrance of the Daleks, it’s not as if this was something created wholecloth by Peel, and the fact that the novel so frequently cuts against the darker and more manipulative Seventh Doctor of Season 25 onwards seems to lend a great deal of credence to the idea that he wasn’t exactly a fan, something which the man himself has quite readily admitted.

(It would be really unfortunate if he did something embarrassing like release a whole book whose entire purpose seemed to be to undercut a key plot point in Remembrance of the Daleks. Luckily for him, he’s done no such thing, and probably never will… for the next eight months at least.)

No, if you’re talking about the New Adventures as a line with a distinct mythology, there are two obvious candidates that will always loom large over the discussion, neither of which have anything to do with John Peel. The first is the so-called Cartmel Masterplan, although with the War trilogy’s conclusion a full year behind us now, it seems safe to say that Marc Platt and even Ben Aaronovitch were far more invested in this particular piece of “lore” than Cartmel ever was, an impression which will only be further confirmed when March rolls around.

The second, and the one which is far more important when discussing The Room With No Doors, is the Sandman-esque pantheon of multifarious Eternals and their mortal Champions who have been knocking about time and space ever since Paul Cornell hit the ground running with Revelation.

In a way, it’s rather strange that fandom seems to have come to the collective decision to focus the bulk of their ire and debate on the former of these two strains of thought. I mean, yes, the stuff about the Pythia and the Other and the looms is important in as much as it sculpts out a textured background for the novels and their conception of Gallifreyan history. As far as New Adventures authors are concerned though, Platt is just about the only writer to so prominently foreground it in the way that tends to raise the hackles of the more militant Doctor Who fans, give or take a Lawrence Miles or a Neil Penswick here and there.

In comparison, Death, Time and all the rest appeared with enough regularity that you could quite reasonably consider them to number among the most frequently-appearing guest players the New Adventures ever had. Even in quieter, more low-key instalments like SLEEPY or The Also People, they’d put in the odd appearance or two, and the Doctor’s dalliances with Death proved particularly important over the course of Roz’s character arc.

(Mind you, the fact that so many of these appearances are veiled in metaphor and dream imagery does rather mean that it’s kind of up in the air as to what extent they can qualify as literal “guest appearances” as such, but the books are at least consistent on the point that these beings definitely do seem to exist in some kind of tangible sense.)

On the face of it, it makes far more sense for fandom to be familiar with a cosmology that made repeated appearances throughout the length and breadth of the series – many of which number among the New Adventures’ most acclaimed and, perhaps even more importantly, most accessible instalments, being published in the period which can pretty safely be considered the range’s heyday in terms of the sheer length of the novels’ print runs – than it does to focus in on a single, ludicrously expensive book from the very tail end of the Seventh Doctor’s involvement with the series.

And yet, when you give this conundrum more than fifteen seconds’ thought, it very rapidly becomes totally and profoundly unsurprising that things turned out the way they did. Fandom, as we’ve just seen, loves lore, and as far as pieces of Doctor Who lore go, you can’t really get much more appetising than “the Doctor’s origins.”

Combine this with the aforementioned position of Doctor Who fans as arbiters of their own personal continuity, where the official standing of the plethora of non-televised material is murky at best, and it makes perfect sense that a book like Lungbarrow would prove to have greater staying power as a topic of conversation and debate.

Naturally, this debate doesn’t usually run much deeper than an explanation of the ways in which its additions to the lore supposedly demonstrate some kind of fundamental failing on the part of the wider Virgin line to pay the appropriate homage to its continuity forebears, or some such nonsense. Which is a shame, really, because that’s quite possibly the least interesting conversation that you can have about Lungbarrow, but that’s just the way fandom works sometimes.

All of this waffling, however, is little more than a nasty flare-up of my own chronic tendency to get a bit ahead of myself, so I suppose we should waste no more time arguing about what kind of book The Room With No Doors isn’t, and instead talk about the kind of book that it actually is, saving the discussions of Lungbarrow until next time.

By now, you’ve hopefully gathered that The Room With No Doors will concern itself more with the business of tidying up the line’s more abstract, psychological and character-focused items of baggage.

This much, at the very least, should probably have been obvious from the moment we saw Kate Orman’s name on the front cover, combined with a title which directly references one of the more memorable bits of imagery contained within Steve Lyons’ quietly influential Head Games.

Dreams, mythology, godly visions, angst. All of these are well within Orman’s usual artistic wheelhouse, and it therefore makes perfect sense that she should be the one to try and give some sort of satisfying conclusion to the ways in which these devices have been utilised throughout the NAs. The only other obvious candidate, really, would be Paul Cornell, but it’s very much clear at this stage that he’s largely finished with the novels, Oh No It Isn’t! notwithstanding.

If Happy Endings was a bubbly, frocky love letter from Cornell to the books and characters that he had played a central role in shaping, then it seems fair to argue that The Room With No Doors represents Orman’s own attempt to square that particular personal circle.

Admittedly, the circumstances in which each author was writing are markedly different. Although both writers will go on to contribute just one more New Adventure each past this point – maybe two in Orman’s case, depending on how achronological you’re willing to be in defining So Vile a Sin‘s release date – it’s not as if The Room With No Doors can really be said to mark a conclusive break between Orman and the world of Doctor Who novels in quite the same way that Happy Endings did for Cornell. We still have a good few Orman outings to cover from the BBC Books years, not to mention a genuinely award-winning Telos novella to round things off.

Still, The Room With No Doors does mark a definitive ending of sorts. With the exception of the aforementioned So Vile a Sin, whose long-delayed publication has almost become a modern fandom myth in its own right, this is the last time that Orman will write for the Seventh Doctor as the protagonist of a full-length novel. It’s fair to say, with all this context feeding into the book, that a lot was riding on her ability to stick the landing, both as a means of capping off her own take on the character and providing a final mission statement for the New Adventures as a whole.

Is anyone really at all surprised that she managed to pull it off?

The Room With No Doors is a delight from start to finish, meditating in a sombre and mature fashion on the final fate of a book series I have loved and cherished for over five years now. Although its lack of a particularly big or showstopping adventure or any massive lore revelations might mean that it tends to get overshadowed by the books surrounding it, this understated quality is undoubtedly one of its most appealing traits, and Orman so skilfully handles the task of bidding farewell to the adventures of the Doctor and Chris that she makes it look practically effortless, finally demonstrating the remarkable level of internal thematic cohesion that the New Adventures brought to Doctor Who.

In attempting to unpack the novel’s many themes, perhaps the most logical place to start is with a discussion of the titular Room itself, particularly in light of the fact that its meaning has become markedly more poignant in the sixteen months since it was first explicitly introduced.

Back in October 1995, the idea of the Seventh Doctor eventually being supplanted and succeeded as the standard-bearer for new Doctor Who was a rather abstract threat, something which Lyons could tackle in a rather clinical and dispassionate manner.

In February of 1997, as we well know, this is no longer the case. We are less than four months removed from the launch of BBC Books’ brand spanking new Eighth Doctor Adventures range, and about two months away from the point at which the New Adventures themselves will jettison McCoy in favour of McGann. Doctor Who Magazine, spurred on in no small part by the self-confessed ambivalence towards the New Adventures on the part of editor Gary Gillatt, has gone so far as to kill off Ace in the pages of its ongoing comic strip, and is just wrapping up The Keep, its second instalment in the adventures of Eight and Izzy Sinclair.

This has led to the strange situation in which, to borrow an observation I made in reviewing Cold Fusion, every New Adventure since around the time of Happy Endings has technically been a Missing Adventure in all but name, and the books have repeatedly played with this idea, tying it into their own status of living on borrowed time in the wake of revitalised interest in the Doctor Who prose license from the corporate arms of the BBC.

Lawrence Miles was probably the first to literalise this formless angst in Christmas on a Rational Planet through the wonderfully inventive conceit of the Eighth Man Bound, a game in which Time Lords were able to suspend themselves in a state between regenerations in hopes of catching a glimpse of their future incarnations, heavily implying that the Doctor was the nameless Prydonian acolyte who managed the rare feat of seeing all of his first seven selves.

Orman herself would build on these foundations in the very next novel, with Return of the Living Dad offering the Doctor a glimpse of the meaningless death that lay in wait for him in a San Francisco alleyway, even if the particulars were hidden from him. “Do you know,” he confesses later in that book, “I had always assumed I could beat chance and choose the moment to die. I imagined I’d rise out of the ashes of regeneration and laugh, ‘I meant to do that.’ But that’s not going to happen. I’m not going to be in control. Surrounded by strangers. Helpless.”

It’s this angst which proves emblematic of the strange, uncertain nature of the Wilderness Years at this point in time, and tying it so strongly to the fundamental character arc of the Seventh Doctor is the kind of casually genius manoeuvre that we’ve come to expect from Orman.

On the purely in-text level, there’s a bitter irony to be mined from revealing the broad strokes of the Doctor’s next regeneration to Seven, the incarnation most prone to manipulating and stage managing events in a foolhardy, stubborn effort to lessen the resultant fallout by any means necessary. It confronts him with the existential horrors of predestination in a way that wouldn’t be nearly as effective if it were to happen to any other Doctor.

Adjacent to that, there’s a very metatextual frisson to this revelation that effectively acknowledges the peculiar position in which the New Adventures found themselves after May 1996. Before this point, and disregarding the DWM strip for the time being, the NAs had managed to retain their crown as the premier range for those fans who were hungering for long-form original Who storytelling. Regardless of what the general opinions of fandom might have been as to the actual material quality of these books, however, it could no longer be denied that the writers at Virgin were, in the aftermath of the TV movie, now forced to tell these stories by making use of the presence of an incarnation who had been given a definitive ending.

The Room With No Doors very much takes this tension and runs with it, building off Return of the Living Dad to offer a deeper exploration of some of that novel’s ideas in the wake of the seismic shocks that have happened since, most notably the deaths of Roz and Liz.

Despite his best efforts to hide behind the convenient excuse of a temporal distortion, the Doctor eventually confesses his real reasons for bringing Chris to feudal Japan, and it can’t help but recall the earlier conversation with his companions back in Little Caldwell.

“You speak as though you know the hour and the place,” Kadoguchi-roshi notes when the Doctor speaks of the desire to be ready for his impending death. It is in his response to this, admitting that he doesn’t know the specifics of his fate, that we can find the most crucial exchange in deciphering some measure of our favourite Time Lord’s mindset throughout the novel:

“…I want to. I want to choose. If I’ve got to regenerate again, go through that miniature death one more time, I want it to be on my own terms.”

“You want it to mean something.”

“Yes,” said the Doctor. “Everything I do is for a purpose. Too many people just die, die for no reason.”

This is the exact kind of mentality that we have come to expect from Seven, striving against all the odds to prevent meaningless, senseless deaths. It’s the kind of thing we saw most plainly – or will see, I suppose – in his reaction to Roz’s actions in So Vile a Sin, the “Time’s Champion” sort of mentality that Orman so astutely rebuffed with the observation that sometimes even the Doctor couldn’t save people from history. Even more immediately though, this rebuttal of the logic of “Time’s Champion” also lies at the heart of The Room With No Doors.

Now, when I said earlier that a lot of fans don’t remember the grand cosmology of Eternals and Champions and Stewards, it was with full knowledge that I was really only half-right. In truth, the Seventh Doctor’s status as “Time’s Champion” tends to be rather well-remembered, but more in the sense of being a general thematic marker than as so much continuity minutiae.

Unfortunately, it’s also often grossly misrepresented.

In the five years I’ve been reviewing the Virgin novels, I’ve repeatedly referenced the existence of a persistent school of thought that conceives of the New Adventures in particular as being angsty and edgy to a fault, willing to justify any atrocity committed by the Doctor by reference to his special position as a servant of an anthropomorphised representation of an intangible universal force. Often, you’ll see this argument paired up with a parallel strain of thinking which uses the NAs’ purported edginess as a means to argue that the novels manage to fundamentally misunderstand Doctor Who, and should therefore be shunned by fandom post-haste and regarded as non-canonical, whatever that means.

Now I’ll quite willingly concede here that this effectively amounts to the most extreme form of the argument. However, I do think I’ve captured the general spirit of a certain subset of fans’ reactions to the Virgin era, even if they might not always argue their case in such severe terms, and I do think this school of thought is overly simplistic and reductionist.

(With that being said, here at the very end, I suppose I’d feel uneasy with myself if I didn’t admit one last time that there’s some measure of truth to these claims, however minuscule it might ultimately be. There are certainly some books that handle the whole “dark, manipulative Doctor” thing in a much less sophisticated way than others, but these novels are generally not the ones held up by fans of the Virgin era as shining examples of the form. Indeed, more often than not, these tend to number among those instalments that receive an active and widespread critical lambasting.)

The Room With No Doors, then, puts the New Adventures’ cards on the table one last time, with the Doctor coming to actively reject the notion that the logic of “Time’s Champion” can ever be a truly sustainable form of heroism. Far from failing to understand the core values of the franchise, then, Orman makes a compelling case that the NAs have always been a journey back to those very same values, and a recognition that such ideals are worthless if they aren’t validated under pressure.

This process of “de-angsting” both the Doctor and Chris, to borrow the book’s own terminology, also sits quite comfortably within that titanic struggle between the cult and the domestic which we’ve singled out as the core conflict of Doctor Who in 1997. As with So Vile a Sin, it’s quite clear that Orman’s sympathies reside more with the latter side, as it’s yet another case of tripping the human brain’s own personal ‘That’s Too Damn Big’ switch, reducing an epic and grandiose model of heroism down to a more intimate and personal level.

Indeed, this interplay between mythology and heroism seems to lie at the heart of The Room With No Doors. The novel is practically overflowing with characters who all seem to embody their own particular brands of heroism, in turn reflecting back upon the Doctor and Chris’ attempts to discern their respective places in the cosmic schema of heroic self-sacrifice.

Perhaps the most obvious analogues to discuss are Penelope Gate and returning Orman guest star Joel Mintz, the latter having aged up about thirteen years since the events of Return of the Living Dad.

As a Victorian inventor in possession of her own personal time machine, Penelope is very clearly crafted as a representative of that particular branch of nineteenth century science fiction that serves as an antecedent to the beginnings of Doctor Who itself. She’s a wandering Brit, dedicated to marvelling at and observing spectacles from across the length and breadth of time and space, in the grand tradition of the protagonists of novels like H. G. Wells’ The Time Machine or Jules Verne’s The First Men in the Moon, or even the title character of Arnold Galopin’s remarkably Who-like Doctor Omega.

Moreover, she is said to power her time machine with a bolt of lightning, which Joel eagerly and not-so-subtly proclaims as being “like something out of Frankenstein.” The choice of reference material is illuminating, explicitly grounding Penelope’s backstory in a work often considered one of the earliest examples of modern science fiction as we know it.

Within the context of Doctor Who itself, of course, any fan with a passing familiarity with the series’ origins will also recognise shades not only of William Hartnell’s original Doctor, but also of “Doctor Who,” the eccentric human inventor played by Peter Cushing when the series made its first jump to the big screen in the 1960s.

With all of these obvious intertextual references, it’s hardly surprising that Orman’s subsequent novels for the BBC Books range – in conjunction with the works of Lance Parkin – should choose to incorporate Penelope into an expansion upon the account of the Doctor’s origins offered in John Leekley’s rejected “Leekley Bible,” implicitly casting her in the role of the Doctor’s human mother hinted at in the final television movie.

On a purely fictional level, the kind of stories in which you would expect to find Penelope Gate are exactly the kind of stories which proved such a vital component in the development of Doctor Who, and the subsequent parental link to the Doctor is only a literalisation of that connection.

Crucially, however, Orman also suggests that there exists a deep-rooted incompleteness to the kind of worldview implied by this school of science fiction adventuring. When the Doctor presses her on the motivations behind her jaunts through time, she quickly makes it clear that she sees her role in history as a passive one, quietly interacting with historical figures and locales without ever interfering. Even the very operating principles of her time machine are cold and clinical, running on the unremitting, iron logic of the Analytical Engine.

This, too, should be familiar to those with even the most casual of acquaintances with the Hartnell years. It’s virtually identical to the philosophy driving some of the programme’s earliest “pure historicals,” right down to the dogmatic insistence that you can’t rewrite one line of history. It’s telling that all of the figures Penelope cites – Shakespeare, Marco Polo, Richard the Lionheart – were featured at the dawn of the programme, in the period before Dennis Spooner really redefined what a historical story could look like with The Time Meddler; two of those three figures even served to anchor genuine pure historicals of their own.

It is, however, too much to claim that Orman displays no sympathy whatsoever for Penelope as a character. She never once tries to unfairly demonise her, and her desire to escape the stifling confines of her Victorian life is a completely understandable one.

Indeed, even if her initial methods and outlook may be flawed, The Room With No Doors still suggests that they aren’t irrevocably so. Over the course of the narrative, Penelope finds her detachment breaking down, eventually taking an active part in assisting the Doctor’s plans. In an early conversation with Chris, she even comes face to face with the fact that, in treating her own subjective past history as an eternal, closed system whose weight cannot be fought or railed against no matter what, she inadvertently ends up walling herself off from the possibility of exploring, say, the kind of future history that the New Adventures have crafted.

In a model of adventure that treats the past as the only worthy object of dispassionate, academic study, a concept like “the future” becomes inherently useless and incomprehensible. This is, in other words, the same kind of reasoning that leads to seemingly self-contradictory leaps in logic like the way in which it’s not OK for the protagonists of a show from 1966 to interfere in the seventeenth century Cornish smuggling rings of their own pasts one week, but it’s totally OK for the same characters to foil an alien invasion in 1986 just one week later. In short, then, Penelope’s arc is a microcosm of the philosophical and ideological transformation which Doctor Who itself has undergone over the past three decades.

In light of this, it’s undoubtedly significant that the Doctor is eventually able to meld Penelope’s machine with the technology of his own strange, temporal egg, suggesting that these two worldviews are not as mutually incompatible as one might initially suspect. Most tellingly of all, it’s Penelope who ultimately manages to communicate with Psychokinetic, taking advantage of a link that was forged even before the events of the book thanks to the captive alien’s transmission of temporal energy to power her time machine.

On a subtextual level, Penelope and the Doctor amount to little more than two distinct points on the strange, twisting artistic timeline that is Doctor Who. In spite of the tension that exists between them, they are ultimately able to reconcile and collaborate with one another, in much the same way as the show itself has been historically able to pull together the disparate strands of its past and push boldly on.

(As one might expect from Orman, there’s also something understatedly feminist in the decision to so casually make the book’s most prominent female guest star into a rather literal “Chosen One,” in the sense of Penelope being literally selected by Psychokinetic as his liberator. Similarly pointed is the Doctor’s reaction of disbelief to the revelation that she too has been dreaming of the Room, immediately and not a little condescendingly noting that she “[hasn’t] got a trace of telepathic ability.” Read today, in an age where, to pick a totally random example, Star Wars fans have proven totally incapable of accepting something like Rey’s proficiency in the Force without a ready-made link back to the franchise’s prominent male characters, it’s refreshing to see Orman so offhandedly overturn the rather gendered power structures that seem to plague a lot of “Chosen One” narratives within fantasy and science fiction.)

So, in order to find the real spanner in the works amidst all this romanticism and Victoriana, we need to turn to Joel Mintz, and it’s here that The Room With No Doors becomes incredibly, undeniably interesting when read in the context of February 1997.

In his first appearance in Return of the Living Dad, Joel was very obviously cast as the avatar of science fiction fandom in the 1990s. He had opinions on which episodes of Star Trek: The Next Generation were considered classics, sought answers to the eternal mystery of UNIT dating, and was, of course, a hardcore devotee of the New Adventures’ resident thinly-veiled Doctor Who clone, Professor X.

In the case of The Room With No Doors, these traits are only pushed further to the forefront. It’s almost certainly no coincidence, for instance, that the character’s own subjective experience of the gap between the two novels has lasted just long enough to make him around the same age as Doctor Who itself. Just in case things were getting a little too subtle, Penelope’s first journey through time lands her in May 1996, “two days before the Professor X movie premiered.”

Ahem.

With this in mind, it’s pretty clear that this subtly retooled Joel is meant to serve as an ambassador of the future of Doctor Who as it existed at the time of the telemovie’s premiere, or at the very least a possible future, contrasting with Penelope’s status as a representative of the franchise’s past.

As a character who was already established as a native of the United States in Return of the Living Dad, he’s pretty much the perfect poster-child for the trans-Atlantic vision of Philip Segal – an American dream, if you will – right down to receiving a prophetic visit from the Eighth Doctor during his time at Little Caldwell. By extension, this very firmly places his allegiances on the side of the “cult” rather than the “domestic.”

Naturally, by February 1997, Doctor Who fandom was well aware that the prospect of resurrecting Doctor Who as a cult property in the vein of something like The X-Files had effectively proven itself to be a spectacular failure. The 1996 television movie wound up attracting very little attention from either investors or audiences across the pond, and its most lasting effect was to throw the Virgin novels into the weird state of limbo that made The Room With No Doors necessary in the first place.

At the same time, we should be very careful not to argue that the cult property model of Doctor Who was wholly dead. Eternity Weeps, for instance, had proven that this kind of insular, continuity-focused thinking was still alive and well, resulting in a book that curiously managed to treat the death of Liz Shaw as a worthwhile plot beat on the basis of little more than the fact that Liz Shaw was an established character from the programme’s history. Paradoxically, however, Mortimore afforded this development such little room that it’s only in The Room With No Doors that we are first introduced to the idea that Imorkal effectively mercy killed the erstwhile UNIT scientist after her exposure to Agent Yellow.

Later in 1997, this model of Doctor Who will find perhaps its most notorious and universally-panned apotheoses in the form of The Eight Doctors and War of the Daleks, wherein the series’ continuity is elevated to a position of almost religious primacy.

Orman, unsurprisingly, manages to expertly sidestep these pitfalls in her handling of Joel. In many ways, Joel’s arc is consciously constructed as a mirror to Penelope’s. Rather than starting from the position of being a passive observer, perceiving the events of history as nothing more than so many punch cards in the great Analytical Engine of the universe, there’s a sense that Joel possesses some level of understanding of perceptual subjectivity as regards time travel.

He constantly keeps a watch on hand in order to preserve a certain measure of continuity to his existence, measuring out the span of years that he’s lived through in his own timestream, even as he’s buffeted from pillar to post through the Time Vortex. All his diary entries are prefaced with two datelines, one reflecting “Subjective Time” and the other “Local Time.”

But there exists a subtly monstrous quality to this logic all the same, offset by a certain crushing banality, and this is particularly apparent in the ways in which Joel applies these guiding principles to history. His grand plan to weave himself into the tapestry of world history effectively amounts to little more than introducing rudimentary computer technology to Japanese society a few centuries early.

Frankly, as far as threatening Doctor Who plans go, it resembles nothing so much as the rather childish and lackadaisical schemes of the Meddling Monk, and there’s something grimly comic in the revelation that his big “call to action” was something so petty as the inability to talk about his work with the Admiral in the Usenet communities in which he found himself, as well as the rather snide and dismissive press coverage of a Star Trek fan convention in Liverpool.

I mean, it’s hardly a Shakespearean motivation, is it?

It is the cold, mechanistic reasoning of the computer, however, that provides the most revealing insight into the real existential horror of these plans. In his pursuit of the chance to become a hero in his own right, stepping out from under the faux-paternalistic shadow of Admiral Summerfield for the first time in his life, Joel inadvertently ends up reinforcing the same kind of disinterested, passive Victorian worldview.

Indeed, there’s a sense that these actions are considered to be far more objectionable than Penelope’s own initial aloofness. It is, after all, perhaps no small wonder that an Englishwoman of the Victorian age – implied to be reasonably well-off financially – might prove a little blinkered at first in her conception of the world at large. We’re directly told that her only real brush with adventure, before becoming trapped by the societal conventions of the housewife, was on safari in Tanganyika, an image with distinctly colonial and imperialist connotations.

Joel, on the other hand, doesn’t really have such an excuse, having dealt with the strange and the fantastical on a regular basis for well over a decade now. He should, by rights, have developed some measure of empathy and self-awareness.

The fact that he’s so readily able to compartmentalise his instinctive disgust and revulsion at witnessing Gufuu’s brutal dismemberment of a traitorous subordinate, willing himself not to throw up through little more than the judicious and wilful application of some pretty extreme historical relativism, is downright disturbing, and only further reinforces the impression we received in recent Virgin novels like Bad Therapy or Burning Heart that the most unnerving and heinous human failing of all is a refusal to empathise.

What’s more, it is this lack of empathy, this inability to recognise or even care about the human cost of history, that motivates the construction of these mythological narratives of noble heroism. When it comes down to the big confrontation between Gufuu and Umemi, both Joel and Chris separately end up realising that the ideal of the samurai as proud, wholly virtuous warriors totally devoted to honour above all else is effectively just a convenient veil thrown over the historical reality of brutal, total and all-consuming war.

In fact, it’s worth noting that the real-world historical record largely bears out these notions. Much of the romantic iconography associated with the samurai in modern Western pop culture can be traced back to the publication of Inazō Nitobe’s Bushido: The Soul of Japan in 1899, a work which proved so popular as to meet with a ringing endorsement from President Theodore Roosevelt himself.

Despite the exuberant response from Western audiences, however, scholars of Japanese history and culture have argued that the accuracy of Nitobe’s idealised portrait of the samurai does not exactly hold up well under scrutiny. In fact, by effectively presenting the samurai in terms redolent of European medieval knights, Bushido can quite reasonably be read as an attempt to placate Western audiences who might have been made uneasy and confused by the sudden rise of Japan as a major political power in the wake of the Meiji Restoration and the country’s crushing defeat of China in the First Sino-Japanese War.

Needless to say, there’s a rather clear parallel here to Chris’ own arc of coming to terms with the ways in which he feels the narrative of Time’s Champion and his loyal steward – or even, as Orman points out in an apparent bid to further drive home the medieval undertones, his squire – has begun to crowd out the personal connection he feels with the Doctor, replacing it with an overblown sense of the theatrical and the mythically ostentatious.

In the process, then, The Room With No Doors manages to seamlessly bridge the gap between the historical and the intimate. Which finally brings us to the point where I must try and somehow do the same, the point at which everything we’ve been talking about hopefully starts to coalesce, and the point at which I can start wrapping up this overly long post. Heroism, history, lore, mythology, continuity. All of these forces are deeply intertwined with one another, and all of them have a profound relevance in analysing the state of Doctor Who and its attendant fandom in early 1997.

Because Joel’s way of seeing the universe is, ultimately, totally in line with the more obsessive tendencies of fan culture. Viewing history and its inhabitants as nothing more than a set of equations with no emotional content is exactly the same kind of mindset that motivates the hollow excesses of modern fandom, bringing back beloved characters without having any greater purpose for them than to garner a few more sentences on overly meticulous fan wiki projects. To use a more contemporary example, it’s the kind of mindset that leads Hollywood executives to seriously consider the use of AI to ghoulishly resurrect departed actors like Harold Ramis or George Reeves in order to push fans’ nostalgia buttons for a cheap emotional high.

And it is, Orman contends, thoroughly toxic to the long-term future of Doctor Who, with the avatar of the TV movie’s “cult television series” approach being pushed to the point where he almost finds himself forced to kill the Doctor on the orders of Gufuu Kocho. Indeed, when compared to the Doctor, Chris and Penelope, Joel seems quite removed from Psychokinetic’s plight, being the only time traveller not to share in the portentous dreams of imprisonment that lend the book its title.

We’ve seen this kind of argument advanced before; in a sense, we’re really just circling back around to the observations made in Who Killed Kennedy, and to David Bishop’s portrayal of fandom and mythology as inescapable forces that actively absorb those who try to impose some kind of readily quantifiable narrative structure upon them.

And just like in Who Killed Kennedy, there’s a sense that 1990s Internet fandom might not be too far removed from the trappings of conspiracy culture. Consider The X-Files, perhaps the most prominent pop culture representation of the decade’s conspiracy culture and a strong stylistic influence on both Who Killed Kennedy and the TV movie to boot. As a series, its most lasting legacy in the popular imagination will probably always be its ongoing semi-serialised saga of aliens and government cover-ups, a plotline whose instalments were traditionally assigned the moniker of, you guessed it, mythology episodes.

The Room With No Doors is all about tidying away this mythology, of conceding that Doctor Who‘s future will probably not be found in the form of the Campbellian monomyth so eagerly adopted by folks like Leekley and Segal, but in the series’ own delightfully quirky and idiosyncratic take on the hero’s journey.

By the novel’s end, both Chris and the Doctor have quite firmly rejected any possibility of having these sorts of mythic structures foisted upon them, with the former going so far as to finally assert the correct pronunciation of his surname, and the latter having rid himself of the angst and self-loathing characteristic of Seven’s relationship with his earlier selves. Even when Joel offers up prophetic foreknowledge of his eighth incarnation, he declines, choosing to let the universe take him where it will.

And in so doing, the New Adventures manage to make a compelling and watertight case that they are, and have always been, a vital part of Doctor Who, despite the protestations of those with more orthodox and conservative inclinations. The titular room which lays the groundwork for so much angst over the course of the novel is not, in actual fact, a ghastly vision of the NAs’ future, consigned to an eternal limbo wherein their developments are wholly ignored.

Instead, it turns out to be nothing more than the psychic plea of a trapped alien, and consequently serves as a final reminder of the all-too-easily forgotten truth that the Doctor doesn’t always need to serve the larger-than-life role of “he who fights monsters,” or the Oncoming Storm, or even the President of the Intergalactic Floral Society. It’s enough to just be the kind of individual who will always make the choice to win, to help people, and to stick around for a tea ceremony and a spot of snowman-building after the dust settles, rather than stewing in his own personal hell and dragging those around him down there with him.

Ironically then, despite not being a Doctor-lite novel in the vein of Eternity Weeps, and not exhibiting a single trace of Benny’s presence, The Room With No Doors proves itself to be far more adept at broadening the scope of heroism possible within the New Adventures’ remit than Mortimore’s book ever was.

Here, at the last, Kate Orman has managed to signal that Doctor Who need not align itself with the forms and grammar of cult ’90s television properties, but that it can instead strive for a more universal and domestically grounded approach.

It is, of course, one of life’s tragic little ironies that this affirmation should arrive at a point where the New Adventures are about to take their greatest leap yet into the realms of the cult classic, retooling themselves as a spin-off series centred around the escapades of a novel-original character, arguably confining themselves to the very same sort of isolated, claustrophobic pop cultural afterlife that The Room With No Doors so stirringly railed against.

As any respectable critic will tell you, though, the degree of commercial or popular success enjoyed by a work of art should by no means be taken as a reliable indicator of its quality, and the fact that so many of the NAs’ innovations have been vindicated by the passage of time is surely reason enough to judge them to be worthy additions to the ongoing story of the franchise, rather than as one big artistic cul-de-sac as some might contend.

At the end of the day, The Room With No Doors makes a compelling closing argument in defence of this half-decade of weird and wonderful authorial innovation that Virgin managed to provide us, full of astonishing imagery and beautiful characterisation, and although there might still be two more New Adventures featuring the Doctor for us to talk about, on a purely thematic level, this is the end.

And maybe, just this once, it’s OK if the moment hasn’t been prepared for.

Miscellaneous Observations

With how thematically and symbolically rich this book is, I’m gonna be up front and admit that there are a lot of things that didn’t end up making it into the final review, or even in this here Miscellaneous Observations section. At a certain point, though, I had to start getting really disciplined with what I included in order to not feel like I was yabbering on too much and keeping you here for the rest of time.

(I know, the sheer length of this post probably doesn’t exactly do much to showcase the notion that I’ve been at all economical or disciplined in my inclusions but just… it’s true I swear, trust me on this!)

Anyway, there are a few things that would have felt like positively criminal omissions if I didn’t mention them, so here they are. For starters, Orman is fantastic at writing for the Doctor. We knew this already, but it bears repeating. This is one of the best depictions of Seven the NAs have ever turned out, striking the perfect balance between humour and forlornness, and with so many standout moments that it would be impossible to list them all.

As for the symbolism of the thing… well, the scene in which the Doctor ends up impaled by an arrow that has killed the peasant girl in his arms is, as has been pointed out by countless reviewers before me, one of the most shocking and memorable visualisations of what the “NA Doctor” is really all about. In fact, far from “spoiling” the book, I think my foreknowledge of the image made the slow realisation of how it was all going to slot into place all the more impactful.

Which might kind of play against the themes of the book itself, now that I’m thinking about it, but we humans are nothing if not walking contradictions…

As if to offer up a few final morsels of proof that Kate Orman deserves to be mentioned in any discussion of the most influential Doctor Who writers never to have worked on the television series, there are a number of moments within The Room With No Doors that put me in mind of subsequent beats from the 2005 revival. Not in the sense where I’m lobbing accusations of plagiarism at later writers, mind you, I’m just pointing out casual parallels that occurred to me.

For one, Joel’s whole plan to change history and the Doctor’s subsequent irascible response feels rather akin to the fate of Adam Mitchell in The Long Game – although, to be honest, it might make a bit more sense in that case than it does here, considering Adam’s relative inexperience and youth when compared to Joel’s thirty-three years of age. I guess that’s partially intentional, in order to reinforce the point that he should really know better, but it is a little odd nonetheless.

Nitpicks aside, bits of the novel also bring to mind Heaven Sent, from the Doctor’s burial to the sequence in which Penelope, trapped in the mental hellscape of the Room, repeats the Doctor’s own advice regarding the choice between inaction and winning. Some day I might write a big piece on the thematic parallels between Orman’s work and that of Steven Moffat, but for now I’ll just say, as I always have, that the covering of similar ground – even while both authors retain their own distinct styles – probably accounts for a great deal of my enjoyment of both their respective oeuvres.

Final Thoughts

Sorry that that was a bit of a long one, folks, but I felt like it behooved me, at such a pivotal turning point in the dying days of the series, to really pull out all the stops. To be honest, this was a tough review to write, as my brain kept screaming at me to include more and more.

As if that wasn’t enough, I ended up re-reading large chunks of the novel again and again in order to ensure I wasn’t missing anything. I probably hindered my own enjoyment of the experience quite a bit by doing so, but what else is new, I suppose? Ah well, there’s always the promise of some distant future where I can re-read as many of the books as I choose without having to worry about writing a full-length review to elucidate my thoughts and opinions.

Whatever the case, join me next time as I hopefully learn how to restrain my verbosity a little bit better, and Christopher Bulis continues his ongoing quest to write for every Doctor under the sun, with the Fourth Doctor, Sarah, and Harry encountering A Device of Death. Until then, however…

Kind regards,

Special Agent Dale Cooper

Virgin Missing Adventures Reviews: Burning Heart by Dave Stone (or, “A Tale of Two Mega-Cities”)

Here at Dale’s Ramblings, I’ve traditionally stuck to a very particular writing pattern when I find myself faced with the task of writing a review. Even as the sophistication and depth of my musings has grown over time – or at least, that’s certainly what I would like to think, given how frankly naff a lot of my earliest reviews seem when I look at them nowadays – there’s an endearing simplicity to these old, tried-and-true methods that I find difficult to forsake.

As the name of the blog might lead you to suspect, I don’t ever plan out the structure of these posts in any kind of strict detail in advance, and even after more than five years of writing my book reviews, I have yet to take a single page of notes.

In the absence of these more formalised acts of planning, then, I habitually lean much more heavily on the opening sentence or paragraph of a given post as a means of dictating my train of thought. If I can find a good initial observation with which to kickstart my writing, I’m pretty much already halfway there, and I can just let the flow of subsequent comments and impressions guide me where they will as they occur to me.

Naturally, this is a bit of an oversimplification. I’ll always go back over the posts as they begin to take shape, in a more-than-likely futile attempt to ensure that I’m not jumping from thought to thought in too erratic and incoherent a fashion.

What’s more, there have been cases in which a post has gone through a good few tentative opening paragraphs before I manage to find one that really clicks with me. I can attest that there have been times where I’ve written a good few hundred words proceeding down a certain avenue, only to decide that it isn’t working and subsequently redo the whole thing from scratch.

(Stability, what is it good for?)

However, in the case of Burning Heart, the latest novel from two-time New Adventures contributor Dave Stone, I found myself in a rather unprecedented spot of difficulty. If it had been a simple case of being unable to find any opening angle whatsoever, that would be one thing. It’s happened before, certainly, and I usually tend to resolve such issues through the practical application of an ancient and mystical artform that I like to call “pulling something out of thin air.”

No, my problem was that I was able to conceive of two equally valid narratives which each had the potential to provide me with more than enough background material and bigger-picture context to properly set the stage for the review proper, as it were.

One of these choices was quite clearly the more conventional option, exactly the kind of story you’d expect to hear told in a discussion of this, the final Missing Adventure to feature the Sixth Doctor. It’s the story of a fair-haired, Technicolour-dream-coated, Gallifreyan do-gooder who lost his way in the mid-1980s, and has spent the last few years clawing his way back to some kind of reputational rehabilitation.

On the other hand though, there’s also a much wider story at play here beyond the traditional confines of Doctor Who itself, operating in accordance with the handbook of a completely different media playing field.

This isn’t to imply that the two are completely discrete, isolated entities that never crossed paths. Quite the contrary. The United Kingdom is a very small place, especially on the printed page, and these two narratives frequently end up intersecting with and paralleling one another in some rather interesting and revealing ways.

As I stewed over this decision for a little while, I began to realise that there was also a secret third option lurking in the shadows. I could always just do them both, and attempt to fold them back into some kind of weird, metatextual commentary on my own creative process. This, then, is the result of these endeavours, and something that we might – only half-seriously – term a Tale of Two Mega-Cities.

Where, then, should we begin? In the year 2000 AD, of course… or, y’know, near enough.

In the early 1970s, the British comics industry found itself in a bit of a pickle. The previous decade had seen readership figures on a steady downward slide, largely brought about by the rising popularity and accessibility of television.

This crisis was only further compounded by the adoption of colour television signals in England by the two major broadcasters in late 1969, and although it would still take a good few years for colour sets to outnumber black-and-white models in the UK, it became clear that comics were in dire need of a shake-up if they were to have any hope of competing with the kind of bright, poppy splendour that was now being routinely beamed into scores of living rooms across the country.

The first such attempt hit British stores in September 1974, when Dundee-based publishing giant DC Thomson released the first issue of Warlord, a new weekly comics anthology series containing tales of derring-do and British exceptionalism during wartime, with the early years devoting the bulk of their attention to the Second World War.

Now something that you need to understand about the eponymous David Couper Thomson is that he was, to aggressively understate my case, a bit of a conservative. He was infamously opposed to union membership among his workforce, requiring that all his firm’s employees sign an anti-union clause upon hiring. When more than seventy printers were dismissed in 1952 for having been discovered to have attained union membership in secret, the Trades Union Congress organised a boycott of Thomson’s papers in protest of his employment practices.

There are, undoubtedly, so many more rabbit holes that I could disappear down in order to make my point about Thomson’s politics. I could, for instance, bring up the vicious war of words that he waged in the Dundee press against local Liberal Party member, Winston Churchill, enabling Scottish Prohibition Party candidate Edwin Scrymgeour to unseat the future Prime Minister and become the only person in British parliamentary history to win political office in the House of Commons on a prohibitionist ticket. Suffice it to say, however, that it’s hardly a great surprise to learn that Dundee’s “vast tartan monster” has drawn comparisons in recent times to figures like Succession‘s own Logan Roy, portrayed by fellow Dundonian thespian Brian Cox.

Although Thomson died nearly twenty years before Warlord ever saw print, the conservative leanings of the publication house definitely bled through into the new comic, as you were probably able to surmise by my earlier use of the phrases “Second World War” and “British exceptionalism” in the same sentence.

In fact, it’s almost impressive how quickly the first issue jumps into this kind of content, with the first sentence of the anthology’s very first page of comic strip content unabashedly making use of an anti-Japanese ethnic slur in announcing the adventures of Union Jack Jackson, “the only Britisher in the U.S. Marines.” One could also flip to the end of the comic to read about the childhood exploits of the Wolf of Kabul, a strip whose handling of colonial India is about as racially sensitive as you’d expect.

Whatever the case, Warlord was a smash hit for an ailing industry, and it inspired DC Thomson’s main rival, IPC Magazines, to concoct a title of their own. Enlisting the help of freelance comic creatives Pat Mills and John Wagner, IPC shortly launched Battle Picture Weekly in early March 1975, covering much the same wartime milieu as Warlord. It was another IPC title, however, that was to prove both successful and wildly controversial at the same time.

In February 1976, the first issue of Mills and Wagner’s Action was released. Where Warlord and Battle Picture Weekly had been exclusively concerned with wartime wranglings, this new publication was intended to incorporate a more generalised form of, well, action within the scope of its own original comics.

Mills and Wagner’s efforts also presented a stark contrast to the kind of nostalgic romanticisation of an imagined historical Britain exemplified by these more war-oriented comics. Instead, they set out to try and capture the rough, barbed sense of social upheaval that the 1970s would come to signify for the nation. As the idealism and pacific imaginings of the 1960s gave way to the bitter, heated industrial disputes that would dog the premierships of Heath, Wilson and Callaghan, Action felt perfectly in tune with the spirit of the decade.

In striving to resonate with this zeitgeistAction would also prove itself decidedly unwilling to shy away from any suggestions of violence or general unpleasantness. Consider, as an example, one of the more infamous strips to ever grace its pages, Hook Jaw.

On the most fundamental of levels, Hook Jaw is very much just an obvious and shameless attempt to cash in on Steven Spielberg’s surprise selachian smash hit of the summer of ’75, with a dash of environmentalism for flavour. And yet, Ken Armstrong and Pat Mills don’t skimp out on the shark attacks as perhaps might have been expected for such a readily accessible comic, depicting them in all their gory glory.

Of course, the more conservative corners of British society were shocked and appalled at what they saw as a prime example of the moral degradation at work in the nation’s youth. Right-wing Evangelical Christian crusader, Mary Whitehouse, turned the full, meagre and artistically illiterate weight of her not-so-impressive arsenal against the publication, campaigning in conjunction with her National Viewers and Listeners Association to have Action banned from major newsagents.

These outraged voices would continue to grow in strength as the months dragged by, and in late September, editor John Sanders appeared on the popular BBC1 current affairs programme Nationwide, defending the fledgling comic in an interview with presenter Frank Bough. A week later, the comic found itself discussed in the House of Commons itself.

Afraid that the continual furore over Action would lead popular national outlets W.H. Smith and John Menzies to refuse to stock any IPC comics whatsoever, the publisher placed the series on hold after the 36th issue in October, and issue #37 would be pulped. When the comic returned a month later, the anarchistic, devil-may-care violence had been noticeably toned down, and although it limped on for another year, sales never returned to their previous heights, and the comic would eventually find itself suffering the ironic fate of being totally subsumed by Battle Picture Weekly, the very comic against which it had initially distinguished itself.

While all of this was going on, however, IPC sub-editor Kelvin Gosnell had happened by chance upon an article in the London Evening Standard which spoke of a surfeit of impending science-fiction films. Inspired by this news, he collaborated with Mills and Wagner to develop the magazine that would eventually become 2000 AD. Although Judge Dredd did not appear until the second issue – or “prog,” to use the magazine’s own parlance – it quickly became clear that he was destined to become one of the collection’s breakout characters, and would go on to appear in virtually every one of the more than 2000 regular weekly “progs” published to date.

It’s around about here, then, that we can find the first parallels between Dredd and Doctor Who, as well as our first cases of franchise cross-pollination. Most obviously, in becoming a victim of the narrow-minded evangelism of Mary Whitehouse and the NVLA, not to mention the wider-scale conservative forces at play in the Britain of the mid-1970s, Action can quite credibly claim to stand shoulder-to-shoulder alongside Doctor Who‘s own Hinchcliffe Era. Given how widely acclaimed that particular chapter of the programme’s history is, that’s rather good company for any piece of art to keep, I’d say.

As something of an addendum to that, the rise of 2000 AD itself as a more explicitly science fiction-oriented title than its predecessor pretty neatly mirrors the shift in creative direction undertaken by Graham Williams in his own three-season stint as Doctor Who‘s producer.

It’s undoubtedly significant that Mills and Wagner’s most extensive flirtation with the franchise’s non-televised material coincides rather neatly with the tail end of the Williams years, with the duo collaborating on four comic stories in the earliest days of Doctor Who Weekly. Two of these strips in particular, The Iron Legion and The Star Beast, are almost certain to merit inclusion on any list of the most iconic and fondly-remembered stories ever printed in Doctor Who Magazine, with the former of these even being adapted from a rejected script for Season Seventeen, and the latter seemingly destined for some form of adaptation or homage in Russell T. Davies’ upcoming trilogy of 60th anniversary specials.

As anyone familiar with the folk history of the Hinchcliffe and Williams years will be able to tell you, however, it can also be quite readily argued that it was the latter’s decision to so profoundly retreat from some of the best attributes of the former which set in motion a gradual decline in the programme’s prestige, and charted a course towards its eventual 1989 cancellation.

This is, admittedly, oversimplifying things a tad, and there are certainly still more than enough pockets of merit to be found between The Talons of Weng-Chiang and Survival. The strange micro-era represented by the stewardship of Christopher H. Bidmead, for instance, is certainly not without its avid defenders, and it should shock nobody to hear, ninety-two books into Virgin’s output of original novels, that I actually quite enjoy the Cartmel years. Nonetheless, rightly or wrongly the prevailing narrative of the Williams Era is as a turning point in the cultural standing of Doctor Who, and I have myself made reference to this notion in the past.

Whatever you make of the historiography of this period of the programme’s history, the end result is the same. You know the drill by now: Doctor Who ends up cancelled, Virgin picks up the slack about eighteen months later with the New Adventures, carving out a niche that idiots on WordPress can still talk about to this day.

Judge Dredd, meanwhile, kept going strong. The strip, and the magazine in which it was housed, eventually went on to attract such a multitude of British comic notables that listing them off here almost seems redundant. If you can think of them, there’s a reasonably high chance that their orbits have crossed paths with 2000 AD at some stage.

As with any successful franchise, it wasn’t too long before Dredd began migrating to other forms of media. Over the years, avid video game fans could choose from 1986’s imaginatively-titled Judge Dredd, 1990’s Judge Dredd, or maybe even – please stifle your gasps of surprise – 1995’s Judge Dredd. The possibilities were truly boundless!

The most important thing for us to talk about today, however, is the fact that the Judge Dredd prose license ended up in the hands of Virgin Books in the early 1990s. For a little under two years, the company published a total of nine full-length novels set in the world of the comic strip. If you cast a casual glance over the list of titles, you might notice a few familiar faces, including Managra author Stephen Marley, Who Killed Kennedy “co-author” – not to mention long-time Judge Dredd Megazine editor – David Bishop, and, yes, Dave Stone.

After the publication of Stone’s own Wetworks in February 1995, however, the publication of new titles came to a standstill. American-based St. Martin’s Press would release a novelisation of the Danny Cannon-directed, Sylvester Stallone-starring, critically-panned Judge Dredd feature later in the same year, alongside a junior version, but beyond that, Dredd would not return to the world of prose until Black Flame released Dredd vs. Death in 2003, effectively a novelisation of the video game of the same name.

Still, if Virgin’s Judge Dredd novels provide a tantalising glimpse of the way in which the adventures of the Doctor and Dredd had run in parallel to one another for much of their respective lifetimes, then Burning Heart represents the point at which these two strains crash into one another in perhaps the most direct fashion yet.

By all accounts – and, since we’re still working in the hazy, distant early days of the Internet, the credible and verifiable accounts I could find are stretched quite thin indeed, mostly amounting to a single footnote at the beginning of Lars Pearson’s I, Who – Stone’s novel was initially intended for the Judge Dredd line, before these plans were essentially scuppered by the less-than-stellar reviews which greeted the aforementioned Stallone film in mid-1995.

As such, the Dredd line was effectively left to rot, and the book that became Burning Heart was extensively reworked to fit with the Missing Adventures instead. The Judges became the Adjudicators that have been a mainstay of Virgin’s novels since Lucifer Rising, while Dredd himself became Adjudicator Joseph Craator, and additional details were added to the worldbuilding to more firmly root the plot in the aftermath of the Earth Empire’s spectacular decline in the yet-to-be-published So Vile a Sin.

(This last part, incidentally, sounds remarkably like the plans we discussed last time in relation to Cold Fusion. Although Virgin were seemingly intending for that book to take place in the direct aftermath of Aaronovitch and Orman’s work, and Burning Heart takes place some centuries later, the general idea of using the MAs to explore the fictional world crafted by the NAs is the same in both cases. Coupled with the duality of ice and fire imagery in their titles, I do have to wonder if Parkin and Stone’s novels were intended to form something of a loose thematic duology. I have no evidence to either support or disprove such a notion, but the thought occurred to me nonetheless.)

Even if the direct Dredd connection is one of those things that has kind of just been parroted by fan reviews over the years with very little attention paid to proper sourcing, it’s not exactly hard to spot the remaining traces of Mills and Wagner’s creation. The face-lift to turn the Judges into Adjudicators isn’t much more than skin-deep, and any lingering doubts must surely be put to rest by the time we look at Alister Pearson’s cover art and see the distinctly Dreddful figure occupying pride-of-place next to the likenesses of Colin Baker and Nicola Bryant.

Moreover, though, there’s something of a perverse irony that, in January 1997, Judge Dredd should finally intersect with the Doctor in all but name in the wake of a disappointing filmic adaptation whose most significant long-term impact was the stagnation and eventual reshaping of the franchise’s licensed tie-in novels.

Do I really need to spell out the parallels to the McGann film at this point?

As the final Sixth Doctor adventure from Virgin, Burning Heart carries with it an even greater sense of finality than we have experienced in our other recent farewells to particular incarnations like Speed of Flight or Cold Fusion, but that feels, oddly enough, like the best possible swansong for Baker’s Doctor.

Ever since State of Change, the Missing Adventures have been keenly aware that the Sixth Doctor’s much-reviled tenure will prove to be something of an issue for the novels if they don’t handle his character with great care, and it’s not for nothing that these novels have perhaps the most readily discernible arc of any Doctor’s.

With the range’s first crack at old number Six, Christopher Bulis set out to achieve the simultaneously modest yet daunting task of proving that it was in fact possible to tell solid, engaging stories featuring the Sixth Doctor and Peri, without descending into the kind of unpleasantness traditionally associated with the pair’s dynamic.

It was with Steve Lyons’ Time of Your Life, however, that Six’s renaissance was to truly make its presence known. A brutal, bloody, uncompromising work, it did its best to exorcise the violent, misogynistic and fannish demons that had haunted Season 22, before closing with the promise of new adventures with a new companion in the form of Grant Markham. It was, perhaps, more successful as a mission statement than as a novel in its own right, but it was precisely the kind of treatment that the era needed at that point in time.

Craig Hinton continued to apply this approach in Millennial Rites, finally initiating Bonnie Langford’s much-maligned Mel into the Missing Adventures fold and attempting to deal with the Valeyard head-on. Beyond this point, the novels have subsequently adopted a rather neat symmetry, giving us our first – and, lamentably, only – proper adventure with Grant Markham in Killing Ground.

And now, at last, we have circled back around to Peri, about a month after the New Adventures themselves categorically identified Doctor Who‘s horrendously toxic treatment of the character as a lasting stain on the programme’s legacy in Bad Therapy.

Indeed, taking place between Vengeance on Varos and The Mark of the Rani as it does, Burning Heart is actually the first Missing Adventure to be set in that dreaded twenty-second season which I and many others would consider Doctor Who‘s televisual nadir. Although State of Change had featured the Sixth Doctor and Peri, its back-cover blurb placed it between Revelation of the Daleks and The Mysterious Planet, and the novel quite obviously took its cues from Season 23’s far less hostile depiction of the characters’ relationship.

So if Dave Stone is to meaningfully tackle this TARDIS team and their… troubled history, shall we say, it’s pretty crucial that he treads carefully. Further cause for concern might be raised when one considers that his output to date has been confined to the New Adventures. Burning Heart is his first attempt at a Missing Adventur. Since he’ll be pretty much exclusively writing for the Bernice Summerfield books for the next three-odd years, it’s also his only past Doctor novel until 2000’s Heart of TARDIS, though he would contribute a Sixth Doctor short story for 1999’s More Short Trips.

And if all of that wasn’t enough, Stone’s wheelhouse has already been pretty rigidly defined just three books in. Yes, there were deeper themes at play – OK, count it, one theme, namely the difference between perception and reality, but it’s a good theme – but Sky Pirates! and Death and Diplomacy had both been pretty silly affairs on the whole. Endearingly silly, at least for me, and with flashes of seriousness like the deeply grounded and emotionally turbulent courtship of Jason and Bernice, but silly nonetheless.

Thankfully, I’m pleased to say that Burning Heart manages to be an atypically mature and considered outing from the normally zany and off-the-wall Dave Stone. His fingerprints are still all over the finished product, but they’re tempered by an understanding that restraint and understatement can sometimes be virtues in and of themselves.

Even if it wasn’t boosted by that strange Dave Stone Effect – that alchemical magic that we’ve discussed before whereby an assortment of individually irritating parts is somehow transmuted into a whole that I find remarkably coherent and entertaining – I feel like I would still enjoy Burning Heart a great deal, in a way that I’m not sure would necessarily be true of the writer’s previous New Adventures.

Like so many of Stone’s other works, Burning Heart is a novel concerned with the gap between how we perceive things to be and how they actually are. It is, in fairness, the One Theme that he hits upon incessantly, but the fact remains that he’s very good at exploring it in a reasonably fresh manner with every attempt.

In this case, I think the key to the story’s success is the way in which it manages to direct this sense of perceptual ambiguity back upon the very narrative structures of Doctor Who itself. Sky Pirates! was riffing on the generalised subject of epic quest/adventure stories as a whole, while Death and Diplomacy picked apart the West’s self-constructed image as an impartial observer drifting above the trials and travails of the Third World in the unipolar moment. In a more straightforwardly intertextual sense, of course, both the Dagellan Cluster and the character of Jason Kane owed a conscious debt to Star Wars.

Avron Jelks, though, is a figure of the kind that we’ve seen countless times throughout the course of Doctor Who. He’s a charismatic, passionate rebel leader who seems virtually pre-ordained to shape a better world and free Dramos from under the oppressive yoke of the Adjudicators. The only problem, of course, is that he’s also unapologetically anthrocentric in his politics and, in his own way, is arguably just as much of a tyrannical despot in the making as High Churchman Garon could ever be.

Now on the face of it, you might figure that we’re in for some tedious and unconvincing bothsidesism, with the rebellion-hungry anarchists being painted as having noble goals but employing unspeakable methods, and the end result being a tacit endorsement and reinforcement of the status quo.

(Paging The Falcon and the Winter Soldier…)

It’s to Stone’s credit that he’s shrewd enough to avoid some of the more obvious pitfalls that tend to come with telling these kinds of stories, however. Burning Heart makes absolutely no bones about the fact that Garon and the Church of Adjudication are a legitimately nefarious and toxic force, and there’s never any serious suggestion that their overthrow would be anything but beneficial to the inhabitants of Dramos.

At the same time, the novel exhibits a fundamental distrust of autocracy of any stripe, and practically relishes in the ambiguity inherent to these kinds of tough, complex sociopolitical quagmires. The demands of a 200-odd page novel inevitably lead to some degree of simplification, but the broad points are communicated rather effectively.

Jelks positions himself and his followers as outsiders to the Adjudicators’ system, if only by dint of his own considerable force of personality, but the actualities of his relationship to the apparatus of the state are consciously murky. As its name implies, Human First’s belief systems share more than a passing ideological resemblance to the militant anti-alien paranoia of the Empire and the Church.

When Peri first sees Jelks speak at the rally that serves as the novel’s inciting incident, it’s telling that she instinctually likens him to the Governor of Varos. Her internal thought processes quickly downplay any suggestion that he might be anything other than the downtrodden rebel leader that he would so like others to believe him to be, noting the apparent role reversal, but it’s a slip of the mind that proves quite telling as to the book’s general political philosophy.

When she wakes up from the stress-fogged torpor that had stolen over her upon her initial arrival at the Mimseydome™ – a thinly-veiled Disneyland clone that serves as your regular reminder that you are, in fact, reading a Dave Stone novel – she’s able to see that what she had initially taken to be a ragtag gang of rebels is actually a surprisingly well-organised paramilitary force. Almost disturbingly so, in fact.

In such a world, the lines between the establishment and the anarchist rapidly become very difficult to discern without a firmly applicable set of moral principles by which to guide our judgment. There’s a sense here, then, that the cloud of uncertainty that hovers over all these duelling narratives and individuals has material consequences for both the characters inhabiting the novel, and the wider structures of Doctor Who as a whole, in a way that wasn’t quite true of Stone’s earlier books.

Even on a more generalised level, this sense of confounding the expected beats of a Virgin novel finds expression in other ways as well. One of the most powerful scenes in the novel initially appears to be a bog-standard “get the companion naked” scene, of the kind which has proved a disturbingly recurrent fixation of the novels. Indeed, even State of Change felt the need to keep Peri in a state of near-total undress for much of its opening chapters.

But here, in glancing at herself in the mirror, Peri reflects on the physical after-effects suffered by her body in her violent escape from the riot, and the scene quickly becomes something deeper than the mindless titillation it might otherwise evince. The injuries, while not especially graphic, are at least pronounced enough to cause Peri to not initially recognise herself.

It is, undoubtedly, a deeply uncomfortable scene in spite of its brevity, and I definitely understand if one were inclined to say that Burning Heart goes too far in this one instance. Still, I think Stone handles it with a surprising amount of tact and grace, and for a character who was relentlessly sexualised almost from the very first moment of her introduction, it brings home the implicit sexist violence of that kind of objectification in a rather startling way.

Lest I give Stone too much credit, though, this powerful and disquieting moment sits rather at odds with the later decision to have Peri “armoured” in scavenged fetish gear as little more than a cheap gag built off of the White Fire forces being short on legitimate body armour.

Admittedly, I think you could possibly make the case even here that the novel is ridiculing the frankly ludicrous lengths to which the television shows would sometimes go to objectify Nicola Bryant, and Peri’s pithy, snide self-assessment that she resembles “a cross between a peroxide rock chick and the wet dream of a gentleman of a certain age” would probably go some ways towards supporting that theory, but equally… I dunno.

It still feels a little too coy for my liking, especially when the novel has already acknowledged that this longstanding treatment of the character is a serious matter that should be treated delicately where possible. It’s an occasion on which I think Burning Heart misses the mark a little, and the only reason it’s as noticeable as it is is down to how thoughtful everything else has been. I suppose, on balance, there are worse sins to commit. I mean, I’d readily take this over a John Peel book any day, so it must have something going for it…

Putting all of that aside for the moment, it’s also worth noting that this commitment to ambiguity and rebellious, iconoclastic anti-authoritarianism on a fundamental narrative level ultimately makes Burning Heart a work that speaks almost perfectly to the central satirical tension of Judge Dredd – “violence on the side of justice,” in the words of John Sanders himself – even if it may have had a few vestigial Doctor Who accoutrements bolted on.

In turn, Stone is able to offer up a resounding refutation of the kinds of British conservatism that we have continually come back to over the course of this review, and which had similarly lingered on in the corridors of power for the better part of two decades now.

The world of Dramos and the Habitat, if it can be taken as a reliable microcosm of human society as a whole, is one that should seem disturbingly familiar to any historian of that strange decade which gave us both Thatcher and Judge Dredd, the 1970s. A fading Empire, poverty, starvation, homelessness, even a waste crisis for good measure. We hear nothing of divisive industrial action, but it’s not exactly a giant leap to suppose that such things might have happened just out of frame at some point in the not-too-distant past.

These are the kinds of conditions under which people might be predisposed to, say, reject those darn out-of-touch Labourites and throw their weight behind a seemingly newer, more forceful, more commanding style of leadership.

It’s an environment in which a bigoted, hateful schoolteacher could become one of the most powerful voices in the country, kicking up a stink about popular comics and stirring up fears that the once-virtuous and impartial BBC had sunk to broadcasting “teatime brutality for tots.”

It’s an environment where parties like the National Front could reliably command an alarmingly high share of the vote in local council elections off the backs of anti-immigration sentiment, despite being a quite openly violent neo-fascist and white supremacist movement.

This last observation proves the most enlightening in attempting to ascertain the particulars of Burning Heart‘s moral philosophy. The reason the National Front – as well as its slew of spiritual successors like the British National Party – saw their electoral popularity decline so starkly from the mid-1970s onwards can be pretty squarely laid at the feet of one Margaret Hilda Thatcher.

(As is true in the case of an alarming amount of problems facing modern Britain, but anyway…)

See, the thing that made Thatcher such a scarily propulsive political force for so long was her uncanny ability to wield the bigotries of those more extreme social movements surrounding her, diluting them just enough that they would be more widely socially palatable, while still drawing in the same audience of xenophobic or homophobic or simple, good old-fashioned common or garden nutters.

Thatcher was never a virulent Nazi on the level of A. K. Chesterton or John Tyndall, but she knew that she didn’t have to be out there clashing with anti-fascist protesters in Red Lion Square or Lewisham to play upon the fears lurking in the hearts of Britons everywhere. In fact, she recognised that she could be far more effective if she wasn’t so outright objectionable, and that, if anything, was the true evil of Thatcherism.

(A virtually identical fate, incidentally, ended up befalling Mary Whitehouse and the NVLA, with their homophobic screeds being quietly absorbed into Tory policy in the form of drivel like Section 28, even as the party let them believe that they were a valued ally in any sense beyond the most basic level of serving as useful idiots.)

Stone isn’t exactly subtle in his commentary, but that’s not a knock against him by any means. Once Kane has revealed the true nature of Avron Jelks and Human First to Peri, the book pulls out all the stops in the “thinly-veiled Hitler analogue” playbook. Jelks is seen writing in his manifesto, the suspiciously familiar-sounding My Struggle Against Tyranny, railing against the inherent uncleanliness of all non-human species and the injustice of getting rejected from art school. For all his vitriol, however, it’s also clear that Human First are ultimately just being used for personal gain by Garon, as Garon himself is being used by the creature inhabiting the Node.

The parallels are about as subtle as a hot pink jackhammer to the skull, and it might ordinarily be rather groan-inducing if not for the fact that its very unsubtleness is so laughably pronounced as to loop back around to being strangely brilliant.

But the final trick up Burning Heart‘s sleeve, the really fiendish manoeuvre that cements it as something of an underrated gem, is the way in which Stone manages to tie all this back to the Doctor and Peri. Virgin have long since established that talk of manipulation and cold calculation in a Sixth Doctor novel is virtually destined to invite discussions of the Valeyard and Time’s Champion, and the book at least has the good grace to clearly signpost this fact almost from the very start:

His every thought had been overlaid by a kind of bleak desolation — a sense, an
intimation, that something bad was coming. Not immediately, not on this particular
excursion, but quite soon now. Something that was quite possibly worse than he
had ever known.

Being set before The Trial of a Time Lord as it is, the word “Valeyard” is never uttered, but the intimation is clear. The idea that the Doctor is becoming more heartless in his methodology over the course of his sixth incarnation is the kind of thing that we can almost take as a Sixth Doctor adventure staple by this point, but it’s lent some much-needed extra poignance by the fact that this is the last time Virgin will get to write a novel featuring this Doctor in a lead role.

And, quite contrary to the popular image of the New and Missing Adventures as out-and-out misery buffets where absolutely everything is horrible and goes to shit, it’s telling that Dave Stone chooses to end things on not just a note of hope, but an outright declaration that the existence and maintenance of hope is imperative.

For all that the Doctor and Peri’s relationship is very seriously flawed and rough around the edges, Burning Heart offers us a sincere and honest conception of that relationship as one between two people who do genuinely care about one another at the end of the day. It is not, admittedly, a complete and total erasure of the issues that exist in this dynamic; to be frank, such an erasure has almost certainly been wholly impossible from the moment The Twin Dilemma chose to evoke the dynamic of an abusive relationship with its infamous strangulation scene.

Yet there is, if nothing else, far more here to suggest a genuine friendship than Eric Saward ever gave us on TV, and that surely has to count for something. With Burning Heart, it seems that we have finally wrought the missing link in the chain connecting the combative and hostile atmosphere of Season 22 with the comparatively equable camaraderie evident in The Trial of a Time Lord or State of Change.

In so doing, we are also presented with a much more credible and successful attempt at reconciling the demands of fan-pleasing cult properties and the grounded domesticity of everyday human interactions than Eternity Weeps could ever purport to be.

It’s telling that it’s the Doctor’s callous quips to Peri – and the particular content of the proverbial quip that broke the camel’s back somehow manages the impressive feat of being much too off colour to ever be spoken by Six on television, while still feeling entirely in-character – that end up driving her so far into the arms of Jelks and Human First that she almost finds herself forced to gun down a group of alien prisoners, and only avoids doing so by putting her foot down and asserting her identity as an individual fundamentally opposed to such actions.

This pattern of characters taking a determined stand against the unconscionable acts surrounding them, of drawing a line in the sand, repeats itself throughout the book, always stemming from a similar kind of inducement. Kane, for instance, only begins to see just how fundamentally flawed and broken the Church is when he realises that Nadia has been killed by a Hand of God in the meaningless squabbles gripping the Habitat.

When the consciousness inhabiting the Node merges with OBERON, it’s through the ensuing communication and the broadening of its conception of the universe that it’s able to understand the tangible human cost of its manipulations, sacrificing a portion of its own mass to resurrect those who had been transformed and absorbed by its influence.

You might even say that just this once, everybody lives.

In short, then, and in true Doctor Who fashion, it is empathy that has the power to overcome real monstrousness. All that it takes for this kind of fragile cruelty to unravel is for a bunch of principled people to stand firm against it in compassion and love. One could perhaps consider this a naively optimistic and romantic worldview, but I think it fits Doctor Who to a T.

Indeed, perhaps what’s most remarkable about all of this is that it feels perfectly in tune with the kind of message that Kate Orman will suggest as a summation of the New Adventures at large in the very next novel, while also managing to feel distinctly and unmistakably Stone-like in its delivery.

Buried amongst all of this, we can also perhaps glean a rather sardonic last-minute twist on the nature of the Virgin books’ mythology. If the Valeyard can be implicitly evoked by the kind of heartless manipulation practiced by actors like Jelks or Garon without a care for the consequences of their actions on those around them, and said actors are effectively a barely-veiled commentary on the different facets of Thatcherism, then it surely stands to reason that Burning Heart, by extension, argues that the Valeyard himself serves just as well as some sort of twisted, Thatcherian reflection of Britain’s social climes as he does the rather thankless and boring role of “the dark Doctor.”

Three months from the final end of the Major government, that can’t help but feel particularly pointed. It’s obviously patently ridiculous to argue that “Burning Heart brought down the Conservatives” or anything along such lines, but I do think you can make a case that it at least exorcised a good deal of the ghosts that had firmly lodged themselves in Doctor Who‘s artistic subconscious in the wake of the bloodless coup against Hinchcliffe spurred on by a staunch Thatcher ally twenty years ago.

That’s the ultimate lesson of this Tale of Two Mega-Cities, in the end. The circumstances that allowed Judge Dredd and the Doctor to cross paths in Burning Heart may not have been “the best of times,” or even “the worst of times,” but they were pretty undeniably “of the times,” and the final product manages to speak to the mood of not just two separate media franchises, but arguably that of the nation as a whole.

The fact that it’s so well-written, with perfectly characterised leads and an often understatedly funny sense of humour is really just the proverbial icing on the cake, and it might just be the most internally cohesive and satisfying summary of a given incarnation’s Missing Adventures run that we’ve seen from any of these de facto, miniature series finales that we’ve seen recently.

Wow, what a great run. I only wonder how BBC Books will usher in their own line of Sixth Doctor novels. Business Unusual, you say? No, no, no, that can’t be right… Hmm…

Miscellaneous Observations

Didn’t talk much about the guest characters beyond the broad strokes, but you shouldn’t take that as a suggestion that they aren’t great. Particular highlights include the delightfully verbose Queegvogel, who is probably one of those characters where your feelings on them will be almost entirely dictated by your overall opinion of Dave Stone’s in-house style.

Craator makes for a passable “Judge Dredd with the serial numbers filed off” kind of character, but the real star of the show is probably Kane. In a book populated with ambiguity, the questions thrown up by Kane’s very existence are some of the most fascinating, and he’s also just interestingly characterised to boot.

Given the exact identity of the man behind the word processor on this particular instalment, the obvious implication is that he’s meant to be some sort of distant descendant of Death and Diplomacy‘s own Jason Kane. Although the audience never learn his first name, he whispers it to Peri at the very end, and she comments that it’s the sort of name that seems vaguely “unisexual,” but unfitting.

Coupled with a passing reference from Nadia to a “Benny K” as one of her lovers in the Undercover Operations Section, it seems pretty clear what this unspoken name is supposed to be. However, with Benny and Jason’s separation in the contemporaneously-published Eternity Weeps, and the suggestion that there probably isn’t much of a Summerfield-Kane lineage to be carried forward after those events, it casts Kane’s presence in a subtly different light.

Even further than that, how do later revelations as to the fate of Keith and Rebecca in Stone’s own The End of the World figure into this, if at all? We’ll likely never know, and I don’t think I’d ever actually want these sorts of overly esoteric questions of continuity minutiae to be addressed in any great detail within the text itself, but it’s still one of those things that’s fun to contemplate.

Speaking of fun but almost certainly inconsequential things, the placement of Burning Heart in the lee of Vengeance on Varos feels like a rather coincidental spot of brilliance, given that Philip Martin’s script was moved up in the Season 22 production schedule to fill the hole left by Pat Mills’ own legendarily-troubled The Space Whale.

I would, admittedly, be very surprised if Stone was consciously thinking of this, and it also just works on the level of Vengeance being a sufficiently harrowing adventure for Peri to discombobulate her a bit. Still, what am I good for if I’m not making barely-founded connections and associations in my head while reading these books?

Final Thoughts

Well, that’s another month down. Hope this crack at something of a structural experiment was successful enough that you weren’t bored out of your skulls. In the end, it probably didn’t pan out too outrageously differently from my usual stuff, but I had a very fun time making it nonetheless.

Most of my time was spent trying to desperately string together some semblance of a thesis based on a comics character that I had only the most passing familiarity with before sitting down to do all the research and writing, but finding something that finally made it all “click” was very satisfying.

Again, I suppose the best-case scenario I can hope for is for the final review not to bear the marks of my unfamiliarity with the source material in too pronounced a manner, so… yeah, I hope that’s how it turned out.

Regardless, be sure to join me next time as we continue the maudlin task of wrapping up the New Adventures and providing the Seventh Doctor with some measure of closure, travelling back to feudal Japan with Kate Orman in The Room With No Doors. Until then, however…

Kind regards,

Special Agent Dale Cooper

Virgin New Adventures Reviews: Eternity Weeps by Jim Mortimore (or, “The Bleakverse, Part IV: Kill the Moon”)

As we enter into 1997, it’s quite clear that there’s change in the air for Doctor Who.

Well, OK, maybe that’s overselling things a little. In the most important sense, not much has actually changed since we talked about Bad Therapy and Cold Fusion. Pretty much everything that I said about the state of the franchise in the former of those two reviews still stands, but to recap for those who are just joining us, the eagerly anticipated and hoped-for revival of Doctor Who as an American co-production in the wake of a high-profile television movie had pretty much fizzled out by this stage.

In the gap between December and January, the biggest news which fans could hold on to in a last ditch effort to find some hope that a new McGann-headlined series might yet materialise was the BBC’s decision to extend their agreement with Universal Television at the last possible minute. Whereas the studio’s option to take the TV movie to series had previously been set to expire at the end of 1996, the ultimate decision on the fate of the prospective pilot would now be afforded an extra four months’ worth of breathing room.

I made a passing reference to this stay of execution in my review of Bad Therapy, but I do think it’s worth reflecting on exactly why this decision was taken, as it’ll help us to provide some possible answers to some pretty important questions. These questions include:

  • Why did the franchise never quite make the great trans-Atlantic migration that was Philip Segal’s dream?
  • Why are the New Adventures about to be quietly supplanted by BBC Books’ Eighth Doctor Adventures novels?
  • And why did Eternity Weeps land with about as much fanfare and jubilation as a fiery cannonball shot straight into fandom’s collective places of residence?

On the face of it, the extension of Universal’s arrangement might initially seem a little odd, and it is. The material realities facing any attempt to produce a new version of Doctor Who in collaboration with the American studio system had not changed, after all.

Fox had been distinctly underwhelmed with the TV movie’s performance in its Tuesday night movie slot, and had consequently pulled out of the project post-haste. The distinct lack of any network on which to air a full series was always going to be a major roadblock for Universal to contend with, even if anyone at the studio had actually demonstrated any interest in pursuing such a show.

It’s worth noting that the studio’s own reluctance to aid in the financing of the film had almost sunk the project to begin with, and a firm commitment on their end had only been secured after a number of messages – claiming to be penned by Segal himself – appeared on fan sites explaining the situation and leaking the phone number of Universal Television president Tom Thayer. The phone line was subsequently clogged with messages from irate fans, all demanding that Thayer deliver on the promised monies.

With the ratings performance of the telemovie being distinctly underwhelming at best – it tied with a repeat showing of fellow Fox programme COPS as the seventy-fifth most-watched show of that week – one almost suspects that Universal’s judgment of the whole affair was probably something akin to “We told you so.”

For a justification of the licensing deal’s extension, then, we must direct our gaze closer to home. In marked contrast to its performance across the pond two weeks earlier, the May Bank Holiday broadcast of the TV movie in the United Kingdom attracted a whopping 9.1 million viewers, enough to garner it a comfortable ninth place ranking among the week’s televised offerings. This also separated it immensely from the ninety-first place which Doctor Who had attained with the broadcast of the final episode of the classic series six and a half years earlier.

The message was pretty clear, then. Doctor Who still had legs, but the feet at the end of those legs were not likely to find any kind of solid grounding in the cutthroat world of American prime-time television. Here, though, that ugly question of “Why?” raises its head once again, and I think the big answer ultimately just comes down to a question of poor timing and shifting network priorities.

The decision to turn to Fox had very much been a desperate last resort for Philip Segal, with Rupert Murdoch’s fledgling network pretty much standing as his one remaining viable port of call after facing rejection from the Big Three networks of ABC, NBC and CBS. When Segal secured a deal with Fox in June 1994 to broadcast the completed film, the network was still less than a decade old.

Even in these preliminary stages, however, Fox was already undergoing a transformation just as profound as that facing Doctor Who itself. The previous December, a $1.58-billion deal had been struck with the National Football Commission for Fox to gain exclusive broadcast rights to the NFL, managing to outbid CBS in the process.

The real scheduling coup would be announced to the public just over a month before the network put ink to paper in their agreement with Segal, as no fewer than twelve local affiliates which had enjoyed a long and storied association with the Big Three networks suddenly switched allegiances to join Fox.

This, in hindsight, was one of the most seismic upheavals in the history of American broadcast television, and the start of Fox’s meteoric ascension to the lofty heights of unquestioned “fourth network” status. Like most topics over here at Dale’s Ramblings, we’re going to underline just how meteoric this rise to power was by reference to, you guessed it, The X-Files.

See, The X-Files is obviously a crucial televisual document in understanding the general history of cult television in the 1990s, but it also speaks quite well to the history of Fox in particular, and even the Doctor Who television movie itself.

In many respects, Chris Carter was quite lucky to receive the greenlight from Fox when he did, with the first season of his soon-to-be hit show premiering just three months before the historic deal with the NFL. The X-Files, therefore, would arrive at a point in time just after the network had begun to truly stretch out its hand into the television arena – before January 1993, the channel had failed to produce a full seven-night television schedule – but just before the big boom.

This sense of perfect timing pretty handily explains why the show returned for a second season in September 1994, despite failing to even crack the top one hundred shows of the 1993-94 season. That second season, however, would see the show rise to sixty-third place, and it seemed like the series was destined to be another shining jewel in Fox’s increasingly lustrous crown.

The parallels and overlaps between The X-Files and Segal’s Doctor Who are pretty obvious, and have been remarked upon often enough that it’s hardly a novel observation. Not only did they share the Fox connection, but both productions would conduct the bulk of their filming – as with most genre fiction shows in the 1990s – on location in Vancouver.

As I observed back in my review of Christmas on a Rational Planet, the network even dropped the first commercials for their shiny new telefilm in the premiere broadcast of Jose Chung’s From Outer Space. What isn’t quite as well-discussed, however, is the sense in which this relationship had a profoundly detrimental impact on the show.

To be fair, as I kind of just alluded to, it does receive some share of discussion. When the topic is raised, though, it’s usually in service of a point that the decision to ape shows like The X-Files was a fundamentally flawed one in its own right. As Elizabeth Sandifer writes in her 2012 TARDIS Eruditorum essay on the TV movie:

“The problem isn’t that it’s American, but that the specific type of American television it’s emulating is mediocre, and it has no ambitions whatsoever towards surpassing that mediocrity. The TV Movie is trying to be bland and pointless American sci-fi, it succeeds admirably, and for that, at least, it is rightly hated.”

On the level of first principles, this is a take that I would broadly agree with. While books like Who Killed Kennedy and The Scales of Injustice had argubly proved that there was some mileage to be gleaned from a premise like “Doctor Who does The X-Files,” I can also point to countless examples of novels that seem content to simply offer up inferior renditions of Star Trek storytelling in an era where there were as many as two Star Trek shows on television at any one time.

In short, if the niche market of readers of the Doctor Who novels proved itself unable to warm to the prospect of cod Star Trek, then there was virtually no hope of the wider television audience being willing to stick around to watch a poor substitute for The X-Files or Sliders when they could just… choose to watch The X-Files or Sliders instead. What’s more, they wouldn’t even have to change their channel viewing habits to do it.

All this is true, but I do think that the above assessment remains incomplete. Yes, Doctor Who may have suffered for the decision to imitate mediocre cult television, but the deeper problem had less to do with the fact that this television was mediocre than with the fact that it was simply not the type of television Fox seemed to want to make.

Sure, Sliders was renewed for a third season on the network for 1996-97, but this would mark the end of its original run on Fox. When it returned in June 1998, it would migrate to the much more niche Sci-Fi Channel.

The X-Files, too, went on to have a nine season run, even releasing a full-on theatrical film in the gap between the fifth and sixth seasons, but it’s still hard not to consider this the exception rather than the rule. It could quite handily be pigeonholed as something of a genre show, but it was also a bona fide ratings success.

Just ten days after the publication of Eternity WeepsLeonard Betts would be chosen as the lead-out programme for Super Bowl XXXI, scoring the series’ highest ever ratings of 29.15 million viewers in the process. At the next Emmy Awards in September, Gillian Anderson would snag a coveted Outstanding Lead Actress win, and Peter Boyle and Darin Morgan had both already received Emmys for their work on Clyde Bruckman’s Final Repose the previous year. These are the kinds of prestigious wins that so-called genre shows don’t often achieve, so the fact that The X-Files was able to attain them at all is noteworthy in and of itself.

If you want to name genre outings cancelled by Fox after somewhat abbreviated runs, the task is much easier. Space: Above & Beyond, FireflyMillenniumHarsh RealmThe Lone Gunmen. Hell, if you broaden the criteria by which a cancellation would “count” on this list, you can even see the network gleefully pulling the trigger on numerous comedies like Family Guy or Wonderfalls.

Even if Doctor Who had somehow scrounged up the ratings necessary to convince Fox to proceed to series, then, it seems unlikely that it would have really flourished in such an environment for very long. From the standpoint of 2023, it’s perhaps tempting to say that it might have fared better on a premium cable network like HBO, but in January 1997, we’re still six months away from the premiere of Tom Fontana’s Oz, and nearly two years removed from The Sopranos and the so-called “Golden Age of Television.”

And so we must slightly alter our perspective on the TV movie’s ratings. Doctor Who was pretty definitively a non-starter in America, but it had proven potentially lucrative in the United Kingdom. Not lucrative enough to go ahead with a full-on series, but certainly enough to convince the BBC that it might not be especially wise to keep handing out the license to print official fiction to random companies like Virgin.

Which, in turn, brings us back around to the New Adventures, and the shift that we’ve been talking about for the past few months. By this stage, the shift has been all but completed, and nowhere is this more glaringly apparent than in Jim Mortimore’s Eternity Weeps.

This shift makes itself known right from the front cover, in fact, and even the least observant and plugged-in of readers surely couldn’t fail to notice the absence of the familiar and reassuring Doctor Who logo designed in 1987 by Oliver Elmes.

The feeling of a profound distance from any of the familiar landmarks of the New Adventures or, indeed, Doctor Who at large can only have been exacerbated once they actually read the book, containing as it does a pronounced dearth of scenes which actually feature the Doctor himself, a focus on the miserable dissolution of a marriage between two fan-favourite novel original recurring cast members, the violent death of a former companion, and the utter annihilation of a tenth of the Earth’s population.

With all of these factors in play – and I certainly recognise the dramatic weight of the proclamation I’m about to make here, but bear with me – I think it’s fair to say that Eternity Weeps might just represent Jim Mortimore at the absolute pinnacle of his own particular brand of brutality and cynicism.

Because, y’know, Blood Heat and Parasite were just such a bundle of laughs, weren’t they?

Even amidst the surroundings of the New Adventures’ rather sombre and subdued endgame, this book sticks out. Novels like The Room With No Doors, Lungbarrow or even The Well-Mannered War might display a certain frustration at the impending relegation of the New Adventures to the role of “a spin-off of a spin-off,” but there was always a sense that this was tempered with a dose of optimism for the franchise’s future. Not so for Eternity Weeps.

Choosing to adopt the rather skewed metric of Mortimore’s own prior novels as our baseline for judgments of gloominess cannot even help us here. The fictional worlds of Lucifer RisingBlood Heat and Parasite might all have been devastated by the events contained therein, but even these veritable orgies of carnage, death and destruction went to the trouble of offering up a tiny morsel of hope at the end.

Where a novel like Blood Heat saw the Doctor allow the gradual dissolution of the Silurian Earth timeline rather than wiping it out in an instant as he had originally intended, here he becomes directly responsible for the deaths of hundreds of millions of human beings. There’s no convenient reset button, no last-minute out to allow Mortimore to pull his punches, just an overwhelming sense of futility and despair. And divorce, I suppose.

Returning to the bigger picture for a minute here, it must be said if the TV movie’s flop had cemented the notion that there was little space for a cult series like Doctor Who within the American network system, the great irony was that it still managed to ensure that the New Adventures would shortly become marginalised as a cult property in their own right.

This had, to a certain extent, always been true. It was always going to be true of any novel series that tried to offer up a continuation of a cancelled oddity of British science fiction like Doctor Who. With the impending loss of the prose license, however, even that small claim to legitimacy – not to mention that ever-dreaded buzzword, “canonicity” – was soon to be withdrawn.

All of this is to say that at this very moment, fandom was in a very confused and uncertain place, and the decision to proclaim the NAs’ new identity with a book as angry, downbeat and jaded as Eternity Weeps smacks so strongly of a chronic inability to read the room that it’s almost laughable. “Everything you’ve ever loved will die horribly” is not exactly the message you want to hear in the immediate aftermath of your favourite show’s failed attempt at a revival.

This probably goes a long way towards explaining exactly why the novel met with the reaction it did. If you cast a glance at the final version of Shannon Sullivan’s rankings, the contrast between Eternity Weeps and its contemporaries is marked.

Of the final five New Adventures, four managed to fall quite comfortably within the top twenty; even Bad Therapy, cutting it quite fine, nonetheless straddles the very edge of this divide in the #20 spot. Eternity Weeps sits at #48, somehow managing to fall quite some ways below such utter rubbish as GodEngine and St Anthony’s Fire. It is, in fact, the second-lowest rated Mortimore book on the list – being beaten out by Parasite at #59 – and, alongside The Death of Art, one of only two New Adventures from the period of 1996 and 1997 to fall within the bottom quartile of the ranking.

It’s therefore quite clear that we’ve reached another one of those books which could understatedly be described as “a bit controversial,” in the grand tradition of works like Transit or Falls the Shadow. This is a book where to even state a strong opinion one way or the other is almost akin to planting a battle standard on the great Bosworth Field of fandom.

(As you might guess, I don’t really agree with taking such an attitude towards what are, at the end of the day, just a bunch of science-fiction tie-in books. But hey, if fandom will insist on trending towards pomposity, I have to at least pay lip service to it, I suppose.)

Of course, long-term readers of Dale’s Ramblings will know that I’ve gone on record as a bit of a Mortimore fan – well, of his books at least, we’ll leave discussions of the man’s own recent conduct until the Miscellaneous Observations – even as I recognise that there are definitely flaws aplenty within his work that tend to make their presence known if he’s not careful.

Even allowing for those issues, the fact remains that – for better or worse – nobody is better at writing like Jim Mortimore than Mortimore himself, despite the best efforts of many other NA authors. There’s simply a certain mind-boggling, purely bonkers sense of scale and propulsive force that drives the best of his novels that I can’t help but find strangely captivating in spite of my better judgment.

Could I honestly sit down and argue that Parasite, say, is a flawless masterwork that deserves to be considered in conversations about the best of the New Adventures? No, but by the same token, I certainly don’t think it deserves to be considered the third-worst in the series. Even on the most basic, rudimentary level of “avoiding typographical and grammatical errors,” I think it still scores significantly higher than Shadowmind, ranked directly above it at #58 by the almighty Sullivan list.

This, too, is a pretty good summary of my thoughts on Eternity Weeps. In many respects, it’s quite probably one of the most unapologetically Mortimore-like books (is “Mortimorean” too pretentious?) that Mortimore has ever written, and this sense of archetypality magnifies both the good and the bad aspects of that particular authorial style.

In the end, this ensures that the novel almost plays like some kind of weird, apocalyptic Rorschach test. If you like the way Mortimore tends to write his stories, you’ll probably find it strangely enthralling from cover to cover, but if you aren’t… well, you’ll probably just find the experience so excruciating that you might just end up envying the faceless hordes who fall victim to his literary bloodthirst throughout its pages.

With everything I’ve just said, I think it’s no surprise that I fall pretty firmly into the former camp. Oh, don’t get me wrong, this book has its issues, and I will be among the first to admit it, but nothing in Eternity Weeps really manages to shake my belief that the continued commissioning of an author as creative, as polarising and, frankly, as batshit insane as Mortimore is a testament to the atypical commitment to stylistic diversity which Virgin’s editorial staff repeatedly exhibited.

So, I suppose we had better begin with the actual plotting of the thing, such as it is. Like Parasite and Lucifer Rising before it, Eternity Weeps is pulling pretty heavily from the kind of slow, wondrous – or ponderous, depending on who you ask – “artifact” science fiction typified by Mortimore’s perennial muse, Arthur C. Clarke, and the result is a book which feels, as you might expect, unapologetically huge in its sense of scale.

Only in the prologue to a Jim Mortimore novel could you so offhandedly reveal that the subsequent story will span over six billion years and conclude with six hundred million deaths. The fact that it’s a Jim Mortimore novel does also mean that the audience’s primary reaction to this information isn’t likely to be anything more moving than a simple “Yeah, that sounds about right.”

This fact is emblematic of perhaps the most routine complaint thrown at Mortimore’s books, and Eternity Weeps in particular. When the death toll of your novel reaches such astronomically high levels, you do rather run the risk of desensitisation. If you’ll permit me to indulge in a particularly bloodthirsty and nihilistic form of Cartesian psychology for a moment, the fact is that the human brain simply can’t adequately distinguish the impact of six hundred million deaths from that of five hundred million.

I could attempt to construct some kind of grand defence here as to why this isn’t the case, but it’s true. If the sensation of numbness managed to creep in around the edges of a book like Damaged Goods, in spite of a significantly lower death count and far more characterisation of the supporting cast from Davies than you could ever realistically hope for from a Mortimore production, then Eternity Weeps hasn’t got a prayer. Six hundred million is simply too big a number.

Yet even as I’ll grant you these points, I do think Mortimore manages to quite deftly lessen the impact of these issues, and a lot of it boils down to a simple question of pacing. Realistically, that’s what it has always boiled down to, and I’ve been saying words to that effect since at least the time of my Blood Heat review four whole years ago.

Basically, the thinking seems to be that if you ratchet up the speed of your novel to maximum, the audience simply won’t have enough time to process any possible gaps along the way. It might not be the most traditionally skilled or thoughtful form of art under the sun, but it still requires a certain finesse to successfully pull it off. Supporting evidence for this claim, again, is quite readily available in the form of the many failed attempts at replicating the exhilarating success of Blood Heat.

If nothing else, Eternity Weeps is an expertly paced work. Initially, the opening chapters seem to run against this impression, with Mortimore dutifully going through all the necessary archaeological minutiae to get Bernice, Jason and their respective cadres of assorted doomed extras onto the mountains.

While these segments could have quite easily become monotonous, they were handled well enough that I never really found myself getting bored. Although set in the midst of a warzone – including the retroactively eerie inclusion of a heavily mobilised Iraqi military in April 2003 – there was a surprisingly relaxed tone to it all that almost seemed to recall the successes enjoyed by Justin Richards in his own similarly Bernice-led, Doctor-lite opening to Theatre of War.

And then, about a quarter of the way through, everything just went to hell and I found it very difficult to put the book down. Right when I had started to be lulled into a false sense of security, all my illusions were shattered, and Mortimore never let up on the accelerator for a second.

While none of the guest cast’s personalities had been especially deep and nuanced as presented to the audience before this point, the almost clinical precision with which they were all dispatched was truly something to behold in a perverse, slow-motion car crash kind of way.

Enhancing this sense of raw, visceral chaos is the decision to tell the book from a first person perspective. With the exception of an oddity like Who Killed Kennedy, I’m pretty sure this is the first time one of the New or Missing Adventures has chosen to adopt such a structure for the entirety of its length, and it’s certainly effective at creating a sense of immersion. Depending on your own personal tolerance for death and destruction on such a Biblical scale, that might well be counted as a negative, but it worked well enough for me that I’m mostly willing to count it as a success.

Lest you dismiss this first person perspective as a trivial narrative contrivance on Mortimore’s part, it ultimately ends up fundamentally changing the novel’s character, and only further contributes the sense that this is effectively an attempt to push the established confines of the New Adventures to their breaking point.

In all probability, the decision to drop the Doctor Who logo starting with Eternity Weeps was a decision dictated by nothing more than the abstract logic of the Gregorian calendar, but it somehow feels entirely in-line with the way in which the Doctor is presented throughout. Being told from the perspective of Benny and Jason – who trade off on narration duties with each chapter in a prototypical use of a technique Mortimore will later employ in next year’s Eye of Heaven – the novel manages to effectively keep Time’s Champion on the very edges of the frame for much of its length.

Even with his presence being so actively minimised, the printed page somehow still feels too small to contain the raw, elemental power that he seems to be here. This is, without a doubt, one of the biggest and most mind-boggling portrayals the character has ever seen, and the ominous moniker of “the whirlwind” that he’s acquired here seems wholly appropriate. At times, it goes so far that it almost seems determined to make Dave Stone’s novels collectively crawl into a dark corner and cry themselves to sleep.

This is obviously very difficult to square with the Doctor as seen in either of the books sandwiching this one, but you almost get the suspicion that that’s the point. When all is said and done, Eternity Weeps isn’t really supposed to be the Doctor’s novel at all. It’s Benny’s. If Return of the Living Dad was a proof of concept for the idea of Bernice Summerfield’s personal history serving as the driving force behind one of her own adventures, then this is… well, it’s been called a backdoor pilot, but I’m hesitant to use that term since it implies a sense of conventionality that I don’t really think is applicable.

Mind you, that’s not to say that the steps taken here don’t fit the broad objectives of any good pilot worth its salt, and Mortimore would go on to confess in later years that this was very much intentional.

“When I found out Virgin was planning a New Adventures spin-off series,” he explained in Bernice Summerfield: The Inside Story, “I asked Peter Darvill-Evans if I could write the first one without the Doctor in. Peter, as usual, had other plans. The lack of Doctor in Eternity Weeps was no coincidence. It was my first go at being genuinely mental in a book and he just didn’t seem to sit comfortably there unless as this mythic, rumoured presence; a force of nature almost.”

“Genuinely mental” feels as good a description as any, and even if the book technically fulfills the broad strokes of its editorial mandate – namely, break up Benny and Jason – the beats with which it chooses to fill the remaining gaps are so utterly off-the-wall as to make it extremely difficult to neatly categorise and quantify.

Still, the divorce of Benny and Jason is a big enough deal for the NAs that we very much have to address it. Coming just eight months after their joyous, celebratory wedding in Happy Endings, it was understandably quite a shocking development for fandom at the time.

To hear Rebecca Levene speak on the matter in conversation with fellow New Adventure alumni and frequent DWM contributor Matthew Jones for his regular Fluid Links column in the magazine’s 252nd issue, the reasoning was purely one of pragmatics. “The more I thought about it,” she explained, “the more I realised that we would have to lose Jason because books whose central character is happily married don’t work.”

The same feature saw Jones note, as one of the authors invited to the preliminary meetings on setting the shape and scope of a proper Bernice Summerfield line, that “several of the writers [were] quite perturbed that a divorce was on the cards.”

Whatever the feelings of the individual writers may have been, and for all that I think Virgin may have still been able to craft a workable structure for the solo Benny books in which she and Jason were still married, I can’t exactly begrudge Levene too much for making this decision.

Admittedly, it’s hard for me to appraise the relationship from the standpoint of a Doctor Who fan in January 1997. When I read Death and Diplomacy back in November, it was with full knowledge of the fact that the blossoming romance between these two characters would be torn apart by Eternity Weeps in nine months’ time.

Even so, I’ve always felt that it would make complete sense that this kind of marriage, whose beginnings were marked by such emotional turbulence, wouldn’t exactly prove the most stable in the long-term. There are a lot of things about Eternity Weeps that feel consciously heightened and exaggerated in that typical Mortimore fashion, but I don’t think that the deteriorating relationship between Benny and Jason is one of them.

The aggression and venom which both of them manage to fling at each other in their moments of stress here don’t exactly paint them in the most flattering of lights, but the characters still feel completely and totally recognisable in the midst of everything. Indeed, the novel repeatedly plays up the almost blackly comic juxtaposition between the vast, epoch-spanning, sulphuric acid-drenched epic taking place in the overarching plot, and the intimate, small-scale tale of a rapidly collapsing marriage.

It’s an approach that probably finds its peak in the inevitable big emotional blowout between the couple, as the insults and insinuations are hurled against the backdrop of the Astronomer Royal’s narrated holographic infodump about the rise and fall of the Cthalctose civilisation. The scale of this exposition is simply jawdropping, taking in black holes and destroyed solar systems and everything in-between, but Mortimore very deliberately and cleverly prevents us from hearing the narration directly.

Instead, we are only provided with descriptions of the stunning visuals, alongside distracted second-hand reports of the Astronomer’s words from Benny’s perspective. It’s a fiendishly brilliant and inventive means of conveying an otherwise quite dry set of revelations, and serves to clearly delineate – for at least this one scene – where the novel’s priorities lie in that age-old tension between the cult science-fiction epic and the domestic drama.

The problem is that this prioritisation is only readily apparent in the case of this one plot thread. For the rest of its length, Eternity Weeps leans pretty heavily in the opposite direction. Granted, Mortimore’s vision of what “Doctor Who as a cult science-fiction property” looks like differs considerably from the TV movie’s, if only in the sense that I think the budget of a weekly television series like Sliders or The X-Files would be sorely tested if they were to attempt even a fraction of the stuff contained within this novel.

If anything, Eternity Weeps‘ chief object of fascination would seem to be something more akin to Dean Devlin and Roland Emmerich’s 1994 overnight box-office sensation, Stargate, with the novel uncannily prefiguring the premiere of Stargate SG-1 on Showtime by about six months. In The Inside Story, however, Mortimore offers his own rationale for the dissolution of Benny and Jason’s marriage: “It’s all soap in the end. Watch any episode of EastEnders.”

In the case of that specific plotline, at least, the defence holds water. However, it’s perhaps telling that Mortimore’s non-Doctor Who work contains original novels for shows like Babylon 5 and Farscape. Both these series arose out of the 1990s science-fiction boom brought about in the wake of Star Trek: The Next Generation, and both found homes far outside the traditional Big Three – well, Big Four if you figure in the smash success of Fox – network landscape that we have already established as a rather unforgiving environment for cult properties of this ilk. When a number of New Adventures writers made the jump to an actual soap (Emmerdale) in the mid-to-late ’90s, Mortimore would be conspicuous by his absence.

I don’t intend to paint this divergence as a bad thing in and of itself. After all, an Emmerdale storyline from the pen of Jim Mortimore would quite possibly be one of the most insane things I could ever conceive of, and not every single writer has to make the jump from literature to television.

But this unresolved tension between the cult and the domestic embeds itself at the heart of Eternity Weeps, and it has implications which are, in their own strange way, just as devastating as any pinhead singularity could ever be. It ensures that the story of Bernice and Jason’s failed marriage sits as a lone island of domesticity amid a jagged, hard-edged and downright angry tornado of cult science-fiction storytelling.

It’s not even that this tension ruins the novel. At times, both approaches are equally capable of producing momentary flashes of brilliance. For all I know, the tension might well be completely intentional, with the ultimate aim of constantly keeping the audience off balance. I certainly wouldn’t put it past Mortimore, and if that was his aim, then he succeeded admirably.

Still, if Eternity Weeps can be said, like many of its contemporaries in this period of the New Adventures, to speak to the current mood of Doctor Who fandom, it doesn’t do so in an especially complimentary fashion. The sharp edges here are at times distinctly off-putting, with a sense that Mortimore is raging against the dying of the light in a way that feels far louder and more embittered than the reflective contemplation of a work like The Room With No Doors.

Perhaps most significant of all is the central threat of the novel. Although the Cthalctose are long since dead, they’re determined to reshape the world in their own image, at the expense of killing off all life on Earth. While there may well be no deeper meaning to the terraforming virus beyond the way in which it enables Mortimore to really hammer in the religious symbolism, it’s also not hard to spot the way in which this narrative might resonate with the frustrations of those at Virgin.

Segal’s reboot may have been dead in the water in all but name, but it had still effectively begun its own process of terraforming the untamed landscape of Doctor Who books. In short order, the New Adventures would be forced to drop the guise under which they had seen so much success for the past five and a half years.

With the loss of the Doctor Who logo from the front cover, it seemed that the process was already well underway by January 1997. The flood had come, and it looked as if the only lasting legacy of the TV movie was to drag the franchise back into the frothing sulphuric acid seas of cult television.

The issue with Eternity Weeps, then, is that it seems completely and totally resigned to that fate. Free will only exists so that predestination can operate properly. On an abstract level, I don’t necessarily object to this. Pessimistic and dejected fiction certainly has its place in the world, and even if the novel’s decision to take such an oppressively downbeat tack in one of fandom’s darkest hours pretty much ensured it would receive a widespread lambasting on release, that doesn’t automatically invalidate the whole exercise.

By the same token, however, this fatalism causes Mortimore some problems. And it’s now that we have to talk about Liz.

Eternity Weeps is, as I alluded to back at the beginning, the novel that kills off Liz Shaw. It is quite possibly one of the most horrific and awful deaths suffered by a former companion, as she is forced to endure excruciating pain after being infected by Agent Yellow, kept alive so that the formula for an experimental antidote can be retrieved from her mind.

We’ve already said, multiple times, that companion deaths are an extremely tricky device to throw into your story without running the risk of seeming crass and emotionally manipulative. The best case scenario is probably what Kate Orman gave us in her handling of Roz’s death in So Vile a Sin, where the character was treated with respect and dignity, never sidelined or brushed aside for the sake of scoring cheap points off the back of the audience’s affinity for a member of the regular cast.

Liz in Eternity Weeps doesn’t get this treatment. In fact, we don’t even see her death occur, and the news is only conveyed to us after the fact by Imorkal. Make no mistake, my objection here is certainly not based on any kind of desire to bear witness to the slow, lingering death that surely awaits someone whose organic matter is rapidly transforming into sulphuric acid. What scenes we did get showing the aftermath of Liz’s infection were, to my mind, already more than enough, and I don’t think that showing the audience more would have even come close to being a decent solution.

This underscores just how bad an idea it was to reserve such a gruesome and horrible fate for a companion while clearly giving such little thought to its integration into the larger novel, and it’s an impression only reinforced by the fact that Liz’s presence in the story is already extremely cursory. Overall, it’s extremely difficult to escape the feeling that her role could just as easily have been filled by a faceless UNIT functionary, if it weren’t for the consequent loss of shock value.

That’s the ugly and cynical side of Eternity Weeps‘ flirtation with cult fiction, and it arguably goes some way towards explaining why Mortimore will have virtually disappeared from the radar of Dale’s Ramblings by the time we come to the end of 1998.

The problem is not just that these decisions fail to assess the ambient mood of fandom, but that they actively contribute to a vision of Doctor Who that is offputtingly insular and spiky. It’s a vision wherein a companion who was known on television for the ignominy of being written out off-screen between seasons, but who had managed to find a new lease on life in the Missing Adventures, can end up right back where she started, receiving a cursory off-screen death for no deeper purpose than to shock the audience.

As far as companion deaths go, this is much closer to the brutal murder of Dodo in Who Killed Kennedy, and although it was ultimately released a good three months before So Vile a Sin, it serves as a surprisingly handy demonstration of exactly the kind of story that Kate Orman so deftly avoided telling with the death of Roz.

And yet despite all of that, I do think Eternity Weeps is, broadly speaking, a good book. If nothing else, it certainly deserves to be ranked above GodEngine, by the simple virtue of not boring me to tears. It’s filled to the brim with punchy, high-octane thrills in the best Mortimore tradition, and I was so engrossed that I was able to blitz through it in two days. At times – especially as regards the Benny and Jason stuff – it’s even extremely poignant, demonstrating a commitment to a deeper kind of emotional resonance than that of simple mindless spectacle.

It’s unfortunate that it also ends up hamstrung by a troubling tendency towards some of the worst habits afflicting cult/genre series, especially since these are probably the things for which the novel is most remembered in fan circles today. With all the good stuff on display here, that’s perhaps a little unfair, but it’s also entirely understandable, and it tarnishes my enjoyment of what could have been an outright exceptional novel.

What we’re left with, then, is something of a missed opportunity, but it certainly could have turned out a whole lot worse. You might call that damning with faint praise, but it’s still a good summary of how I feel.

Miscellaneous Observations

You’ll notice that I didn’t really touch on Chris at all. This is for the singularly amazing reason that, well, there really isn’t much to say. He spends most of his scenes in the novel in a rather weird mental state, believing that Roz is still alive and just generally acting kind of out of it. As such, my ability to discern any deeper character truths about him is pretty severely curtailed, so… yeah. Sorry. Blame Jim Mortimore, not me.

Whiiiich brings me to the next point, that being Mortimore’s inexorable slide towards posting COVID misinformation on his personal Facebook page. This has actually been going on for a while, but the reason this is my first time mentioning it has something to do with a combination of my not having reviewed a full-length novel of his since Parasite all the way back in April 2020, and sincere unawareness of the matter until a few months ago.

So yeah, it just genuinely slipped my radar. I try to keep up with the big-ticket authorial dickheadedness a la Gareth Roberts or Trevor Baxendale wherever possible, but I also have to balance that with not relentlessly stalking every single writer’s social media. If I did that, I’d never get anything done.

Still, it sucks that Mortimore has decided to go this route, even if I can’t imagine it impinging upon my enjoyment of his books in the same way as Roberts’ transphobia. It’s totally valid to have a different response, mind you, but I feel like the fact that Roberts possesses a much higher profile – from both his work on televised Who and his current cushy columnist position at The Spectator – than Mortimore can ever claim to have had makes his situation the more egregious and noteworthy of the two.

I’m pretty sure this whole thing still isn’t exactly common knowledge among Doctor Who fans anyway, so there’s probably a fair chance that this is the first any of my readers are hearing about it. If so, then I’m sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

Anyway, on a much lighter note, I feel obliged to point out the cheeky trick played by Virgin’s editors in the back cover blurb. In case you don’t already know, I won’t spoil it, but I’ll just say to go and read it while thinking of the Bible. No greater hints than that, it’s rather cute, I think.

Final Thoughts

Well, here’s to 1997, folks!

As ever, I didn’t think I’d be back quite so soon, but writing these reviews has genuinely been so much fun this past year that I find myself missing doing them whenever I’m on a break. I suppose that’s a good thing, right?

Next time, we bid farewell to the Sixth Doctor’s adventures within the pages of Virgin’s novels, and turn our attention to the last full-length Doctor Who book from Dave Stone for more than three years. That’s right, it’s Burning Heart. Until then, however…

Kind regards,

Special Agent Dale Cooper

1996: The Year In Review

It’s not over until Dale’s Ramblings publishes the Year in Review post for a given year.

~ Richard Feynman, or someone else smart, idk

So that’s 1996, folks. It’s been a rather strange year, all told. The first half of the year saw Virgin on top of the world, celebrating fifty books in outrageous style. By December, however, it’s become painfully apparent that the New Adventures’ time as the lone shepherd of the franchise’s destiny is soon to come to an end.

In light of this news, let’s all take a moment to pause and reflect on the fact that this will be the last Year in Review post to solely focus on Virgin’s output. By the time the next one rolls around, BBC Books will have joined the party, and nothing will ever be the same again.

Done reflecting? OK, excellent, because there’s quite a few novels to get through this time around. I mean, there’s actually exactly the same number as there were last year, but I’ve just gotten considerably more wordy in the interim. So without further ado, let’s start by ranking all twelve of…

The New Adventures

12. GodEngine by Craig Hinton

Well, it’s nice to know that the wise old sages were wrong. You can, in point of fact, go home again… if “home” is “a year in which the worst New Adventure is so completely godawful as to obviously and loudly proclaim its worstness for all to see.” Try fitting that one on a postcard.

There’s a reason that “GodEngine? More like GodAwful!” has virtually become a cliché all of its own when talking about Craig Hinton’s final novel-length contribution to Virgin. Shockingly, this reason is actually the fact that the book really isn’t that good at all.

In a way, it’s a crying shame that this book has the absolute audacity to posit itself as something of a “missing link” that follows up on the story threads laid down by Ben Aaronovitch in Transit. Whatever you might think of the content of that book, its ideas were at least uncharted territory for the franchise at that point in time. In contrast, GodEngine really feels like the first point at which all the criticisms of Hinton as an overly indulgent author with a predilection for fanwank – to the point that he allegedly coined the term – are completely justified.

To give Aaronovitch his due, I think that dropping ten F-bombs in a Doctor Who book while doing a weird and wacky cyberpunk pastiche is an idea with far more artistic merit than a lengthy treatise on the specifics of Ice Warrior genitalia, or a riveting discussion of the social status of Martian cooks.

There are moments at which GodEngine manages to gesture at bigger ideas about the 1990s and the end of history, but these glimmers of insight are buried so far under a heap of extraneous nonsense that you really can’t bring yourself to care on anything other than the most abstract and theoretical of levels. If this is a book that can really be said to have any kind of tangible raison d’etre – and that’s honestly still up for debate – it would probably be an attempt to explain exactly how the Daleks planned to pilot the Earth around as a spaceship in The Dalek Invasion of Earth. I feel like that should say it all, really.

It’s precisely the sort of shallow, pandering nonsense that you would expect from science-fiction tie-in literature, and if this were any series other than the New Adventures, that might be enough to pass muster. You’d still have to contend with the sheer, unrelenting tedium of the thing, but that’s just another drawback we kind of expect with this kind of territory.

But to be blunt, the New Adventures have repeatedly proven themselves to be capable of so much more. Even more miserable is the fact that Craig Hinton himself has repeatedly proven to be capable of so much more, but in this one instance I guess he just gave up. If it weren’t for the existence of the thankfully rather good Zeitgeist, this would be a truly unfortunate note on which to bid farewell to the author for the next five years or so.

11. The Death of Art by Simon Bucher-Jones

I feel like there is a good book somewhere at the heart of The Death of Art. For all the novel’s many faults, first-time writer Simon Bucher-Jones has at least managed to prove that he has promise. In its best moments, there’s a certain moody and atmospheric darkness to its evocation of late nineteenth-century Paris that proves rather compelling. There’s even some rather interesting commentary on fin de siècle conservatism that ties in nicely to the broader preoccupations of the Psi Powers arc as a whole, and even if many of those ideas had already been floated by Lawrence Miles in Christmas on a Rational Planet, trying to pull together the arc’s various threads and create a single coherent point is at least a noble cause.

Sadly, a noble cause does not always guarantee a desirable outcome, and The Death of Art‘s attempts at coherence ultimately prove to be spectacularly and fundamentally flawed. If anything, the best that can be said about its role in the Psi Powers arc is that it serves as something of a sin-eater for some of the more bloated and confused impulses of the storyline. Featuring intricate and complex power struggles between no less than four different psychic factions, alongside an incomprehensible and almost Lovecraftian – if rather benign – alien race in the form of the Quoth, the novel’s good attributes are far outweighed by its failings.

On top of everything else, it’s a novel which chooses to sideline Roz for a massive portion of the plot just two stories before the character’s death, which is an utterly boneheaded manoeuvre. With the possible exception of Anton Jarre, the guest cast are also not nearly as memorable as they need to be, and the attempts to implicate the Shadow Directory in the history of the Dreyfus affair feel woefully misguided.

Still, for all that The Death of Art might fall rather short of the mark, it fails in more interesting and nuanced ways than something like GodEngine, and it bears repeating that Bucher-Jones’ writing is occasionally quite lovely. I just wish that it hadn’t been wedded to such an overly complex slog of a plot.

10. Warchild by Andrew Cartmel

Oof, this one kind of hurts.

Let’s make one thing plainly clear here, there’s a pretty large gulf of quality separating Warchild from The Death of Art. At the very least, we’ve crossed over into the “good” realm of the list. Not “very good,” but “good,” and I think that has to count for something. It’s Cartmel, so you still get your usual social commentary mixed in with the continually unfolding saga of the McIlveens and the Wheatons. The action scenes might drag a bit, but at least it’s always pretty clear what’s going on.

Why, then, does Warchild land in tenth place on this twelve-book list? Well, as with so many sequels, it largely comes down to the sheer weight of precedent. Warhead and Warlock were not just “good” or even “very good,” they could make a legitimate claim to being “great,” and they still remain some of the boldest and most confronting pieces of Doctor Who ever to be published. Under those circumstances, having the final instalment of the much-celebrated War trilogy be simply “good” was always going to seem like something of a disappointment.

One of the biggest things holding Warchild back from the classic status attained by its predecessors – apart from the aforementioned drawn-out quality of the action scenes – is the sense that the social commentary is a little muddled. While it was very clear, in the past, what Cartmel wanted to say on such subjects as environmentalism or the War on Drugs, here his attempts to interogate the links between fascism and masculinity stumble a bit.

As ably as Warchild manages to communicate its broad points about the co-option of traditional gender roles by far-right movements, the decision to wrap all of this up in the heavily debunked pseudo-scientific notion of the “alpha male” muddies the waters considerably.

Sure, Doctor Who has a long history of pulling from some dubious-at-best science, but the sheer proliferation of weird alpha male content on the Internet in recent years lands Cartmel in the odd position of critiquing fascism and masculinity while partially falling into some of the same rhetorical traps subsequently employed to unsettling effect by conservative social movements. He obviously could never have anticipated that, but it does mean that the central arguments of the novel are a little confused.

But there’s still plenty to enjoy here. If Vincent’s evil schemes to use Ricky as some kind of fascist mouthpiece fall flat, then the book almost redeems itself in the whole Christian Leemark subplot. It’s a truly chilling snapshot of the rise of American religious fundamentalism, and in moments like Francis Leemark’s brutal assault on Mr. Pangbourne, Cartmel manages to recapture that same sense of clear and burning social consciousness that made those first two novels so striking.

In addition to all of this, the character writing for our recurring players remains as strong as ever. Even if it’s rather unpleasant to spend as much time inside the head of Creed when he’s in full-on “bitter, jealous and spiteful adulterer” mode, it honestly doesn’t feel too unbelievable given what we saw of his marriage’s rather abrupt and emotion-fuelled beginnings in Warlock. It certainly would have been nice if Justine didn’t seem so sidelined, though, given the decision to essentially play much of this book – however ironically – as a weird masculine power struggle between Vincent, Creed and Ricky.

Perhaps that’s a good summary of Warchild, though. Little of it is outright bad in the same way as a GodEngine or a Shadowmind, but there was always this niggling voice in the back of my head that was wishing for more. More depth, more subtlety, more room for events to breathe. More. And I guess that’s the most basic reason for it landing this low on the list, despite generally being a good enough read in the moment.

9. Death and Diplomacy by Dave Stone

Ah, the book which convinced me that there was, in fact, a palpable Dave Stone Effect. Like with Sky Pirates!, there’s plenty of stuff in Death and Diplomacy that I really wouldn’t like in isolation, but throw it all together like this and it works much better than I thought it would.

As the book which sets up Benny’s departure in Happy EndingsDeath and Diplomacy pretty much lives and dies off of the relationship between Benny and Jason, and while I’m not usually one for the type of screwball-esque interactions Stone seems to have chosen to run with, there’s enough emotional depth at work that it still feels true to who the characters are.

After all, it really wouldn’t make sense to try and give Benny the standard “companion is swept off her feet by conventionally attractive and dreamy male guest star” exit. By April 1996, the character had spent more than three and a half years developing into a fully-realised member of the regular cast, so trying to take all of that away would have felt woefully ill-advised.

If you’re going to write the character out, and you’re going to have a romance, this is probably the best and most honest way of doing so. Throughout the course of her dalliance with Jason, Benny is forced to contend with the ways in which her habitual sarcasm and quick wit have served as a means of self-protection and emotional repression.

Crucially, however, Stone never really suggests that Benny is at all obligated to abandon those qualities wholesale in order to find a meaningful connection, and there’s just as much attention paid to stressing the point that Jason is wrangling with his own personal airport terminal’s worth of emotional baggage. I’m still not entirely surprised that the writers made the decision to split the couple up just nine books later, but Stone and Cornell both deserve a great deal of credit for continuing to meet the high benchmark for companion exits that had been laid down by Set Piece.

Aside from the Benny and Jason stuff, you’ve got your usual Dave Stone wackiness in the form of the weird and wonderful Dagellan Cluster, through which he’s actually able to provide a pretty decent snapshot of Western foreign policy in the unipolar moment. The presentation of the Doctor as a ludicrously powerful and incomprehensible entity, constantly flitting about the edges of the frame and subtly stage-managing the negotiations between the Three Empires, is great fun too, even if it remains the kind of thing that the series probably can’t support on a long-term basis.

So yeah, Death and Diplomacy is pretty good. If someone could explain to me how it’s supposed to be the middle act of a trilogy, though, that’d be great.

8. Return of the Living Dad by Kate Orman

Return of the Living Dad is really just a light-hearted, fluffy character piece at the end of the day. Yes, it wraps up one of the biggest dangling loose ends in Bernice’s personal history, and there is your usual world-imperilling villain who needs to be stopped, but this is very much a breather novel.

It’s a testament to just how talented Kate Orman is, then, that such a low-key and laid-back work could still be so thoroughly entertaining, and its placement as the lowest of her three entries on this year’s list shouldn’t be taken as a suggestion that this novel is bad by any means.

On the contrary, it’s frequently extremely entertaining, and even if it can’t hold a candle to The Left-Handed Hummingbird or Set Piece in terms of emotional depth or stakes, it more than makes up for it by just being a good time. Four novels in, Orman has got such a firm grasp on the characters of the New Adventures that she could throw them into just about any situation and fireworks would commence.

And as you’d expect, when Orman does decide to interrupt the boisterous antics of all the angst-ridden Navarinos and sentient Nestene spatulas, the emotional beats hit pretty hard. The Doctor’s destruction of the UNIT safehouse in which he was imprisoned in The Left-Handed Hummingbird is striking, and somehow all the more terrifying for its sheer ordinariness when compared to the numerous world-ending actions taken by Seven throughout the New Adventures. Hell, even the Doctor Who Magazine prelude to Orman’s debut novel is incorporated into the narrative in a particularly hard-hitting moment.

It’s not just the Doctor who gets the chance to shine, though, and it’s surprising that Return of the Living Dad never really feels crowded despite having to try and evenly distribute narrative real estate among so many members of the recurring and regular casts. Sure, it helps that some characters like Jason disappear for large chunks of the novel, but it never feels like anyone’s been egregiously overlooked.

Sitting here a few months after the fact, I don’t really have as much to say about this novel as I thought I would, but I don’t think that’s a problem. It was enjoyable, it did what it set out to do, and it managed to prove that Kate Orman is capable of turning even a light-hearted romp into something worthwhile.

7. SLEEPY by Kate Orman

My feelings on SLEEPY and Return of the Living Dad are pretty similar, broadly speaking. To be honest, I wouldn’t necessarily argue with you if you wanted to place the latter ahead of the former. They are, as you can probably guess by the way I’ve placed them so close together, on about the same level in my estimation. Nothing stellar, but certainly nothing bad, and a Kate Orman novel that’s perhaps a little below average still eclipses so many other writers.

Still, I had to make a choice as to which one would come out on top, and I think that SLEEPY manages to ever so slightly edge its way past Return of the Living Dad. Most of that comes down to the fact that it combines the strengths of Orman’s style that we’ve already observed – namely, she understands these characters really damn well – with a superior plot. Which is to say that… there is actually a plot. It might be a pretty archetypal “science fiction disease outbreak” plot, but it’s pulled off so slickly that I really don’t mind.

Even if Orman is tapping into the same strain of disease paranoia that seemed to be gripping Western media in the mid-1990s, there are all sorts of little details to appreciate. The focus on a disease of a more neurological nature speaks to a United Kingdom anxious over the threat of so-called “mad cow disease,” while the Doctor’s bet with Death that he can save the colony on Yemaya and prevent anyone from dying adds some nifty extra tension. Not even the first hints of the ludicrously overcomplicated Psi Powers arc can manage to drag the book down.

So, SLEEPY is another book that might not appear to be that exceptional on the surface, but it does enough things right that it still manages to add up to an enjoyable reading experience. In that way, then, its placement at almost the exact middle of this list feels entirely appropriate.

6. Christmas on a Rational Planet by Lawrence Miles

There are, perhaps, very few contrasts in life that could ever manage to be quite as strange as that which arises when you place two very unassuming, low-stakes novels like Return of the Living Dad and SLEEPY right next to… this. That’s just the magic of Doctor Who, folks.

Now I’ll admit, there was a deep-rooted, instinctive part of my brain that rather consciously and vociferously rebelled at the thought of placing a Lawrence Miles novel above not one, but two separate offerings from Kate Orman, and there are a couple of very good reasons why this is the case.

Firstly, there’s the fact that I do enjoy a lot of the works that I have read from both of these creators. Even if that weren’t true, and I held the most hardened and skeptical view of one or both of their contributions to the wider franchise, I’d still have to make the grudging concession that those contributions are enormously important in appraising how Doctor Who developed in those dark and twilit days of yore when it wasn’t on our television screens.

If that was all this was, mind, then I wouldn’t be commenting on it at all. It’s part and parcel of these Year in Review posts, so it’s not really the type of thing that’s very noteworthy on its own. What isn’t to be expected, however, is the very specific, very personal and, to be perfectly frank, very one-sidedly nasty beef that will eventually come to define the relationship between these two particular authors.

On the one hand, this is all a few years in the future, so I don’t have any sort of hard-and-fast obligation to talk about it whatsoever at this point, but the fact remains that it is important in the overall arcs of both Orman and Miles’ careers. As such, this placement does tend to carry the rather unfortunate implication that I’m staking my claim on Miles’ side of the “battlefield,” so to speak.

But I want to stress that this isn’t the case, as will hopefully become clear in the very next placement – oops, spoilers! – and the reviews to come. Miles’ spectacular fall from grace was pretty much entirely self-engineered, and we’ll talk about that at a more relevant time. For this present moment, however, Christmas on a Rational Planet earns this spot on the list mostly by virtue of arriving at precisely the right point in time. And also, thankfully, by being very good on its own merits.

After the disaster of GodEngine, you might very well be forgiven for thinking that the New Adventures were at risk of backsliding into awfulness after the departure of Bernice Summerfield and the promise of the Paul McGann TV movie. The novels were in desperate need of a new author who could prove that they had big ideas about Doctor Who.

For better or for worse, Lawrence Miles was that author.

Christmas on a Rational Planet is probably not as polished and tight an opening salvo as something like Revelation or The Left-Handed Hummingbird, which is the main reason why it doesn’t rate any higher among its contemporaries. Still, very few debut novels manage to hit those heights, so that shouldn’t be considered too strong a knock against it by any means.

In its best moments, this is a striking whirlwind tour through 1990s Western existential ennui in the ashes of the Cold War, lampooning Fukuyama’s “End of History” in a manner which can only be described as eerily prescient in our post-9/11 world.

As you can probably imagine if you’re familiar with the themes I tend to gravitate towards when it comes to art, this is the type of thing that’s pretty much right up my alley, and I can’t help but find the finished product intensely thematically interesting in spite of its flaws.

And make no mistake, there are flaws, and they’re substantial enough that I could feasibly see myself revising my opinion of the novel with the passage of time. Some of these are relatively easy pickings, like the fact that it’s already obvious, on considering the guest cast, that Miles isn’t likely to claim the title of “Virgin’s best character writer” at any point in the near future.

The most glaring of these issues, however, is probably the decision to so rigidly tie the particulars of the Psi Powers arc – which receive their first proper articulation in this novel, Warchild and SLEEPY having only been retroactively linked to the overarching plotline – to a rather strange and outmoded dichotomy between “masculine” order and “feminine” chaos of the kind which I can only imagine Jordan Peterson himself would rapturously approve of.

It’s not something Miles pulls out of thin air, and it fits with the established mythology of the Virgin novels, but it does already begin to suggest that he might be an author with some pretty large blind spots on issues of gender. Which will, of course, arguably find rather unfortunate expression in his feud with Kate Orman.

Ironically enough for a book which so thoroughly embraces the circularity of history then, Christmas on a Rational Planet seems to already hint that the arc of Miles’ own career will come to resemble nothing so much as a jagged sketch of a flat circle. To give him his due, it’s already equally clear that that sketch is, if nothing else, the product of an intelligent hand. A profoundly messy sort of intelligence, to be sure, but still intelligence.

For now, at least, that’s enough.

5. So Vile a Sin by Ben Aaronovitch and Kate Orman

With the veritable mountain of production issues that afflicted it, So Vile a Sin should theoretically have no business landing this high up on a list of this kind. By rights, it should be a complete and total disaster. But, defying all expectations yet again, Kate Orman’s frenetic rewrite managed to do the impossible and actually turn out a book that is eminently enjoyable.

The book is certainly not without its problems, and they’re not hard to spot. The nature of the book means that the styles of Aaronovitch and Orman have been very hastily and cursorily welded together. The middle third loses a lot of the dramatic impetus found in the opening and the denouement. It’s still not entirely clear what the Brotherhood’s whole deal is on anything but the most superficial of levels.

Even with these flaws, however, the bulk of So Vile a Sin is actually very, very good, to the point where it’s rather difficult to bemoan the loss of what might have been if its publication had been wholly untroubled.

Indeed, some of its strongest aspects actually stem from these uncontrollable production realities. Perhaps the most notable example here is the death of Roz. With the shock of this development having been considerably neutered by the publication of four whole NAs dealing with the lingering fallout, Orman was free to showcase the development at the very start, before rewinding to fill in the gaps. In so doing, the New Adventures were afforded the opportunity to demonstrate just how far they had pushed Doctor Who from the cheap Sawardian spectacle of Earthshock.

The result is a thing of remarkable beauty, with Roz being afforded one of the most dignified and satisfying companion exits to date. It’s certainly the most sensitive treatment of a companion’s death to be found this side of Hell Bent. What could have been a straightforward and unfortunate case of “fridging the woman” becomes something far more nuanced.

More to the point, the pathos-drenched Epilogue offers a pitch perfect showcase of Orman’s writing talents, with the Doctor’s heart attack and subsequent emotional breakdown providing one of the most heartbreaking sequences in the New Adventures.

It’s so good, in fact, that it probably single-handedly dragged the book up a few places in this list. By all accounts, So Vile a Sin has very little business being this good. For it to meet the low expectations engendered by its tumultuous production is, in itself, a phenomenal achievement.

To so thoroughly surpass those expectations? That’s downright miraculous.

4. Bad Therapy by Matthew Jones

Bad Therapy is a bit of a difficult novel to parse, and I strongly suspect that the context of how you read it plays a big role in shaping your ultimate reaction to it, even more so than you usually expect with novels.

Read in December 1996, as an elegiac and mournful reflection on the death of a main character in a book that had yet to be published, it was undoubtedly a bit confusing. Read over a quarter of a century later, in a world in which you can quite easily read the NAs in the way that Virgin originally intended, it’s a far more satisfying experience.

First-time novelist Matthew Jones – who would later go on to write for the 2005 revival of Doctor Who and its spin-off series, Torchwood – gives a truly impressive showing here, especially since I found his debut First Doctor short story in Lost Property to be a bit lacklustre.

Despite being the least experienced author to crop up in these final four post-So Vile a Sin New Adventures, he manages to capture the Seventh Doctor pretty darn well, conveying the sense of a deep well of sadness lurking just underneath the character’s usual jovial, wise-cracking exterior.

Chris also gets a more emotionally substantial plot here than he arguably had in any of the eighteen prior books to feature the character, and his strange relationship with Patsy seems to stretch the narrative logic of his numerous past doomed romances to breaking point.

The presence of a post-Mindwarp Peri also serves to allow the New Adventures an opportunity to directly and explicitly use Roz’s death as a springboard towards acknowledging and remedying the failures of the Saward Era, and the empathetic and frank exploration of homosexuality in 1950s Britain proves that the novels were never afraid to push the franchise forward, even at this late stage of the game.

In conjunction with Damaged Goods, it also serves to hark forward to Jones’ collaboration with Russell T. Davies as the script editor of the controversial Channel 4 drama series Queer as Folk, and thereby unwittingly foreshadows the future of Doctor Who in an even more direct way.

As the final New Adventure to bear the iconic McCoy logo on its front cover, then, Bad Therapy provides the series with one hell of a parting gift, even if it’s a gift whose impact may only be wholly visible in hindsight.

3. Happy Endings by Paul Cornell

Yes, it’s a shameless overindulgence.

Yes, your emotional response to it will entirely depend on your opinion of the New Adventures as a whole.

Yes, it’s not the kind of hard-hitting masterpiece that we know Cornell to be capable of.

And no, I don’t care one jot.

Happy Endings provides a wonderful little snapshot of the New Adventures at the absolute zenith of their relevance within the franchise, celebrating fifty novels with a cutesy, fluffy love letter to everything the books have accomplished in the last five years. In a way, it’s almost poetic that it should arrive in May 1996, right as the McGann TV movie was just about to be broadcast and supplant the NAs as the face of the franchise’s future.

And indeed, that sense of glorious and joyous memories passing into history resonates throughout the book, as you can probably imagine from the title. Barring his brief return to launch the new Bernice Summerfield novels with Oh No It Isn’t! in a year’s time, this is the last full-length Doctor Who novel from Cornell until 2000’s The Shadows of Avalon, and it’s pretty apparent in reading Happy Endings that the writer himself appears to be aware of this fact.

You could perhaps criticise stuff like the Emily Hutchings subplot for being too navel-gazing or self-obsessed, and that might well be true. Certainly, a writer wanting to break away from their most popular work and move on to more serious fare would seem to offer a rather neat and obvious parallel to where Cornell seems to be at in regards to his own relationship with Doctor Who and the New Adventures.

But just this once, I think the indulgence can be pardoned. As I said, this is one of those books where I can totally understand a reader having a different reaction to my own, because so much of this novel is based upon an assumption of goodwill towards the NAs that might not hold true for everyone due to, y’know, individuality and all that boring stuff.

Speaking as someone who’s spent a good quarter of their life writing about these books, and who has thoroughly enjoyed every second of it, however, Happy Endings was nothing short of a fuzzy, light-hearted, silly, frockish joyous bundle of fun. If we had to bid a farewell – however temporary it might have been – to Cornell and Bernice, then this is the way it should have been done. Yes, this is about as low-stakes and light-hearted as it gets, but it’s done so artfully and with such clear passion that I find it next to impossible to complain.

I like fun, go ahead and sue me why don’t ya?

2. Damaged Goods by Russell T. Davies

If this were a list of the most important New Adventures of 1996, then Damaged Goods would win, hands down. This is the Doctor Who debut of Russell T. Davies, and once you say those words, pretty much anything that comes after is destined to be little more than an add-on. It could be absolute garbage and it would still merit a mention in any kind of comprehensive history of the franchise.

As you’re probably able to gather by its high placement on this list, however, it’s not garbage. As a matter of fact, it’s actually rather brilliant. This is the sort of book which serves to vindicate the New Adventures as a worthwhile artistic endeavour, tackling drug use, poverty, gang violence and homophobia in a way that would never have been possible on television.

Even within the books themselves, the approach adopted here is still fresh, with Davies eschewing even the minimal amount of near-future stylistic frills favoured by Andrew Cartmel’s War trilogy in its own treatment of pressing social issues. If we wish to reflect on society’s failings, we need not dream up dystopian cyberpunk hellscapes to do so, as much fun as it might be; Thatcher’s Britain, Damaged Goods argues, is quite sufficient.

Ultimately, however, perhaps the greatest trick Davies manages to pull here is one which cannot possibly have been intentional, relying as it does on a contrast to a portion of his work that he had yet to write.

After all, there is an initial temptation to present Damaged Goods as something of an aberration within the larger body of Davies’ Doctor Who work, a novel which is brilliant in ways wholly divorced from the brilliance of an episode like Rose or Midnight.

Superficially, this argument would seem to hold up. Not only does Davies delve into the sort of subject matter that would never fly on a BBC show in a primetime family slot, but there’s also just the simple fact that this is a very grim and bleak work. The climax sees eleven thousand people die in a single moment as the N-Form manifests itself throughout Britain, in a move which I’m sure had Jim Mortimore positively overflowing with enthusiasm, and which makes Children of Earth seem about as hopeless and miserable as an episode of The Magic Roundabout.

But any serious argument that positions Damaged Goods as a case of Russell T. Davies doing his best Jim Mortimore impression is not an argument that really holds much water. Whatever its surface-level differences when compared to the author’s later contributions, the similarities exhibited by the novel are of a far more meaningful and fundamental stripe.

For all that the death toll might reach some pretty ludicrous heights here, it’s Davies’ uncanny and idiosyncratic knack for humanising the guest cast that helps to ensure that the devastation of the Quadrant has real emotional weight, and isn’t just a piece of hollow, meaningless spectacle.

In so doing, Damaged Goods manages to cement itself as an essential part of the New Adventures, and a damn fine novel to boot. If anyone ever asks you for an explanation of exactly how Doctor Who got from Survival to Rose, this is the book you can point them to.

1. Just War by Lance Parkin

It’s quite rare that the first book of a given year is good enough to remain on top for the full twelve months, but Just War is one such book. Even with every new novel I read and responded to with thoughts along the lines of “Damn, that’s really, really good,” there wasn’t ever a point where I felt that Lance Parkin’s debut novel had been dethroned as the reigning champion.

Having Doctor Who come up against the very real and very horrific atrocities of the Nazis sounds like a recipe for total and abject failure, which perhaps explains why the classic TV series generally kept a respectful distance from the Second World War in any realm beyond the purely allegorical. The simple fact of the matter is that the horrors of the Nazi regime aren’t exactly the type of subject that a family-friendly show like Doctor Who can explore in any great depth.

Even allowing for the New Adventures’ well-established policy of being more open to mature themes, this still seemed like an incredibly risky gambit for Virgin, especially coming from a first-time novelist. In defiance of all the odds, however, Lance Parkin manages to turn in a novel that is so mature and well-considered in its handling of the topics at hand that it almost makes you want to put the kibosh on any future attempts at “Doctor Who in an Exciting Adventure with the Nazis.”

Much of Just War‘s success comes from a recognition of its own limitations as a piece of science-fiction, and a willingness to engage in an active conversation with its most obvious antecedent in the NAs, Terrance Dicks’ Exodus. Direct name drops of Hitler, for instance, are conspicuous by their total absence here, and it’s indicative of the general approach that the book takes. If Parkin had just drummed up some high-octane thriller in which the Doctor gets the chance to beat back the bigotry of Germany and save the day, it would probably have come perilously close to cheapening the suffering of the regime’s victims.

Here, the Doctor is consciously separated from the action, with his biggest accomplishment being the theft of a prototypical Nazi superbomber and the prevention of a devastating attack on the UK. Crucially, however, even that small victory was only made necessary by a simple slip of the tongue on his part in conversation with Hartung, underscoring the fact that the character is fundamentally unable to operate in these surroundings.

Even if you know the twist ahead of time, it’s still a positively brutal reveal, particularly when you’ve already sat through the gruelling torture of Benny – where Parkin is constantly treading a delicate tightrope between emotiveness and exploitation, in a microcosm of the balancing act undertaken by the rest of the book – and it manages to give an already excellent novel that extra little push into true classic status.

Just about the only complaint I can conceive of is that it’s perhaps a very wordy novel. Copious space is given over to lengthy monologues on the nature and feasibility of fascism, and you could perhaps argue that it’s all a bit on the nose. Even here, though, I would point out that they at least manage to be very well-written monologues, and the unsettling resurgence of far-right movements in recent years lends an even greater poignance to these passages than they would have had originally.

Just War is a classic, and even if my decision to crown it the best New Adventure of 1996 might be slightly cliché, I still think it’s well-deserving of such a placement. I certainly couldn’t argue if someone wanted to substitute Damaged Goods, say, in its place, but for now I think it belongs pretty comfortably in the #1 spot.

The Missing Adventures

12. Twilight of the Gods by Christopher Bulis

Twilight of the Gods might just be the best Second Doctor novel to date. Unfortunately, that largely just serves to illustrate how dire a state the incarnation’s books have been in so far, rather than suggesting any actual level of quality on the part of this particular story. Because really, this just isn’t very good at all, and it’s pretty handily Bulis’ worst book since Shadowmind.

The idea of doing a sequel to The Web Planet feels rather thin on the ground from the very beginning. What could possibly be added to the original beyond offering up more baffling insect fight scenes, or half-heartedly aping the same sort of strange, otherworldly tone that made Strutton’s script so distinctive? Sure, you could perhaps argue that the non-visual medium is a better place in which to realise Vortis’ alienating and ethereal nature than the ropey sets of a 1960s British sci-fi serial, but if that’s all that you’re looking for from a prose version of The Web Planet, well, Doctor Who and the Zarbi is right over there.

These problems aren’t helped any by Bulis’ inherent traditionalism. It’s one of his qualities which can sometimes be a virtue, if not exactly in a “Sing his praises from the rooftops!” kind of way, but in the case of Twilight of the Gods it mainly translates into a grafted-on plotline about two rival alien factions.

There are no surprises to be found in the Rhumon conflict, with all the guest players feeling totally interchangeable with one another – a problem which also afflicts the Menoptera, mind you – and it’s mostly just there to allow Bulis the chance to indulge in the type of Tesco value Star Trek militarism that he proved so fond of in Shadowmind and The Sorcerer’s Apprentice. Yes, there’s an attempt at a grand moral about the tragedy and folly of war, and how we should just try and get along because we’re more similar than we are different, but that’s so shallow as to basically feel like the literary equivalent of “Live Laugh Love.”

All of this might have been somewhat forgiveable if the attempts at expanding on The Web Planet were at least interesting or creative, but they aren’t, and it isn’t. The depth of Bulis’ contributions to the source material is basically just to reveal that the planet is actually a hollowed out experiment by a bunch of God-Like Beings – and here the Star Trek influence shines through yet again – with a crust composed of a super mineral which is responsible for bestowing the ability of flight upon the Menoptera, and which the Animus wants to seize in order to pilot Vortis around like one big space-convertible.

(Which actually makes me realise that both of the year’s worst novels seem disturbingly preoccupied with explaining or replicating the mechanics of the Dalek plot from The Dalek Invasion of Earth… hmm.)

So it’s safe to say that Twilight of the Gods offers very little for me to latch onto and analyse in any real depth, nor does it even offer me enough of a reason to care enough to attempt to do so. The sheer length of the thing doesn’t do Bulis any favours, and I had mentally checked out long before I turned the final page. This is probably the nadirof the plague of sequels that gripped the MAs in the second half of the year.

Closely followed by…

11. The Shadow of Weng-Chiang by David A. McIntee

Where Twilight of the Gods felt aggressively phoned in and lifeless, The Shadow of Weng-Chiang is clearly the product of a little more thought and effort. Coming in at #11, you can probably tell that I don’t think that these qualities were enough to save it from slipping into the realm of tedium, but the effort is appreciated nevertheless.

It goes without saying that doing a sequel to The Talons of Weng-Chiang was always going to be a rather dicey affair, made all the more dicey by the adamant refusal from certain segments of Doctor Who to so much as admit said diceyness.

Still, McIntee takes a fair enough stab at trying to work through the issues, and his ostensible solution – relocating the action from the East End of 1880s London to 1930s Shanghai in the weeks before the Japanese invasion – is probably the cleverest trick in the novel’s arsenal. It recasts the Doctor and his companion from enjoying the support of local law enforcement to being viewed with suspicion as apparent representatives of European imperialism.

The biggest problem with The Shadow of Weng-Chiang, then, is that McIntee can’t really bring himself to go too far beyond that, and the novel ends up exhibiting a strange and unresolved tension between its deference to the original source material and its desire to call something of a mulligan on that source material. We don’t get prominent guest characters like Litefoot who wilfully and uncritically use slurs, and Romana never refers to Hsien-Ko as “the Yellow One” in the way that Leela did in the case of Chang.

And yet there’s a sense that the novel still wants to cling perhaps a bit too much to the oft-parroted fan defence that “It’s ironic, man! The characters are racist in an ironic way!”, with the Doctor making a number of remarks about China and Chinese people that can’t help but seem uncomfortable in light of the original.

All of this culminates in a truly bizarre moment in which McIntee stops to give our two lead characters a rambling and incoherent diatribe against the horrors of rampant political correctness, which can’t help but feel like I’ve stepped into a bizarro universe in which I can watch the full, unedited horror of Doctor Who as envisioned by someone like Andrew Bolt or Laurence Fox.

(Hey, I already made the dig at Roberts in the original, I need to update my references.)

Much like Twilight of the Gods, however, the book’s true undoing is just how unremittingly boring it is. The third act spends far too much time on violent, gory descriptions of Mr. Sin’s brutality, while vaguely interesting characters like Li get lost in the shuffle and undergo some kind of brain transplant where they seemingly become totally different individuals.

It’s kind of surprising that McIntee would bungle this attempt at a redemptive reading of The Talons of Weng-Chiang, but did considerably better in his handling of Lovecraft in White Darkness. In the end, that seems to validate something that I suspected going into this novel, which is that the Doctor Who fandom of 1996 might have just been completely unequipped to employ the necessary critical distance to truly move forward from Talons.

They should have been equipped to do it, but then again they should be equipped to do it in 2023, and you’ll still find sects of fandom that go to bat for the original. It’s telling, however, that McIntee’s novel seems to have been consigned to the mists of time, and while it might be a little mean of me, I’m tempted to say that that’s exactly where it belongs.

(Also, conceding that it’s a rather minor detail in the grand scheme of things, I still remain completely unable to fathom why you would try and keep Mr. Sin’s presence a secret without apparently telling Alister Pearson not to give him pride of place on the front cover.)

10. Speed of Flight by Paul Leonard

I feel I was rather lenient on Speed of Flight in my initial review, but in attempting to cross all the Ts and dot all the Is, even I am forced to concede that it doesn’t really have that much to recommend it. It falls prey to all the complaints that you should be familiar with by now thanks to the last two books in the list, with guest characters who can most charitably be described as “shallow” and a plot that jettisons any pretenses of deeper commentary in favour of a runaround.

And yet, this probably still stands as Paul Leonard’s most consistent novel to date. Of course, “most consistent” does not necessarily translate to “best.” Nothing here manages to be as pointed as the exploration of postcolonial Africa and the establishment politics of the UNIT era in the first half of Dancing the Code, nor can it match the emotive evocation of interwar Europe found in Toy Soldiers.

With all of that being said, I think Speed of Flight does manage to avoid the grievous self-sabotaging streak that seems to run throughout the back halves of many of Leonard’s works – dubbed, perhaps a little callously, by Stacey Smith? and Anthony Wilson of the Cloister Library as the “Paul Leonard brain haemorrhage” – to the Epilogue, and that surely has to count for something, no? Historical precedent shows us that books like Dancing the Code succumbed to mediocrity much earlier in their run, so it’s nice to see that the ratio of “enjoyable to tedious” is at least improving, I suppose.

The strongest point counting in Leonard’s favour here, though, and the thing that ultimately prevents Speed of Flight from landing among the bitter dregs of this year for me, is that it’s just nowhere near as long as some of the really unbearable novels. Yes, this prevents it from making much in the way of a lasting impression – writing about it now, a little over a month later, I remember pretty much sod-all about what actually happened in the book – but it also means that it never has time to linger or fester.

(For more, see the entry marked “faint praise, damning with.”)

There are some cursory attempts to use the alien world of Nooma – which actually goes unnamed within the text of the novel itself, come to think of it – as a springboard to explore some generalised 1990s anxieties about the looming spectre of industrialisation and technological encroachment, but it never really gels together.

Ultimately, Speed of Flight is the type of book that I find it very hard to give an opinion on one way or the other. It’s certainly much too generic and humdrum to count as some unsung classic of the Missing Adventures, but it never really sticks around long enough for its presence to become unwelcome.

It just sort of… is.

9. Downtime by Marc Platt

We’re getting steadily better, but we’re still in the realms of the unextraodinary. Much like the attendant spin-off video of which it is a novelisation, Downtime is mostly notable as an eccentric curio and a relic of the weird copyright limbo in which Doctor Who found itself lingering for most of the Wilderness Years.

Indeed, it’s kind of debatable whether this sort of story really warrants the novelisation treatment. Part of the appeal of the original Reeltime Pictures film was the ability to see Doctor Who mainstays like Nicholas Courtney, Elisabeth Sladen and Deborah Watling interacting in an all-new adventure. It might have been an exceedingly naff runaround filmed on the campus of a brutalist university in Norwich, but that’s just the kind of thing fans had to content themselves with in the 1990s.

By novelising it in this fashion, however, it must be conceded that you will automatically lose a lot of those aspects that made the original an appealing prospect. If that was true in January 1996, when we were still four months away from an abortive attempt to revive Doctor Who, it’s only become all the more pressing from the standpoint of a world in which we’ve had regularly airing Doctor Who on our screens for the better part of twenty years.

It’s perhaps telling that, when Virgin reached out to Wartime writer and subsequent New Adventures stalwart Andy Lane to give the same treatment to his own script for Reeltime, he declined the offer. Ironically enough, that film eventually got a novelisation from Telos Publishing earlier this very year, but it only stretched to a mere 101 pages. Even if Wartime is considerably shorter than Downtime ever was, it feels like that might be a more appropriate length for a book like this, being more in line with the Target novelisations of days gone by.

Certainly, Downtime‘s attempts at fleshing out the film to better fit the long-form setting of the Missing Adventures seem to suggest that there isn’t really enough material here to warrant a repeat performance of the trick.

For all that Platt’s newfound freedom from budgetary constraints allows him to insert elaborate action scenes involving the Brigadier, there’s also a sense that he’s chosen to fill the page count through the judicious application of padding. Victoria’s journey to Tibet, which constituted a whopping four minutes of the original film, is here expanded to form an opening chapter that takes up the first 20% of the novel. Such indulgences might be forgiven if it weren’t for the fact that substantial issues with the script, like Sarah Jane’s comparative lack of involvement, still remain completely unaddressed.

This isn’t to suggest that there’s nothing worthwhile to be found in Downtime. The stuff with the Brigadier is rather touching, but even here I’d much rather watch the version that has the added benefit of being performed by Courtney himself.

Without the presence of any recognisable actors, and bereft of any ability to create visual spectacle, Downtime ends up floundering in a tangled World Wide Web of reheated techno thriller plotting that was much more appetising when packaged under names like System Shock or Millennial Rites. If you absolutely must experience it, just watch the original film.

8. The Eye of the Giant by Christopher Bulis

The Eye of the Giant is pretty much what you’d expect from a Bulis novel. It’s nothing exceptional, seeming content to offer up a reasonably fun and solid pastiche of old-timey adventure serials. In a way, it feels like a conscious effort to do a follow-up to his imitation of Tolkien-esque fantasy in 1995’s The Sorcerer’s Apprentice, which was apparently critically acclaimed at the time despite me not caring all that much for it.

(Indeed, I literally went back to my Year in Review post for 1995 in order to check where it landed, and it actually ended up in the #8 spot as well. History never repeats, but it is quasi self-similar, as they say.)

Still, even if neither of these books set the world on fire, I’d much sooner have more stories in this vein from Bulis than whatever the hell Twilight of the Gods was supposed to be. It helps that this is probably the first Third Doctor novel to be halfway decent throughout the entirety of its length, and it’s almost surprising that it took Bulis this long to do a story with the UNIT family, given the more militaristic bent a lot of his novels tend to have. I guess his interest wanes a bit if the military in question isn’t heavily futuristic in character…

It’s nice to see Liz being given the chance for some post-Inferno adventures, especially since I wasn’t a huge fan of either of her Decalog appearances in The Straw that Broke the Camel’s Back and Prisoners of the Sun. We’d still have to wait a good three months to get a book that actually gave her something substantial to do as a companion, but it’s nice to see that the effort is there.

The biggest flaw I can really point to in the novel is the rather dated characterisation of Nancy Grover as a one-dimensional gold digger. I get that it’s not exactly uncommon for such a trope to appear in the films that The Eye of the Giant is emulating, but it feels rather short-sighted to so uncritically port over 1930s gender roles into a book released in the mid-1990s. With that being said, the Nancy plotline does at least give us a final battle between the UNIT family and some mad, laser-firing nuns in St Paul’s Cathedral, so it surely can’t be all bad, I suppose.

I don’t really have much more to say about The Eye of the Giant. It does what it sets out to do well enough, and it’s certainly a step in the right direction for the Third Doctor novels. It does have the bad fortune to be published in the same month as Who Killed Kennedy – not featured on this list since it’s very difficult to consider it a regular MA, or any other kind of easily categorisable Doctor Who novel – which is more of a full-on leap in the right direction, but for what it is, this is fine.

7. The Scales of Injustice by Gary Russell

Hey, it’s a Gary Russell novel that I actually kind of liked.

Admittedly, this is another case of the Third Doctor novels being vastly overshadowed by Who Killed Kennedy. There’s a lot of creative cross-pollination between the two books, and in any kind of serious comparison between the two writers, Bishop is pretty much always going to top Russell at this stage in the game.

None of this makes The Scales of Injustice completely worthless, mind you. It is, as I say, the best regular Third Doctor adventure Virgin have given us to date, and light-years ahead of Russell’s earlier work in novels like Legacy or Invasion of the Cat-People. It’s all the more impressive when you consider the fact that he was splitting his time between this book and his novelisation of the Paul McGann TV movie.

Yes, there’s the usual liberal application of continuity that tends to get on my nerves, and the book probably only exists to plug an apparent continuity error in Warriors of the Deep, but these are the kinds of things that you just have to accept with the territory of reading a Gary Russell novel. If nothing else, zeroing in on a single line in Time-Flight about C19 and spinning it out into a vast conspiracy at least feels like an honest extrapolation of the themes of Malcolm Hulke’s own work, so there’s a sense of a greater thematic purpose motivating all the fanwank to be found here, more than you usually get.

Building off of The Eye of the Giant, Liz actually gets given a meaningful character arc that seeks to provide her with the departure story she was never given on screen, and it honestly works pretty well. Add in some good character work with the Brigadier’s failing marriage and you almost don’t notice that the Doctor spends half the book in captivity.

The Scales of Injustice isn’t especially deep, but it’s a lot of great fun, and one of the better outings in this weird rash of late MA sequelitis. As one of the few Virgin books to have seen a relatively recent reprinting, I feel pretty confident in recommending you give it a shot if you’re curious.

6. The Plotters by Gareth Roberts

Ooh, controversial.

Look, here’s the thing about The Plotters, which won’t surprise you at all if you actually read my review of the book, where I barely reviewed it at all and mostly just tiptoed around it to talk about other shit. The Plotters is a fine novel. In a lot of ways, it’s a very good novel, maybe even a great one. Reading it is also perhaps the single most exhausting and unenjoyable experience I’ve ever had in the course of running this blog.

You can throw all the usual “Separate the art from the artist!” talking points at me about how I’m just letting my dislike for Gareth Roberts’ politics of transphobia cloud my judgement, to which I say… yeah no shit, buddy. It is probably very petty of me to place The Plotters this low for such personal reasons that have little to do with the book itself, but I’d argue that they have everything to do with the book itself.

Even before you get to the whole cross-dressing villain stuff – which, as I said so eloquently on my Twitter, has aged like milk mixed with piss given Roberts’ current political outlook – the fact remains that I’m just finding it increasingly hard to have a good time in reading Roberts’ books. That’s a problem when his place in the franchise’s pool of writers was always defined as “the one who writes the stories that are a bit silly.”

I had a few laughs when reading The Plotters, don’t get me wrong, but a lot of my time was just spent wanting it to be over with. The best part of the experience was imagining Alan Cumming in the role of King James, and that’s only something gleaned from a TV story written more than twenty years later by a completely different writer, so I can’t really credit Roberts for that one.

I don’t enjoy being so exhausted with Roberts. Despite what people like him might like to write in their little reactionary tabloid columns, “cancelling” writers whose work you once respected is not a fun experience. Hell, I wouldn’t even say I want Roberts to be “cancelled.” He’s had ample opportunities to just listen to people, but it’s been four years since I posted my review of The Highest Science, and I am just so profoundly tired of his schtick at this point.

So this is the end result of that. A book I might have once enjoyed, that ended up feeling like a chore instead. Tell me again how we on the left-leaning side of the political spectrum are supposed to enjoy this whole cancellation business?

5. The Sands of Time by Justin Richards

The Sands of Time is a welcome return to form for Richards after the middling sophomore effort of System Shock. It’s got archaeology, it’s got a mystery with more twists and turns than you can shake a particularly extravagantly designed Formula One track at, and some genuinely heartfelt scenes for the regular cast.

If Twilight of the Gods represented the nadir of the sequelitis approach, and we crossed over into the realm of decent sequels with The Scales of Injustice, then this is probably as good as it gets. Not only does The Sands of Time deliver on all the familiar aspects of Pyramids of Mars, but there’s also a sense that Richards is actively trying to update some of the more troubling aspects of the original, turning a story with some uncomfortable racial overtones into a more firmly anti-imperialist text. It’s probably not perfect, but it’s certainly a much better stab at the redemptive reading than McIntee was willing to commit to.

The guest cast – Atkins aside – suffer from a distinct lack of definition, but the Doctor and Tegan are captured brilliantly. It’s quite a shame that the plot of the novel really cements the hints we got in Goth Opera that Nyssa’s role in this particular TARDIS team will be “the one who is reduced to a passive victim of a hideous transformation,” but the scene between Tegan and Nyssa’s funeral casket is so good that it almost makes up for it.

I don’t have too much more to say about The Sands of Time, but I don’t think that’s necessarily a bad thing. This isn’t a novel with the boldest or most groundbreaking ideas ever, but very few Missing Adventures are. What it is is a pretty entertaining sequel to a beloved classic that still isn’t afraid to recognise the flaws in its source material, and that’s enough to put it above quite a few of its contemporaries.

4. The English Way of Death by Gareth Roberts

Given my thoughts on The Plotters, I’m honestly quite surprised that The English Way of Death landed this high. If anything, I think the fact that I had a more enjoyable experience is simply reflective of my having read this a good six months or so before The Plotters.

But, alas, I do also think that it reflects the fact that Roberts was a very talented writer. On the whole, the jokes hit much harder than they did in The Plotters, perhaps due to the fact that Season 17 is self-admittedly Roberts’ native wheelhouse and he therefore seems much more comfortable playing with the characters of the Doctor, Romana and K-9. As with The Romance of Crime, it’s a worthy successor to the sense of humour embodied by Douglas Adams’ brief tenure as script editor, while also managing to combine that comedy with a decent plot.

There’s also a sense of a rather pointed satire taking aim at British exceptionalism and the tendency of certain people in the nation to bog themselves down and refuse to change with the times. Which would have, y’know, aged much better if it was coming from literally any other author but the one who has most prominently decided to bog down and refuse to change with the times, but I’ll take what I can get, I suppose.

It’s for that reason that my feelings on The English Way of Death are ultimately rather mixed, despite its high placement overall. This was the point at which I really began to feel like reviewing Roberts’ work wasn’t leaving me with a sense of enjoyment and levity so much as anger and sadness at the trajectory of his career. In this case, there was enough quality writing to distract me from those feelings, but it was definitely a foreshock of the general sea change in attitude that I’ve undergone since reading the middling Fegovy.

3. The Man in the Velvet Mask by Daniel O’Mahony

First things first, I fully recognise that placing this book so high is bound to be a little contentious, especially when I’m placing it above a number of well-respected classics like The Plotters or The English Way of Death. With its copious amounts of sax and violins, it’s no big surprise that Daniel O’Mahony’s sophomore novel has become such a lodestone of controversy among those wishing to point to the Virgin years as being needlessly edgy and puerile.

While I can understand that viewpoint, I do ultimately think that this is a pretty good novel. It’s very clearly the product of the same mind that gave us Falls the Shadow back in 1994, while reining in some of the more self-indulgent excesses of that book with regards to its length. This renders a lot of O’Mahony’s ideas into a much more coherent form – well, I use “much” a bit loosely, I’ll admit – the second time around, and there’s a stunning level of imagination here.

Even the Dodo stuff, while certainly a little salacious, never feels quite as exploitative or horrible as a lot of folks make it out to be. I definitely understand why it sits ill at ease with folks, especially given the awful treatment the character suffers in subsequent novels, but in this instance it doesn’t feel like the boat has been pushed out too far. Your mileage may vary, of course.

Underneath all of this, there’s a very timely air to the whole project. Although the whole “This is about Holocaust denial, actually” reading I gave in my original review might be one of the more outlandish takes I’ve ever given on Dale’s Ramblings, I do still stand by it. In that regard, The Man in the Velvet Mask is a book which is almost as confronting as Just War, but in a totally different way, and I think that Doctor Who as a whole is richer for having published it.

2. Cold Fusion by Lance Parkin

Cold Fusion is a meticulously crafted piece of work, with Lance Parkin practically revelling in the chance to play around with the structure of the multi-Doctor story. To be honest, I had actually initially pegged it as the best Missing Adventure of the year, but the plot is still a little bit too simplistic, and its guest characters a little too flat, for it to truly claim the crown.

The fact that I was almost willing to totally overlook that fact, however, speaks volumes to how enjoyable much of Parkin’s work here is. It’s filled with cheeky jokes, from a gentle needling of Tegan’s dubious status as an authentic representation of Australia to a not-so-subtly hidden reference to an infamous Nicholas Courtney anecdote – although the latter does cost the book some points on originality, with Parkin having already trodden this territory before in Just War.

Even beyond that, the idea of so explicitly crossing over Virgin’s two lines of fiction is such a clever idea that it’s a wonder it apparently took this long to think of, barring the loose connections between Blood Harvest and Goth Opera. At the same time, there’s a funereal atmosphere to the way in which Cold Fusion goes about its task which feels perfectly in tune with the mood of Doctor Who fandom at the very end of 1996, to the point where it seems difficult to imagine it ever being quite as successful a trick at any earlier point.

All the regulars are on fine form, with even the much-maligned – and rarely-featured – Adric being at least tolerable for much of the novel’s length. Even more impressive is that Parkin manages to find a role for Nyssa that doesn’t involve her turning into a monster.

All told, Cold Fusion is an excellent way for Virgin to bid farewell to the Fifth Doctor and close off 1996. I said in my recent review of the novel that it’s probably a much better final book than the second half of the year deserved, and I’ll reiterate that once again. It’s a little telling that only one other Missing Adventure from the period of July to December 1996 made it into the top half of this list, but it just serves as a further demonstration of the ways in which Cold Fusion stands out from the crowd.

1. Killing Ground by Steve Lyons

This is perhaps the strangest and most unexpected pick I’ve ever made for “best novel of the year” in one of these lists, but I really do think it merits the crown. Killing Ground is a perfect send-off for Steve Lyons, who remains one of the most quietly influential writers that Virgin has ever had. On top of that, however, it’s just a damn good Cyberman story that far outshines the New Adventures’ earlier attempt in Iceberg.

(Which is a little ironic when you consider exactly who wrote that one, but nevertheless…)

This is the kind of story that the metal men from Mondas were made for, but which they were so rarely used in on television. It’s an uncomfortable, violent tale which successfully reworks one of the series’ most iconic monsters as an analogue for fascism without ever losing sight of the unique horror that they represent. Along the way, Lyons also treats the audience to some juicy, if slightly well-worn, debates about the moral and ethical lines of anti-fascist resistance, without ever feeling the need to hold the audience’s hand too much and patronisingly moralise to them.

Couple this with some wonderfully nuanced character work for the best companion-that-never-was, Grant Markham, and an arc for the Sixth Doctor that sees him pushed to the very brink of his capacity and desire to help those around him, and the result is something rather special.

It’s a damned shame that fandom seems to have largely forgotten this book, and while some of that might be down to the fact that Lyons is using a much more traditionalist and straightforward structure than he does in his other novels for Virgin, I think there’s more than enough emotional heft here to prove that using a tried-and-tested model by no means precludes an author from constructing a gem of a novel.

Final Thoughts

Well, that was the year that was. Or something.

Honestly, it’s quite surreal to know that I’m now so much closer to the end of Virgin’s output than I am to the start. Thankfully, having to cut back and forth between the Virgin and BBC lines over the next few years should postpone our final goodbye to the New Adventures, but it still drives home how much time I’ve invested in this project.

As for how 1996 stacks up to previous years overall? Well, I’d say it’s a little weaker than 1995, but that’s true of a lot of years in Doctor Who‘s history. The Missing Adventures were especially off their game this year, though their spell of mediocrity only really seemed to hit in full force in the second half. Even the worst MAs were only “so bad they’re boring” rather than “so bad they’re trainwrecks,” which is arguably worse in a way, and is definitely a lot less entertaining.

The New Adventures, however, were largely going from strength to strength. Sure, you still had your clunkers like GodEngine and The Death of Art, but these were set against a number of very good to outright great instalments, and even some of the less stellar novels were still executed with a certain level of slick professionalism. In retrospect, knowing how turbulent the coming BBC Books years would be for the franchise, it’s a damn shame that the vagaries of copyright law killed a series like the NAs that was still very firmly in the prime of its life.

But all of that is for another time. For now, I’m just glad to have gotten through a whole ninety books, and I hope to still be doing this for some time yet. I’m probably going to hold off on jumping into 1997 until I can get my hands on a copy of Bernice Summerfield: The Inside Story, which does unfortunately mean waiting for eBay to ship it from the UK to Australia and, yes, will definitely cost me a frankly upsetting amount of money.

Once that gets here, and I have a chance to read it for a bit, we’ll get back to the fray with Jim Mortimore’s Eternity Weeps as promised, however. Until next time, then…

Kind regards,

Special Agent Dale Cooper

Virgin Missing Adventures Reviews: Cold Fusion by Lance Parkin (or, “Patience Is a Virtue”)

What is a Missing Adventure?

In December 1996, this is a question which is neither particularly pertinent nor overly complex. As a result, it’s actually more uninteresting than anything else, mostly because it’s the kind of query that you can give a pretty straight and easy answer to. And, well, as someone who runs a Doctor Who review blog, such questions tend to be rather boring for me.

(How am I supposed to fulfil my mandate of extrapolating insignificant nonsense out into a 4000 word post under such circumstances, I ask you?)

Anyway, if you’ll allow me a second to collect my energy in a valiant attempt to keep my eyelids open, the answer is as follows: The Missing Adventures are a series of full-length novels which purport to slot between gaps in the televised eras of the first six Doctors.

At last count, they numbered twenty-nine in total. By cheating a little and phoning up the ever-reliable wisdom of hindsight, however, we know that they’re not long for this world, with only four more books in the offing before BBC Books decline to renew Virgin’s Doctor Who prose license.

Riveting stuff, to be sure. If this answer effectively marks the limits of our opening question’s usefulness, then I suppose the only logical response is to attempt to ask a subtly different question: What is suggested by the use of the term “Missing Adventure” as it applies to Doctor Who?

The most important thing to understand about the Missing Adventures is that they have always been but one half of a dichotomy within the world of Doctor Who novels, serving to complement the post-Survival adventures of the Seventh Doctor and Ace that began in the New Adventures with the publication of Genesys in June 1991. From the very beginning, the MAs were something of an outgrowth of their predecessors, and it seemed like the writers and editors at Virgin were always keenly aware of this fact.

When Goth Opera hit shelves in July 1994, it opened with a Preface from early NA architect extraordinaire Peter Darvill-Evans that attempted to outline the rationale behind the launch of the new series. Here, he took great pains to stress that “the Missing Adventures [would not be] the New Adventures all over again,” but it is the distinctions he draws between the two that ultimately prove most instructive in appraising the overall arc of the Missing Adventures as a whole and, eventually, that of BBC Books’ subsequent Past Doctor Adventures novels.

In the estimation of this preface, the New Adventures could be characterised by a willingness to engage in “experimental techniques, ultra-fast cutting between scenes, enigmatic dialogue, and… other modern styles.” By contrast, Darvill-Evans’ self-professed aim in creating the Missing Adventures was to produce works that could slot neatly – nay, seamlessly, to use his own words – between the televised adventures of the Doctor and his companions, attempting to faithfully recreate the stylistic quirks of whatever bygone era that a given book happened to be a part of.

In a way, this served to embed a certain degree of narrative and aesthetic conservatism into the range from the very beginning, and this is perhaps the point that the MAs have most frequently come under criticism for in later years. Asked by David J. Howe to give a retrospective evaluation of the series for an article in Doctor Who Magazine, editor Rebecca Levene would confess, “I didn’t have a passion for the range or a vision for them, whereas with the New Adventures we could change, develop and build characters as we went, which is far more satisfying.”

By their very nature as books that could only exist in the gaps and lacunae of the franchise’s continuity, there was much less scope for the authors to use the Missing Adventures to push the franchise forward in any meaningful fashion.

There is undeniably some measure of merit to such claims. For all that you might occasionally get bold or provocative Missing Adventures like Managra or The Man in the Velvet Mask or, as much as it pains me to say it, The Plotters, the books never quite outgrew their traditionalist impulses. With that being said, however, I still believe that to paint a picture which frames the MAs and PDAs as being solely defined by this conservatism is to overlook another rather important ingredient in their composition, and it’s one that is obliquely hinted at by my earlier observation that these are books that, in effect, literally live between the gaps in the stories.

In short, the Missing Adventures effectively represent an exercise in a particular method of proselytising fandom history. For there to be “missing” adventures, there must be an accepted backlog of adventures. In other words, Doctor Who must have something resembling a history, something which can be feasibly talked about with the use of terms like “eras.” This is the most fundamental distinction between the NAs and the MAs, and it’s even reflected in the respective monikers of the series themselves.

After all, if the dichotomy was nothing more than a simple polarisation between experimentation and traditionalism – between “rad” and “trad,” if you will – then the obvious counterpoint to a series bearing the title of the “New Adventures” would probably be something along the lines of the “Old Adventures,” no? Of course, I imagine that there are precisely zero publishing executives that would seriously argue that you should willingly title your fresh new book series in a manner that suggests a certain janky and outdated quality, but the decision to employ “Missing Adventures” instead suggests that the books effectively serve as a secret history of sorts.

If, like so many other cult franchises of its day, Doctor Who can be said to have a history, then it follows that it must also have a historical progression. Like with any “real” history – and much to the dismay of political scientists like everyone’s favourite VAR recurring character, Francis Fukuyama – this progression is rarely entirely linear or neatly teleological but, broadly speaking, it does march onward. In fits and starts, maybe, but onward nevertheless.

Which brings us to the rather delicious irony inherent in using chronologically coded language to label certain corners of the franchise. When you decide to title your fledgling book series the “New Adventures,” the very nature of long-running franchises as constantly evolving pieces of art means that you will almost inevitably run up against a point in time at which the adventures you’re relating to the audience cease to be… well, new.

By the end of 1996, that point has been well and truly reached thanks to the broadcast of the TV movie and the succession of Sylvester McCoy by Paul McGann. In a sense, then, every New Adventure from around the time of Happy Endings has effectively been a Missing Adventure, filling in the gaps between our last regular adventure alongside the Doctor and Ace in Survival and the brutal murder of the Seventh Doctor in turn-of-the-millennium San Francisco.

It won’t be until the Eighth Doctor ever so briefly takes the reins in The Dying Days that one can really make a claim as to the accuracy of the New Adventures moniker having been restored, and by that point the novels are on the cusp of making Bernice the main character and thus falling into the weird limbo to which spin-off series are invariably consigned.

So here, in the last book of the year, Lance Parkin returns with the apparent goal of finally literalising all of that historical subtext, and there are quite a few interesting aspects to talk about when it comes to Cold Fusion‘s handling of that general task.

On the surface level, there’s obviously a rather neat symmetry to the fact that the year should open and close with a Parkin book. Admittedly, this is a symmetry which is entirely dependent on whether you read each month’s Missing Adventure before or after the corresponding New Adventure, and it’s therefore only really significant as nothing more than a happy quirk of reviewing these books in this particular way.

But glancing at the novel’s blurb suggests something far more interesting about Parkin’s own place within the franchise’s established pool of authors. In giving the customary spiel about the writer, it is mentioned that Cold Fusion is his third book to be published in 1996. At first blush, this might appear a little odd if you only have a passing familiarity with the literature of the time. Cold Fusion is, after all, only his second novel after his debut in Just War at the start of the year.

Novels and books, however, are two very different things.

(Happily enough, this provides a rather convenient little segue to mention that this officially represents the 90th book I’ve reviewed. Huzzah! But in keeping with the spirit of the above observation, I’d be remiss if I didn’t point out that it’s only the 87th novel, short story collections being what they are.)

The “second” book which is being referenced here as this novel’s predecessor is the speculative reference work A History of the Universe. Published in May 1996, it represented Parkin’s attempt to place all the televised Doctor Who stories – alongside the first fifty New Adventures and the first twenty-two Missing Adventures – on a single coherent timeline.

As it turns out, this book eventually came to represent little more than the proverbial first draft of history, and although the original edition of the project is long out-of-print, the underlying mission statement is still alive and kicking in the form of Mad Norwegian Press’ AHistory. With an extra twenty-odd years between the first and most recent iterations of Parkin’s timeline, the enterprise is naturally becoming steadily more ludicrously labyrinthine with each new edition published, to the point where the Fourth Edition is actually split up into three separate 400-page volumes.

To tell the truth, I’m rather fond of AHistory, which is somewhat surprising even to myself. You’d think it’d be the kind of thing I’d have a deep-seated loathing for, given the tendency that a lot of fan theorising and continuity debating tends to have where it very rapidly devolves into a pointless screaming match about who’s “right” and “wrong” with regards to what pieces of a fictional television show really “count.”

What makes Parkin’s attitude stand out amongst many of these discussions, though, is his willingness to admit that the whole thing is just a bit silly and shouldn’t be taken as anything more serious than a game at the end of the day. More to the point, he concedes in the introduction that his timeline is by no means attempting to be definitive or authoritative, something reflected in the title of the book itself.

The indefinite article, you might say, and all of that jazz.

This worldview naturally bleeds through into a lot of Parkin’s work in the franchise, arguably climaxing with The Gallifrey Chronicles‘ joyous declaration that all of fiction can be said to be “real” in some fashion, in spite of the intertextual contradictions that such a statement throws up.

Even before that late stage of his Doctor Who career however, it’s visible in the way in which, upon being assigned to write the series’ 35th anniversary novel in The Infinity Doctors, he gleefully set about constructing a book which seemed to almost thumb its nose at any attempts to place it within established continuity.

While there are any number of other authors who take astronomical amounts of carte blanche when it comes to utilising bits and pieces of the franchise’s history to expound their own pet theories – the most obvious targets for this generalisation are probably Gary Russell and Craig Hinton, but it also applies to authors I generally look more positively on like Andy Lane and Lawrence Miles – Parkin is one of the few who seems to recognise both the futility and the fun inherent to such pursuits.

With Just War having been less concerned with televisual history than it was with, y’know, actual history, Cold Fusion represents our first real look at the approach to continuity that was exemplified by A History of the Universe. This is a book which is positively drenched in continuity and history, featuring as it does perhaps the most extensive engagement with the character of the Other between Time’s Crucible and Lungbarrow.

On top of all of that, as we discussed at the beginning, it’s a book which firmly and unequivocally historicises the New Adventures by establishing their status as an era of the franchise within which gaps can be found and exploited for storytelling opportunities. This is, in and of itself, a fascinating and rather clever move on Parkin’s part. It’s so fascinating and clever, in fact, that the subsequent BBC Books Past Doctor Adventures novels would attempt something similar with Nick Wallace’s Fear Itself in their own twilight days.

That aside, the main reason that Cold Fusion works as well as it does and avoids becoming an absolute flaming disaster is the sense that Parkin is very acutely aware of the novel’s strange status as the first and only multi-Doctor Missing Adventure, and has decided to play around with that premise in a rather intricate and clever fashion.

The existing paradigm of multi-Doctor stories on television is a rather simple one, and it takes us back to a comment I made in my Return of the Living Dad review. If there was ordinarily a certain degree of rigidity and solidity to the partitions in the proverbial “revolving door” cast policy that Doctor Who very quickly adopted as a core part of its identity, then multi-Doctor stories represented a rare opportunity to quite literally break the mould and allow the programme’s past and present free reign to interact with one another.

Because of the exceptional nature of such stories, they were generally limited to the realm of celebratory anniversary specials like The Three Doctors. Hell, this tradition even managed to outlast the programme itself, as Dimensions in Time could quite readily attest.

(Again, like we did with Return of the Living Dad, I’m just going to breeze past The Two Doctors here. I see it, I’m acknowledging it, let’s just move on.)

When the series made the transition from the small screen to the printed page, however, the fans and writers weren’t exactly feeling in much of a celebratory mood, and this was reflected – alongside many other parallel developments – in a shift in the way that multi-Doctor stories were approached.

No longer was Doctor-to-Doctor interaction a source of fun, light-hearted banter or gentle ribbing like the Second and Third Doctors trading quips in the Death Zone. Instead, it seemed to become a source of massive existential dread and angst. Cutesy moments like Seven momentarily being supplanted by Three’s personality in Genesys began to seem more and more like an outlier when books like RevelationLove and War and Head Games postulated an outright antagonistic and violent relationship between the Sixth and Seventh Doctors.

The conclusion to the Timewyrm arc in Revelation even hinged upon the Doctor having imprisoned his fifth self as a representation of his buried conscience, and needing to set that conscience free in order to best the Cybernetic Snake Woman Formerly Known As Ishtar.

With its focus on a desolate, wintry world haunted by strange ghosts with a vaguely Gallifreyan vibe, Cold Fusion very quickly and efficiently establishes itself as another work playing in that grand old New Adventures wheelhouse of a vaguely funerary and mythic approach to the programme’s history.

Indeed, there are points at which it seems Parkin is consciously evoking Revelation in particular. It’s hard not to read the opening passages, which juxtapose a poetic folktale about the local snowstorms giving voice to the souls of the damned against the mundane scientific reality, without being put in mind of Cornell’s own musings on the diversity of snowflakes. The basic tension between these particular incarnations also recalls that which undergirded the earlier novel’s aforementioned climax.

If Cold Fusion‘s task is to firmly collapse the New Adventures into the hazy netherrealm of history and legend which their Missing counterparts represent, then it only makes sense for it to pull upon the iconography and imagery of the book that really established the NAs as a series with their own distinct identity. The impression that we’re dealing with a consciously legendary space here is only further heightened by the fact that we never learn the name of the planet on which the bulk of the action takes place. This is, in effect, a fairytale, but in the dark, forbidding Brothers Grimm-like use of the term.

Only with a lot more spaceships, I guess. I dunno, I never read the originals.

With all of that being said, the decision to contrast the Fifth and Seventh Doctors is a multi-layered one, resonating on a level even deeper than the former’s status as the youngest-appearing and most empathetic of the Time Lord’s incarnations. The key lies in the novel’s placement in the Fifth Doctor’s timeline. Coming fresh off the heels of his first adventure in Castrovalva, it’s the earliest novel to feature Davison across the entirety of the Missing and Past Doctor Adventures ranges.

Featuring a freshly-regenerated Doctor is an obvious choice in this story about change and growth, but the use of the Fifth Doctor feels much more purposeful than readily comparable analogues like Invasion of the Cat-People attempting to slot between The Power of the Daleks and The Highlanders.

As in the case of other recent efforts like So Vile a Sin and Bad Therapy, it all comes back to the Saward Era, and an attempt to cast the Cartmel Era and the New Adventures, now at the end of their lifetime, as a reaction to their direct precursor’s more egregious failures. If you’re going to be tackling the end of Cartmel Era-adjacent fiction in a matter of mere months, it only makes sense to have it share space with the dawn of the Saward years in this way.

Naturally, the confusing production schedule of Season 19 and the turbulence of Antony Root’s extremely brief tenure as script editor before leaving to work on Juliet Bravo both combine to make the particulars of that dawn something of an open question.

Although Castrovalva was the first Fifth Doctor serial to be broadcast, and the first on which viewers would have been able to see the name “Eric Saward,” the writer had technically stepped into his new role with the production of Kinda one story earlier. Root would still receive the script editor’s credit on Four to Doomsday and The Visitation, two stories which had been produced beforehand but were aired later in the broadcast season.

Still, it remains true that the Fifth Doctor’s era was the first to come under the auspices of Saward. The NAs traditionally placed the lion’s share of the focus on the Colin Baker years in conducting their strange post-mortem of the series, and this is completely understandable. In many ways, however, it was the Davison years that saw the quiet pollenation of a number of rather nasty and unpleasant trends that would reach their full, hideous flowering in Season 22.

The brutal Cyber-continuity schlockfest of Attack of the Cybermen was only really made possible by the smash success of Earthshock, just as the violent and horrible not-quite-death of Peri at the end of Mindwarp – and again, the shadow of Bad Therapy rears its head – was foreshadowed by the shocking sting of Adric’s own demise.

Which provides us, funnily enough, with a decent excuse to pivot into briefly talking about Adric for the very first time. On the face of it, it seems a little extraordinary that we’ve gone ninety books and five Fifth Doctor novels before talking about him at any great length.

On the face of it.

Because let’s be real for a minute, when you think about it for more than ten seconds, nobody in their right mind was really clamouring for the return of Adric, let alone any attempts at a redemptive reading. It’s telling that a quick skim through the blog’s back catalogue reveals that the few fleeting acknowledgments of Adric I have made have either been in reference to the character’s untimely end, or the simple fact that, in life, he was a staggeringly annoying creation. Those are the two big legacies of Adric: he was annoying, and then he died.

(It’s not for nothing that this marks the first of only two appearances by the Alzarian boy wonder as an actively travelling companion across the entirety of the Virgin and BBC lines, even if you factor in the short stories. What’s the other, I hear you ask? Oh, just Gary Russell’s much-reviled Divided Loyalties, almost another ninety books from now. Ironically enough, on Shannon Sullivan’s novel rankings, Cold Fusion is actually the second-highest rated Missing Adventure, while Divided Loyalties is the second-lowest rated Past Doctor Adventure. That’s some truly wondrous symmetry of the type that you couldn’t plan, even if you tried.)

Conspicuously absent from Cold Fusion are any real attempts to move the character beyond that simplistic two-clause description. Thankfully, Parkin is wise enough to tone down the annoyingness, but it’s there nevertheless. It feels absolutely consistent, for instance, that Adric would find himself somewhat seduced by the cold, borderline fascistic logic of the Scientifica, particularly when Whitfield starts recognising his vaunted “mathematical excellence.”

These qualities are offset, however, against some genuinely funny sequences like the boy genius’ complete failure to apprehend Roz early on, or the Doctor trying to pass off his time sensor as a watch reminding him of Adric’s bedtime.

Here, once again, we get the sense that Parkin is using this opportunity to have a bit of cheeky fun. There’s no other way you can feasibly read sequences like, say, Chris’ attempts to go undercover by donning an incredibly broad Australian accent and the identity of “Bruce Jovanka” than as an attempt to lightly poke fun at the fact that the character of Tegan herself was rather caricature-esque. Chris even ends up twisting his ankle at one point, in a nice subversion of the rather gendered expectations of the companion role throughout the years.

The emphasis here needs to be placed on the word “lightly,” mind you. There’s never a sense of genuine malice or venom to any of Parkin’s observations, and it ultimately just comes across as another expression of his genuine enjoyment in playing with the particulars of Doctor Who‘s extensive cast and history.

Adric might still be a stuck-up brat, and Nyssa and Tegan might be exiled to a whole lot of wacky comedy highjinks at the novel’s beginning as they attempt to unravel the mystery of “Bruce’s” true identity, but they are all expertly characterised, as is the Doctor himself.

Or should I pluralise the pronoun in this case?

Whatever the case may be, the decision to almost exclusively present the Seventh Doctor and his companions through the eyes of the Fifth Doctor’s own companions at first is also a rather shrewd one. It’s an approach whose creative high point probably comes rather early on, as Parkin avoids offering a third-person description of which Doctor we’re reading about in the first chapter for as long as humanly possible. Avid readers of the NAs will probably be able to make the identification pretty easily, but to complain about that almost seems to be missing the point.

By keeping the representatives of the Cartmel Era at arm’s length like this, Cold Fusion manages to effectively communicate that its plot will be a case of the programme’s future intruding upon its past, rather than the other way around as we have come to expect from what we know of the way televised Doctor Who tends to operate.

Davison’s Doctor simply doesn’t belong in this hardened world of military peacekeeping and Adjudicators and the Earth Empire. Even if it might be a world based on concepts that were introduced in a throwaway manner back in the Pertwee years, Parkin’s approach owes a much greater debt to Andy Lane’s extrapolations in books like Lucifer Rising or Original Sin than it does to Colony in Space or The Mutants.

Indeed, these connections were originally planned to have been even more explicit, with Cold Fusion having been planned to be set in the thirtieth century and tie directly into the Empire’s status quo in So Vile a Sin. These plans were scuppered by the lengthy delays which plagued that novel, but it’s not too difficult to spot their remnants. For one thing, there’s the fact that the two novels both share the presence of the Unitatus, but Parkin has also onboarded the basic themes of the conflict between rationality and superstition that informed so much of the Psi Powers arc.

Not to mention, the twist that the Machine is actually a primordial TARDIS is pretty easily predicted when you factor in a similar beat concerning the nature of Cassandra in Aaronovitch and Orman’s novel. Of course, the selfsame delays that we keep coming back to meant that readers in 1997 would have actually experienced the inverse of all of these sensations. Which isn’t confusing at all, honest.

In the end, Cold Fusion actually ends up hearkening forward to the New Adventures’ future in other ways, some of which are more intentional than others. With the thirtieth century setting of So Vile a Sin having been declared off-limits, a compromise was reached whereby the novel would instead tie into the forthcoming retooling of the line to focus on the adventures of Bernice Summerfield in the late twenty-sixth century.

(This is a little bit bungled when the wardroid in the first chapter gives a copyright date that would better fit the twenty-seventh century, but it’s hardly the first time the Virgin novels’ internal chronology has become confused by Benny’s mere existence. It’s a little bit ironic that this should pop up here, when Parkin himself was the one who aimed to explain away the inconsistent dating of Love and War in his first novel, but the author claims in AHistory that the droid’s copyright date was the result of a simple “typographical error.” Believe that as you will, I suppose.)

And so we get not only our first reference to Dellah, but also numerous flashbacks involving Patience, erstwhile wife of the Other. Here, Parkin draws liberally upon the backstory that Marc Platt will explore at the close of the New Adventures with Lungbarrow. Being tied up with all the usual Cartmel Masterplan stuff, a lot of these flashbacks tend to dominate fan discussions of Cold Fusion, but I won’t really touch on it too much here at the risk of repeating myself for when we do eventually cover Platt’s novel in the hopefully not-too-distant future.

If you’ve read enough of my reviews however, you’ve probably gleaned a broad approximation of my stance on the matter at this point, which is to say that I’m generally rather agnostic about it all. I’m by no means religiously devoted to all the talk of sentient Houses and Looms and the Pythia’s curse, but I also don’t think it’s the franchise-ruining evil that some people make it out to be.

It helps that Parkin is at least competent and stylistically talented enough to portray Gallifrey in an interesting and evocative manner. It’s dripping with the same moody, chilly darkness that suffused Platt’s own efforts, and while some might find it pretentious and overwrought, it’s a take on the often rather musty and dry trappings of Time Lord society that I’ve always rather liked. Sneaking in a covert Twin Peaks reference in describing Patience and the Other’s residence certainly doesn’t hurt the novel’s chances any, either.

All of the Cartmel Masterplan stuff only serves to further reinforce the sense that the Fifth Doctor has wondered onto the sets of a very different show/book series/what have you. After all, in his era, the extent of the wider programme’s engagement with Gallifrey looked more like Arc of Infinity than it did Lungbarrow.

I’ll leave an appropriate pause here for you to get any instinctive shudders of revulsion out of the way.

If this is the point at which we’re finally starting to talk about the particulars of the novel’s plot, then the last manifestations of the future that we really need to talk about are the Ferutu. In view of their status as the denizens of a timeline in which Gallifrey was destroyed at a very early point in its history, they’re a monster whose presence once more brings me back to something we talked about with So Vile a Sin, and only further reinforces the abortive ties between the two stories.

In a superficial sense, I am of course talking about the tendency of Doctor Who novel ranges to become fascinated by questions of alternate timelines and universes as they approach their end, but there’s also another serving of irony heaped on top of this subtext casserole. As with all good ironies, it’s almost completely unplanned and only really becomes perceptible when you’re able to view the arc of history in full a few decades after the fact.

The Ferutu are not just limited to the role of harbingers of a past-that-never-was, even though that’s the only purpose that Parkin probably had in mind when he wrote Cold Fusion. When you take into account their later operations under the guise of the People’s former Gods in the Bernice Summerfield-led New Adventures, they also manage to provide a vital signpost on the road to the final conclusion of Virgin’s novels.

There are all sorts of totally valid reasons to dislike the later revelation that the Gods are actually just the Ferutu. Most of those reasons hinge on the fact that it seems rather unlikely that the resolution to the thread was actually planned to unfold in that way, and dismissing all the various other theories that had been dreamt up in books like Where Angels Fear or Dead Romance in order to shrug and go “Eh, they’re the villains from an old Missing Adventures novel, I guess?” isn’t exactly a very satisfying manoeuvre.

We’ll get to all of that in time, but for this particular moment, all that can be said is that the Ferutu’s eventual about-face as the final “big bads” of the New Adventures – however anticlimactic and mediocre it might be on anything but the most abstract and intellectual of levels – serves to illustrate the fundamental frictions between past and future that run throughout Cold Fusion.

It’s a conflict that can even be seen when one considers the larger shape of the plot itself. Underneath all the familiar New Adventure trappings, a lot of what happens here is a pretty simple runaround, with events following a tried-and-true structure familiar to any fan of Doctor Who.

Yet it’s those little touches of panache and authorial style from Parkin that elevate Cold Fusion above so many of its contemporaries, combined with a sense that the writer is at least aware of the very archetypal structure he’s adopted. This isn’t a novel that can be dismissed as another in the recent line of MAs that have buried their points under a staid and formulaic plot structure.

If Cold Fusion can be credibly accused of wearing that age-old Missing Adventure albatross of “aesthetic and narrative conservatism” around its neck, then it is at least one of the rare books that manages to twist those tendencies in such a way as to actively enhance its bolder themes and ideas.

This is a wonderfully intelligent and sophisticated work, filled with all sorts of cute and endearing touches, and if it has one big flaw it’s that reviewing twenty-five full-length novels and a short story collection in the space of a little under nine months has burned me out a bit and perhaps prevented me from appreciating Parkin’s work to its fullest extent. But that’s an extremely specific critique that only applies to my situation, and even that can be easily remedied by giving it another readthrough at a later date.

Cold Fusion is very, very good, and considering the pretty dire turn that the MAs have taken into cut-rate, low-merit, sequelitis-afflicted offerings in the latter half of 1996, it’s arguably a far better novel to wrap up the year than they ever deserved. At any rate, this is undeniably the most fun I’ve had reading a Missing Adventure since at least The Scales of Injustice, even with the burnout in play.

And I think that’s perhaps as good a note to close on as any.

Miscellaneous Observations

I’m glad that, three novels in, the Missing Adventures have finally figured out something to do with Nyssa besides having her turned into some kind of science fiction/horror monster. Seeing her work with Chris is actually quite enjoyable, and it’s unfortunate that by all accounts the Past Doctor Adventures will have returned to business as usual by the time the character is steadily turning into an antimatter creature in her next appearance in Zeta Major.

Oh well, what we got here was pretty good, I suppose.

In this instalment of what will probably become a recurring feature whenever we talk about one of Parkin’s novels – and which I’m taking this opportunity to dub the “Richardson Report” – I had almost thought we’d get away without a character based on the appearance of Ian Richardson.

Thankfully, Admiral Dattani comes along at the very last minute with his aquiline nose and high forehead, and Parkin virtually reuses the same descriptors he applied to Oskar Steinmann in Just War. Not that that’s anything to complain about, mind you. It’s a fun little in-joke, as ever.

Final Thoughts

Well, there you have it folks. All twenty-six books from 1996 present and accounted for, reviewed over the course of a brisk 262 days. All told, WordPress’ stats are telling me that I ended up writing well in excess of 130,000 words over the course of this block of posts, which is… mildly crazy.

I’ll admit, I did feel a lot of pressure in writing this one, and I worried that the quality of the review simply wasn’t up to par. I had to do a lot of pruning to get it to a point that I was happy with, and collateral fallout from having to slog away at my university work did start to sap the fun out of writing a bit towards the end. Hopefully this was still enjoyable enough, though.

In short, I need a bit of a break.

Still, you can expect the customary Year in Review post at some point in the not-too-distant future. I don’t really have a set time for when I’ll be back, beyond “when I feel like I’ve recovered from this burst of activity.” When I do, however, it’ll be time to ring in 1997 with just… just colossal amounts of death. It’s the return of Jim Mortimore in Eternity Weeps! Until then, however…

Kind regards,

Special Agent Dale Cooper

Virgin New Adventures Reviews: Bad Therapy by Matthew Jones (or, “Toy Soldiers… Wait”)

What would it mean for Doctor Who to end?

In December 1996, this is a very pertinent question, and yet it’s also a surprisingly complex one. In one respect, of course, Doctor Who has already ended. There was once a show called Doctor Who that ran on the BBC for twenty-six seasons between 1963 and 1989, and then it stopped. It has therefore been seven years since the last of these seasons. These are obvious and incontrovertible facts.

As we well know, however, this doesn’t even begin to paint the whole picture. Doctor Who continues to live on, not only in the form of Virgin Books’ original novels that they’ve been steadily publishing since 1991, but also in other ancillary forms of media like the pages of the Doctor Who Magazine comic strip.

Still, on television, the series was dead. And then, for about 89 minutes – or 85 if you happened to be watching a UK copy that was afflicted with PAL speed-up – in May 1996, it was alive again. The Seventh Doctor was dead and buried, and Paul McGann had stepped forward to shoulder the burden of becoming the Eighth Doctor. Because the Wilderness Years apparently hadn’t been turbulent and confusing enough up to this point, the franchise promptly decided that the only thing it could do under the circumstances was to pop its clogs and sink back into the grave.

Yet at this stage, the BBC were still remaining resolutely tight-lipped about the fate of a hypothetical revival of the series with McGann at the helm. Constant enquiries from publications like DWM were met with the same answer every time: BBC Worldwide was reticent to commit itself to any hard-and-fast decision before the expiry of their licensing arrangement with Universal at the end of the year. Having nurtured seven long years of doubt, even in the face of executive producer Philip Segal’s bold and ecstatic proclamations in the lead-up to the TV movie that this new revival was “going to be huge,” fans weren’t exactly holding out much hope.

So it was that, in late November – on the same day that The Plotters was published, and the day that So Vile a Sin would have been published if not for the whims of the ever-fickle production gods – the cover of DWM‘s 246th issue posed the question “So, Doctor… which way now?” Signalling the first instalment in a two-part deep dive from editor Gary Gillatt into the production history and subsequent aftermath of the TV movie, this presented a marked contrast to the tone taken just seven months earlier, when issue 239 had so brazenly proclaimed the series to be “back on TV!” For better or for worse, though, this inquiry ultimately seemed to provide a rather apt snapshot of the mood of fandom at the time.

(Well, barring the people who were still unreasonably and blindingly angry over the Doctor being half-human, but we usually like to disregard those folks as much as possible anyway.)

With each new month that dragged by without any news on the promised revival, Segal’s dream of a trans-Atlantic future for Doctor Who was beginning to look more and more like a false dawn. Even when the calendar year came and went, bringing with it the news that BBC Worldwide had decided to extend their arrangement with Universal through to the end of April 1997, it was with the caveat that crucial network co-partner Fox had made the decision to drop all involvement with the franchise.

In interviews with British newspapers and radio stations, an unnamed senior BBC executive would stress that the future of any revival attempts would be contingent upon finding another network to aid in the process of financing and distribution. “If Doctor Who has a future,” the anonymous source declared, “it is as another one-off movie.” Even Paul McGann seemed to be begrudingly coming to terms with his likely fate in an interview with DWM, joking that Sylvester McCoy had taken to calling him “the George Lazenby of Time Lords” and that he had become “famous for two hours.”

But even if the TV movie had failed to drum up enough ratings interest to persuade the BBC and its American partners to make the leap from pilot to series, it performed well enough in the United Kingdom to bring about something of a lasting sea change in the face of Doctor Who. At the same time that it was running interviews with McGann on the transitory nature of fame and television pilots, DWM had rather firmly signalled that it believed the future of the franchise – or at least, the future of its own comic strip – lay with the Eighth Doctor, killing off Ace in the conclusion to Ground Zero and almost immediately launching into a four-part adventure in which the Doctor’s newest incarnation came face to face with the Celestial Toymaker.

(Which actually makes me realise that we somehow haven’t talked about the Celestial Toymaker at all thus far, which I believe makes Virgin one of the only companies in the business of publishing new Doctor Who fiction to so firmly resist the pull of the weird reverence with which fandom treats that particular character. Oh well, you’ll just have to wait another ninety books to hear my thoughts on Divided Loyalties, I suppose…)

Even within the realm of novels, BBC Books had proven more than eager to snatch back the rights to publishing original Doctor Who fiction from Virgin in the light of the TV movie’s surprising success in the programme’s native stomping grounds. In November, Doctor Who had even won an open election as part of the BBC’s Auntie’s All-Time Greats competition as the nation’s “all-time favourite popular drama,” and the fan press were quick to seize on this victory, suggesting that the appetite for a revival was stronger than the Beeb’s stony-faced silence might have insinuated.

Although the mainstream newspapers submitted that this was simply the result of a concerted effort on the part of an immature fandom – and incidentally, whatever the truth of these claims might be, it is very funny to witness Gillatt interrupt the flow of his post-mortem of the failed pilot to go on the defensive against any intimations that publications like DWM or the Doctor Who Appreciation Society’s Celestial Toyroom were engaged in any electoral impropriety; track down the back issues for yourself and see if I’m wrong – the BBC must have at least thought there was some money to be found in this field, and the 246th issue would also contain the news that the first titles in a new range of Eighth and Past Doctor Adventures had been announced. Right under the announcement of the vote’s outcome, as a matter of fact…

All of this means that Bad Therapy arrives at a point in the New Adventures’ life cycle in which they really have to grapple with the question of what it would mean for Doctor Who to end, or at least this particular corner of the franchise. When Jim Mortimore rings in the new year with Eternity Weeps, the iconic McCoy logo will have disappeared from the front cover for ever, as if to proclaim that the New Adventures were aware, on some level, that their time was coming to an end.

This is, of course, because the staff at Virgin were well aware that their novels were effectively living on borrowed time. In conversation with David J. Howe for The Who Adventures, editor Peter Darvill-Evans would later reveal that he had spent a good eighteen months fruitlessly negotiating with the higher-ups at BBC Worldwide before the public announcement of their plans not to renew Virgin’s license when it expired at the end of 1996:

“It was an intensely frustrating time. It was impossible to find out from BBC Worldwide what plans they had for Doctor Who licensing. At first, the only indication that they had any plans at all was the fact that I couldn’t pin down Chris Weller, who at that time was in overall charge of the book ranges, Richard Hollis, the licensing manager, or anyone else to talk about renewing Virgin Publishing’s licence.

Then, once it became clear that BBC Worldwide wanted BBC Books to publish tie-ins to the new eighth Doctor TV movie, we still couldn’t find out whether or not Virgin Publishing would be licensed to continue publishing all, some or none of the several sorts of Doctor Who books – New Adventures, Missing Adventures, non-fiction – that we and our predecessor companies had been producing for 25 years. It seemed hard to believe that such a long publishing history could be entirely swept away.”

In the light of all this confusion, it seems especially pointed that the final NA to bear the Doctor Who logo on the cover should essentially prove to be an extended meditation on grief and loss. Even the in-universe justification for that tone, the death of Roslyn Forrester, ends up inadvertently reflecting the peculiar limbo in which the New Adventures and the larger franchise find themselves at the moment.

Like the hazy, indefinite hope of Doctor Who‘s return to television, Roz’s fate exists with something of a question mark hanging over it. On the one hand, she’s very obviously dead, and author Matthew Jones – making his full-length novel debut after having contributed The Nine-Day Queen to the second of Virgin’s Decalog short story collections – tells us as such from Chris’ very first appearance. On the other hand, though, the fact that fans would have to wait another four months to discover the actual circumstances of that death meant that the impact of this development was always going to be rather muted.

Indeed, readers who only decided to pick up this month’s Missing Adventure would almost be forgiven for not even realising Roz had died to begin with, as Lance Parkin’s Cold Fusion would feature the character travelling with the Doctor and Chris as if nothing had changed at all.

Over twenty-five years later, we don’t have these problems, but there remains something of a laughable irony to the fact that So Vile a Sin‘s production issues should actively enhance the sense that this moment marks a weird, in-between point in the history of Doctor Who. In the chaos and turmoil of the Wilderness Years, even the end of a series was far from being a simple proposition.

However, let’s take a step back from the chaos and try to discern some method within the madness. In a happy twist of fate that greatly simplifies such efforts, Bad Therapy is ultimately a rather traditional and unassuming little tale in and of itself, making it perhaps the perfect book to introduce a confused fandom to the true endgame of the New Adventures. The endgame of the endgame, if you will.

Jones’ work isn’t saddled with the task of resolving the so-called Cartmel Masterplan like Lungbarrow, nor is he expected to exorcise all the Seventh Doctor’s angst like The Room With No Doors. Hell, he doesn’t even have to offer up a massive epic that kills off Liz Shaw alongside 10% of the human race like Eternity Weeps – although one suspects that Jim Mortimore didn’t have to do that either, strictly speaking, but that he insisted on doing it anyway on account of being Jim Mortimore.

None of this should be taken as a suggestion that Bad Therapy lacks depth, mind you. On the contrary, it’s a rather promising debut novel, serving as a pleasantly quiet little character piece that closes out the New Adventures’ stint as a  series bearing the official Doctor Who logo on an appropriately downbeat and reflective note. If So Vile a Sin was the explosive finale, then Bad Therapy confirms that these last five – well, really these last four – novels will be the coda.

Obviously, I can’t really envision how this book would land if I had been unable to read So Vile a Sin beforehand, but then again, neither could Jones himself during the writing process. Under that rather exceptional set of circumstances, I think it manages to have the desired impact, even if it doesn’t ever become the out-and-out sobfest that the epilogue to its would-be predecessor ultimately ended up being. Besides, it would almost certainly dilute the importance of So Vile a Sin if every book managed to hit the exact same emotional highs, so even that’s not much of a point against it by my reckoning.

Now if we’re going to try and hew to my declaration in the previous review that I want these final NA posts to be more character-focused, then I suppose it’s only logical to start this post by talking about Chris, and although this might be his nineteenth book, I think it’s fair to say that this is probably the first time he’s really had to shoulder the weight of an entire story all by himself. Being introduced alongside Roz in Original Sin, there’s a sense that Chris’ arrival onboard the TARDIS was always something of a package deal, and it didn’t take long for writers like Ben Aaronovitch to decide that Roz was the more interesting of the pair.

In all honesty, it’s pretty hard to fault the writers for making this decision. By the very nature of Chris and Roz’s relationship, the latter’s status as the gruff, hardened veteran in the duo provided far more opportunity for a deep and enriching backstory. That’s not to say that there was absolutely no potential in the character of Chris as introduced to us by Andy Lane, but the fresh-faced rookie routine meant that it was far simpler to just, I dunno, give him a random pseudo-romance every other month.

Which is pretty much exactly the route they eventually decided on, funnily enough. While it was never the most revolutionary bit in the world when it was first tried all the way back in Zamper, any remaining freshness was well and truly wrung out of it by the time you had Head Games and The Also People offering up imitations of the trick in rapid succession.

(To be totally fair, The Also People probably stands as the high water mark for the whole “Chris romance of the month” device, with Happy Endings coming in a close second. It took me a re-read of Aaronovitch’s novel, free from the surrounding glut of lesser photocopies, to really appreciate that fact, but it probably helps that he and Paul Cornell are easily some of the strongest emotion salesmen – for lack of a better term – in Virgin’s pool of writers.)

With four regular cast members vying for space in the TARDIS, it was inevitable that somebody would be left out. In a way, the fact that the proverbial third wheel proved to be Virgin’s lone male companion is actually something of a pleasant surprise when you consider Doctor Who‘s historical issues with the rather gendered nature of the companion’s place in the proceedings.

Perhaps spurred on by the precedent set by Ace in the final two seasons of the classic show – leaving aside the age-old question of her post-Deceit persona – it seemed that the New Adventures were far more willing to treat their female companions as multi-faceted individuals with their own personal histories, and that tendency alone is enough to distinguish them from huge swathes of the television programme. It would certainly have been nice if that had translated into the hiring of more female talent besides Kate Orman and Rebecca Levene, but that’s by the by.

As a result of all of this, Bad Therapy represents the point at which the writers seem to recognise that they need to play catch-up with Chris before the final curtain call. Gone are the days in which you could almost entirely write the character out of a book with the excuse that he had gone undercover as a Buddhist monk; the regular cast has now officially dwindled to two for the first time since Original Sin, and that’s not an ideal situation when one half of said cast has spent most of his tenure relegated to perfunctory romance plots and small, cute beats playing off his naïveté as part of a wider ensemble.

Ironically enough, though, it’s these same qualities which serve to make Jones’ work with the character of Chris so impactful. There’s something undeniably heart-breaking about seeing a companion predominantly defined by his youthful and joyous exuberance be so thoroughly wrapped in the cold throes of grief. Even in the moments at which he’s partaking in behaviour that we would ordinarily read as heroic, like using his Adjudicator’s training to escort panicked customers from the blazing remains of the Upstairs Room, there’s a sense that he’s operating on autopilot, and that he himself is aware of this fact.

Indeed, his relationship with Patsy seems rather clever and wry in light of the numerous interchangeable romances of varying quality that we’ve been subjected to over the course of the character’s tenure as a companion. Here is what we might feasibly deem the logical endpoint of all of those subplots, a romance where the would-be object of Chris’ desire lacks any identity outside of that which he himself bestows upon her as a weird melting pot of Roz and all the love interests of days gone by. This is a case in which the characteristics of this school of storytelling are consciously pushed to their absolute limits, stretched so far beyond breaking point that any future attempts will inevitably feel cheap and forced.

This is not a romantic relationship, at least not in the conventional sense. This is a romantic exorcism, both for Chris and for the New Adventures as a whole.

Now, there’s perhaps a much weaker version of Bad Therapy to be had in which the book decides to straightforwardly lean on the tragic irony card and make a big deal out of the perceived misfortune in the fact that the “perfect,” tailor-made partner finally comes along for Chris, and he’s too wrapped up in grief to embrace them. There are shades of this to the finished product, but Jones shrewdly never loses sight of the fundamental existential horror of the Toys.

Because let’s be real here, it’s an absolutely horrifying concept, but in such a deliciously understated way that it might not even fully register in your conscious mind at first. The idea of beings that solely exist to mould themselves to the emotional state of their owner is unsettling enough as it is, but the notion that the Toys’ designers deliberately chose to make them so dependent on those emotions as to literally die in their absence takes this to a whole other level of “messed up.”

This isn’t even that old trope of the “perfect mate” as exemplified by other genre fiction offerings like Elaan of Troyius or… The Perfect Mate. There, while the decision to treat a woman as little more than chattel is obviously deeply unpleasant, there’s not the same visceral and immediate sense of abstract horror; the fates of Elaan and Kamala still have a grounding in the sexual.

(Good God, what a deeply weird sentence that is to type…)

While it’s pretty clear that there’s something of a sexual component to the Toys’ enslavement as well, there’s also just a deeper ontological confinement at work that becomes mind-bogglingly unpleasant if you think about it long enough. As a result, sequences like Doctor Mannheim’s description of Moriah’s desperate attempts to resurrect Petruska are far more unnerving than any pedestrian-gobbling ersatz taxi cab could ever be.

Of course, the notion of a tailor-made pairing with a vaguely horrifying implied power dynamic also has a very specific resonance within the context of Doctor Who, and especially the New Adventures at this point in time. None of Bad Therapy‘s musings on the Doctor-companion relationship necessarily stray into thematic ground that we haven’t trodden many times in the past, but the death of Roz casts an intriguing light over proceedings nevertheless.

Particularly noteworthy is the Doctor’s reaction to the fallout, which is sculpted in such a pitch-perfect manner that it’s honestly rather incredible that it came from the only first-time novelist in this final five-book stretch of the New Adventures. With this novel, Jones slots so neatly into the novels’ established house style that you feel like he’s always been present, and not an author whose only previous contribution is a single First Doctor short story nearly eighteen months ago.

At first, I’ll admit that it seemed a little unlikely to me that the Doctor would bounce back this much given just how total and all-consuming his despondency at the end of So Vile a Sin was. Obviously I would have cut Jones and Bad Therapy some slack here, given the unfinished nature of Aaronovitch’s novel at the time, but the more I let the book sit with me, I was surprised at how well it ended up gelling.

Just like in the case of Chris, there’s a sense that although the Doctor is doing his usual schtick of cracking wise in the face of danger and standing up to the evildoers of the world, something’s ever so slightly off. There’s a powerful sense of a quiet, melancholy sadness lurking just under the surface of every grin and quip, and in those brief moments where the façade slips, you truly feel the depth of his grief at having lost Roz.

Some of the novel’s most powerful beats belong entirely to the Doctor, particularly his impassioned, pained monologue to Moriah about the importance of accepting loss and moving on, even as he clutches at the very heart which so recently stopped at Roz’s funeral. It’s very hard to escape the conclusion that the Doctor in Bad Therapy feels like a fundamentally broken man, trying desperately to hold on to those around him even as it all falls to pieces. In a way, the Seventh Doctor has always been a broken and flawed incarnation, reflecting the New Adventures’ place as a continuation of a dead-and-buried franchise. Once again, however, it’s the understated nature of that damage here that lends it some much-needed additional heft.

And all of that’s before we get to Peri.

The portrait of Peri’s life in the aftermath of Mindwarp is one of the more controversial aspects of Bad Therapy, and it’s often cited as yet another example in the chain of the New Adventures putting ex-companions through hell. On one level, I can definitely understand this characterisation of what Jones is doing here. We’ve talked more than enough about the less-than-stellar post-TARDIS lives dreamed up by Virgin’s authors in the cases of companions like Dodo or Mel, and we’ll talk about it even more next month in the case of Eternity Weeps. The decision to put such characters through hell is one which should obviously be very carefully interrogated, especially in the context of the New Adventures’ endgame, involving as it does the death of one of their own regular characters.

But on the other hand, I would counter that the case of Peri represents something of an anomaly, for the very simple reason that… well, she’s already been through hell. The character’s departure in Mindwarp represents one of the single biggest messes ever thrown up by a classic series companion’s swan-song, no matter which way you choose to slice it.

If you only take into account the evidence we’re initially presented with by Philip Martin’s script, she finds her identity completely erased by the brain of Lord Kiv and is subsequently murdered in a fit of rage by King Yrcanos, reduced to little more than a tally point on the Doctor’s personal moral scoreboard. Alternatively, you can choose to hew to the revelations dreamt up by Pip and Jane Baker in The Ultimate Foe at the urging of producer John Nathan-Turner, and say that she just ended up embroiled in another of the long line of unconvincing and underdeveloped romances that the classic series proved so fond of.

As you can probably imagine, neither of these options is wholly appealing, with each involving a rather significant erasure of Peri’s agency and independence. However, it’s the Bakers’ sheer unwillingness to commit to the more pointed and stinging critiques inherent in Mindwarp that ultimately marks their hypothesis as the weaker one in my estimation, and which arguably undoes any claims The Trial of a Time Lord might make to being any kind of coherent or serious piece of metatextual self-criticism on the part of Doctor Who.

(I do want to stress, however, that Martin is by no means wholly blameless in this situation, and there are some much wider issues at play within his own oeuvre regarding the ways in which women are routinely and unabashedly subjected to disempowerment and humiliation. If I ever get around to doing a piece on The Creed of the Kromon… hoo boy. For now, I’ll only say that his decision to end his novelisation of Mindwarp with a faux-cutesy reveal that Peri and Yrcanos returned to 1980s California and took up a career in the local wrestling industry seems to prove my point that it’s not just the Bakers and Nathan-Turner who were capable of misguided and cowardly retreats from that story’s proposed fate for Perpugilliam Brown.)

With all of this history, the decision to posit a less-than-happy future for Peri becomes not so much an act of unnecessary cruelty, and more an admission of guilt on the part of Doctor Who for sins past. More to the point, it’s the logical culmination of themes that have been bubbling in the background of the New Adventures for some time now. If, as works like RevelationLove and War and Head Games have posited, Season 23 and the accompanying hiatus represent something of an original sin for the Wilderness Years, then Peri’s not-quite death is just as much a part of that failing as any piece of continuity surrounding the title of “Time’s Champion” or the existence of the Valeyard.

Hell, even in a more immediate sense, if the books are going to try and offer up another “companion death” narrative, it’s a supremely logical decision to return to the last bungled example of such a plot beat in an effort to stress the progress that the series has made in the intervening years. And make no mistake, that’s very obviously the point that Jones is making.

Perhaps the most telling moment to examine here is Peri’s personal epiphany regarding the fate of Petruska. Even though the First Queen did not survive as she had hoped, it becomes apparent that her death was not the result of a fit of jealous rage from her husband, but was in fact a final assertion of her own agency and independence in the face of that rage. Given how strongly Kate Orman would subsequently stress the point that Roz’s actions in So Vile a Sin resulted from a desire to “write the final chapter” of her own life, even in the face of the Doctor’s urging to the contrary, there’s a symmetry to Petruska’s tale here that proves deeply significant.

Underneath all the doom and gloom and misbegotten grief, however, there’s a sense that Jones has buried some small kernels of hope for us to take heart from. At the end of the day, the most powerful force in the narrative turns out to be the rather simple, unassuming gesture of extending a little bit of empathy. For all that Moriah might protest that the Toys are inhuman, there’s a rather quaint and ironic sense that they might just number among the most human characters in the book.

This empathy pervades every page of the novel, in ways both big and small. It’s empathy with Petruska’s proto-feminist covert communication network that drives Peri to seek out answers between the lines of the erstwhile queen’s ballad, and it’s a broader, communal sense of shared empathy that allows the Toys to affirm each other’s existence independent of their bonded partners. When the Doctor needs to create a replica of Moriah’s lost bride, he reaches out to Peri’s own memories in order to help shape said replica.

Not only that, the very fact that Tilda and the Major predominantly gravitate towards the racial and sexual minorities of Notting Hill seems to suggest an ability to relate to the plight of the disadvantaged and the ostracised, further reinforcing the idea of the Toys’ fundamental decency and humanity. Even the Doctor’s discussion of psychological profiling with Chief Inspector Harris is basically just – as any reasonably knowledgeable fan of the glut of ’90s serial killer fiction would be able to tell you – a discussion about the ability of an investigator to empathise with the object of their pursuit.

Bad Therapy, then, plays as something of an ode to the human capacity for empathy in the face of loss and hardship. In their own individual way, each of the characters in the novel are professing their ability to empathise with others, even as the once-certain bedrock of the world around them is tossed and turned by the winds of change and the foreshocks of the turbulent 1960s.

Ultimately, this is the real kicker, and the thing that cements Bad Therapy as an essential piece in the unfurling tapestry of Doctor Who in the 1990s. Because the Britain evoked by Jones, a world rocked by social upheaval, challenges to the purported post-war social consensus and the looming spectre of decolonisation? Well, that’s precisely the Britain that drove a certain Canadian producer to create an unassuming little educational show about a crotchety old grandfather travelling time and space alongside his granddaughter and her teachers.

If Roger Ebert was right when he declaimed that the purpose of cinema was to serve as something of an “empathy machine,” then maybe Doctor Who can be too. Maybe that’s the real fuel of the franchise, even more than any silly technobabble about artron energy or dimensional transcendentalism. And if that’s true, if Doctor Who runs on empathy, then perhaps there isn’t any reason that the story ever has to end.

I suppose that if that’s the last big statement that the New Adventures get to make before they lose the official Doctor Who seal forever, then it’s a bloody good one indeed, and a credit to all involved.

Miscellaneous Observations

There’s a nice bit of symmetry to be found in Chris’ vision of a half-formed Eighth Doctor pushing his way out of the ashes of the Seventh. Obviously, it’s consciously evoking Ace’s encounter with the Doctor’s future self within the mindscape of Revelation, and as such there’s something rather neat in returning to such a memorable piece of imagery from the fourth New Adventure in this, the fourth-last New Adventure to feature Seven.

Speaking of symmetry, the gunshot that Chris takes to his shoulder in attempting to rescue Patsy at the climax of the novel pretty directly recalls the mythic wounds sustained by the Doctor himself in books like The Left-Handed Hummingbird and Set Piece. There is, I suppose, no better way to signify the character’s long-overdue induction into the panoply of “broken and wounded New Adventures protagonists” than that.

Fully acknowledging that I’m stepping pretty firmly into the territory of ludicrous reaches with this one, I do have to wonder if there’s perhaps something to Chief Inspector Harris sharing a surname with the author who pretty much invented the whole “overly empathetic criminal profiler” subgenre of detective fiction with books like Red Dragon. There probably isn’t, but hey, who knows?

Final Thoughts

So yeah, there we have it. The final New Adventure of 1996, and our final goodbye to the McCoy logo that has been our constant companion over the past five years. Which feels… odd, to say the least. I didn’t think I could attach so much emotional value to a logo, but maybe that’s just proof of a strange empathy of my own. Anyway, hope you enjoyed the review as ever, and I hope you’ll join me next time as we come full circle and close the year in the same way we began it, as Lance Parkin returns to bring the Seventh Doctor squarely into the realm of the Missing Adventures with Cold Fusion. Until then, however…

Kind regards,

Special Agent Dale Cooper

(P.S. I didn’t intend for there to be a Full Circle pun in my teaser for what will be our first full look at the character of Adric in a Missing Adventure, but it’s there now. How happily serendipitous these things can be!)